Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics最新文献

{"title":"The effect of individualized ocular refraction customized spectacle lenses on myopia control in schoolchildren: A 1-year randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Si Lei, Ye Wu, Ji Kou, Qian Chen, Longqian Liu","doi":"10.1111/opo.13354","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13354","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of individualized ocular refraction customized (IORC) spectacle lenses with different actual amounts of peripheral myopic defocus (MD) on myopia control over 1 year. These lenses compensate for the original peripheral refraction via the free-form surface on the back of the lens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 1-year, double-masked randomised clinical trial included 184 myopic schoolchildren aged 8-12 years. Participants were randomised to receive IORC lenses with high (IORC-H group, +4.50 D), medium (IORC-M group, +3.50 D) or low (IORC-L group, +2.50 D) MD or single-vision (SV) lenses. The spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline and 6-monthly intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1 year, the mean (SD) changes in SER were -0.18 (0.37), -0.36 (0.37), -0.52 (0.39) and -0.60 (0.42) D for the IORC-H, IORC-M, IORC-L and SV groups, respectively. Compared with the SV group, the effects of slowing myopia progression were 70%, 40% and 13% for the IORC-H (difference of 0.47 D, p < 0.001), IORC-M (difference of 0.32 D, p = 0.001) and IORC-L (difference of 0.15 D, p > 0.05) groups, respectively. The mean (SD) changes in AL were 0.12 (0.16), 0.23 (0.17), 0.29 (0.17) and 0.36 (0.17) mm for the IORC-H, IORC-M, IORC-L and SV groups, respectively. The axial elongation was 67%, 36% and 19% lower in the IORC-H (difference of 0.25 mm, p < 0.001), IORC-M (difference of 0.15 mm, p < 0.001) and IORC-L (difference of 0.10 mm, p = 0.04) groups, respectively, compared with the SV group. The IORC-H group exhibited significantly less axial elongation than the IORC-M and IORC-L groups (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the IORC-M and IORC-L lenses, the IORC-H lens was found to have superior efficacy in inhibiting myopic progression and slowing eye growth in schoolchildren, with better myopia control efficacy in younger children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1279-1289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141469722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ultraviolet protection in eye and face protection against biological hazards.","authors":"Stephen J Dain, Brian B Cheng, Maitreyee Roy","doi":"10.1111/opo.13342","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the development of eye and face protection standards against biological hazards, it is important to consider that the eye and face protectors may be used in the outdoor environment, where ultraviolet (UV) exposure from the sun is much higher than indoors. Workers affected include paramedics, ambulance officers and clinical testing personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spectral transmittances (280-780 nm) were measured on eight face shields and one goggle of the types used in hospital and clinical environments, three overhead projector sheets and an occupational impact protective goggle. The UV and luminous transmittances were calculated according to the international and two national sunglass standards, and compared with the compliance requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the face shields and goggle lenses were made of variants of the same material. All the samples, including the overhead projector sheets, complied with the requirements of the sunglass standards (for normal conditions, in the case of the American standard).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since all the lenses complied with the sunglass standards for UV protection, and there appears to be uniformity in the choice of materials in this product type, there is no need to make provision, as is the case for occupational eye and face protection standards, for protectors that do not provide UV protection. This makes labelling and advice to end users from eyecare and safety professionals much simpler.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1142-1147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.","authors":"Ian McCormick, Kelvin Tong, Nurliyana Abdullah, Carmen Abesamis-Dischoso, Theresa Gende, Effendy Bin Hashim, S May Ho, Isabelle Jalbert, Belmerio Jeronimo, Elenoa Matoto-Raikabakaba, Koichi Ono, Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena, Jaymie T Rogers, John Szetu, Minh Anh Tran, Dennis Yan-Yin Tse, Ye Win, Tiong Peng Yap, Sangchul Yoon, Mayinuer Yusufu, Matthew J Burton, Jacqueline Ramke","doi":"10.1111/opo.13348","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub-regions within the Western Pacific.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited eye care professionals to complete a two-round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub-region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub-regions, reducing out-of-pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide policy-makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context-specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector-dominated models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1148-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141331528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The efficacy of orthokeratology lenses with smaller back optic zone diameter in myopia control. A meta-analysis.","authors":"Yongli Zhou, Huan Li, Jiangdong Hao, Wei Pan, Zhikuan Yang, Weizhong Lan","doi":"10.1111/opo.13347","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to determine whether orthokeratology (OK) lenses with a smaller back optic zone diameter (BOZD) could exhibit stronger myopia control effects.