亨廷顿病基因检测远程遗传咨询随机试验。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200394
Deborah A Hall, Marc Rosenbaum, Jacob Hawkins, Bichun Ouyang, Christa Cooper, Neepa Patel
{"title":"亨廷顿病基因检测远程遗传咨询随机试验。","authors":"Deborah A Hall, Marc Rosenbaum, Jacob Hawkins, Bichun Ouyang, Christa Cooper, Neepa Patel","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine the feasibility and patient satisfaction of telegenetic counseling, or counseling done by video, for Huntington disease (HD). Background: Genetic counseling is necessary for presymptomatic or symptomatic HD genetic testing, but the lack of access to counseling because of geography or expense is a critical gap for many patients. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be no difference in patient satisfaction between telegenetic counseling (tele-GC) or in-person counseling (in-person GC) for HD testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded study of either tele-GC or in-person GC for HD gene testing. Participants had standardized genetic counseling in the clinic or through a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) appropriate telemedicine platform first and then crossed over. A study coordinator interviewed the participant using a telehealth survey after each encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 in-person GC and 15 tele-GC participants were included: 68% women, 41 ± 15 years, 80% White, 10% Hispanic, and +CAG repeat length = 45 ± 4.4 (n = 15) (<i>p</i> > 0.1). All participants were satisfied with their initial counseling experience when asked to rate on a scale of 1-10 (median 10/10, <i>p</i> = 0.94). The majority of symptomatic HD participants (5/7) preferred in-person GC. The main advantage of tele-GC was reduction in travel time for both in-person GC first (n = 16) and tele-GC first (n = 11) participants. Technical challenges were encountered in many of the participants. Visually seeing the genetic counselor improved understanding for in-person GC (n = 10) and tele-GC (n = 8) participants. Participants felt they were able to pick up on emotional cues (n = 33) and felt comfortable asking questions (n = 34) using the tele-GC format.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telegenetic counseling is a feasible option for HD gene testing, if patients are able to overcome technical issues. Having a video visit with both audio and video components, rather than an audio-only phone call, should be considered when using telegenetic counseling for HD. Finally, in-person counseling may be preferred to increase understanding of the genetic counseling materials in patients, especially in motor manifest HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"e200394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Trial of Telegenetic Counseling for Gene Testing in Huntington Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah A Hall, Marc Rosenbaum, Jacob Hawkins, Bichun Ouyang, Christa Cooper, Neepa Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine the feasibility and patient satisfaction of telegenetic counseling, or counseling done by video, for Huntington disease (HD). Background: Genetic counseling is necessary for presymptomatic or symptomatic HD genetic testing, but the lack of access to counseling because of geography or expense is a critical gap for many patients. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be no difference in patient satisfaction between telegenetic counseling (tele-GC) or in-person counseling (in-person GC) for HD testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded study of either tele-GC or in-person GC for HD gene testing. Participants had standardized genetic counseling in the clinic or through a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) appropriate telemedicine platform first and then crossed over. A study coordinator interviewed the participant using a telehealth survey after each encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 in-person GC and 15 tele-GC participants were included: 68% women, 41 ± 15 years, 80% White, 10% Hispanic, and +CAG repeat length = 45 ± 4.4 (n = 15) (<i>p</i> > 0.1). All participants were satisfied with their initial counseling experience when asked to rate on a scale of 1-10 (median 10/10, <i>p</i> = 0.94). The majority of symptomatic HD participants (5/7) preferred in-person GC. The main advantage of tele-GC was reduction in travel time for both in-person GC first (n = 16) and tele-GC first (n = 11) participants. Technical challenges were encountered in many of the participants. Visually seeing the genetic counselor improved understanding for in-person GC (n = 10) and tele-GC (n = 8) participants. Participants felt they were able to pick up on emotional cues (n = 33) and felt comfortable asking questions (n = 34) using the tele-GC format.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telegenetic counseling is a feasible option for HD gene testing, if patients are able to overcome technical issues. Having a video visit with both audio and video components, rather than an audio-only phone call, should be considered when using telegenetic counseling for HD. Finally, in-person counseling may be preferred to increase understanding of the genetic counseling materials in patients, especially in motor manifest HD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e200394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究旨在确定亨廷顿病(HD)的电报遗传咨询(即通过视频进行的咨询)的可行性和患者满意度。背景:亨廷顿病(HD)的遗传咨询是一项非常必要的工作:遗传咨询对于症状前或有症状的亨廷顿氏病遗传检测是必要的,但由于地理位置或费用原因,许多患者无法获得遗传咨询,这是一个关键的缺口。本研究的假设是,在 HD 检测中,远程遗传咨询(telegenetic counseling,tele-GC)和面对面遗传咨询(in-person counseling,in-person GC)在患者满意度方面没有差异:这是一项前瞻性、随机、非盲法研究,研究对象是进行 HD 基因检测的远程遗传咨询或亲临现场遗传咨询的患者。参与者首先在诊所或通过符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)的远程医疗平台接受标准化遗传咨询,然后进行交叉咨询。每次会面后,研究协调员都会通过远程医疗调查对参与者进行访谈:共纳入了 19 名面对面 GC 和 15 名远程 GC 参与者:68%为女性,41 ± 15 岁,80%为白人,10%为西班牙裔,+CAG 重复长度 = 45 ± 4.4(n = 15)(p > 0.1)。所有参与者都对他们最初的咨询经历表示满意,评分标准为 1-10 分(中位数为 10/10,P = 0.94)。大多数有症状的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者(5/7)更喜欢面对面的 GC。远程 GC 的主要优势在于减少了首次面对面 GC(16 人)和首次远程 GC(11 人)参与者的旅行时间。许多参与者都遇到了技术难题。亲眼看到遗传咨询师提高了面对面遗传咨询(10 人)和远程遗传咨询(8 人)参与者的理解能力。参与者认为他们能够捕捉到情感线索(33 人),并对使用远程遗传咨询形式提问感到舒适(34 人):讨论:如果患者能够克服技术问题,远程遗传咨询是进行 HD 基因检测的可行选择。在使用 HD 基因检测远程咨询时,应考虑使用包含音频和视频内容的视频访问,而不是仅有音频的电话。最后,为增加患者对遗传咨询材料的理解,尤其是对运动表现型 HD 患者而言,当面咨询可能是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized Trial of Telegenetic Counseling for Gene Testing in Huntington Disease.

