{"title":"An audience perspective on the precarity of Black witnessing","authors":"Nandi Pointer","doi":"10.1177/14614448251370359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251370359","url":null,"abstract":"From slavery to police brutality, the Black struggle in the United States can be traced in the visual field. The online dissemination of disparate acts of violence against Black men first widely publicized when a witness recorded the beating of Rodney King on a cellphone in 1991, has evolved into a U.S. cultural phenomenon, culminating with the video of the murder of George Floyd in 2020. Insufficient attention has been paid to how audiences with lived experiences of systemic injustice bear witness to such videos. This paper seeks to understand how Black audiences engage with these sites of violence captured on cell phones and disseminated on social media platforms. The paper argues that instead of serving as a tool for accountability, the widespread dissemination of mediated Black suffering has engendered a ceaseless state of anxiety and somber acceptance of the precarity of the Black body in the United States.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144919333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disability audience agenda melding on Twitter: How visually impaired advocates, their parents, and their organizations build powerful online communities","authors":"Ibrahim Helmy Emara","doi":"10.1177/14614448251352118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251352118","url":null,"abstract":"Research on Twitter—now known as X—use by blind or visually impaired individuals for self-advocacy is limited. This study examines (1) the key topics and issues discussed by visually impaired advocates, their parents, and organizations; (2) the individuals and organizations most frequently mentioned; (3) the use of visual media in posts by these groups; (4) disability identity disclosure; and (5) the structure of their online networks. Analyzing 163,476 tweets from visually impaired advocates, their parents, and organizations, the study finds that tweets with high engagement often feature personal narratives, accessibility advocacy, humor, and emotion. Retweets were most frequent for posts about politicians, parental advocacy, and empowerment. Mentions of individuals and organizations were common, while emojis and URLs conveyed positivity and promoted initiatives. Hashtags reflected themes of blindness, resilience, and education. Disability disclosure and regular tweeting were associated with higher engagement and larger follower bases.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144915551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tuomas Heikkilä, Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, Matti Pohjonen
{"title":"Reluctant arbiters of truth: Discursive legitimation of platform interventions against COVID-19 misinformation","authors":"Tuomas Heikkilä, Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, Matti Pohjonen","doi":"10.1177/14614448251365270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251365270","url":null,"abstract":"Major digital platforms have long resisted fact-checking their users, even as public concern about misinformation has grown. We explore how they legitimated a change in this policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using blog posts by Meta, YouTube and Twitter, the study contributes to the body of research on content moderation by US-based platforms as they expand their policies into contested areas. Based on the theories of discursive legitimation, we examine the strategies platforms employ when presenting their actions in countering false and misleading health information. We show that the pandemic emerges as an important opportunity for platforms to narrate their legitimacy in society. Yet, the newly adopted responsibility to curb health misinformation does not signal a reform towards more truthful platforms, but temporary exceptions whose future is left open. These findings foreshadow the reversals of misinformation policies in recent years and highlight the continued importance of external regulation.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Temu is evil, but I still use it”: Platform cynicism in platform capitalism","authors":"Shuxian Liu, Edgar Gómez-Cruz","doi":"10.1177/14614448251365269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251365269","url":null,"abstract":"Recent scholarship in critical algorithm studies has illuminated how users negotiate and resist algorithmic influence in everyday platform use, yet these perspectives remain underexplored in online consumption. Bridging theoretical frameworks of consumer culture and critical algorithm studies, this study examines the complexities of algorithmic consumer culture and practices through qualitative research on users’ experiences with Temu. We introduce the concept of <jats:italic>platform cynicism</jats:italic> —an ambivalent and negotiated user attitude in which skepticism, mistrust, and criticism of platforms’ exploitative, manipulative, or unethical practices coexist with pragmatic, often reluctant engagement and tactical adaptation due to structural, social, economic, or cultural constraints. Platform cynicism manifests across five interconnected dimensions: cognitive awareness, affective disillusionment, pragmatic resignation, tactical adaptation, and user–platform co-constitution. This concept can extend beyond e-commerce to broader user-platform relationships, offering insights into how consumers adapt to, contest, and remain embedded in platform capitalism despite critical awareness of their manipulative nature.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dian van Huijstee, Ivar Vermeulen, Peter Kerkhof, Ellen Droog
{"title":"Combatting the persuasive effects of misinformation: Forewarning versus debunking revisited","authors":"Dian van Huijstee, Ivar Vermeulen, Peter Kerkhof, Ellen Droog","doi":"10.1177/14614448251359988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251359988","url":null,"abstract":"We posit that research into misinformation interventions puts too much focus on informational outcomes (e.g. perceived accuracy of misinformation), and too little on persuasive outcomes (e.g. inferred beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors). Because of the informational outcome focus, common misinformation interventions (i.e. forewarning and debunking) have not been systematically tested for their ability to mitigate persuasive effects. In two preregistered experiments ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 657 and <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 427), we tested the effectiveness of forewarning versus debunking for positive and negative misinformation, focusing on attitudes and behavioral intentions as outcome measures. Results show that, as hypothesized, post-exposure corrections are most effective in reducing misinformation’s persuasive effects; pre-exposure corrections in fact do not significantly reduce persuasive effects. We also corroborate prior findings that especially effects of negative misinformation are resistant to corrections. Based on our results, we advise media outlets to not only rely on forewarnings, but to also correct misinformation <jats:italic>after</jats:italic> user exposure.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Denise Mensonides, Anna Van Cauwenberge, Joëlle Swart, Marcel Broersma
