Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation最新文献

{"title":"Approaching a population‐level assessment of body size in pinnipeds using drones, an early warning of environmental degradation","authors":"Daire Carroll, Eduardo Infantes, Eva V. Pagan, Karin C. Harding","doi":"10.1002/rse2.413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.413","url":null,"abstract":"Body mass is a fundamental indicator of animal health closely linked to survival and reproductive success. Systematic assessment of body mass for a large proportion of a population can allow early detection of changes likely to impact population growth, facilitating responsive management and a mechanistic understanding of ecological trends. One challenge with integrating body mass assessment into monitoring is sampling enough animals to detect trends and account for individual variation. Harbour seals (<jats:italic>Phoca vitulina</jats:italic>) are philopatric marine mammals responsive to regional environmental changes, resulting in their use as an indicator species. We present a novel method for the non‐invasive and semi‐automatic assessment of harbour seal body condition, using unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs/drones). Morphological parameters are automatically measured in georeferenced images and used to estimate volume, which is then translated to estimated mass. Remote observations of known individuals are utilized to calibrate the method. We achieve a high level of accuracy (mean absolute error of 4.5 kg or 10.5% for all seals and 3.2 kg or 12.7% for pups‐of‐the‐year). We systematically apply the method to wild seals during the Spring pupping season and Autumn over 2 years, achieving a near‐population‐level assessment for pups on land (82.5% measured). With reference to previous mark‐recapture work linking Autumn pup weights to survival, we estimate mean expected probability of over‐winter survival (mean = 0.89, standard deviation = 0.08). This work marks a significant step forward for the non‐invasive assessment of body condition in pinnipeds and could provide daily estimates of body mass for thousands of individuals. It can act as an early warning for deteriorating environmental conditions and be utilized as an integrative tool for wildlife monitoring. It also enables estimation of yearly variation in demographic rates which can be utilized in parameterizing models of population growth with relevance for conservation and evolutionary biology.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quantifying nocturnal thrush migration using sensor data fusion between acoustics and vertical‐looking radar","authors":"Silvia Giuntini, Juha Saari, Adriano Martinoli, Damiano G. Preatoni, Birgen Haest, Baptiste Schmid, Nadja Weisshaupt","doi":"10.1002/rse2.397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.397","url":null,"abstract":"Studying nocturnal bird migration is challenging because direct visual observations are difficult during darkness. Radar has been the means of choice to study nocturnal bird migration for several decades, but provides limited taxonomic information. Here, to ascertain the feasibility of enhancing the taxonomic resolution of radar data, we combined acoustic data with vertical‐looking radar measurements to quantify thrush (Family: Turdidae) migration. Acoustic recordings, collected in Helsinki between August and October of 2021–2022, were used to identify likely nights of high and low thrush migration. Then, we built a random forest classifier that used recorded radar signals from those nights to separate all migrating passerines across the autumn migration season into thrushes and non‐thrushes. The classifier had a high overall accuracy (≈0.82), with wingbeat frequency and bird size being key for separation. The overall estimated thrush autumn migration phenology was in line with known migratory patterns and strongly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient ≈0.65) with the phenology of the acoustic data. These results confirm how the joint application of acoustic and vertical‐looking radar data can, under certain migratory conditions and locations, be used to quantify ‘family‐level’ bird migration.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141448122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mapping emergent coral reefs: a comparison of pixel‐ and object‐based methods","authors":"Amy Stone, Sharyn Hickey, Ben Radford, Mary Wakeford","doi":"10.1002/rse2.401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.401","url":null,"abstract":"Although emergent coral reefs represent a significant proportion of overall reef habitat, they are often excluded from monitoring projects due to their shallow and exposed setting that makes them challenging to access. Using drones to survey emergent reefs overcomes issues around access to this habitat type; however, methods for deriving robust monitoring metrics, such as coral cover, are not well developed for drone imagery. To address this knowledge gap, we compare the effectiveness of two remote sensing methods in quantifying broad substrate groups, such as coral cover, on a lagoon bommie, namely a pixel‐based (PB) model versus an object‐based (OB) model. For the OB model, two segmentation methods were considered: an optimized mean shift segmentation and the fully automated Segment Anything Model (SAM). Mean shift segmentation was assessed as the preferred method and applied in the final OB model (SAM exhibited poor identification of coral patches on the bommie). While good cross‐validation accuracies were achieved for both models, the PB had generally higher overall accuracy (mean accuracy PB = 75%, OB = 70%) and kappa (mean kappa PB = 0.69, OB = 0.63), making it the preferred method for monitoring coral cover. Both models were limited by the low contrast between Coral features and the bommie substrate in the drone imagery, causing indistinct segment boundaries in the OB model that increased misclassification. For both models, the inclusion of a drone‐derived digital surface model and multiscale derivatives was critical to predicting coral habitat. Our success in creating emergent reef habitat models with high accuracy demonstrates the niche role drones could play in monitoring these habitat types, which are particularly vulnerable to rising sea surface and air temperatures, as well as sea level rise which is predicted to outpace reef vertical accretion rates.