{"title":"Neurologists' Attitudes and Perceptions on Palliative Care: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Miranda M Wan, Nora D Cristall, Lara J Cooke","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200322","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite significant advances in the treatment of neurologic disorders, many conditions require complex care planning and advanced care planning. Neurologists are in a unique position because they are integral in providing patient centered care, understanding neurologic disease and illness trajectory, and how disease can affect patients' sense of self and values. Currently, little is known about neurologists' perceptions and challenges in care planning and palliative care for their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurologists from one Canadian academic institution participated in a 30-minute semistructured interview from November 2022 to April 2023. Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached and confirmed. Interviews occurred online through a secure platform or in-person and were recorded. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method using constructivist grounded theory. Member checking was conducted post interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten neurologists participated across a broad spectrum of neurology experience and subspecialties. We developed a detailed theory of understanding neurologists' attitudes and perceptions of palliative care. When neurologists delay or fail to initiate care planning discussions or palliative care, it results from a complex interplay between patient, physician, and resource accessibility factors. Certain contextual factors, such as a first visit or follow-up, inpatient vs outpatient setting, clinic culture, and the type of clinic practice, are factors that can influence these conversations. As a result, physicians may fail to use available resources, or they may involve other care providers or refer to subspecialty neurologic clinics. However, this delay can still lead to patient and provider harm. Opportunities to improve care exist with continuing education opportunities for trainees and staff, collaboration with palliative care specialists, and health systems support, such as increasing public awareness to address misconceptions about palliative care and resource availability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings identify that failure or delay to initiate care planning and palliative care by neurologists results from a complex interplay between local culture, experience, context, practice type, and patient factors. Opportunities to improve care include increasing educational opportunities, building integrated and collaborative practices, and dedicated health systems support.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shumei Man, David Bruckman, Ken Uchino, Jesse D Schold, Jarrod Dalton
{"title":"Racial, Ethnic, and Regional Disparities of Post-Acute Service Utilization After Stroke in the United States.","authors":"Shumei Man, David Bruckman, Ken Uchino, Jesse D Schold, Jarrod Dalton","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200329","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Post-acute care is critical for patient functional recovery and successful community transition. This study aimed to understand the current racial, ethnic, and regional disparities in post-acute service utilization after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in 2017-2018 using the National Inpatient Sample. Discharge destinations were classified as follows: (1) facility including inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, and facility hospice; (2) home health care (HHC), including home health and home hospice; and (3) home without HHC. Multinomial logistic regression was used to study the odds of discharge to a facility over home and HHC over home without HHC by race, ethnicity, insurance, and census division, adjusting for clinical factors and survey design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,000,980 weighted ischemic stroke admissions, 66.9% were White, 17.6% Black, 9.5% Hispanic, 3.1% Asian American/Pacific Islander, and 0.4% Native American. Relative to private insurance, uninsured patients had the lowest adjusted odds of facility over home discharge (0.44; 95% CI 0.40-0.48) and HHC discharge over home without HHC (0.79; 95% CI 0.71-0.88). Compared with White patients, only Hispanic patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance or self-pay had lower odds of facility over home discharge (adjusted OR 0.80 and 0.75, respectively; 95% CI 0.76-0.84 and 0.63-0.93). Uninsured Hispanic patients also had lower odds of HHC discharge over home without HHC than White patients (0.74; 95% CI 0.57-0.97). Facility discharge rate was the highest in East North Central (39.2%) and lowest in Pacific (31.2%). HHC discharge rate was the highest in New England (20.2%) and lowest in West North Central (10.3%), which had the highest home without HHC discharge (46.1%). Compared with New England, other census divisions had lower odds of facility over any home discharge with Pacific being the lowest (adjusted OR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.71) and HHC over home without HHC discharge with West North Central being the lowest (adjusted OR, 0.33; 95% CI 0.29-0.38). Similar patterns were observed in intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Significant insurance-dependent racial and ethnic disparities and regional variations were evident in post-acute service utilization after stroke. Targeted efforts are needed to improve post-acute service access for uninsured patients especially Hispanic patients and people in certain regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gregory F Guzauskas, Sarah J Tabrizi, Jeffrey D Long, Astri Arnesen, Jamie L Hamilton, Daniel O Claassen, Lorraine R Munetsi, Shahid Malik, Idaira Rodríguez-Santana, Talaha M Ali, Frank Zhang