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023408184). A comprehensive systematic database search was conducted, encompassing PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid, CNKI and CBM, to identify relevant studies up to 25 March 2023. The primary inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were studies that investigated the myopia control effect of OK lenses with a small optical treatment area (≤5 mm). To assess the quality of the retrieved articles, two researchers evaluated them using the Cochrane bias risk assessment criteria. The primary outcome measures were the changes in axial length (AL) and refractive error, using the weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess differences between small and traditional back optical treatment zone groups in terms of these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis encompassed five eligible studies, with a 1 year duration. The average difference in AL between the groups was 0.12 mm (WMD = -0.12, 95% CI [-0.16, -0.09], p < 0.00001). Likewise, the average difference in refractive error between the two groups was 0.44 D (WMD = 0.44, 95% CI [0.30, 0.57], p < 0.00001). None of the studies reported severe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests that OK lenses with smaller back optical treatment zone are more effective in preventing myopia progression than traditional lenses. However, a longer-term evaluation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1215-1223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141331529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography indices in healthy children and young adults.","authors":"Barsha Lal, David Alonso-Caneiro, Scott A Read, Andrew Carkeet","doi":"10.1111/opo.13357","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the repeatability of retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) indices among healthy children and compare it to healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study captured 3 mm × 3 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm macular OCT-A scans including superficial and deep retinal layers, choriocapillaris and deep choroid over two visits, 1 week apart at approximately the same time of day, for 22 healthy adults (18-30 years) and 21 children (6-15 years). Magnification and projection-artefact corrected indices extracted using a custom image analysis program and individual biometry were compared between visits using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation (ICC). Retinal indices included foveal avascular zone metrics, perfusion and vessel density and choroidal indices included choriocapillaris flow deficit metrics and deep choroid perfusion density, in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal regions. Repeatability between adults and children was compared with F-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean differences between repeated OCT-A indices were not significantly different from zero for either of the zones, layers and scan sizes in the two age groups (p > 0.05) except for foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter (p = 0.04 for both) of 6-mm-deep retinal layer scans. The ICC ranged between 0.67 and 0.99. Significantly higher variability between visits (p < 0.05) in the indices was noted among adults than children, especially for choroidal indices of larger scan size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retinal and choroidal OCT-A indices in the foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal zones were repeatable in healthy children except for the foveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone perimeter of the 6-mm-deep retinal layer, which exhibited statistically borderline differences between visits. The adult group showed more variability between visits compared to children, especially in the larger scan size for choroidal OCT-A indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141458523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prediction of proliferative diabetic retinopathy using machine learning in Latino and non-Hispanic black cohorts with routine blood and urine testing.","authors":"Ayelet Goldstein, Kun Ding, Onelys Carasquillo, Barton Levine, Aisha Hasan, Jonathan Levine","doi":"10.1111/opo.13363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective was to predict proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Latino (LA) patients by applying machine learning algorithms to routinely collected blood and urine laboratory results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of 1124 type 2 diabetes patients treated at the Bronxcare Hospital eye clinic between January and December 2019 were analysed. Data collected included demographic information (ethnicity, age and sex), blood (fasting glucose, haemoglobin A1C [HbA1c] high-density lipoprotein [HDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and urine (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR]) test results and the outcome measure of retinopathy status. The efficacy of different machine learning models was assessed and compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to evaluate the contribution of each feature to the model's predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The balanced random forest model surpassed other