Prehospital Emergency Care最新文献

{"title":"Barriers to Buprenorphine: A Case Series of Misadventures Implementing a Prehospital Buprenorphine Protocol.","authors":"Parker Bailes Iv, Mirinda Ann Gormley, Sarah B Floyd, Wesley R Wampler, Gerald Wook Beltran, Luke Estes, Alain H Litwin, Phillip Moschella","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2418443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2418443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While several studies have focused on preliminary data and outcomes associated with prehospital buprenorphine administration interventions, to date there has been little discussion of the challenges experienced during the initial implementation of a prehospital buprenorphine protocol. In this case series we examine 3 separate patient encounters with different crews, patients, and receiving emergency medicine (EM) physicians, which highlight initial challenges experienced with implementing the first prehospital buprenorphine program in a rural Appalachian County within South Carolina. In 2 cases we highlight conflicts that may require collegial intervention and education of local receiving EM physicians regarding the new prehospital protocol. In 1 case we describe a patient who was eligible but not enrolled due to a misunderstanding among an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinician of how to correctly apply protocol criteria. We discuss the management of each implementation issue and outcomes after follow-up with members of the study team. As these novel programs emerge, understanding the potential challenges and personal biases that may be encountered when implementing a prehospital buprenorphine administration protocol is essential to inform organizations planning to implement similar programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142971941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Association of Lowest Prehospital Blood Pressure with Mortality in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury from a Nationwide Emergency Medical Services Database.","authors":"Sarah K S Knack, Aaron E Robinson, Gregory J Beilman, Akshay Bhardwaj, Michael A Puskarich","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2433153","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2433153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) focuses on preventing secondary injury from cerebral edema and ongoing anoxic injury. Consensus guidelines recommend maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 110 mmHg. A recent prehospital study suggested lowest adjusted mortality from 130 mmHg to 180 mmHg, suggesting the ideal pressure may be higher. This study aims to explore and externally validate the association between lowest out-of-hospital SBP and mortality in a nationwide database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study of nationwide data from the ESO© (Austin, TX) prehospital electronic health record. Inclusion criteria were an ICD-10 code for TBI, age >10 years, admission to the hospital, abbreviated injury severity head/neck sub-score ≥ 3. Data were split into 70% training and 30% test sets. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized additive models with splines for the continuous variables of SBP and age were created to assess the relationship between lowest SBP and mortality. Adjusted model covariates included age, sex, injury severity score, mechanism, polytrauma, trauma center transport (level 1, 2, or 3), hypoxia and airway management. To evaluate the independent association of lowest SBP with mortality, the adjusted marginal means for predicted probability of death at any fixed value of SBP were estimated and an optimized SBP range was identified. Age and injury severity were evaluated as possibly relevant interaction terms with SBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2018 to 2022, 44,360 encounters with ICD-10 codes for TBI were screened and 9,449 met final inclusion criteria, with 2,005 meeting the primary outcome (21.2%). Both unadjusted and adjusted analysis identified lowest prehospital SBP as a significant predictor (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on adjusted marginal means, the optimized SBP for mortality was 132 mmHg (range 110-158 mmHg). The interaction between SBP and age was significant with a higher optimized SBP of 133 mmHg (range 125-145 mmHg) for patients aged 65 and older.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Out-of-hospital SBP is a significant predictor of mortality in subjects with severe TBI. These results suggest an optimized SBP range 110-158 mmHg, consistent with current consensus guidelines of SBP > 110 mmHg but may suggest benefit for higher SBP targets in older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Incorporating Systems-Level Stakeholder Perspectives into the Design of Mobile Integrated Health Programs.","authors":"Laurel O'Connor, Stephanie Behar, Jade Refuerzo, Xhenifer Mele, Joel Rowe, Alexander Ulintz, Jamie M Faro, Apurv Soni, Peter K Lindenauer","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2443485","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2443485","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite early evidence of effectiveness, cost-savings, and resource optimization, mobile integrated health (MIH) programs have not been widely implemented in the United States. System, community, and organizational-level barriers often hinder evidence-based public health interventions, such as MIH programs, from being broadly adopted into real-world clinical practice. The objective of this study is to identify solutions to the