Cultural data markets: Interpreting the popularity of public datasets

IF 4.3 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Alejandro Alvarado Rojas, Marlon Twyman
{"title":"Cultural data markets: Interpreting the popularity of public datasets","authors":"Alejandro Alvarado Rojas, Marlon Twyman","doi":"10.1177/14614448251359631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data markets are critical sites that organize access to data products, such as datasets. This study argues that data markets increasingly operate as digital platforms for cultural production, where the logic of popularity shapes the cultural value of datasets. We conceptualize these shifts by analyzing how dataset valuation operates within <jats:italic>cultural data markets</jats:italic> . Through statistical and forensic qualitative analysis, we examine key content features of the most popular public datasets on the data science platform Kaggle and their relationship to different popularity metrics. We find that the logic of popularity establishes a value structure that relies on quantifiable user–dataset interactions, which obfuscates key aspects of data curation and collaboration for assessing the cultural value of datasets. Dataset popularity remains a limited approach for data valuation in cultural markets that requires more comprehensive measures of cultural investments in dataset production.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251359631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data markets are critical sites that organize access to data products, such as datasets. This study argues that data markets increasingly operate as digital platforms for cultural production, where the logic of popularity shapes the cultural value of datasets. We conceptualize these shifts by analyzing how dataset valuation operates within cultural data markets . Through statistical and forensic qualitative analysis, we examine key content features of the most popular public datasets on the data science platform Kaggle and their relationship to different popularity metrics. We find that the logic of popularity establishes a value structure that relies on quantifiable user–dataset interactions, which obfuscates key aspects of data curation and collaboration for assessing the cultural value of datasets. Dataset popularity remains a limited approach for data valuation in cultural markets that requires more comprehensive measures of cultural investments in dataset production.
文化数据市场:解读公共数据集的流行
数据市场是组织访问数据产品(如数据集)的关键站点。本研究认为,数据市场越来越多地作为文化生产的数字平台运作,其中流行的逻辑塑造了数据集的文化价值。我们通过分析数据集估值如何在文化数据市场中运作来概念化这些转变。通过统计和取证定性分析,我们研究了数据科学平台Kaggle上最受欢迎的公共数据集的关键内容特征及其与不同流行度指标的关系。我们发现,流行的逻辑建立了一个价值结构,它依赖于可量化的用户-数据集交互,这混淆了数据管理和协作的关键方面,以评估数据集的文化价值。数据集受欢迎程度仍然是文化市场中数据估值的一种有限方法,需要对数据集生产中的文化投资进行更全面的衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Media & Society
New Media & Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: New Media & Society engages in critical discussions of the key issues arising from the scale and speed of new media development, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and on both theoretical and empirical research. The journal includes contributions on: -the individual and the social, the cultural and the political dimensions of new media -the global and local dimensions of the relationship between media and social change -contemporary as well as historical developments -the implications and impacts of, as well as the determinants and obstacles to, media change the relationship between theory, policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信