models in predicting PDR for both NHB and LA cohorts, achieving an AUC (area under the curve) of 83%. Regarding sex, the model exhibited remarkable performance for the female LA demographic, with an AUC of 87%. The SHAP analysis revealed that PDR-related factors influenced NHB and LA patients differently, with more pronounced disparity between sexes. Furthermore, the optimal cut-off values for these factors showed variations based on sex and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning in identifying individuals at higher risk for PDR by leveraging routine blood and urine test results. It allows clinicians to prioritise at-risk individuals for timely evaluations. Furthermore, the findings emphasise the importance of accounting for both ethnicity and sex when analysing risk factors for PDR in type 2 diabetes individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141590967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing neophyte response to daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses: A randomised clinical trial investigation over one month.","authors":"Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga, Hugo Pena-Verdeal, Dolores Ferreiro-Figueiras, Veronica Noya-Padin, Maria J Giraldez, Eva Yebra-Pimentel","doi":"10.1111/opo.13328","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomised clinical trial assessed the impact on symptoms, tear film dynamics and ocular surface integrity of daily disposable silicone-hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) over a month, paying special attention to lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and its implications for CL discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neophyte CL wearers (n = 44, 21.09 ± 5.00 years old) were randomly assigned to either the experimental (n = 24) or control group (n = 20). Participants assigned to the experimental group were required to wear daily disposable CLs for 1 month for at least 8 h/day and 6 days/week. All participants were healthy subjects (no history of ocular surgery or active ocular disease) with spherical refractive errors between -8.00 and +5.00 D and cylindrical power <0.75 D. At the baseline and 1-month sessions, the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5) was completed, together with the measurement of tear film osmolarity with the TearLab osmometer, tear meniscus height (TMH) and lipid layer pattern (LLP) using a slit-lamp with Tearscope Plus attached, fluorescein break-up time (FBUT), maximum blink interval (MBI), corneal staining with fluorescein under cobalt blue light and LWE with lissamine green under slit lamp and halogen white light.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the baseline session, LWE showed a negative correlation with DEQ-5 (r = -0.37, p = 0.02). Significant differences in FBUT and LWE (p = 0.04) and a positive correlation between LWE and DEQ-5 (r = 0.49, p = 0.007) were observed at 1 month. Intrasession analysis at 1 month showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups in DEQ-5, FBUT and LWE (all p ≤ 0.02). Intersession analysis in the experimental group showed variations in DEQ-5, FBUT and LWE (all p ≤ 0.02) but no significant variation in the control group (all p ≥ 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of LWE was significantly correlated with higher symptom values in the DEQ-5. Also, participants in the experimental group presented higher values of LWE after 1 month of CL wear, in comparison with the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"876-883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140855632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Measurement of in vivo lens shapes using IOLMaster 700 B-scan images: Comparison with phakometry.","authors":"Asik Pradhan, Rohan P J Hughes, Emily Pieterse, David A Atchison, Andrew Carkeet","doi":"10.1111/opo.13319","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13319","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared in vivo crystalline lens shape measurements using B-scan images from the IOLMaster 700 with phakometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four young adult participants underwent IOLMaster 700 and phakometry measurements under cycloplegia (1% cyclopentolate). The IOLMaster 700 generated B-scan images along six meridians in 30° increments, which were analysed using custom MATLAB software to determine lens surface radii of curvature. Phakometry measurements were obtained using Purkinje images reflected from the lens surfaces.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IOLMaster 700 image analysis method yielded a lower mean anterior lens surface spherical equivalent power (+6.20 D) than phakometry (+7.55 D); however, the two measurements were strongly correlated (R₍₂₁₎ = 0.97, p < 0.0001). The astigmatic power vectors (J₀ and J₄₅) for the anterior lens surface were significantly higher for the IOLMaster 700 measurements, with only J₀ showing a significant moderate positive correlation (R₍₂₁₎ = 0.57, p = 0.005). For the posterior lens surface, the IOLMaster 700 measurements had a higher mean spherical power (+14.28 D) compared to phakometry (+13.70 D); however, a strong positive correlation (R₍₂₁₎ = 0.90, p < 0.0001) was observed. No significant correlations were noted for posterior lens surface astigmatic vectors (J₀ and J₄₅). The IOLMaster 700 estimates for the equivalent lens mean spherical power were slightly lower than those for phakometry, with a mean difference of -0.72 D, and both methods were positively correlated (R₍₂₁₎ = 0.94, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrate that IOLMaster 