Mis-Taking in Halakhah and Aggadah (Jewish Responses to Kant II)

Sergey Dolgopolski
{"title":"Mis-Taking in Halakhah and Aggadah (Jewish Responses to Kant II)","authors":"Sergey Dolgopolski","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter accounts for how the rabbinic political was constructed and thereby productively lost in Jewish secularizing modernist thought and literature of Franz Kafka, Chaim Bialik, and Walter Benjamin. Modernist notions of logical implication, literary expression, and language are at the center of analysis in this chapter, as it articulates a crisis in the relationships between law and literature in how these thinkers navigate both the human condition and both the Jewish and general law as its part. The chapter further shows how a departure from neo-Kantianism in these thinkers lead to a reconsideration of the role of mistake and failure in human condition, and how their understanding of both mistaking and failing both purports to capture and misses the Talmudic understanding of mistake in terms of self-refutation. The result is a new vision of the otherwise purely logical notion of implication, a vision in which the very being implicit rather than explicit remains fundamental for human condition, and that no explication of the implicit can ever either replace or tame the power of the implicit in human condition.","PeriodicalId":184911,"journal":{"name":"Other Others","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Other Others","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823280186.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter accounts for how the rabbinic political was constructed and thereby productively lost in Jewish secularizing modernist thought and literature of Franz Kafka, Chaim Bialik, and Walter Benjamin. Modernist notions of logical implication, literary expression, and language are at the center of analysis in this chapter, as it articulates a crisis in the relationships between law and literature in how these thinkers navigate both the human condition and both the Jewish and general law as its part. The chapter further shows how a departure from neo-Kantianism in these thinkers lead to a reconsideration of the role of mistake and failure in human condition, and how their understanding of both mistaking and failing both purports to capture and misses the Talmudic understanding of mistake in terms of self-refutation. The result is a new vision of the otherwise purely logical notion of implication, a vision in which the very being implicit rather than explicit remains fundamental for human condition, and that no explication of the implicit can ever either replace or tame the power of the implicit in human condition.
《哈拉卡与阿格达》中的错误认识(犹太人对康德的回应)
这一章描述了拉比政治是如何构建的,并因此在犹太世俗化的现代主义思想和弗朗茨·卡夫卡、查伊姆·拜利克和瓦尔特·本雅明的文学中富有成效地消失了。现代主义关于逻辑蕴涵、文学表达和语言的概念是本章分析的中心,因为它阐明了法律与文学之间关系的危机,即这些思想家如何驾驭人类状况以及犹太法和一般法作为其组成部分。本章进一步展示了这些思想家对新康德主义的背离是如何导致对错误和失败在人类状况中的作用的重新思考,以及他们对错误和失败的理解是如何以自我反驳的方式捕捉和错过了塔木德对错误的理解。其结果是对暗示的纯逻辑概念的一种新的看法,在这种看法中,隐含的存在而不是明确的存在仍然是人类状况的基础,而且任何对隐含的解释都不能取代或驯服人类状况中隐含的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信