Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin最新文献_第5页

Resource Possession in the Mind's Eye: Ideological Convergence and Divergence in the Perceptions of Poor People. 心灵眼中的资源占有：穷人认知中的意识形态趋同与分歧。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251371787

Wilson N Merrell, Lei Fan, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Lotte Thomsen

{"title":"Resource Possession in the Mind's Eye: Ideological Convergence and Divergence in the Perceptions of Poor People.","authors":"Wilson N Merrell, Lei Fan, Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Lotte Thomsen","doi":"10.1177/01461672251371787","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01461672251371787","url":null,"abstract":"Social hierarchies ultimately concern resource possession, yet psychological processes for regulating resource-related tensions remain underexplored. We examine how support for intergroup equality (egalitarianism) relates to explicit attitudes toward, and mental images of, the resource poor. In Study 1 (N = 625), egalitarians report more favorable attitudes toward the resource poor than anti-egalitarians. However, using the reverse correlation paradigm, both groups generate similarly negative mental images of this group, as shown by pixel luminance comparisons (Study 1) and evaluated by independent raters of person-perceptual (Study 2, N = 394) and coalitional traits (Study 3, N = 348). While ideology did not shape image generation, it did influence image evaluation: egalitarian raters showed less polarization between resource-poor and resource-rich faces than anti-egalitarian raters. These findings suggest that despite ideological differences in explicit attitudes (divergence), egalitarians, and anti-egalitarians share similarly negative mental representations (convergence) of the resource poor, highlighting a nuanced interplay between social perception and hierarchy regulation.","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3464-3480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145391846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Underestimation of Transgender Women's Vulnerability to Workplace Sexual Harassment. 对跨性别女性职场性骚扰脆弱性的低估。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251368955

Bryn Bandt-Law, Nathan N Cheek, Jessica J Glazier, Kristina R Olson, Cheryl R Kaiser

引用次数: 0

Effects of Friendship Influence and Normative Pressure on Adolescent Attitudes and Behaviors. 友谊影响和规范压力对青少年态度和行为的影响。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251366388

Tibor Zingora, Andreas Flache

引用次数: 0

Fifteen Reasons You Should Read This Paper: How Providing Many Arguments Increases Perceptions of Both Expertise and Persuasive Intent. 你应该阅读这篇论文的十五个理由：提供许多论点如何增加专业知识和说服力意图的感知。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251366068

Abigail Bergman, Mohamed A Hussein, Rhia Catapano, Zakary L Tormala

引用次数: 0

When the Shot Backfires: Demonstrating How Science Communication Can Fail. 当镜头适得其反：展示科学传播如何失败。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251370004

Yashvin Seetahul, Tobias Greitemeyer

{"title":"When the Shot Backfires: Demonstrating How Science Communication Can Fail.","authors":"Yashvin Seetahul, Tobias Greitemeyer","doi":"10.1177/01461672251370004","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01461672251370004","url":null,"abstract":"We examined how scientific research influences the beliefs of those most invested in the research. We focused specifically on violent video game (VVG) and aggression research and tested the hypothesis that non-players and non-habitual players would update their beliefs based on the study conclusions, whereas more habitual players would not. Participants read abstracts with either a positive effect or a null effect. Beliefs about the effect of VVGs on aggression were measured before and after reading. Results in both studies (overall N = 1,576) showed that at low VVG exposure levels, participants in both conditions updated their beliefs to align with the research. However, at high VVG exposure levels, participants maintained their belief that VVGs do not increase aggression, and at very high VVG exposure levels, positive-effect studies led participants to believe the opposite: that VVGs reduce aggression. We interpret this pattern of response as suggesting a process of psychological distancing, whereby individuals defensively shift their beliefs away from threatening claims. These findings highlight the need to understand how scientific information is received and to develop strategies that prevent reinforcing misconceptions.","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3426-3446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13507507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145378327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Do People Listen to Cassandra? Persuasion and Accuracy in Geopolitical Forecasts. 人们会听卡桑德拉的话吗？地缘政治预测的说服力和准确性。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251375500

