儿童院外心脏骤停伴晚期气道的通气率和导管造影。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kelsey Stanton, Annabella Mershad, Chelsea Kadish, Andrew Murphy, Robert Lowe, Imanol Ania, Andoni Elola, Elisabete Aramendi, Matthew Hansen, Ashish R Panchal, Henry E Wang, Michelle M J Nassal
{"title":"儿童院外心脏骤停伴晚期气道的通气率和导管造影。","authors":"Kelsey Stanton, Annabella Mershad, Chelsea Kadish, Andrew Murphy, Robert Lowe, Imanol Ania, Andoni Elola, Elisabete Aramendi, Matthew Hansen, Ashish R Panchal, Henry E Wang, Michelle M J Nassal","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2496756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ventilation is important in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation; however, few studies describe ventilation rates during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (pOHCA). Our objective was to characterize ventilations and end-tidal capnography (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) after advanced airway placement by emergency medical services (EMS) during pOHCA resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that included pediatric (age < 18 years) non-traumatic OHCA treated by an urban fire-based EMS system (Columbus Division of Fire, Columbus, Ohio) from April 2019 to December 2020. We identified ventilations delivered during resuscitation by manual review of continuous EtCO<sub>2</sub> recorded by cardiac monitors. We also identified ventilations using automated detection algorithms previously validated in adult resuscitation. Mean ventilation rate and EtCO<sub>2</sub> were summarized in one-minute (min) epochs from advanced airway insertion through end of resuscitation efforts. We compared return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vs non-ROSC ventilation rates using Student's t-tests. Cochran-Armitage test of trend was used to evaluate EtCO<sub>2</sub> temporal trends. Associations between ROSC and EtCO<sub>2</sub> were tested using a regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 38 pOHCA cases and 30 cases were included for ventilation analysis. Cases were primarily infants (0.7 years, IQR 0.17-2), male (52.6%), and African-American race (63.1%). Most pOHCAs were unwitnessed (65.8%) with non-shockable rhythms (94.8%) and infrequent bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (31.2%). Eight patients achieved ROSC (21.2%) and two patients survived (5.3%). Advanced airway attempts included supraglottic airway devices (71.1%), endotracheal intubation (7.8%), or both (7.8%). Ventilation rates ranged from 0-23 per minute. Automated ventilation detection algorithms performed well in pediatric ventilation detection where the mean standard error was 3.7 mmHg in EtCO<sub>2</sub> values and 1.3 per minute in ventilation rates. Ventilation rates differed between ROSC and non-ROSC groups (9.2 vs 6.9 per min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Ranges of EtCO<sub>2</sub> values included 0-100 mmHg during resuscitation. The EtCO<sub>2</sub> trends over time differed between ROSC and non-ROSC groups (59.82 mmHg to 75.9 mmHg vs 20.7 mmHg to 19.0 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.01). EtCO<sub>2</sub> was significantly associated with ROSC (OR 1.0 95% CI 1.00-1.01, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results offer one of the first perspectives of ventilation in pOHCA. Differences were observed in ventilation rates and EtCO<sub>2</sub> trends between ROSC and non-ROSC cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ventilation Rates and Capnography in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Advanced Airways.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Stanton, Annabella Mershad, Chelsea Kadish, Andrew Murphy, Robert Lowe, Imanol Ania, Andoni Elola, Elisabete Aramendi, Matthew Hansen, Ashish R Panchal, Henry E Wang, Michelle M J Nassal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2496756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ventilation is important in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation; however, few studies describe ventilation rates during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (pOHCA). Our objective was to characterize ventilations and end-tidal capnography (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) after advanced airway placement by emergency medical services (EMS) during pOHCA resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study that included pediatric (age < 18 years) non-traumatic OHCA treated by an urban fire-based EMS system (Columbus Division of Fire, Columbus, Ohio) from April 2019 to December 2020. We identified ventilations delivered during resuscitation by manual review of continuous EtCO<sub>2</sub> recorded by cardiac monitors. We also identified ventilations using automated detection algorithms previously validated in adult resuscitation. Mean ventilation rate and EtCO<sub>2</sub> were summarized in one-minute (min) epochs from advanced airway insertion through end of resuscitation efforts. We compared return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vs non-ROSC ventilation rates using Student's t-tests. Cochran-Armitage test of trend was used to evaluate EtCO<sub>2</sub> temporal trends. Associations between ROSC and EtCO<sub>2</sub> were tested using a regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 