Policy Design and Practice最新文献_第8页

Managing internal policy risk: Australia, the UK and the US compared 管理内部政策风险：澳大利亚、英国和美国的比较

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2022.2065716

Michael Howlett, Ching Leong, S. Sahu

引用次数: 1

Factors influencing the development and implementation of national greenhouse gas inventory methodologies 影响制定和实施国家温室气体清单方法的因素

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-05 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.2020967

L. Yona, B. Cashore, M. Bradford

{"title":"Factors influencing the development and implementation of national greenhouse gas inventory methodologies","authors":"L. Yona, B. Cashore, M. Bradford","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2021.2020967","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.2020967","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In contrast to its Assessment Reports, less is known about the social science processes through which the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) produces methodologies for greenhouse gas emissions reporting. This limited attention is problematic, as these greenhouse gas inventories are critical components for identifying, justifying, and adjudicating national-level mitigation commitments. We begin to fill this gap by descriptively assessing, drawing on data triangulation that incorporates ecological and political analysis, the historical process for developing emissions guidelines. Our systematic descriptive efforts highlight processes and structures through which inventories might become disconnected from the latest peer-reviewed environmental science. To illustrate this disconnect, we describe the IPCC guideline process, outlining themes that may contribute to discrepancies, such as diverging logics and timeframes, discursive power, procedural lock-in, resource constraints, organizational interests, and complexity. The themes reflect challenges to greenhouse gas inventories themselves, as well as broader challenges to integrating climate change science and policy. Highlights This article provides an illustrative analysis of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s greenhouse gas inventory guideline process There is evidence for substantive discrepancies between empirical literature and these guidelines Particularly for forest soil organic carbon reporting, inventory guidelines are influenced by a multitude of political and scientific actors Explanations for these discrepancies merit further inquiry, and include institutional lock-in, political influence, discursive power, resource constraints, and world views","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46949386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Two logics of participation in policy design 参与政策设计的两种逻辑

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2022.2038978

Kidjie Saguin, B. Cashore

引用次数: 4

A framework to conceptualize innovation purpose in public sector innovation labs 公共部门创新实验室创新目的概念化的框架

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.2007619

Lindsay Cole

引用次数: 8

Knowledge coproduction: panacea or placebo? Lessons from an emerging policy partnership 知识共生：万灵药还是安慰剂？新兴政策伙伴关系的经验教训

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1992106

T. Reddel, S. Ball

{"title":"Knowledge coproduction: panacea or placebo? Lessons from an emerging policy partnership","authors":"T. Reddel, S. Ball","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2021.1992106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1992106","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Governments across the globe have expressed their interest in forms of codesign and coproduction as a useful tool for crafting policy solutions. Genuine relationships between partners are seen as an important way to build meaningful and lasting impact for policy. One area of interest in this space has been on how researchers and policymakers can work better together to design and produce more evidence-based policies. For many practitioners and researchers, knowledge coproduction is presented as a panacea to the ongoing challenges of research translation. It is positioned as assisting in building more meaningful, trusting relationships which, in turn, support the development of more effective policy solutions. Using the insider experience of a coproduced government project in Queensland, Australia, this paper reflects on the realities and tensions between this idealism associated with policy co-production methodologies and the ongoing messiness of public policy practice. Beginning with an overview of the literature on coproduction, followed by a brief introduction to the case and the method used, the paper concludes by highlighting the strengths, facilitators and benefits of the approach while raising questions about whether coproduction is a panacea to research translation concerns or a placebo. The answer, we argue, lies more in how success is defined than any concrete solution.","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47077456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Forming issues and publics: participatory design things and uncertain rural futures 形成问题和公众：参与式设计与不确定的农村未来

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1930688

Ditte Bendix Lanng, Lea Louise Holst Laursen, Søren Risdal Borg

{"title":"Forming issues and publics: participatory design things and uncertain rural futures","authors":"Ditte Bendix Lanng, Lea Louise Holst Laursen, Søren Risdal Borg","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2021.1930688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1930688","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Through a case of civic action in relation to rural development in Denmark, this paper contributes its deliberations on rural participatory policy by shedding light on the unordered site of controversy where participatory-oriented policy meets public involvement practices that happen beyond procedural limits. Danish rural planning is marked by economic and population decline and by economic pressure on the municipal sector. In this uncertain situation, rural livelihood and development increasingly rely on citizens. Drawing on perspectives from participatory design, public involvement, and Science and Technology Studies, and mobilizing the concept of design Thing, the paper attempts to understand a citizen-initiated participatory design (PD) process as an experimental means of public involvement in a rural setting. It analyses the intersection between the micro-level activities of the PD process and national and municipal plans, policies and procedures. In doing so, it traces how the socio-material PD process was a civic attempt to contest institutional definitions and to move the power to define issues from the authorities to the community. It analyses the role of the PD process in the articulation of shared issues, and how this process was one event in the ongoing community practices of public-ization of issues and of forming publics, so as to define local trajectories for an uncertain future. Continuing the analysis, the paper considers that the process of issue and public formation is neither linear nor uncontested; there is no single public, but rather multiple and porous configurations of difference and change.","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41583033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Setting the table for policy intrapreneurship: public administrator perspectives on local food system governance 为政策内部创业奠定基础:公共管理者对地方粮食系统治理的看法

