Danish Journal of Archaeology最新文献_第6页

The origins of Odense – new aspects of early urbanisation in southern Scandinavia 欧登塞的起源——斯堪的纳维亚南部早期城市化的新方面

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2018.1475891

M. Runge, M. Henriksen

{"title":"The origins of Odense – new aspects of early urbanisation in southern Scandinavia","authors":"M. Runge, M. Henriksen","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2018.1475891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2018.1475891","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article presents an updated study of the centuries prior to Odense’s traditional ‘birth certificate’ of AD 988, resulting in a new model for the urbanisation of Odense. The conclusion reached is that there was activity of a permanent and possibly urban character in Odense from the end of the late eighth century until the late tenth century. The town’s development can be followed through three phases. Phases 1 and 2 cover the periods AD 700–900 and AD 900–100, respectively, while phase 3 covers the period AD 1000-1101. During phases 1 and 2, the proto-town develops through bottom-up processes, such as network, crafts and possibly trade. After AD 1000, Odense develops into a town proper, under royal influence. The model from Odense provides the background for a fresh view of urbanisation in southern Scandinavia in general. A three-phase model is proposed. Phase 0 constitutes the emporia of the eighth–ninth century, which perhaps primarily is satellites in a trading network controlled from the south. Phase 1 takes the form of locally initiated and based incipient urbanisation extending from the end of the eighth century until the tenth century. Phase 2 comprises the royally established towns from around AD 1000 onwards.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126078489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 15

From a port for traders to a town of merchants: exploring the topography, activities and dynamics of early medieval Copenhagen 从贸易港口到商人小镇:探索中世纪早期哥本哈根的地形、活动和动态

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2018.1464619

Hanna Dahlström, B. Poulsen, J. Olsen

{"title":"From a port for traders to a town of merchants: exploring the topography, activities and dynamics of early medieval Copenhagen","authors":"Hanna Dahlström, B. Poulsen, J. Olsen","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2018.1464619","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2018.1464619","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Copenhagen’s earliest history has long been shrouded in uncertainties. This is mainly due to insufficient source material. Basic questions – how old is the town, how did it originate, and where was the oldest settlement situated? – are still under discussion, as are questions regarding specific features of the early medieval town. Was Absalon’s twelfth-century castle preceded by an earlier one? What does a centrally placed, early medieval horseshoe-shaped enclosure surrounded by a massive ditch represent? Using archaeological results from recent major excavations, combined with Bayesian modelling of new 14C dates from the two early cemeteries of Sankt Clemens and Rådhuspladsen, older archaeological information and the medieval written sources on Copenhagen are revisited to form a new interpretation of the early development of the town. Three phases of topographical development from the eleventh to the early thirteenth century are recognised. The changes tell of a dynamic first two hundred years of the town’s history and of its changing role in Danish society. The article explores the people, activities and networks that lie behind the outstanding development from the small early settlement of the eleventh century to the flourishing merchant town of the thirteenth century.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"22 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125954504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

How to define borders between private and common land in Norway? 在挪威，如何界定私人土地和公共土地之间的边界?

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1323992

L. Hansen

{"title":"How to define borders between private and common land in Norway?","authors":"L. Hansen","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2017.1323992","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2017.1323992","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article focuses upon the delimitation between the separate farm units and the collectively exploited common lands (‘allmenninger’) in Southeastern Norway during Medieval times. In these commons, various kind of resources – like pastures, woodland and fisheries – were accessible for exploitation by a majority of farmers in the settlement community, but subject to more restrictions than the resources of the ‘outlying fields’ pertaining to the separate farms. While the majority of the farmers within the community preferred that the extension of the commons should be preserved for their convenience, two groups of farmers might appropriate parts of the original common land area: those cultivating farms bordering to the common area, and who might extend their separate farmland successively into the previous commonly held area, and landless people who wanted to establish new farms (‘clearances’) within the common land. The legislation was also double and ambiguous. On the one hand it stated that ‘the commons [should] stay in the way they have been before’. On the other hand it was declared that a farmer establishing a farm as a new clearing in the commons should become the King’s tenant and thus come under his protection. The processes behind the institutionalizing of boundaries between the commons and private farm properties are highlighted through an analysis of settlement development in two municipalities/parishes in Southeastern Norway.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125101146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Carolingian Pfalzen and law 加洛林王朝的法尔岑和法律

