Other Others最新文献_第2页

chapter 4. Conceptions of the Human (Interpersonality II): The Limits of Regret 第四章。人的概念(人格间性II):遗憾的限度

Other Others Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.1515/9780823280216-006

引用次数: 0

chapter 6. Formally Human ( Jewish Responses to Kant I) 第六章。形式上的人(犹太人对康德1的回应)

Other Others Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.1515/9780823280216-008

引用次数: 0

chapter 1. The Question of the Political: Back to Where You Once Belonged? 第1章。政治问题:回到你曾经属于的地方?

Other Others Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI: 10.1515/9780823280216-003

引用次数: 0

Mis-Taking in Halakhah and Aggadah (Jewish Responses to Kant II) 《哈拉卡与阿格达》中的错误认识(犹太人对康德的回应)

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0008

Sergey Dolgopolski

引用次数: 0

The Earth for the Other Others 为了他人的地球

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0009

Sergey Dolgopolski

{"title":"The Earth for the Other Others","authors":"Sergey Dolgopolski","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores an implication of the question of effacement of the other others, which this book advanced, for and in thinking the Earth. Mobilizing the question of the other others to think the Earth anew is no more but also no less than an articulation of yet another, perhaps the most important part of the question: How, or is it possible, to think the Earth in the first place? Advancing this problem moves the argument in the chapters beyond the hitherto predominant paradigms of linear otherness, in which the other and the question of belonging to a territory have been inextricably connected one to another. Is that connection between other and territory necessary, and what does that connection preclude from the view? To formulate and advance these questions the chapter engages with Gilles Deleuze’s notion of territorialization, and in particular with his questioning of the relationships between territorialization and existence, as well as between earth and being. The argument shows both necessity and insufficiency of Deleuze’s analysis of territorialization in relation to otherness in order to ask about of those others who remain in an intrinsically necessary relationship to the earth without ever finalizing their relation with a particular territory. In that way, the chapter provides a view of the political before it locks into either political ontology or political theology -- now extending the question of the effacement of the political beyond its exemplification as the political in the Talmud.","PeriodicalId":184911,"journal":{"name":"Other Others","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133632384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Talmudic Self-Refutation (Interpersonality I) 塔木德自我反驳(人格间性ⅰ)

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0004

Sergey Dolgopolski

引用次数: 0

Conceptions of the Human (Interpersonality II): The Limits of Regret 人的概念(人格间性II):遗憾的限度

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0005

Sergey Dolgopolski

{"title":"Conceptions of the Human (Interpersonality II): The Limits of Regret","authors":"Sergey Dolgopolski","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"The chapter expands the notion of Talmudic refuting to translate it into a certain structure of personhood in an interpersonal relationship. It stages a conception of personhood, which neither “subjectivist” nor “relativist” notions of the humanity of humans can either fully grasp or fully efface. At issue is a possibility for a conception of humanity in general and of a human being that reaches beyond notions of “a human” as bestowing nonbeing on things, and in particular measuring their being. To advance this argument, the chapter engages with, and limits the applicability of, Alexey Losev’s Eastern Orthodox political aesthetics as a purported foundation of, or even a possible replacement for, political theology. The argument in the chapter arrives at the insufficiency of Losev’s political aesthetics to grasp Talmudic interpersonality grounded in self-refuting, or broader yet, in refuting as its foundation. That helps showing how Losev’s Eastern Orthodox political alternative for modern notions of either universal “human being” or of a modern notion of a “Jew” -- as not only its counterpart but also its root -- prove insufficient to grasp the interpersonal political the Talmud’s pages show emerging and disappearing.","PeriodicalId":184911,"journal":{"name":"Other Others","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121586060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Apodictic Irony and the Production of Well-Structured Uncertainty: Tosafot Gornish and the Talmud as the Political after Kant 绝对反讽与结构良好的不确定性的产生:托萨弗特·戈尼什与《塔木德》作为康德之后的政治

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0006

Sergey Dolgopolski

引用次数: 0

Formally Human (Jewish Responses to Kant I) 形式上的人(犹太人对康德1的回应)

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0007

Sergey Dolgopolski

{"title":"Formally Human (Jewish Responses to Kant I)","authors":"Sergey Dolgopolski","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"The chapter shows how among tradition-oriented scholars of the 20th and early 21st century, the interpersonal in the Talmud became effaced in the notion of a universal subject of reason, ultimately conceived of as pure thought and denying any intrinsic necessity of the intersubjective, let alone the interpersonal. At the center of the discussion is post-Kantian formal transcendental definition of what it means to be human as opposed to any phenomenal description of humanity in external phenomenal terms of a physical, biological, or other objectifying terms. The chapter follows the Jewish thinkers who, in response to Kant’s critique of Jewish law as positive law, argue that Rabbinic law – the Talmud and its interpretation – entail a transcendental rather than positive notion of the law, and a transcendental rather than empirical notion of universal humanity in each human being. The chapter further shows, how for the sake of that argument, modern Jewish thinkers reinvent Jewish law. The chapter displays how that process entails both construction and denial of the Talmud as an allegedly empty form of merely rhetorical arguments to be translated into, and according to the principles of a universal humanity, build, as it is for these Jewish thinkers after Kant, on the principles of intersubjective transcendentalism, and on the resulting understanding of the political in their work.","PeriodicalId":184911,"journal":{"name":"Other Others","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115392035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Question of the Political: Back to Where You Once Belonged? 政治问题:回到你曾经属于的地方?

Other Others Pub Date : 2018-06-05 DOI: 10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0002

Sergey Dolgopolski

{"title":"The Question of the Political: Back to Where You Once Belonged?","authors":"Sergey Dolgopolski","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823280186.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"The chapter analyses how the question of the political in two currently predominant and competing schools of political thought, political theology, exemplified by Carl Schmitt, and political ontology, exemplified by Jacques Rancière. The notion of the other others comes front and centre in this analysis. In political ontology, the concept of the political is predicated on an ability of a politician, a lawyer, or an artist to employ the philosophical, and in modern terms, “ontological” distinction between what is the case in each case and what seems to be the case in each case. In political theology, it is no longer “being” as opposed to “seeming”, but rather an ability to represent as radically distinct from any particular content conveyed. The chapter further traces foundations of both political theology and political ontology in Kant’s transcendentalism -- in particular in the necessity by which transcendentalism denies “positive law,” which Christianity traditionally ascribed to the Jews. The balance of the chapter shows how, however mutually exclusive, both political theology and political ontology remain intersubjective in their scope and thereby both efface and help notice what, in the following chapters will emerge on the pages of the Talmud as interpersonal rather than intersubjective dimension of the political.","PeriodicalId":184911,"journal":{"name":"Other Others","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122439973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0