700 B-scan image analysis technique provides similar estimates of lens surface powers to phakometry. These results highlight the potential of the IOLMaster 700 to provide measurements of lens shape, informing future research and clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140866233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessment of large-diameter and small-diameter SoftK specialty contact lenses for early-stage keratoconus.","authors":"Eyal Gal, Joan Gispets, Meira Zyroff, Efrat Netanya, Liat Gantz","doi":"10.1111/opo.13331","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Soft contact lenses may be a good alternative for early-stage keratoconus (KC) patients who do not tolerate rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses due to ocular discomfort or complications. This prospective study compared outcomes obtained after 2 weeks of wearing two types of soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses for keratoconus that varied in their diameter and central thickness (cc).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades I or II KC were fitted with small-diameter (14.2 or 14.8 mm) SoftK (SD-SoftK, cc = 0.48 mm) and large-diameter (17 mm) SoftK (LD-SoftK, cc = 0.60 mm) lenses, each worn for 2 weeks in a crossover design. Low (10%;10VA) and high (100%;100VA) contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS, Pelli-Robson), higher order aberrations (HOAs, Visionix Vx130), the number of trial lens modifications during fitting and the subjectively preferred lens were compared using Friedman tests with post-hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty eyes (N = 20, 10 males, mean age: 39.0 ± 9.9 years, range: 23-55 years) were examined. Their habitual median (interquartile1, interquartile3) 10VA (LogMAR), 100VA (LogMAR) and CS (LogCS) were 0.52 (0.30, 0.50), 0.14 (0.10, 0.15) and 1.35 (1.35, 1.50), respectively. For the SD-SoftK condition, the values were 0.23 (0.17, 0.30), 0.02 (0.00, 0.05) and 1.50 (1.50, 1.65), respectively. For the LD-SoftK condition, the respective values were 0.36 (0.27, 0.44), 0.09 (0.05, 0.13) and 1.50 (1.50, 1.60). SD-SoftK lenses significantly improved 10VA compared with habitual and LD-SoftK. SD-SoftK also significantly improved CS compared with habitual, but not LD-SoftK. LD-SoftK significantly improved spherical aberration compared with uncorrected (0.03 ± 0.10 μ vs. 0.07 ± 0.13 μ) but not SD-SoftK (0.04 ± 0.07 μ). Both lenses required a mean of 1.5 modifications prior to final lens fitting. Fewer adverse events were seen with SD-SoftK (N = 3) compared with LD-SoftK (N = 8), and 75% of participants preferred SD-SoftK lenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SD-SoftK lenses were preferred by 75% of subjects, were associated with fewer adverse events and significantly improved 10VA compared with LD-SoftK lenses. SD-SoftK lenses also significantly improved CS compared with the habitual correction, but this did not differ significantly from the LD-SoftK lenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"884-893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141082175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accommodative response and visual fatigue following a non-congruent visual task in non-asthenopic and asthenopic individuals.","authors":"Rémi Coq, Pascaline Neveu, Justin Plantier, Richard Legras","doi":"10.1111/opo.13304","DOIUrl":"10.1111/opo.13304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Asthenopia is related to near vision activities or visual tasks that dissociate accommodation from vergence. Since the results of previous studies using objective measures to diagnose asthenopia are inconsistent, this study compared optometric tests and objective metrics of accommodation in non-asthenopic and asthenopic young adults before and after a visual fatigue task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The accommodative response was recorded objectively for 6 min at a 3.33 D accommodative demand using an autorefractor, before and after a 5-min non-congruent visual task. Accommodation was disassociated from vergence with a ±2.00 D accommodative flipper while reading at the same distance. Optometric tests and subjective evaluations of asthenopia were performed before and after the task. Twenty-six non-presbyopic adults (23.15 ± 2.56 years) were included and identified as asthenopic (n = 14) or non-asthenopic (n = 12) based on their score on the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mixed ANOVA found no significant difference between the groups for objective (accommodative response) or subjective metrics (feeling of fatigue, optometric tests), although all participants reported greater visual fatigue after the task. A significant effect of time (before and after the non-congruent task) was identified for the overall sample for mean accommodative lag (+0.10 D, p = 0.01), subjective visual fatigue (+1.18, p < 0.01), negative relative accommodation (-0.20 D, p = 0.02) and near negative fusional reserve (blur: +2.46Δ, p < 0.01; break: +1.89Δ, p < 0.01; recovery: +3.34Δ, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The task-induced asthenopia, measured both objectively and subjectively, was accompanied by a change in accommodative lag, greater visual fatigue and a decrease in negative relative accommodation. Conversely, near negative fusional reserves seem to adapt to the task. No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to accommodative metrics (objective) or subjective and optometric tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"925-935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}