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141177384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Uncovering mangrove range limits using very high resolution satellite imagery to detect fine‐scale mangrove and saltmarsh habitats in dynamic coastal ecotones","authors":"Cheryl L. Doughty, Kyle C. Cavanaugh, Samantha Chapman, Lola Fatoyinbo","doi":"10.1002/rse2.394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.394","url":null,"abstract":"Mangroves are important ecosystems for coastal biodiversity, resilience and carbon dynamics that are being threatened globally by human pressures and the impacts of climate change. Yet, at several geographic range limits in tropical–temperate transition zones, mangrove ecosystems are expanding poleward in response to changing macroclimatic drivers. Mangroves near range limits often grow to smaller statures and form dynamic, patchy distributions with other coastal habitats, which are difficult to map using moderate‐resolution (30‐m) satellite imagery. As a result, many of these mangrove areas are missing in global distribution maps. To better map small, scrub mangroves, we tested Landsat (30‐m) and Sentinel (10‐m) against very high resolution (VHR) Planet (3‐m) and WorldView (1.8‐m) imagery and assessed the accuracy of machine learning classification approaches in discerning current (2022) mangrove and saltmarsh from other coastal habitats in a rapidly changing ecotone along the east coast of Florida, USA. Our aim is to (1) quantify the mappable differences in landscape composition and complexity, class dominance and spatial properties of mangrove and saltmarsh patches due to image resolution; and (2) to resolve mapping uncertainties in the region. We found that the ability of Landsat to map mangrove distributions at the leading range edge was hampered by the size and extent of mangrove stands being too small for detection (50% accuracy). WorldView was the most successful in discerning mangroves from other wetland habitats (84% accuracy), closely followed by Planet (82%) and Sentinel (81%). With WorldView, we detected 800 ha of mangroves within the Florida range‐limit study area, 35% more mangroves than were detected with Planet, 114% more than Sentinel and 537% more than Landsat. Higher‐resolution imagery helped reveal additional variability in landscape metrics quantifying diversity, spatial configuration and connectedness among mangrove and saltmarsh habitats at the landscape, class and patch scales. Overall, VHR satellite imagery improved our ability to map mangroves at range limits and can help supplement moderate‐resolution global distributions and outdated regional maps.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141096665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Walruses from space: walrus counts in simultaneous remotely piloted aircraft system versus very high‐resolution satellite imagery","authors":"Hannah C. Cubaynes, Jaume Forcada, Kit M. Kovacs, Christian Lydersen, Rod Downie, Peter T. Fretwell","doi":"10.1002/rse2.391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.391","url":null,"abstract":"Regular counts of walruses (<jats:italic>Odobenus rosmarus</jats:italic>) across their pan‐Arctic range are necessary to determine accurate population trends and in turn understand how current rapid changes in their habitat, such as sea ice loss, are impacting them. However, surveying a region as vast and remote as the Arctic with vessels or aircraft is a formidable logistical challenge, limiting the frequency and spatial coverage of field surveys. An alternative methodology involving very high‐resolution (VHR) satellite imagery has proven to be a useful tool to detect walruses, but the feasibility of accurately counting individuals has not been addressed. Here, we compare walrus counts obtained from a VHR WorldView‐3 satellite image, with a simultaneous ground count obtained using a remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS). We estimated the accuracy of the walrus counts depending on (1) the spatial resolution of the VHR satellite imagery, providing the same WorldView‐3 image to assessors at three different spatial resolutions (i.e., 50, 30 and 15 cm per pixel) and (2) the level of expertise of the assessors (experts vs. a mixed level of experience – representative of citizen scientists). This latter aspect of the study is important to the efficiency and outcomes of the global assessment programme because there are citizen science campaigns inviting the public to count walruses in VHR satellite imagery. There were 73 walruses in our RPAS ‘control’ image. Our results show that walruses were under‐counted in VHR satellite imagery at all spatial resolutions and across all levels of assessor expertise. Counts from the VHR satellite imagery with 30 cm spatial resolution were the most accurate and least variable across levels of expertise. This was a successful first attempt at validating VHR counts with near‐simultaneous, in situ, data but further assessments are required for walrus aggregations with different densities and configurations, on different substrates.