房屋的临时化:探索丹麦定居点考古中时间和考古记录的替代观点

Anna Severine Beck
{"title":"房屋的临时化:探索丹麦定居点考古中时间和考古记录的替代观点","authors":"Anna Severine Beck","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article calls for a renewed debate on the role played by time and temporality within Danish settlement archaeology. Recent theoretical debate has challenged the conventional way of thinking about time in archaeology by drawing attention to the multitemporal character of the archaeological record. In the article, the temporalisation of the archaeological record of the house is discussed based on a critical review of the archaeological process. The analysis shows how basic excavation and archiving practices favours a temporalisation of the house based on the chronological date and, at best, downplays other temporalities. The inherent temporalities of the archaeological record of the house, particularly the posthole, are discussed, and it is argued that the posthole should both be perceived as an object and a process in order to create space for alternative temporalities. Instead of seeing stratigraphy as a property of the posthole, the posthole should be seen as an assemblage made up of the events and materials that created the stratigraphy, a process which is directly related to the life history of the house. It is argued that a multitemporal perspective is a prerequisite for new and fruitful ways to understand the house as an archaeological and cultural phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporalising the house: exploring alternative perspectives on time and the archaeological record within Danish settlement archaeology\",\"authors\":\"Anna Severine Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article calls for a renewed debate on the role played by time and temporality within Danish settlement archaeology. Recent theoretical debate has challenged the conventional way of thinking about time in archaeology by drawing attention to the multitemporal character of the archaeological record. In the article, the temporalisation of the archaeological record of the house is discussed based on a critical review of the archaeological process. The analysis shows how basic excavation and archiving practices favours a temporalisation of the house based on the chronological date and, at best, downplays other temporalities. The inherent temporalities of the archaeological record of the house, particularly the posthole, are discussed, and it is argued that the posthole should both be perceived as an object and a process in order to create space for alternative temporalities. Instead of seeing stratigraphy as a property of the posthole, the posthole should be seen as an assemblage made up of the events and materials that created the stratigraphy, a process which is directly related to the life history of the house. It is argued that a multitemporal perspective is a prerequisite for new and fruitful ways to understand the house as an archaeological and cultural phenomenon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish Journal of Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish Journal of Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2017.1400281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文呼吁重新讨论丹麦定居考古中时间和时间性所起的作用。最近的理论争论挑战了传统的考古学时间思维方式,引起了人们对考古记录的多时间特征的关注。在文章中,基于对考古过程的批判性回顾,讨论了房屋考古记录的时间化。分析表明,基本的挖掘和存档实践倾向于根据时间顺序对房屋进行时间化,充其量也就是淡化其他时间。讨论了房屋考古记录的固有时间性,特别是后洞,并认为后洞既应该被视为一个对象,也应该被视为一个过程,以便为替代的时间性创造空间。而不是将地层学视为后孔的属性,后孔应该被视为由创造地层学的事件和材料组成的组合,这一过程与房屋的生活史直接相关。有人认为,多时间视角是理解作为考古和文化现象的房屋的新的和富有成效的方法的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporalising the house: exploring alternative perspectives on time and the archaeological record within Danish settlement archaeology
ABSTRACT This article calls for a renewed debate on the role played by time and temporality within Danish settlement archaeology. Recent theoretical debate has challenged the conventional way of thinking about time in archaeology by drawing attention to the multitemporal character of the archaeological record. In the article, the temporalisation of the archaeological record of the house is discussed based on a critical review of the archaeological process. The analysis shows how basic excavation and archiving practices favours a temporalisation of the house based on the chronological date and, at best, downplays other temporalities. The inherent temporalities of the archaeological record of the house, particularly the posthole, are discussed, and it is argued that the posthole should both be perceived as an object and a process in order to create space for alternative temporalities. Instead of seeing stratigraphy as a property of the posthole, the posthole should be seen as an assemblage made up of the events and materials that created the stratigraphy, a process which is directly related to the life history of the house. It is argued that a multitemporal perspective is a prerequisite for new and fruitful ways to understand the house as an archaeological and cultural phenomenon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信