{"title":"Un proconsul en Tripolitaine : Q. Manlius Ancharius Tarquitius Saturninus","authors":"Khaled Marmouri","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2016.1873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2016.1873","url":null,"abstract":"Alors qu’il n’était connu jusque-là que par un seul document épigraphique de Lepcis Magna, le proconsulat africain de Q. Manlius Ancharius Tarquitius Saturninus est attesté par de nouveaux textes révisés provenant de Lepcis Magna et de Sabratha. Tout en permettant de revisiter la carrière et l’onomastique de ce gouverneur et de son légat L. Volumnius Memor Felix, ces inscriptions invitent à réfléchir sur la principale mission qui aurait justifié le déplacement de ces hauts administrateurs romains dans la région des Syrtes : la promotion municipale des deux cités au tout début de la censure de Vespasien.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121886576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Une épitaphe inédite de Mustis sur l’administration des domaines impériaux en Afrique du Nord au début du IIe siècle apr. J.-C.","authors":"Moheddine Chaouali","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2014.1815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2014.1815","url":null,"abstract":"In 2011, the epitaph of a man called Marcus Ulpinus Fortunatus was discovered in the necropolis of Mustis. He was a freedman of Emperor Trajan and participated in the management of imperial possessions as a procurator. The name of his wife, Coelia Thallussa, allows us to assume that the couple was of Italian origin. The discovery of the epitaph in Mustis suggests that this city may have housed an administrative service which initially was subordinated to a procurator based in Carthage and to the dismemberment of the imperial administration of the beginning of the second century AD.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125523608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La performativité des termes administratifs démotiques : l’exemple du SḤN TꜢ ḲḤJ","authors":"Stéphanie Wackenier","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2016.1868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2016.1868","url":null,"abstract":"Le P. dem. Cairo III 50148 est l’unique papyrus démotique identifié avec certitude comme un document émanant de l’administration héracléopolitaine sous les Lagides. S’il se lit facilement, il présente plusieurs difficultés pour identifier les titres et fonctions des administrateurs mentionnés. Il pose donc la délicate question du degré de technicité des termes utilisés par les scribes démotiques. Cette étude vise à démontrer que les scribes égyptiens donnaient bien un sens technique aux termes qu’ils utilisaient, instaurant dès le IIIe siècle, des correspondances entre termes grecs et démotiques.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133916900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rhétorique, politique et pratique épigraphique monumentale. Introduction","authors":"S. Benoist","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2014.1824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2014.1824","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122186725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La période et les périodoniques à l’époque impériale","authors":"Jean-Yves Strasser","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2016.1860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2016.1860","url":null,"abstract":"Les notions de période et de périodonique restent controversées. La théorie la plus courante est celle de L. Robert. Il considérait que la période ancienne (Olympia, Pythia, Isthmia, Nemea) s’était élargie à l’époque impériale, notamment avec les créations romaines (Aktia de Nicopolis, Sebasta de Naples, Kapetôlia de Rome). La documentation actuelle ne permet pas d’étayer cette idée. Au contraire, les palmarès comme l’étude des titres et de la phraséologie de certaines inscriptions en l’honneur de vainqueurs montrent que la période n’a sans doute pas subi de modifications avant le milieu du IIe siècle, sauf pour les artistes. Pour ceux-ci, une période spécifique a été créée, où les Hèraia d’Argos remplacent les Olympia de Pise, dépourvus d’épreuves artistiques. Après la création des Eusebeia de Pouzzoles, les Kapetôlia, les Sebasta, le nouveau concours campanien et les Aktia forment une nouvelle période, qui ne remplaça jamais l’ancienne.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124913627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Imperium, Promagistrats et triomphe au Ier siècle av. J.-C. : quelques affaires","authors":"M. Tarpin","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2015.1852","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2015.1852","url":null,"abstract":"Imperium and auspicium seem to be the key elements of power of magistrates and promagistrates. They are nevertheless difficult to define and historians are discussing the meaning and the forms of acquisition of those specific skills. The first century BC, a politically troubled period, offers first hand documents that do not seem to have been modified by the imperial ideology. This paper examines some of the theoretical texts from this period and some famous political affairs, which involve the imperium and auspicium of influential people. We note that the theoretical texts should be treated with caution because they are intended to support causes whose legitimacy can be questionable. Political scandals on the other hand, involve not only relations of personal power and rhetoric but also specific issues of law and the statutes of the magistrates. Indeed, the political actual practice is probably less rigid than in the mommsenian theory. Each situation is the result of an interaction of laws, jurisprudence and formal procedures, many of which are unknown. The scandal caused by the affair of the province of Appius Claudius Pulcher (54 BC.) is not a question of abuse of authority but a subtle legal arrangement. The political and legal conflicts of the 49 year – often regarded as an actual example of Realpolitik – still betray the major role of the imperium and of the legal procedures necessary for the establishment of a legitimate power. As A. Magdelain noticed, we do not have any attestation of a law generally defining the imperium. The latter, granted to the upper magistrates and promagistrates, was specified by laws passed case by case and most likely voted by the assemblies Curiata.