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141085525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Robust retrieval of forest canopy structural attributes using multi‐platform airborne LiDAR","authors":"Beibei Zhang, Fabian J. Fischer, Suzanne M. Prober, Paul B. Yeoh, Carl R. Gosper, Katherine Zdunic, Tommaso Jucker","doi":"10.1002/rse2.398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.398","url":null,"abstract":"LiDAR data acquired from airplanes and helicopters – known as airborne laser scanning (ALS) – are widely regarded as the gold standard for characterizing the 3D structure of forests at scale. But in the last decade, advances in unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies have led to a rapid rise in the use of UAV laser scanning (ULS) for mapping forest structure. As both ALS and ULS data become increasingly available, they are being used to derive an ever‐growing number of metrics designed to measure different facets of canopy structure. However, which metrics can be robustly retrieved from both ALS and ULS platforms remains unclear. To address this question, we acquired coincident, high‐density ALS and ULS scans covering 115 plots (4‐ha in size) in an open‐canopy temperate ecosystem in Western Australia. Using this unique dataset, we quantified 32 canopy structural metrics related to canopy height, openness and heterogeneity, including metrics calculated directly from the point clouds and ones measured from derived canopy height models (CHM). Overall, we found that ALS and ULS‐derived metrics were strongly correlated (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.90). However, this high degree of correlation masked considerable systematic differences between platforms. Specifically, point cloud metrics were less strongly (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.87) correlated and had higher bias (10.7%) compared to CHM‐derived ones (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.98; bias = 2.5%). Similarly, metrics of canopy openness and heterogeneity were less strongly correlated (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.84 and 0.87) and exhibited greater bias (14.4 and 7.9%) than ones relating to canopy height (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.96; bias = 3.8%). Our results indicate that only a small subset of the 32 metrics we tested were directly comparable between ALS and ULS platforms. Consequently, future efforts to combine laser scanning data across platforms and instruments should think carefully about which metrics are most appropriate, especially when working with point cloud data.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140953879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Estimating beluga whale abundance from space: using drones to ground‐validate VHR satellite imagery","authors":"Jordan B. Stewart, Justine M. Hudson, Bryanna A. H. Sherbo, Cortney A. Watt","doi":"10.1002/rse2.396","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.396","url":null,"abstract":"Routine monitoring of cetaceans is imperative for understanding their population trends and making informed management decisions. However, the inherent nature of cetaceans and the marine ecosystems they inhabit make annual population surveys logistically and economically challenging with current survey methods. One emerging solution is utilizing very high‐resolution (VHR) satellite imagery, which is a logistically efficient method for providing an instantaneous view of areas spanning hundreds of square kilometers. The objective of this study was to determine two factors required to reliably conduct beluga whale population abundance estimates with VHR satellite imagery: (1) depths that beluga whales are visible in VHR satellite images, which are used to define availability bias correction factors, and (2) a comparison of abundance estimates in VHR satellite imagery to current aerial methods. We submerged beluga whale models to different depths in two different water clarities and determined that beluga whales are distinguished only at the surface in turbid water (Secchi depth: 2.56 m) and at depths of 0–2 m in clear water (Secchi depth: 4.04 m). Based on the proportion of time beluga whales spend at these depths, an availability bias correction factor for Western Hudson Bay beluga whales was defined as 2.40 ± 0.16 for turbid water and 1.89 ± 0.05 for clear water. Synchronous ground‐validation surveys determined availability corrected beluga whale abundance estimates in 0.31 m VHR satellite imagery (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 173 beluga whales) and imagery that was HD sharpened using a proprietary algorithm to approximate 0.15 m resolution (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 170) to be comparable to drone imagery (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 164). VHR satellite imagery has the potential to increase the frequency of beluga whale population surveys, which has become increasingly important as beluga whales face rapid ecosystem changes and increased anthropogenic disturbances.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140895391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Using multiscale lidar to determine variation in canopy structure from African forest elephant trails","authors":"Jenna M. Keany, Patrick Burns, Andrew J. Abraham, Patrick Jantz, Loic Makaga, Sassan Saatchi, Fiona Maisels, Katharine Abernethy, Christopher E. Doughty","doi":"10.1002/rse2.395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.395","url":null,"abstract":"Recently classified as a unique species by the IUCN, African forest elephants (<jats:italic>Loxodonta cyclotis</jats:italic>) are critically endangered due to severe poaching. With limited knowledge about their ecological role due to the dense tropical forests they inhabit in central Africa, it is unclear how the Afrotropics are influenced by elephants. Although their role as seed dispersers is well known, they may also drive large‐scale processes that determine forest structure through the creation of elephant trails and browsing the understory, allowing larger, carbon‐dense trees to succeed. Multiple scales of lidar were collected by NASA in Lopé National Park, Gabon from 2015 to 2022. Utilizing two airborne lidar datasets in an African forest elephant stronghold, detailed canopy structural information was used in conjunction with elephant trail data to determine how forest structure varies on and off trails. Forest along elephant trails displayed different structural characteristics than forested areas off trails, with lower canopy height, canopy cover, and different vertical distribution of plant density. Less plant area density was found on trails at 1 m in height, while more vegetation was found at 12 m, compared to off trail locations. Trails in forest areas with previous logging history had lower plant area in the top of the canopy. Forest elephants can be considered as “logging light” ecosystem engineers, affecting canopy structure through browsing and movement. Both airborne lidar scales were able to capture elephant impact along trails, with the high‐resolution discrete return lidar performing higher than waveform lidar.