Yhonatan S Shemesh, Avi Gamoran, David Leiser, Michael Gilead

{"title":"Do People Listen to Cassandra? Persuasion and Accuracy in Geopolitical Forecasts.","authors":"Yhonatan S Shemesh, Avi Gamoran, David Leiser, Michael Gilead","doi":"10.1177/01461672251375500","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01461672251375500","url":null,"abstract":"In a world marked by persistent uncertainty, accurately predicting the future is vital. While certain people (\"superforecasters\") and practices (aggregation) can produce more accurate forecasts, the utility of these forecasts depends on whether they are persuasive enough to be heeded. This study investigates the relationship between persuasion and accuracy in geopolitical forecasts. In a forecasting competition, 153 forecasters predicted future global events and explained their rationales. Next, 474 evaluators rated these rationales for persuasiveness. Using a neural network-based language model, we found that although forecasting rationales contained valid cues for accuracy, evaluators were no more persuaded by accurate forecasts. Further analyses using large language models revealed that psychological attributes indicating expertise, trustworthiness, and emotional composure were associated with both persuasion and accuracy, while eloquence and confidence, though persuasive, were unrelated to accuracy. We conclude that people are sensitive to valid cues, but are misled by invalid ones, impairing overall calibration.","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3363-3378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13507494/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145308479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Control Motivation Function of Populist Attitudes: Causal Evidence that Populist Reasoning Raises Perceptions of Control. 民粹主义态度的控制动机功能：民粹主义推理提高控制意识的因果证据。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-31 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251373106

Annedore Hoppe, Immo Fritsche, Helena Pauen

{"title":"The Control Motivation Function of Populist Attitudes: Causal Evidence that Populist Reasoning Raises Perceptions of Control.","authors":"Annedore Hoppe, Immo Fritsche, Helena Pauen","doi":"10.1177/01461672251373106","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01461672251373106","url":null,"abstract":"The present studies investigate how populist attitudes influence perceptions of personal control. Populist reasoning is proposed to enhance personal control by promoting a sense of belonging to an agentic group (\"the people\") that opposes a perceived antagonistic \"corrupt elite.\" Across three experiments (N = 733), participants were asked to adopt either a populist or a pluralistic reasoning style. In Study 3, the salience of high versus low personal control was additionally manipulated. Results showed that populist reasoning increased participants' sense of control, particularly in relation to specific goals, such as performing well in an upcoming debate. However, making low control salient tended to diminish this effect. These findings suggest that populist narratives may be appealing during crises due to their control-enhancing function. The novel experimental method for manipulating populist attitudes opens new pathways for testing causal effects and understanding the motivational drivers of populism, potentially contributing to future interventions in this field.","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3512-3527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13507497/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145409824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Goals Out Loud: Telling Others About a Goal Increases Support Received and Facilitates Goal Pursuit. 大声说出目标：告诉别人你的目标会增加你得到的支持，也会促进你对目标的追求。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251382271

Johanna Peetz, Roger Buehler, Tayler Wells

引用次数: 0

Demotivating Justice: White Americans' Outrage at Individual Bigotry May Reduce Action to Address Systematic Racial Inequity. 削弱正义：美国白人对个人偏见的愤怒可能会削弱解决系统性种族不平等问题的行动。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251361264

Zachary K Rothschild, Myles Hugee

{"title":"Demotivating Justice: White Americans' Outrage at Individual Bigotry May Reduce Action to Address Systematic Racial Inequity.","authors":"Zachary K Rothschild, Myles Hugee","doi":"10.1177/01461672251361264","DOIUrl":"10.1177/01461672251361264","url":null,"abstract":"These studies examine whether expressing outrage at a prejudiced individual may undermine justice-insensitive White Americans' motivation to engage in more costly actions addressing systemic racism. Study 1 (N = 896) manipulated White privilege salience and the opportunity to express outrage before measuring donations to a racial justice organization. Reminders of racial privilege increased White collective guilt, and donations among White U.S. participants low (but not high) in justice sensitivity. However, the opportunity to express outrage at another's prejudicial behavior negated privilege-induced reparative action. A second preregistered study (N = 1344) found this effect only when outrage was directed at a racialized (vs. non-racialized) injustice. A third preregistered study (N = 1133) replicated the effects using a more controlled manipulation of outrage expression and more ecologically valid outcomes. Findings suggest that salient racial privilege may motivate some White Americans to address systemic racism, but expressing outrage at another's bigotry may undermine this process.","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3164-3181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145023933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Re-examining Spontaneous Trait Transference from an Attributional Perspective. 从归因视角重新审视自发性特质移情。

IF 3.3 2区心理学

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-28 DOI: 10.1177/01461672251365982

Marine Rougier, Leonard Heusler, Jan De Houwer

引用次数: 0