Implementation and Validation of Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) in a Rural EMS Region.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Luke Wohlford, Miles Kittell, Jackson Lyttleton, Jane G Morris, Timothy G Lukovits, Kate D Zimmerman, J Matthew Sholl, Thomas W Trimarco, Peter W Callas, Daniel Wolfson
{"title":"Implementation and Validation of Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) in a Rural EMS Region.","authors":"Luke Wohlford, Miles Kittell, Jackson Lyttleton, Jane G Morris, Timothy G Lukovits, Kate D Zimmerman, J Matthew Sholl, Thomas W Trimarco, Peter W Callas, Daniel Wolfson","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2498012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prehospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients is crucial for timely mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) score effectively predicts LVOs, but its utility in rural, multi-state emergency medical services (EMS) systems remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included ground prehospital stroke alerts in Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine from July 2021 to December 2022. Patients with a prehospital FAST-ED score recorded were enrolled. LVO was confirmed by CT angiography. Our primary outcome was the accuracy of LVO identification with FAST-ED scores. Secondary outcomes included the predictiveness of the prehospital FAST-ED score for Thrombectomy Capable Center (TCC) appropriateness, MT, and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 370 patients. The overall LVO prevalence was 23.2% (<i>n</i> = 86). A positive FAST-ED score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 63%-82%) and specificity of 61% (95% CI, 55%-66%) for presence of LVO. The PPV was 36% (95% CI, 29%-44%) and the NPV was 88% (95% CI, 83%-92%). Positive FAST-ED scores were associated with significantly higher rates of TCC appropriateness (46% vs 10%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), mechanical thrombectomy (19% vs 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (24% vs 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAST-ED score can be implemented by prehospital personnel to triage patients to a TCC when faced with options for hospital destination in a rural setting. This study supports incorporating FAST-ED scoring in rural protocols for potential diversions to TCCs. Further research should be done to better characterize the effects of prehospital diversion on time to thrombectomy, functional outcomes, and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2498012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Prehospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients is crucial for timely mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) score effectively predicts LVOs, but its utility in rural, multi-state emergency medical services (EMS) systems remains unexplored.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included ground prehospital stroke alerts in Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine from July 2021 to December 2022. Patients with a prehospital FAST-ED score recorded were enrolled. LVO was confirmed by CT angiography. Our primary outcome was the accuracy of LVO identification with FAST-ED scores. Secondary outcomes included the predictiveness of the prehospital FAST-ED score for Thrombectomy Capable Center (TCC) appropriateness, MT, and 30-day mortality.

Results: This study included 370 patients. The overall LVO prevalence was 23.2% (n = 86). A positive FAST-ED score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 63%-82%) and specificity of 61% (95% CI, 55%-66%) for presence of LVO. The PPV was 36% (95% CI, 29%-44%) and the NPV was 88% (95% CI, 83%-92%). Positive FAST-ED scores were associated with significantly higher rates of TCC appropriateness (46% vs 10%, p < 0.0001), mechanical thrombectomy (19% vs 6%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (24% vs 6%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The FAST-ED score can be implemented by prehospital personnel to triage patients to a TCC when faced with options for hospital destination in a rural setting. This study supports incorporating FAST-ED scoring in rural protocols for potential diversions to TCCs. Further research should be done to better characterize the effects of prehospital diversion on time to thrombectomy, functional outcomes, and mortality.

农村地区急诊目的地脑卒中分诊现场评估(FAST-ED)的实施与验证
目的:院前识别大血管闭塞(LVO)脑卒中患者对及时机械取栓(MT)至关重要。急诊目的地脑卒中分诊(FAST-ED)评分可有效预测lvo,但其在农村、多州紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中的应用仍未被探索。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了2021年7月至2022年12月期间佛蒙特州、新罕布什尔州和缅因州的院前中风地面预警。有院前FAST-ED评分记录的患者入组。CT血管造影证实LVO。我们的主要结果是用FAST-ED评分识别LVO的准确性。次要结局包括院前FAST-ED评分对取栓能力中心(TCC)适宜性、MT和30天死亡率的预测性。结果:本研究纳入370例患者。总体LVO患病率为23.2% (n = 86)。FAST-ED评分阳性表明LVO存在的敏感性为73% (95% CI, 63%-82%),特异性为61% (95% CI, 55%-66%)。PPV为36% (95% CI, 29%-44%), NPV为88% (95% CI, 83%-92%)。FAST-ED阳性评分与TCC适宜率显著升高相关(46% vs 10%, pp p)。结论:在农村地区,当患者面临医院目的地选择时,院前工作人员可以使用FAST-ED评分对TCC患者进行分类。本研究支持在农村协议中纳入FAST-ED评分,以潜在地转移到tcc。院前分流对取栓时间、功能结局和死亡率的影响有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信