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140895575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Annual extent of prescribed burning on moorland in Great Britain and overlap with ecosystem services","authors":"Mike P. Shewring, Nicholas I. Wilkinson, Emma L. Teuten, Graeme M. Buchanan, Patrick Thompson, David J. T. Douglas","doi":"10.1002/rse2.389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.389","url":null,"abstract":"In the UK uplands, prescribed burning of unenclosed heath, grass and blanket bog (‘moorland’) is used to support game shooting and grazing. Burning on moorland is contentious due to its impact on peat soils, hydrology and habitat condition. There is little information on spatial and temporal patterns of burning, the overlap with soil carbon and sensitive habitats and, importantly, whether these patterns are changing. This information is required to assess the sustainability of burning and the effectiveness of new legislation. We developed a method for semi‐automated detection of burning using satellite imagery – our best performing model has a balanced accuracy of 84.9%. We identified annual burn areas in Great Britain in five burning seasons from 2017/18 to 2021/22 of 8333 to 20 974 ha (average 15 250 ha year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>). Annual extent in England in 2021/22 was 73% lower than the average of the four previous seasons. Burning was identified over carbon‐rich soils (mean 5150 ha or 34% by area of all burning annually) and on steep slopes – 915 ha across the five seasons (1.3%), contravening guidance. Burning (&gt;1 ha) was recorded in 14% of UK protected areas (PAs) and, within these, the percentage area of moorland burned varied from 2 to 31%. In England in some years, the percentage area of moorland burned inside PAs was higher than outside, while this was not the case in Scotland. Burning in sensitive alpine habitats totalled 158 ha across the five seasons. The reduction in burned area in England in 2021/22 could relate to England‐specific legislation, introduced in May 2021, to prohibit burning on deep peat in PAs. This suggests that regulation can be effective. However, the continued overlap with sensitive features suggests that burning falls short of sustainable practices. Our method will enable repeatable re‐assessment of burning extents and overlap with ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140814580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unoccupied aerial vehicles as a tool to map lizard operative temperature in tropical environments","authors":"Emma A. Higgins, Doreen S. Boyd, Tom W. Brown, Sarah C. Owen, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden, Adam C. Algar","doi":"10.1002/rse2.393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.393","url":null,"abstract":"To understand how ectotherms will respond to warming temperatures, we require information on thermal habitat quality at spatial resolutions and extents relevant to the organism. Measuring thermal habitat quality is either limited to small spatial extents, such as with ground‐based 3D operative temperature (<jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>e</jats:italic></jats:sub>) replicas, representing the temperature of the animal at equilibrium with its environment, or is based on microclimate derived from physical models that use land cover variables and downscale coarse climate data. We draw on aspects of both these approaches and test the ability of unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) data (optical RGB) to predict fine‐scale heterogeneity in sub‐canopy lizard (<jats:italic>Anolis bicaorum</jats:italic>) <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>e</jats:italic></jats:sub> in tropical forest using random forest models. <jats:italic>Anolis bicaorum</jats:italic> is an endemic, critically endangered, species, facing significant threats of habitat loss and degradation, and work was conducted as part of a larger project. Our findings indicate that a model incorporating solely air temperature, measured at the centre of the 20 × 20 m plot, and ground‐based leaf area index (LAI) measurements, measured at directly above the 3D replica, predicted <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>e</jats:italic></jats:sub> well. However, a model with air temperature and UAV‐derived canopy metrics performed slightly better with the added advantage of enabling the mapping of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>e</jats:italic></jats:sub> with continuous spatial extent at high spatial resolutions, across the whole of the UAV orthomosaic, allowing us to capture and map <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>e</jats:italic></jats:sub> across the whole of the survey plot, rather than purely at 3D replica locations. Our work provides a feasible workflow to map sub‐canopy lizard <jats:italic>T</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>e</jats:italic></jats:sub> in tropical environments at spatial scales relevant to the organism, and across continuous areas. This can be applied to other species and can represent species within the same community that have evolved a similar thermal niche. Such methods will be imperative in risk modelling of such species to anthropogenic land cover and climate change.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140651662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}