{"title":"Long-Term Health Outcomes of Huntington Disease and the Impact of Future Disease-Modifying Treatments: A Decision-Modeling Analysis.","authors":"Gregory F Guzauskas, Sarah J Tabrizi, Jeffrey D Long, Astri Arnesen, Jamie L Hamilton, Daniel O Claassen, Lorraine R Munetsi, Shahid Malik, Idaira Rodríguez-Santana, Talaha M Ali, Frank Zhang","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200340","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) such as gene therapy are currently under investigation as a potential treatment for Huntington disease (HD). Our objective was to estimate the long-term natural history of HD progression and explore the potential efficacy impacts and value of a hypothetical DMT using a decision-analytic modeling framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a health state transition model that separately analyzed 40-year-old individuals with prefunctional decline (PFD, HD Integrated Staging System [HD-ISS] stage <3, total functional score [TFC] 13), active functional decline Shoulson and Fahn category 1 (SF1, HD-ISS stage 3, TFC 13-11), and SF2 (HD-ISS stage 3, TFC 10-7). Three-year outcomes from the TRACK-HD longitudinal study were linearly extrapolated to estimate the long-term health outcomes and costs of each population. For PFD individuals, we used the HD-ISS to predict the onset of functional decline. HD costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated over a lifetime horizon by applying health state-specific costs and utilities derived from a related HD burden-of-illness study. We then estimated the long-term health impacts of hypothetical DMTs that slowed or delayed onset of functional decline. We conducted sensitivity analyses to assess model uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expected life years for 40-year-old PFD, SF1, and SF2 populations were 20.46 (95% credible range [CR]: 19.05-22.30), 13.93 (10.82-19.08), and 10.99 (8.28-22.07), respectively. The expected QALYs for PFD, SF1, and SF2 populations were 15.93 (14.91-17.44), 8.29 (6.36-11.79), and 5.79 (4.14-12.91), respectively. The lifetime costs of HD were $508,200 ($310,300 to $803,700) for the PFD population, $1.15 million ($684,500 to $1.89 million) for SF1 individuals, and $1.07 million ($571,700 to $2.26 million) for SF2 individuals. Although hypothetical DMTs led to cost savings in the PFD population by delaying the cost burdens of functional decline, they increased costs in SF1 and SF2 populations by prolonging time spent in expensive progressive HD states.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our novel HD-modeling framework estimates HD progression over a lifetime and the associated costs and QALYs. Our approach can be used for future cost-effectiveness models as positive DMT clinical trial evidence becomes available.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142004873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gender-Informed Care in Neurology: Transgender and Gender-Diverse Populations.","authors":"Emily L Johnson","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200354","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195432/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141450993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ahmad Z Mahadeen, Alise K Carlson, Jeffrey A Cohen, Rachel Galioto, Justin R Abbatemarco, Amy Kunchok
{"title":"Review of the Longitudinal Management of Autoimmune Encephalitis, Potential Biomarkers, and Novel Therapeutics.","authors":"Ahmad Z Mahadeen, Alise K Carlson, Jeffrey A Cohen, Rachel Galioto, Justin R Abbatemarco, Amy Kunchok","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200306","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Increasing awareness and earlier diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) have led to a greater number of patients being cared for longitudinally by neurologists. Although many neurologists are now familiar with the general approach to diagnosis and acute immunosuppression, this review aims to provide neurologists with guidance related to management beyond the acute phase of disease, including long-term immunosuppression, monitoring, potential biomarkers of disease activity, outcome measures, and symptom management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Observational studies in AE have demonstrated that early diagnosis and treatment is associated with improved neurologic outcomes, particularly in AE with antibodies targeting neuronal cell surface/synaptic proteins. The literature regarding long-term management is evolving. In addition to traditional immunosuppressive approaches, there is emerging use of novel immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs) in case series, and several randomized controlled trials are planned. Novel biomarkers of disease activity and methods to measure outcomes and response to treatment are being explored. Furthermore, it is increasingly recognized that many individuals have chronic symptoms affecting quality of life including seizures, cognitive impairment, fatigue, sleep disorders, and mood disorders, and there are emerging data supporting the use of patient centered outcome measures and multidisciplinary symptom-based care.