Intra-Arrest Transport and Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Initial Shockable Rhythm Who Failed the First Defibrillation: A Nationwide Study in Limited Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Settings.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jungho Lee, Jeong Ho Park, Eujene Jung, Hyun Ho Ryu, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin
{"title":"Intra-Arrest Transport and Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Initial Shockable Rhythm Who Failed the First Defibrillation: A Nationwide Study in Limited Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Settings.","authors":"Jungho Lee, Jeong Ho Park, Eujene Jung, Hyun Ho Ryu, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2489036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early hospital transport may benefit out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with shockable rhythms who are refractory to defibrillation, particularly in settings with limited advanced on-scene interventions. However, its impact in emergency medical service (EMS) systems with limited advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) capabilities remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between intra-arrest transport and survival outcomes in OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythms who remained in refractory shockable rhythms despite the first defibrillation attempt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationwide OHCA registry from a country with an intermediate prehospital service level where interventions such as prehospital anti-arrhythmic drugs or double sequential defibrillation are not feasible, adult medical OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythms who failed the first defibrillation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome was good neurological recovery. Time-dependent propensity score matching was performed to assess the association between intra-arrest transport and survival outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and stratified analyses were performed based on matched time intervals after the first defibrillation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 246 eligible patients, 8131 underwent intra-arrest transport. After 1:1 time-dependent propensity score matching, 2332 patients each in the intra-arrest transport and on-scene resuscitation groups were included. In the matched cohort, intra-arrest transport was not associated with good neurological recovery (11.7% and 11.5% in the intra-arrest transport and on-scene resuscitation groups, respectively; RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.91-1.07]). In the stratified analyses based on matched time intervals after the first defibrillation, intra-arrest transport within 5 min after the first defibrillation was associated with poorer neurological outcomes (RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.77-0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an EMS setting with a limited-service level, intra-arrest transport showed no benefit for OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm who remained in refractory shockable rhythms despite the first defibrillation attempt. High-quality on-scene management is crucial before the initiation of hospital transport. Further research is needed to develop integrated systems ensuring effective prehospital and hospital care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2489036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Early hospital transport may benefit out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with shockable rhythms who are refractory to defibrillation, particularly in settings with limited advanced on-scene interventions. However, its impact in emergency medical service (EMS) systems with limited advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) capabilities remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between intra-arrest transport and survival outcomes in OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythms who remained in refractory shockable rhythms despite the first defibrillation attempt.

Methods: Using a nationwide OHCA registry from a country with an intermediate prehospital service level where interventions such as prehospital anti-arrhythmic drugs or double sequential defibrillation are not feasible, adult medical OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythms who failed the first defibrillation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022 were analyzed. The primary outcome was good neurological recovery. Time-dependent propensity score matching was performed to assess the association between intra-arrest transport and survival outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and stratified analyses were performed based on matched time intervals after the first defibrillation.

Results: Of 10 246 eligible patients, 8131 underwent intra-arrest transport. After 1:1 time-dependent propensity score matching, 2332 patients each in the intra-arrest transport and on-scene resuscitation groups were included. In the matched cohort, intra-arrest transport was not associated with good neurological recovery (11.7% and 11.5% in the intra-arrest transport and on-scene resuscitation groups, respectively; RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.91-1.07]). In the stratified analyses based on matched time intervals after the first defibrillation, intra-arrest transport within 5 min after the first defibrillation was associated with poorer neurological outcomes (RR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.77-0.97]).

Conclusions: In an EMS setting with a limited-service level, intra-arrest transport showed no benefit for OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm who remained in refractory shockable rhythms despite the first defibrillation attempt. High-quality on-scene management is crucial before the initiation of hospital transport. Further research is needed to develop integrated systems ensuring effective prehospital and hospital care.

首次除颤失败的院外心脏骤停伴初始震荡性心律的停搏内转运和神经学结局:一项有限院前ACLS设置的全国性研究
目的:早期医院转运可能有利于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者,这些患者具有难以除颤的震荡性心律,特别是在现场干预有限的情况下。然而,其对具有有限先进心脏生命支持(ACLS)能力的紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估具有初始震荡心律的OHCA患者的骤停内转运与生存结果之间的关系,这些患者在第一次除颤尝试后仍处于难治性震荡心律。方法:对2015年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间首次除颤失败的具有初始震荡节律的成年OHCA患者进行分析,这些患者来自一个院前服务水平中等且院前抗心律失常药物或双序除颤干预措施不可行的国家。主要结果是神经系统恢复良好。采用时间依赖倾向评分匹配来评估骤停内转运和生存结果之间的关联。计算风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(ci),并根据首次除颤后的匹配时间间隔进行分层分析。结果:10246例符合条件的患者中,8131例接受了停搏内转运。经1:1时间依赖倾向评分匹配后,分别纳入停搏内转运组和现场复苏组2332例患者。在匹配的队列中,骤停转运与良好的神经恢复无关(在骤停转运组和现场复苏组分别为11.7%和11.5%);Rr (95% ci) 0.97(0.91-1.07)。在基于第一次除颤后匹配时间间隔的分层分析中,第一次除颤后5分钟内的骤停内转运与较差的神经预后相关(RR (95% CI) 0.86(0.77-0.97))。结论:在服务水平有限的EMS环境中,骤停内转运对具有初始震荡性心律的OHCA患者没有益处,尽管首次尝试除颤,但仍保持难治性震荡性心律。在医院运输开始之前,高质量的现场管理至关重要。需要进一步研究开发综合系统,以确保有效的院前和医院护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信