barriers impeding the implementation of MIH through interviews with multilevel stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the CENTERing multi-level partner voices in Implementation Theory methodology, the study team recruited stakeholders to participate in semi-structured interviews that were recorded, transcribed, and open-coded. Stakeholders were asked to explore and propose solutions to established barriers to the implementation of MIH programs including poor understanding of the role of MIH, the absence of sustainable reimbursement for MIH programs, and its disruption of existing clinical workflows. The study team used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop an interview guide and codebook. Coders employed a combination of deductive and inductive coding strategies to identify common themes related to pragmatic solutions for overcoming barriers to the adoption of MIH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews with Department of Public Health officials, medical directors of MIH programs, non-physician MIH program leaders, community paramedics, health insurance officials, ambulatory physicians, hospital administrators, and hospital contract specialists (n = 18) elicited solutions to address barriers including (1) Developing a consistent identity for the MIH paradigm, (2) adopting an interdisciplinary approach to the development of efficient MIH workflows that utilize informatics to mimic existing clinical work, and (3) implementing capitated fee schedules that are cost-effective by targeting high-risk populations that are already a priority for payors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An investigation of solutions to barriers that impede the translation of MIH models into sustainable practice elicited several unifying themes including the establishment of a cohesive identity for MIH to improve engagement and dissemination, the use of a strategic approach to program design that aligns with existing healthcare delivery workflows and collaboration with payors to promote a robust reimbursement structure. These findings may help accelerate the implementation of MIH programs into real clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142847249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pediatric Emergency Medical Services Activations Involving Naloxone Administration.","authors":"Christopher E Gaw, Christopher B Gage, Jonathan R Powell, Alexander J Ulintz, Ashish R Panchal","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2445743","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2445743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Fatal and nonfatal pediatric opioid poisonings have increased in recent years. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are often the first to respond to an opioid poisoning and administer opioid reversal therapy. Currently, the epidemiology of prehospital naloxone use among children and adolescents is incompletely characterized. Thus, our study objective was to describe naloxone administrations reported by EMS clinicians during pediatric activations in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a cross-sectional study using the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS). Within NEMSIS, we identified emergency responses where children 1 day through 17 years old were documented by EMS to have received ≥1 dose of naloxone in 2022. We analyzed demographic and EMS characteristics and age-specific prevalence rates of activations where naloxone was reported. <b>Results:</b> In 2022, 6,215 activations involved naloxone administration to children. Most activations involved males (55.4%, 3,435 of 6,201) and occurred in urban settings (85.7%, 5,214 of 6,083). Naloxone administration prevalence per 10,000 activations was highest among the 13-17 year age group (57.5), followed by the 1 day to <1 year (17.9) age group. A dispatch complaint of an overdose or poisoning was documented in 28.9% (1,797 of 6,215) of activations and was more common among activations involving adolescents aged 13-17 years (31.5%, 1,555 of 4,937) than infants 1 day to <1 year (12.8%, 48 of 375). The first naloxone dose was documented to improve clinical status in 54.1% (3,136 of 5,793) of activations. Naloxone was documented to worsen clinical status in only 0.2% (11 of 5,793) of activations. <b>Conclusions:</b> In pediatric activations involving naloxone, less than one-third were dispatched as an overdose or poisoning but over half were documented to clinically improve after the first dose of naloxone. Naloxone was rarely documented to worsen clinical status. Our findings highlight the safety of prehospital naloxone use, as well as the importance of a high index of suspicion for opioid poisoning in the pediatric population. Opportunities exist to leverage linked data sources to develop interventions to improve prehospital opioid poisoning recognition and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Establishing Core Elements for a Prehospital Emergency Care Systems Evaluation Tool (PECSET) for Systems in Early Stages of Development: A Delphi Consensus.","authors":"Gayathri Devi Nadarajan, Pin Pin Pek, Audrey L Blewer, Ali Haedar, Catherine Staton, Kwanhathai Darin Wong, Faith Joan Mesa-Gaerlan, Sarah Karim, Sattha Riyapan, Truls Østbye, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Anjni Joiner","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2443472","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2443472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>International Prehospital Emergency Care (PEC) standards have been primarily developed by and for high