{"title":"TikTok as a peer playground: Understanding how children in middle childhood use TikTok to shape their peer relations","authors":"Denise Mensonides, Anna Van Cauwenberge, Joëlle Swart, Marcel Broersma","doi":"10.1177/14614448251362690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251362690","url":null,"abstract":"Despite TikTok’s extensive popularity among children below the age of 12, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how they use this platform for social purposes. We therefore ask how children between the ages of 8 and 12 shape their peer relations through their uses of TikTok. Through longitudinal observations of children ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 84) in the context of afterschool care, we found that children use TikTok to develop and employ digital, cultural and social practices. Examples of such practices are referencing popular content to connect with weak tied peers, managing their online presence to prevent scrutinization in offline social contexts and using humoristic trends and knowledge of TikTok to achieve social status and popularity. Employing these practices across on- and offline spaces can support and facilitate their development of social capital. Following these findings, we argue for initiatives and methodologies that support and explore children’s social and digital development.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144898956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Commodifying death: Thanatechnologies as platform workers in the digital afterlife economy","authors":"Jasmine Erdener","doi":"10.1177/14614448251366173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251366173","url":null,"abstract":"Bina48 is the most ambitious manifestation of thanatechnologies, AI systems that digitally resurrect deceased individuals. Online platforms harvest and assemble data, photos, and personal digital effects to reanimate the individual via AI and reap the profits that come from their ongoing interactions with living users. The profiles of deceased individuals are directly owned and mobilized by the platform itself. Building on digital labor scholarship that shows how platforms extract value from living users, thanatechnologies represent a new kind of post-life laborer in the online economy, transforming grief and memory into exchange-value through emotional labor, social maintenance, and content generation. The specter of the zombie highlights how this digital labor intersects with histories of racial and gendered exploitation, particularly visible in the case of Bina48, where a black woman’s identity becomes a site of technological performance and commodification. Post-life laborers reveal contemporary understandings of labor, productivity, and the ongoing commodification of personal identity, affect, and sociality.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Theorizing networked counterpublics sanctions","authors":"Tatsuya Suzuki, Alcides Velasquez","doi":"10.1177/14614448251363940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251363940","url":null,"abstract":"Networked counterpublics have emerged on social media, articulating their lived experiences and collectively countering narratives propagated by mainstream publics. However, the voices of minority publics on social media can also be sanctioned by mainstream publics and institutions. Drawing upon the concept of <jats:italic>sanctions</jats:italic> within counterpublics literature, this study proposes a theoretically based framework that helps us understand the strategies, comprising attack, appropriation, and dismissal, through which discourses, movements, and performances of networked counterpublics are undermined. Each of these discursive strategies is operated by key actors and manifests itself directly and indirectly to undermine minority discourse on social media and beyond. In sum, this article presents a conceptual framework of networked counterpublics sanctions and illustrates how the actors, the direct and indirect manifestations, and the strategies in the contemporary media environment serve as sanctions to networked counterpublics.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144898955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘I’m sorry Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that’: Moral regulation in refusals by LLM chatbots","authors":"Michele Zappavigna","doi":"10.1177/14614448251356686","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251356686","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots regulate moral values when they refuse ‘unsafe’ requests from users. It applies corpus-based discourse analysis to examine how the chatbots employ tenor resources of <jats:sc>positioning</jats:sc> , <jats:sc>tuning</jats:sc> , and <jats:sc>orienting</jats:sc> in the rhetoric of their refusals. This method is informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics, in particular the discourse semantic system of <jats:sc>appraisal</jats:sc> , which models evaluative meaning. Despite their contrite openings, chatbot refusals tend to raise <jats:sc>stakes</jats:sc> in terms of tenor. They deploy prosodies of <jats:sc>propriety</jats:sc> targeted at moral and taboo stances and behaviours. This rhetoric of <jats:sc>oppositioning</jats:sc> involves <jats:sc>encapsulating</jats:sc> key values into iconised attitudes as the chatbots advise users about what is ‘important’ and ‘not appropriate’.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144898999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cultural data markets: Interpreting the popularity of public datasets","authors":"Alejandro Alvarado Rojas, Marlon Twyman","doi":"10.1177/14614448251359631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251359631","url":null,"abstract":"Data markets are critical sites that organize access to data products, such as datasets. This study argues that data markets increasingly operate as digital platforms for cultural production, where the logic of popularity shapes the cultural value of datasets. We conceptualize these shifts by analyzing how dataset valuation operates within <jats:italic>cultural data markets</jats:italic> . Through statistical and forensic qualitative analysis, we examine key content features of the most popular public datasets on the data science platform Kaggle and their relationship to different popularity metrics. We find that the logic of popularity establishes a value structure that relies on quantifiable user–dataset interactions, which obfuscates key aspects of data curation and collaboration for assessing the cultural value of datasets. Dataset popularity remains a limited approach for data valuation in cultural markets that requires more comprehensive measures of cultural investments in dataset production.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144899001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}