Background and objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the feasibility and patient satisfaction of telegenetic counseling, or counseling done by video, for Huntington disease (HD). Background: Genetic counseling is necessary for presymptomatic or symptomatic HD genetic testing, but the lack of access to counseling because of geography or expense is a critical gap for many patients. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be no difference in patient satisfaction between telegenetic counseling (tele-GC) or in-person counseling (in-person GC) for HD testing.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded study of either tele-GC or in-person GC for HD gene testing. Participants had standardized genetic counseling in the clinic or through a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) appropriate telemedicine platform first and then crossed over. A study coordinator interviewed the participant using a telehealth survey after each encounter.

Results: A total of 19 in-person GC and 15 tele-GC participants were included: 68% women, 41 ± 15 years, 80% White, 10% Hispanic, and +CAG repeat length = 45 ± 4.4 (n = 15) (p > 0.1). All participants were satisfied with their initial counseling experience when asked to rate on a scale of 1-10 (median 10/10, p = 0.94). The majority of symptomatic HD participants (5/7) preferred in-person GC. The main advantage of tele-GC was reduction in travel time for both in-person GC first (n = 16) and tele-GC first (n = 11) participants. Technical challenges were encountered in many of the participants. Visually seeing the genetic counselor improved understanding for in-person GC (n = 10) and tele-GC (n = 8) participants. Participants felt they were able to pick up on emotional cues (n = 33) and felt comfortable asking questions (n = 34) using the tele-GC format.

Discussion: Telegenetic counseling is a feasible option for HD gene testing, if patients are able to overcome technical issues. Having a video visit with both audio and video components, rather than an audio-only phone call, should be considered when using telegenetic counseling for HD. Finally, in-person counseling may be preferred to increase understanding of the genetic counseling materials in patients, especially in motor manifest HD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信