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1978691

Rachel Emas, J. C. Jones

{"title":"Setting the table for policy intrapreneurship: public administrator perspectives on local food system governance","authors":"Rachel Emas, J. C. Jones","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2021.1978691","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1978691","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In communities across the U.S., there is growing awareness of food system issues which exerts greater pressure on public servants to help build a better food system for their community. Drawing from interviews with local and state-level public administrators and elected officials in two metropolitan regions in Ohio and New Jersey, and supporting interviews from food producers and nonprofit leaders in those areas, this paper examines what roles public administrators believe they could and should take regarding food system development in their community. From this qualitative data analysis, the research identified commonalities in administrators’ positive and negative perceptions of the potential for development of their community’s local food system (LFS) despite their lack of background knowledge regarding these systems. Given food systems’ interdisciplinarity and complexity, LFS development likely requires multi-sectoral alliances via partnership governance. The alliance itself and each of its components is simultaneously a complete entity and a part of a larger, more complex entity; such entities are called holons. These alliances have greater capacity to manage more complicated problems than can be addressed by subordinate holons. In examining the potential role of local public administrators in LFS development, this paper constructs the concept of the policy intrapreneur to clarify our understanding and discussions of how public administrators, decision-makers, and other stakeholders view their roles and responsibilities in the creation and governance of local food systems.","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43865597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Rising to Ostrom's challenge: an invitation to walk on the bright side of public governance and public service. 迎接奥斯特罗姆的挑战:邀请他走上公共治理和公共服务的光明一面。

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-03 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1972517

Scott Douglas, Thomas Schillemans, Paul 't Hart, Chris Ansell, Lotte Bøgh Andersen, Matthew Flinders, Brian Head, Donald Moynihan, Tina Nabatchi, Janine O'Flynn, B Guy Peters, Jos Raadschelders, Alessandro Sancino, Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing

{"title":"Rising to Ostrom's challenge: an invitation to walk on the bright side of public governance and public service.","authors":"Scott Douglas, Thomas Schillemans, Paul 't Hart, Chris Ansell, Lotte Bøgh Andersen, Matthew Flinders, Brian Head, Donald Moynihan, Tina Nabatchi, Janine O'Flynn, B Guy Peters, Jos Raadschelders, Alessandro Sancino, Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2021.1972517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1972517","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this programmatic essay, we argue that public governance scholarship would benefit from developing a self-conscious and cohesive strand of \"positive\" scholarship, akin to social science subfields like positive psychology, positive organizational studies, and positive evaluation. We call for a program of research devoted to uncovering the factors and mechanisms that enable high performing public policies and public service delivery mechanisms; procedurally and distributively fair processes of tackling societal conflicts; and robust and resilient ways of coping with threats and risks. The core question driving positive public administration scholarship should be: Why is it that particular public policies, programs, organizations, networks, or partnerships manage do much better than others to produce widely valued societal outcomes, and how might knowledge of this be used to advance institutional learning from positives?</p>","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39898555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 20

Are disadvantaged schools slow to adopt school-based management reforms? Evidence from India 弱势学校在推行校本管理改革方面是否进展缓慢？来自印度的证据

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1950349

P. Guha

引用次数: 2

The societal impact puzzle: a snapshot of a changing landscape across education and research 社会影响之谜:教育和研究领域不断变化的景象的快照

IF 7

Policy Design and Practice Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2021.1946251

L. Carson, L. Given

{"title":"The societal impact puzzle: a snapshot of a changing landscape across education and research","authors":"L. Carson, L. Given","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2021.1946251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1946251","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The term ‘impact’ is everywhere. Organizations and individuals want to fund projects for impact, measure impact, and showcase the impact of effort, expertise and financial investment, but clear definitions and understandings of what having an impact really means for people and institutions appear lacking or ad-hoc. This paper explores ‘impact’ in the areas of education and research into government practice. For governments, the impact agenda involves operating in increasingly tight fiscal environments with mounting pressure to articulate and demonstrate return on investment. For education providers, there are increasing calls to justify and prove why investment in education is an efficient and effective endeavor. For universities, this includes a shift from a traditional publication-focused research impact culture to a wider societal impact one that demonstrates direct and indirect benefits to society. This paper conceptualizes impact as a “puzzle” with many pieces, with education and research making up key pieces that can and need to fit together better. In doing so, the paper identifies four problem areas to help guide thinking toward clarity about what ‘impact’ entails. To aid collective progress in this space, we detail key issues facing the education and research sectors. Based on our analysis we arrive at a set of questions intended to help guide thinking and actions toward collectively increasing the ability to generate and demonstrate the impact of both into government practice and society at large.","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25741292.2021.1946251","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46036638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6