resource settings. Most PEC systems in Asia, which are still in the early stages of development, struggle to achieve these standards. There is a need for an evaluation tool which can define achievable basic building blocks for PEC systems in low resource settings to improve quality of PEC. We aimed to identify the core, basic elements (building blocks of a PEC system) for a Prehospital Emergency Care Systems Evaluation Tool (PECSET) for low resource settings in Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-stage modified Delphi consensus method was used to engage 32 PEC experts from 12 Asian countries. Participants voted on 32 elements identified from a prior scoping review, focus group discussions, and survey. Each round of voting was conducted through an anonymous, web-based application and followed by face-to-face group discussions. The first two rounds aimed to answer, \"Is the element important and feasible in a low resource setting?\" The last two stages aimed to answer \"Should this element be prioritized as core in the tool?\" A thematic analysis of the recorded and transcribed discussions was used to identify participants' rationale for prioritization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After four rounds of voting, 12 elements were identified as core elements: (1) dispatch assisted instructions, (2) protocols for screening, triage and destination, (3) medical direction, (4) standardized training programs, (5) minimum ambulance standards, (6) operational metrics, (7) quality assurance, (8) operational safety protools, (9) essential patient care documentation, (10) medical records management, (11) layperson awareness and education and (12) universal access emergency number. However, the participants decided to include all 32 elements in the tool grouped into broader categories by percent agreement for a tiered approach for early, intermediate, and advanced PEC systems. Rationales for prioritization included a need for focus on basic infrastructure and building resilience in resource-stretched systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a Delphi consensus process, stakeholders identified core elements for PEC systems in low resource settings. These findings will inform the development of a tool for quality assurance and monitoring in low resource settings in South and Southeast Asian countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Would Provision of Take Home Naloxone Kits by Emergency Medical Services be Perceived as Acceptable to People at Risk of Opioid Overdose? A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jane Hughes, Fiona Clare Sampson, Penny Buykx, Jaqui Long, Adrian Edwards, Bridie A Evans, Steve Goodacre, Matthew B Jones, Chris Moore, Helen A Snooks","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2435034","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2435034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Take home naloxone kits can reduce mortality, but we know little about how they are perceived by people with lived experience of opioid use. Provision of naloxone in the community has been shown to significantly reduce mortality from opioid overdose. Currently, this is predominantly through drug treatment support services but expanding provision through other services might be effective in increasing kit take-up and mortality reduction. This study aimed to examine participants' experiences of opiate overdose and acceptability of provision of naloxone kits through ambulance/paramedic emergency services (EMS) and hospital Emergency Departments (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 people who had direct experience of opioid use. Participants were recruited at two substance-use treatment centers and a third sector support organization in three large cities in the United Kingdom. Interviews examined respondents' experiences of opioid use and opioid overdose, access and personal use of naloxone kits, and opinions about kit provision from EMS and hospital ED staff. Interview data were thematically analyzed using a constant comparative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four key themes were identified during analysis: (1) High levels of overdose experience and knowledge of naloxone and naloxone kits; (2) naloxone kits were perceived as effective and easy to use; (3) There were some concerns around the risks of administering naloxone, such as peer aggression during withdrawal. (4) Participants supported much wider personal, family and peer provision of naloxone kits from community support organizations as well as from EMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants felt naloxone kits were an important resource and they wanted increased provision across a range of services including EMS and hospital ED staff as well as community pharmacies and needle exchange centers. Participants wanted naloxone kit provision to be extended to peers, family and friends.