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116204269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Society, the market, or actually both ? Networks and the allocation of credit and capital goods in the Roman economy","authors":"Andries Zuiderhoek, Wim Broekaert","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2015.1844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2015.1844","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article étudie comment les producteurs romains avaient accès au crédit et aux capitaux. Il défend l’idée que la répartition du crédit et des capitaux dans l’économie romaine n’était ni fondée entièrement sur le marché, ni entièrement enchâssée dans le social, mais s’opérait par des canaux participant ou non du marché, impliquant un réseau d’institutions commerciales, sociales et politiques (banques, sociétés, familles, gouvernements civiques). L’article présente une synthèse détaillée des manières dont ces institutions contribuaient à l’affectation du crédit et des capitaux et, ce faisant, interagirent de plus en plus. Ainsi, les Romains créèrent un réseau de crédit complexe, flexible et élastique, qui put soutenir l’expansion économique et commerciale du monde romain entre 100 av. J.-C. et 200 ap. J.-C.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134176256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La loi curiate et les auspices du peuple romain","authors":"Michel Humm","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2015.1850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2015.1850","url":null,"abstract":"Lorsque les «magistrats patriciens» sont devenus des «magistrats du peuple», les «auspices des patriciens» sont devenus ceux du peuple romain grâce à la loi curiate. Le concept d’auspices du peuple romain n’a peut-être pas reçu une définition juridique très précise, mais il permettait d’effacer la distinction entre l’origine patricienne et l’origine plébéienne des magistrats, à partir du moment où patriciens et plébéiens dirigèrent ensemble la République romaine. La loi curiate serait ainsi une innovation institutionnelle née du compromis politique entre le patriciat et l’élite de la plèbe, et serait apparue au cours de la seconde moitié du ive siècle av. J.-C. L’expression auspicia populi Romani, loin d’être une figure de style purement rhétorique, correspond ainsi à la réalité politique et idéologique de l’État patricio-plébéien qui se définit véritablement, à partir du ive siècle, comme la res publica.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"512 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120972016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"More than words: imperial discourse in Greek papyri","authors":"Janneke de Jong","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2014.1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2014.1827","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses how Roman imperial discourse is encountered in Greek papyri. The term “ discourse” covers several levels of meaning, ranging from a simple conversation to a set of programmatic or ideological statements. This latter sense is relevant for imperial selfpresentation : through images and words Roman emperors communicated their qualities, which served as an ideological basis for their power position, in order to be accepted as the right man for the job by different groups of subjects. How, then, are Roman emperors present in Greek papyri ? And how can Greek papyri be used for the study of imperial discourse ? In my paper, I will discuss how papyri reveal imperial power and its concomitant discourse in several ways. In certain types of documents, such as imperial letters, the emperor speaks directly. In others, the emperor is present merely as a point of reference, for instance in dating formulas. Nevertheless, even within these dating parts imperial ideology is reflected. All of these texts are instructive for the functioning of imperial discourse. On the one hand, these documents convey a concrete message, as they all were written for a practical reason. On the other hand, the use of certain elements or words could convey a deeper meaning to a text, by expressing concepts “ behind” the message itself. This paper aims to show how imperial discourse can be studied on several levels and how it can be studied for power relations within society and for legitimation of the imperial power position.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123232541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La suprématie auspiciale du prince en question(s). Une nouvelle hiérarchie des auspices","authors":"F. Hurlet","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2015.1853","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2015.1853","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article traite des auspices du prince à la lumière des travaux récents qui ont été consacrés à cette question par Michel Tarpin, Frederik Vervaet, Alberto Dalla Rosa et Yann Berthelet. Il revient spécifiquement sur les points les plus débattus qui sont le processus de mise en place de la suprématie auspiciale d’Auguste et ses modalités. Il maintient la plupart des conclusions auxquelles j’étais parvenu dans des études antérieures publiées en 2000, 2001 et 2006, principalement sur l’existence d’une forme ou une autre de hiérarchie auspiciale au sommet de laquelle se trouvait le pouvoir impérial, mais il abandonne l’idée qu’une telle hiérarchie remonte à l’année 19 av. J.-C. Le problème central étant la définition des rapports hiérarchiques entre les auspices du prince et ceux des proconsuls, l’analyse consiste en un examen approfondi de trois inscriptions qui sont les seules à faire état d’une supériorité en la matière du premier sur les seconds et qui proviennent de Rome pour deux d’entre elles (arc de Tibère du Forum romain, arc de Titus du Circus Maximus) et de Lepcis Magna pour la troisième. Parmi les interprétations qui sont techniquement possibles est désormais privilégiée l’hypothèse, défendue par Alberto Dalla Rosa, selon laquelle la supériorité des auspices d’Auguste fut étendue à l’ensemble de l’Empire durant la dernière décennie de son principat, plus précisément à partir de 6 ap. J.-C.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114086407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}