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review aims to summarize recent literature and offer a practical approach to long-term management of adult patients with AE through a multidisciplinary approach. We summarize current knowledge on ISTs, potential biomarkers of disease activity, outcome measures, and long-term sequelae. Further research is needed to answer questions regarding optimal IST, biomarker validity, and sequelae of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11145747/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141237965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Caregivers' and Health Care Providers' Cultural Perceptions of and Experiences With Latino Patients With Dementia.","authors":"Peter Ch'en, Payal B Patel, Magaly Ramirez","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200307","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The prevalence of Alzheimer dementia in the US Latino population in 2060 is projected to increase 7-fold, the highest among any other major ethnic/racial group. One vital question is how clinicians can tailor their care for Latinos. Given this rapidly growing prevalence, we sought to characterize the experiences and perspectives of Latino caregivers by analyzing interview data from both caregivers and experienced providers that specifically work with Latino populations. In this study, we present 6 themes that emerged along with tailored solutions and recommendations to implement in clinical practice to improve patient care and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative analysis uses coded interview transcripts from 2 studies, one in Southern California and another in Washington State. The combined dataset included interview transcripts with 51 caregivers and 20 providers. A thematic analysis was performed on the coded interview transcripts to identify themes related to tailoring care for Latino populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes emerged from the analysis: (1) multiple caregivers involved within a family-oriented Latino household; (2) need for encouragement in advocating for loved ones in the clinician's office; (3) challenges in reaching and communicating with the Latino population; (4) increasing use of technology by patients and caregivers despite some challenges; (5) stigma associated with mental health issues within the Latino culture; and (6) limited understating of dementia leading to a delay in care in the Latino population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many Latino households have a strong sense of familism, thus care coordination with multiple caregivers is essential to high-quality care. Improved shared decision-making strategies tailored to a population that may be culturally deferential to authoritative figures can aid caregiver understanding and engagement with the provider. These interactions can often be more authentic when communicating with a member of the care team in Spanish. A cultural stigma of mental illness was also identified; clinicians can work toward normalizing discussion of mental illness and its treatment by openly discussing mental health during annual visits. Through these themes, we demonstrate some of the strengths and weaknesses of the current care delivery model within a sociocultural context to improve patient care and outcomes for Latino families caring for individuals living with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11157425/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yasmin Aghajan, Cheryl A Codner, Patricia Martin, Sandhya Prakash, Ronald Mendoza, Deborah L Jones, Bradley J Molyneaux
{"title":"Optimizing Neuroscience Mortality: A Collaborative Approach to Documentation Improvement.","authors":"Yasmin Aghajan, Cheryl A Codner, Patricia Martin, Sandhya Prakash, Ronald Mendoza, Deborah L Jones, Bradley J Molyneaux","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200315","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Mortality index is the ratio of observed-to-expected mortality. Accurate and thorough documentation of patient comorbidities and conditions is the key determinant of neuroscience expected mortality. In this study, we focused on reviewing neuroscience documentation, as optimizing mortality index provides accurate assessment of the quality of care provided, improves service-line rankings, and affects reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assembled an interprofessional team of a neurologist and clinical documentation integrity (CDI) specialists to review clinical documentation of all mortalities from the neuroscience service lines at a tertiary academic medical center over 9 months. We identified common documentation opportunities among high acuity neuroscience patients to improve accuracy of expected mortality. Using the mortality risk adjustment method from Vizient Inc., we compared baseline and postreview expected mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 70 mortality charts over a 9-month period. Opportunities to improve documentation were present in 60%. Common underreported comorbidities included