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implementation of a Child Maltreatment Screening Tool in the Prehospital Setting.","authors":"Makenzie Ferguson, Shelley Brukman, Kim Zaky, Bryan A Lara, Chloe Knudsen-Robbins, Carolina Amaya, Shelby K Shelton, Theodore Heyming","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2440905","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2440905","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are in a unique position to screen for child maltreatment as they are often the first point of contact with the health care system and they may encounter children in their home environment. However, EMS training regarding the signs of child maltreatment is lacking. Although several child maltreatment screening tools have been developed for the primary care and emergency department (ED) settings, there appears to be no published literature describing or evaluating a prehospital screening aid. The objective of this study was to develop, implement, and examine the effectiveness and acceptability of a prehospital child maltreatment screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a mixed methods qualitative and quantitative study, with data collection spanning June 2021-June 2022. We developed a child maltreatment screening tool \"Shield\" for the prehospital setting by adapting Pittsburgh Child Abuse Screening Tool (P-CAST), a screening tool developed at the University of Pittsburgh for use in the ED. Shield was integrated into the EMS electronic patient care report (ePCR) for three participating fire agencies. Data, including demographics, ED evaluation, and outcomes, were collected for patients who underwent Shield evaluation. The EMS clinicians completed self-assessment surveys and participated in focus groups to provide feedback on their experience using Shield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participating EMS agencies evaluated 1,054 eligible patients (children <15 years old) during the study period, June 2021-June 2022. Of these, Shield screenings were initiated on 948 patients and completed on 753. Among all patients for whom a Shield evaluation was started, 32 (3.4%) screened positive for findings and/or histories concerning for possible maltreatment. Of these, 20 patients were transported to the primary study institution; in the ED 10 patients underwent additional child maltreatment evaluation. Pre-implementation surveys suggested a majority (77.2%) of EMS clinicians desired a child abuse screening tool integrated into the ePCR and post-implementation focus group data demonstrated EMS clinicians found Shield to be well integrated into their ePCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shield screens were initiated on nearly 90% of pediatric patients evaluated by EMS during the study period, suggesting that this tool has the potential to help standardize child maltreatment screening in the prehospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142847239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Consensus Guideline for Care of Patients in the Prehospital and Aerospace Settings with Exposures to Hydrazine and Hydrazine Derivatives.","authors":"Joshua B Gaither, Robert French, Mary Knotts, Milton Lerman, Andrew J Harrell, Scott McIntosh, Amber D Rice, Richard Cole, Stevan Gilmore, Diane E Hindman, Christopher Edwards, HoanVu Ngoc Nguyen, Mark Truxillo, Jason West, Andy Yeoh, Todd Davis, Farshad Mazda Shirazi, Bryan Z Wilson, Jacob T Debevec, Michael Schertz, Frank G Walter","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2442097","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2442097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hydrazine (HZ) and Hydrazine Derivative (HZ-D) exposures pose health risks to people in industrial and aerospace settings. Several recent systematic reviews and case series have highlighted common clinical presentations and management strategies. Given the low frequency at which HZ and HZ-D exposures occur, a strong evidence base on which to develop an evidence-based guideline does not exist at this time. Therefore, the aim of this project is to establish a consensus guideline for prehospital care of patients with exposures to HZ and HZ-Ds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi technique was used to develop clinical questions, obtain expert panel opinions, develop initial patient care recommendations, and revise the draft into a final consensus guideline. First, individuals (Emergency Medical Services (EMS) physicians and hazardous materials technicians) with experience in management of HZ and HZ-Ds identified relevant clinical questions. An expert panel was then convened to make clinical recommendations. In the first round, the panel voted on clinical care recommendations. These recommendations were drafted into a guideline that expert panel members reviewed. After review, additional unanswered questions were discussed electronically by expert panel members, and electronic votes were cast. Ultimately, patient care recommendations were condensed into a concise, consensus guideline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight clinical questions regarding treatment of patients with HZ and HZ-D exposures were identified. These questions were reviewed by the expert panel which included 2 representatives from: aerospace medicine, military medicine, EMS medicine, paramedicine, pharmacy, and toxicology. Draft patient care recommendations generated three additional questions which were discussed electronically and voted on. These recommendations were then formatted into a guideline outlining recommendations for care prior to decontamination, during decontamination, and after decontamination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consensus guideline for clinical care of patients with exposure to HZ/HZ-Ds is as follows: Prior to decontamination, use appropriate personal protective equipment, and when necessary, support ventilation using a bag-valve-mask and administer midazolam intramuscularly for seizures. After decontamination, provide supplemental oxygen; consider selective advanced airway management when indicated; administer inhaled beta-agonists for wheezing; and, for seizures unresponsive to multiple doses of benzodiazepines that occur during pre-planned, high-hazard activities, such as spacecraft recovery, consider intravenous or intraosseous pyridoxine.