Functional Connectivity Relationships to Longitudinal Motor Outcomes Differ in Very Preterm Children With and Without Brain Injury.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200397
Peppar E P Cyr, Rachel E Lean, Jeanette K Kenley, Sydney Kaplan, Dominique Meyer, Jeffrey J Neil, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Rebecca G Brady, Joshua S Shimony, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Cynthia E Rogers, Christopher D Smyser
{"title":"Functional Connectivity Relationships to Longitudinal Motor Outcomes Differ in Very Preterm Children With and Without Brain Injury.","authors":"Peppar E P Cyr, Rachel E Lean, Jeanette K Kenley, Sydney Kaplan, Dominique Meyer, Jeffrey J Neil, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Rebecca G Brady, Joshua S Shimony, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Cynthia E Rogers, Christopher D Smyser","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Children born very preterm (VPT) have high rates of motor disability, but mechanisms for early identification remain limited, especially for children who fall behind in early childhood. This study examines the relationship between functional connectivity (FC) measured at term-equivalent age and motor outcomes at 2 and 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this longitudinal observational cohort study, VPT children (gestational age 30 weeks and younger) with and without high-grade brain injury underwent FC MRI at term-equivalent age. Motor development was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition, at corrected age 2 years and Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition, at age 5 years. Logistic and negative binomial/Poisson regression models examined relationships between FC measures and 5-year task scores, with and without 2-year scores as covariates. Infants were categorized as \"injured\" or \"uninjured\" based on structural MRI findings at term-equivalent age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the injured group (n = 34), each 1 SD decrease in neonatal left-right motor cortex FC was related to approximately 4× increased odds of being unable to complete a fine motor task at age 5 (log odds = -1.34, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In the uninjured group (n = 41), stronger basal ganglia-motor cortex FC was related to poorer fine motor scores (Est = -0.40, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and stronger cerebellum-motor cortex FC was related to poorer balance and fine motor scores (Est = -0.05 to -0.23, <i>p</i> < 0.05), with balance persisting with adjustment for 2-year scores.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In VPT children with brain injury, interhemispheric motor cortex FC was related to motor deficits at 5-year assessment, similar to previous findings at 2 years. In uninjured children, FC-measured disruption of the motor system during the neonatal period was associated with motor planning/coordination difficulties that were not apparent on 2-year assessment but emerged at 5 years, suggesting that the neural basis of these deficits was established very early in life. Subsequently, 2-year follow-up may not be sufficient to detect milder motor deficits in VPT children, and they should be monitored for motor difficulties throughout the preschool years. For all VPT children, FC at term-equivalent age has the potential to improve our ability to predict disability before it presents behaviorally.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Children born very preterm (VPT) have high rates of motor disability, but mechanisms for early identification remain limited, especially for children who fall behind in early childhood. This study examines the relationship between functional connectivity (FC) measured at term-equivalent age and motor outcomes at 2 and 5 years.

Methods: In this longitudinal observational cohort study, VPT children (gestational age 30 weeks and younger) with and without high-grade brain injury underwent FC MRI at term-equivalent age. Motor development was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition, at corrected age 2 years and Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition, at age 5 years. Logistic and negative binomial/Poisson regression models examined relationships between FC measures and 5-year task scores, with and without 2-year scores as covariates. Infants were categorized as "injured" or "uninjured" based on structural MRI findings at term-equivalent age.

Results: In the injured group (n = 34), each 1 SD decrease in neonatal left-right motor cortex FC was related to approximately 4× increased odds of being unable to complete a fine motor task at age 5 (log odds = -1.34, p < 0.05). In the uninjured group (n = 41), stronger basal ganglia-motor cortex FC was related to poorer fine motor scores (Est = -0.40, p < 0.05) and stronger cerebellum-motor cortex FC was related to poorer balance and fine motor scores (Est = -0.05 to -0.23, p < 0.05), with balance persisting with adjustment for 2-year scores.

Discussion: In VPT children with brain injury, interhemispheric motor cortex FC was related to motor deficits at 5-year assessment, similar to previous findings at 2 years. In uninjured children, FC-measured disruption of the motor system during the neonatal period was associated with motor planning/coordination difficulties that were not apparent on 2-year assessment but emerged at 5 years, suggesting that the neural basis of these deficits was established very early in life. Subsequently, 2-year follow-up may not be sufficient to detect milder motor deficits in VPT children, and they should be monitored for motor difficulties throughout the preschool years. For all VPT children, FC at term-equivalent age has the potential to improve our ability to predict disability before it presents behaviorally.

有脑损伤和无脑损伤的极早产儿纵向运动结果的功能连接关系存在差异。
背景和目标:极早产(VPT)儿童的运动残疾率很高,但早期识别机制仍然有限,尤其是对于在幼儿期落后的儿童。本研究探讨了足月时测量的功能连通性(FC)与 2 岁和 5 岁时运动结果之间的关系:在这项纵向观察队列研究中,患有和未患有高级脑损伤的 VPT 儿童(胎龄 30 周及以下)在足月时接受了功能连接磁共振成像检查。运动发育的评估采用贝利婴儿发育量表第三版(矫正后 2 岁)和儿童运动评估电池第二版(5 岁)。逻辑和负二项/泊松回归模型检验了FC测量与5年任务得分之间的关系,并将2年得分作为协变量。根据婴儿足月时的核磁共振结构检查结果,将婴儿分为 "受伤 "和 "未受伤 "两组:在受伤组(n = 34)中,新生儿左右运动皮层FC每下降1 SD,5岁时无法完成精细运动任务的几率就会增加约4倍(对数几率 = -1.34, p < 0.05)。在未受伤组(n = 41)中,基底节-运动皮层FC较强与精细动作得分较差有关(Est = -0.40,p < 0.05),小脑-运动皮层FC较强与平衡和精细动作得分较差有关(Est = -0.05至-0.23,p < 0.05),平衡在调整2年得分后仍持续存在:讨论:在VPT脑损伤儿童中,半球间运动皮层FC与5年评估时的运动障碍有关,这与之前2年评估的结果相似。在未受伤的儿童中,新生儿期FC测量到的运动系统破坏与运动规划/协调障碍有关,这些障碍在2年评估时并不明显,但在5年评估时出现了,这表明这些障碍的神经基础在生命早期就已建立。因此,2 年的随访可能不足以发现 VPT 儿童较轻的运动障碍,应在整个学龄前阶段对他们的运动障碍进行监测。对于所有 VPT 儿童来说,在足月等同年龄时进行 FC 有可能提高我们在残疾行为出现之前对其进行预测的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信