38 pOHCA cases and 30 cases were included for ventilation analysis. Cases were primarily infants (0.7 years, IQR 0.17-2), male (52.6%), and African-American race (63.1%). Most pOHCAs were unwitnessed (65.8%) with non-shockable rhythms (94.8%) and infrequent bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (31.2%). Eight patients achieved ROSC (21.2%) and two patients survived (5.3%). Advanced airway attempts included supraglottic airway devices (71.1%), endotracheal intubation (7.8%), or both (7.8%). Ventilation rates ranged from 0-23 per minute. Automated ventilation detection algorithms performed well in pediatric ventilation detection where the mean standard error was 3.7 mmHg in EtCO<sub>2</sub> values and 1.3 per minute in ventilation rates. Ventilation rates differed between ROSC and non-ROSC groups (9.2 vs 6.9 per min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Ranges of EtCO<sub>2</sub> values included 0-100 mmHg during resuscitation. The EtCO<sub>2</sub> trends over time differed between ROSC and non-ROSC groups (59.82 mmHg to 75.9 mmHg vs 20.7 mmHg to 19.0 mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.01). EtCO<sub>2</sub> was significantly associated with ROSC (OR 1.0 95% CI 1.00-1.01, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results offer one of the first perspectives of ventilation in pOHCA. Differences were observed in ventilation rates and EtCO<sub>2</sub> trends between ROSC and non-ROSC cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2496756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2496756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通气在院外心脏骤停复苏中的重要作用;然而,很少有研究描述儿科院外心脏骤停(pOHCA)期间的通气率。我们的目的是表征pOHCA复苏期间紧急医疗服务(EMS)在先进气道放置后的通气和潮末二氧化碳(EtCO2)。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括心脏监护仪记录的2岁儿童。我们还使用先前在成人复苏中验证过的自动检测算法确定了通气。平均通气率和EtCO2以一分钟(min)为单位进行总结,从晚期气道插入到复苏结束。我们使用学生t检验比较了自发循环恢复(ROSC)和非ROSC通气率。采用Cochran-Armitage趋势检验评价EtCO2的时间趋势。采用回归模型检验ROSC与EtCO2之间的相关性。结果:我们确定了38例pOHCA,并纳入了30例通气分析。病例主要为婴儿(0.7岁,IQR为0.17-2)、男性(52.6%)和非裔美国人(63.1%)。大多数pohca为未见(65.8%),无震荡性心律(94.8%)和不常见的旁观者心肺复苏(31.2%)。8例患者达到ROSC(21.2%), 2例患者存活(5.3%)。晚期气道尝试包括声门上气道装置(71.1%)、气管插管(7.8%)或两者兼有(7.8%)。通风量为每分钟0-23次。自动通气检测算法在儿科通气检测中表现良好,EtCO2值的平均标准误差为3.7mmHg,通气率的平均标准误差为1.3 /分钟。通气率在ROSC组和非ROSC组之间存在差异(9.2 vs 6.9 / min, p 2值包括复苏期间0-100 mmHg。ROSC组和非ROSC组的EtCO2随时间变化趋势不同(59.82 mmHg至75.9 mmHg vs 20.7 mmHg至19.0 mmHg, p 2与ROSC显著相关(OR 1.0 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p)结论:这些结果提供了pOHCA通气的第一个视角之一。在ROSC和非ROSC病例中观察到通气率和EtCO2趋势的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ventilation Rates and Capnography in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Advanced Airways.

Objectives: Ventilation is important in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation; however, few studies describe ventilation rates during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (pOHCA). Our objective was to characterize ventilations and end-tidal capnography (EtCO2) after advanced airway placement by emergency medical services (EMS) during pOHCA resuscitation.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included pediatric (age < 18 years) non-traumatic OHCA treated by an urban fire-based EMS system (Columbus Division of Fire, Columbus, Ohio) from April 2019 to December 2020. We identified ventilations delivered during resuscitation by manual review of continuous EtCO2 recorded by cardiac monitors. We also identified ventilations using automated detection algorithms previously validated in adult resuscitation. Mean ventilation rate and EtCO2 were summarized in one-minute (min) epochs from advanced airway insertion through end of resuscitation efforts. We compared return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) vs non-ROSC ventilation rates using Student's t-tests. Cochran-Armitage test of trend was used to evaluate EtCO2 temporal trends. Associations between ROSC and EtCO2 were tested using a regression model.

Results: We identified 38 pOHCA cases and 30 cases were included for ventilation analysis. Cases were primarily infants (0.7 years, IQR 0.17-2), male (52.6%), and African-American race (63.1%). Most pOHCAs were unwitnessed (65.8%) with non-shockable rhythms (94.8%) and infrequent bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (31.2%). Eight patients achieved ROSC (21.2%) and two patients survived (5.3%). Advanced airway attempts included supraglottic airway devices (71.1%), endotracheal intubation (7.8%), or both (7.8%). Ventilation rates ranged from 0-23 per minute. Automated ventilation detection algorithms performed well in pediatric ventilation detection where the mean standard error was 3.7 mmHg in EtCO2 values and 1.3 per minute in ventilation rates. Ventilation rates differed between ROSC and non-ROSC groups (9.2 vs 6.9 per min, p < 0.001). Ranges of EtCO2 values included 0-100 mmHg during resuscitation. The EtCO2 trends over time differed between ROSC and non-ROSC groups (59.82 mmHg to 75.9 mmHg vs 20.7 mmHg to 19.0 mmHg, p < 0.01). EtCO2 was significantly associated with ROSC (OR 1.0 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These results offer one of the first perspectives of ventilation in pOHCA. Differences were observed in ventilation rates and EtCO2 trends between ROSC and non-ROSC cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信