aspiration pneumonia, shock, encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhagic disorder due to anticoagulation, and nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The number of diagnoses identified per patient that affected mortality increased between the first and last quarter from 4.3 to 7.8 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Physician-identified additional diagnoses per patient decreased from 1.0 to 0.3 (<i>p</i> = 0.0037), as CDI specialists had increased capture of neuroscience specific diagnoses throughout the intervention. The average expected mortality significantly increased from baseline 0.33 to 0.42 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Collaboration between physicians and CDI specialists optimizes expected mortality by identification of common gaps in documentation specific to neuroscience patients. Neurologist engagement is beneficial in CDI and lays the framework for clinical documentation education for neurology physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129328/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141160580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura M Hancock, Rachel Galioto, Tasha Rhoads, Daniel Ontaneda, Kunio Nakamura, Brandon Ly, Kamini Krishnan, Justin B Miller, Le H Hua
{"title":"Comparing Cognitive Profiles in Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer Disease: More Similarities Than Differences.","authors":"Laura M Hancock, Rachel Galioto, Tasha Rhoads, Daniel Ontaneda, Kunio Nakamura, Brandon Ly, Kamini Krishnan, Justin B Miller, Le H Hua","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200327","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Up to 65% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience disease-related cognitive impairment, but even after decades of research, still very little is known about the cognitive issues among older adults with MS (EwMS; individuals aged 60+). To date, few studies have attempted to characterize cognitive impairment in this group or compare EwMS with those with other neurodegenerative diseases. Our goal was to address this knowledge gap by comparing EwMS with individuals experiencing cognitive impairment due to probable Alzheimer disease (AD) with biomarker confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational study of individuals seen for routine clinical care at the Cleveland Clinic. After excluding for potential confounding factors, 6 groups were assembled based on the results of their clinical workup and neuropsychological examination: cognitively normal, cognitively normal with MS, mild neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD), and major neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD). These groups were compared in terms of cognitive test performance, percentage of the group impaired on specific cognitive skills, and rates of cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 140 individuals (64 EwMS and 76 demographically matched individuals from a memory clinic). Among those with mild neurocognitive disorder, differences between MS and AD were marked. However, in those with major neurocognitive disorder, these differences largely disappeared, except persistent performance differences on a measure of rote verbal memory. EwMS outperformed those with AD on memory tests at each level of cognitive impairment. EwMS also exhibited both subcortical and cortical deficits, rather than solely subcortical deficits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The overall characterization of the cognitive profile of MS may be different than once described, involving both classically cortical and subcortical functions. Clinically, our results suggest that distinguishing between the cognitive effects of MS and AD at more severe levels of cognitive impairment may be less reliable than once thought. Future work to replicate these findings in other samples and deepen the understanding of cognition in older individuals with MS is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152644/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141284327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Muhib Khan, Malgorzata Miller, Philip Mccarthy, Jenny P Tsai, William Merhi, Duane Berkompas, Nabil Wees, Nadeem I Khan, Asad Ahrar, Elizabeth Evans, Musa Dahu, Andre Gauri, Tarah Moelker, Nagib Chalfoun, Jiangyong Min
{"title":"Multidisciplinary Approach to Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: Brain-Heart Board Experience.","authors":"Muhib Khan, Malgorzata Miller, Philip Mccarthy, Jenny P Tsai, William Merhi, Duane Berkompas, Nabil Wees, Nadeem I Khan, Asad Ahrar, Elizabeth Evans, Musa Dahu, Andre Gauri, Tarah Moelker, Nagib Chalfoun, Jiangyong Min","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200319","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200319","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in approximately 25% of adult population. The prevalence of PFO is high in patients with cryptogenic stroke suggesting paradoxical embolism. PFO closure in carefully selected patients is an effective secondary preventive strategy in these patients. We report predictors of management recommendations by the multidisciplinary Board and their impact on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brain-Heart Board comprises vascular and interventional neurology and cardiology subspecialties (structural, electrophysiology, and cardiac imaging). Adult patients referred to the Board for consideration of PFO closure between October 2017 to March 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Demographics, comorbid conditions, risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score, event frequencies (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or stroke, intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], post-PFO closure cardiac arrhythmias), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year were compared between the groups (PFO closure vs medical management). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with management recommendation and chi-square tests to test differences in outcomes for patients according to management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred seventy patients (229 stroke; 41 TIA) were discussed by the Board for PFO closure. 119 (44.0%) patients were recommended for PFO closure of which 117 (98.3%) had evidence of ischemic infarct on imaging. In univariate analysis, age was similar (50 ± 11.9 vs 52 ± 12.8, <i>p</i> = 0.17), but RoPE score was higher in closure as compared with the medical management group (6 [IQR 5-7] vs 5 [IQR 4-7], <i>p</i> < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, TIA as the index event was an independent predictor of Board recommendation against PFO closure (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.19, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Event frequency was low in both cohorts (5.9% vs 4.8%, <i>p</i> > 0.05) and comprised cardiac arrhythmias (6 cases of atrial fibrillation and 1 ICH in closure group; 1 TIA and 1 recurrent stroke in medical management group). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was similar in both cohorts (66.3% vs 70.7%, <i>p</i> > 0.05) at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board provides a clinical practice model of collaborative care to ensure proper patient selection for PFO closure. TIA as the index event is associated with recommendation of medical management by the multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141200288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G Abbas Kharal, Sidonie E Ibrikji, Youssef M Farag, Aaron Shoskes, Matthew P Kiczek, Richa Sheth, Muhammad S Hussain
{"title":"Predictive Value of Clinical, CSF and Vessel Wall MRI Variables in Diagnosing Primary Angiitis of the CNS.","authors":"G Abbas Kharal, Sidonie E Ibrikji, Youssef M Farag, Aaron Shoskes, Matthew P Kiczek, Richa Sheth, Muhammad S Hussain","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200321","DOIUrl":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Without brain biopsy, there are limited diagnostic predictors to differentiate primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We examined the utility of clinical, CSF, and quantitative vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VWMRI) variables in predicting PACNS from ICAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional design, observational study, we reviewed electronic medical records to identify patients (18 years and older) who presented to our medical center between January 2015 and December 2021 for ischemic stroke due to intracranial vasculopathy. Patients with biopsy-proven PACNS, probable PACNS, or ICAD were included. Patients with secondary CNS vasculitis or no VWMRI data were excluded. On VWMRI, for each patient, a total of 20 vessel wall segments were analyzed for percent concentricity, percent irregularity, and concentricity to eccentricity (C/E) ratios. We also collected several clinical and CSF variables. Using logistic regression models, we assessed the diagnostic value of VWMRI, CSF, and clinical variables in predicting PACNS in patients with biopsy-proven disease. We then performed a sensitivity analysis to assess predictors of biopsy-proven and probable PACNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients with ICAD (54.2%) and 27 patients with PACNS (45.8%) were included. Of the patients with PACNS, 21 (77.8%) were not biopsied and considered probable PACNS. Twenty-four patients with ICAD (75%) and 6 biopsy-proven patients with PACNS (22.2%) showed large vessel involvement and were included in the primary analysis. Encephalopathy (odds ratio [OR], 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09) and seizure (OR 23.00; 95% CI 1.77-298.45) were significantly associated with PACNS. All patients were included in the sensitivity analysis, in which headache significantly predicted PACNS (OR 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09). In the primary analysis, for every 1 white blood cell/µL increase in CSF, there was a 47% higher odds of PACNS (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04-2.07). On VWMRI, a C/E ratio >1 (OR 115.00; 95% CI 6.11-2165.95), percent concentricity ≥50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71), and percent irregularity <50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71) indicated significantly higher odds of PACNS compared with ICAD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that quantitative VWMRI metrics, CSF pleocytosis, and clinical features of encephalopathy, seizure, and headache significantly predict a diagnosis of probable PACNS when compared with ICAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160479/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141296473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}