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142822661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Challenges and Perceived Impacts of Ambulance Diversions During Emergency Department Overcrowding: A Multi-Stakeholder Study.","authors":"Kailing Adriel Rao, Erin Y Q Wee, Anna Oh, Desmond Mao Ren Hao, Nausheen Doctor, Marcus E H Ong, Sungwon Yoon","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2434615","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2434615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ambulance diversion has emerged as a strategy to address Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding, but the question of when or whether diversion should be triggered is widely debated. Although the positive and adverse impacts of diversion have been primarily studied using quantitative data, little is known about the experience and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in diversions. Our study aims to explore the challenges and impacts of ambulance diversion as experienced by key stakeholders and their suggestions for improving the diversion process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders including physicians, nurses and paramedics across two EDs and four fire stations. All interviews were audio-recorded following consent and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis to identify key themes and sub-themes. Coding discrepancies were resolved through iterative discussions until no new themes were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 stakeholders were interviewed. The primary reasons for ambulance diversions were perceived to be resource constraints in EDs, overcrowding and bed block situations. Challenges during diversions included communication breakdowns, operational delays, lack of clarity in diversion criteria and emotional stress for both Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and hospital staff. Participants felt diversions impacted patient safety, staff morale, system efficiency and could generate inter-institutional conflict. Suggestions on improvements focused on use of alternative care pathways, improving hospital's flow issues, better information sharing, and optimizing the diversion process through strategizing the timing and duration of diversions. Reworking the hierarchical approach of dissemination of information to ground staff was also suggested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that while diversions may offer temporary relief for overwhelmed hospitals, they also pose challenges and negative impacts on receiving hospitals and EMS operations. Our findings underscore the need for systemic improvements to address the root causes of ED overcrowding and enhance understanding among stakeholders involved in diversions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prehospital Ground and Helicopter-Based Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Reduce Barriers to ECPR: A GIS Model.","authors":"Adam L Gottula, Man Qi, Bennett H Lane, Christopher R Shaw, Kari Gorder, Elizabeth Powell, Kyle Danielson, Anna Ciullo, Nicholas J Johnson, Joseph E Tonna, William R Hinckley, Amy Koshoffer, Rabab Al-Araji, Jason Bartos, Justin Benoit, Cindy H Hsu","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2355652","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2355652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence suggests that Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) can improve survival rates for nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, when ECPR is indicated over 50% of potential candidates are unable to qualify in the current hospital-based system due to geographic limitations. This study employs a Geographic Information System (GIS) model to estimate the number of ECPR eligible patients within the United States in the current hospital-based system, a prehospital ECPR ground-based system, and a prehospital ECPR Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS)-based system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a GIS model to estimate ground and helicopter transport times. Time-dependent rates of ECPR eligibility were derived from the Resuscitation Outcome Consortium (ROC) database, while the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry determined the number of OHCA patients meeting ECPR criteria within designated transportation times. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response time, ECPR candidacy determination time, and on-scene time were modeled based on data from the EROCA trial. The combined model was used to estimate the total ECPR eligibility in each system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CARES registry recorded 736,066 OHCA patients from 2013 to 2021. After applying clinical criteria, 24,661 (3.4%) ECPR-indicated OHCA were identified. When considering overall ECPR eligibility within 45 min from OHCA to initiation, only 11.76% of OHCA where ECPR was indicated were eligible in the current hospital-based system. The prehospital ECPR HEMS-based system exhibited a four-fold increase in ECPR eligibility (49.3%), while the prehospital ground-based system showed a more than two-fold increase (28.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates a two-fold increase in ECPR eligibility for a prehospital ECPR ground-based system and a four-fold increase for a prehospital ECPR HEMS-based system compared to the current hospital-based ECPR system. This novel GIS model can inform future ECPR implementation strategies, optimizing systems of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}