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1407177

Egon Wamers

引用次数: 1

The Norwegian bureaucratic aristocracy and their manor houses in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries 13、14世纪的挪威官僚贵族和他们的庄园

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1338640

J. O. Sunde, Guttorm Rogdaberg

引用次数: 0

The background of the odal rights: an archaeological discussion 土地权产生的背景:一个考古学的探讨

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1371440

T. Zachrisson

{"title":"The background of the odal rights: an archaeological discussion","authors":"T. Zachrisson","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2017.1371440","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2017.1371440","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The age and origin of the odal rights known from medieval times in Sweden and Norway are debated. Archaeologists tend to view them as old and a part of the pre-Christian society, whereas historians and legal historians view them as established after Christianity was introduced, mirroring canonical laws. In Viking Age runic inscriptions from the eleventh century in the lake Mälaren valley in Sweden, from late tenth to eleventh century in south-western Norway, the term odal, inherited family land occurs together with other expressions concerning landed property. Furthermore, two runestones in Småland and Hälsingland in Sweden, c. 650 km apart, each enumerate five earlier ancestors in a male lineage, the sponsor himself being the sixth generation. As these runic inscriptions were made in different parts of Scandinavia during the late tenth and eleventh century, this indicates that the term and concept odal was widespread already before the canonic laws of the early medieval period were introduced, and quite possibly belongs to an older inheritance structure. The aim of this article is a renewed discussion focussing on the runological sources where the term and concept odal can be found in the Viking Age Scandinavian society (c. 750–1050 CE), but also early medieval written sources. Thereafter, archaeological sources from the Late Iron Age are addressed (c. 550–1050 CE).","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131822134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

From tribute to taxpaying: the changes in the understanding of private property in Denmark circa 1000–1250 从进贡到纳税:1000-1250年丹麦对私有财产认识的变化

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-05-31 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1323993

H. Vogt

引用次数: 2

Late Iron Age longhouse chronology. A study aimed at constructing a formal house chronology for the Late Iron Age, based on selected localities in central and eastern Jutland 铁器时代晚期长屋年表。一项旨在构建铁器时代晚期正式房屋年表的研究，基于日德兰半岛中部和东部的选定地区

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1293870

S. Laursen, M. Holst

引用次数: 2

The Maglemosian skeleton from Koelbjerg, Denmark revisited: identifying sex and provenance 丹麦Koelbjerg的Maglemosian骨骼重新审视:确定性别和来源

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1381418

Jesper Hansen, H. Petersen, K. Frei, P. Courtaud, A. Tillier, A. Fischer, M. Allentoft

引用次数: 6

Temporalising the house: exploring alternative perspectives on time and the archaeological record within Danish settlement archaeology 房屋的临时化:探索丹麦定居点考古中时间和考古记录的替代观点

Danish Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281

Anna Severine Beck

{"title":"Temporalising the house: exploring alternative perspectives on time and the archaeological record within Danish settlement archaeology","authors":"Anna Severine Beck","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article calls for a renewed debate on the role played by time and temporality within Danish settlement archaeology. Recent theoretical debate has challenged the conventional way of thinking about time in archaeology by drawing attention to the multitemporal character of the archaeological record. In the article, the temporalisation of the archaeological record of the house is discussed based on a critical review of the archaeological process. The analysis shows how basic excavation and archiving practices favours a temporalisation of the house based on the chronological date and, at best, downplays other temporalities. The inherent temporalities of the archaeological record of the house, particularly the posthole, are discussed, and it is argued that the posthole should both be perceived as an object and a process in order to create space for alternative temporalities. Instead of seeing stratigraphy as a property of the posthole, the posthole should be seen as an assemblage made up of the events and materials that created the stratigraphy, a process which is directly related to the life history of the house. It is argued that a multitemporal perspective is a prerequisite for new and fruitful ways to understand the house as an archaeological and cultural phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122589894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4