{"title":"Fenomena Rasionalisasi Anggaran Pilkada yang Telah Disepakati","authors":"Faqih Mujahid, Susilo Harjono","doi":"10.55108/jap.v3i1.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v3i1.34","url":null,"abstract":"The budget is one aspect that determines the quality of the implementation of regional head elections (Pilkada). The budget problem that arose in the 2020 Pilkada Concurrent was the rationalization carried out by the DPRD on the Pilkada budget which was contained in the Regional Grant Agreement Text (NPHD) even though the NPHD was signed by the Regional Head and Pilkada Organizer (KPU and Bawaslu) as evidence of the budget allocation agreement for the activities of organizing and supervising the Pilkada. Examples of this rationalization practice occurred in 2 (two) regions, namely Ogan Komering Ulu Timur District, South Sumatra Province, and Tidore Islands City, North Maluku Province. There are 2 (two) factors that give rise to the rationalization problem. First, poor communication between the elements of Pilkada organizers (KPU and Bawaslu) together with the Government and the DPRD, which led to a deadlock and made the Central Government have to step in to resolve it. Second, the classic problems experienced by Indonesia in matters of legal governance that are out of sync (disharmony between regulations) have an impact on the quality of Pilkada budget management. Several things that affect the quality of Pilkada budget management include: First, the practice of assigning staff in charge of the Pilkada budget both at the KPU and Bawaslu has not fulfilled the principle of \"the right man on the right place\". Second, there is regulatory disharmony, namely the law regulating the authority of the DPRD in carrying out its budgeting functions with the technical regulations of the Minister of Home Affairs regarding Pilkada budgeting. By using a qualitative descriptive research method, the author will examine the rationalization problem from the aspects of communication between institutions and regional election budget management. The author uses political communication theory and election budget management to formulate alternative solutions to these problems and provide a meeting point for Pilkada budget problems in these 2 (two) regions.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115034215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Analisis Semiotik Komunikasi Tekstual Studi Kasus #2019GantiPresiden dan #DiaTetapKerja","authors":"Kurnia Setawan, Arsa Widitiarsa Utoyo","doi":"10.55108/jap.v1i1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v1i1.1","url":null,"abstract":"Text semiotics is a branch of semiotics, which specifically examines texts in various forms and levels. Text analysis is a branch of text semiotics, which specifically examines the text as a ‘product of language use’ in the form of a collection or combination of signs. Text is defined as messages — both using verbal and visual signs; and more specifically, it is written messages, namely language products in written form. Signs are part of social life. Through social conventions, it has social meaning and value. According to Saussure, ‘sign’ is an inseparable unity of two fields, namely the signifier to explain ‘form’ or ‘expression’; and the signified field, to explain ‘concept’ or ‘meaning’. Meanwhile, Charles Sander Peirce classified the sign types into three types, namely indexes, icons, and symbols. Index is a sign where the signifier relationship and signified in it are causal, such as the relationship between smoke and fire; the icon is a sign where the relationship between the marker and the marker is similar; and the symbol is a sign that the marker and marker relationship are arbitrary or conventional. Text analysis operates at two levels: First, the analysis of individual signs, such as the type of sign, mechanism or sign structure, and the meaning of the sign individually. Second, the analysis of signs as a group or combination, which is a collection of signs that form what is called ‘text’. Text analysis, according to Roland Barthes, will produce denotative meaning, namely the meaning of an explicit sign, and connotative meaning, namely the meaning of an implicit second tier. The conclusion is that there are differences in ideology, writing of the thesis as a political medium so as to create myths to influence and build public awareness.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124040101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Desain Badan Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dalam Rangka Menghadapi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Serentak Nasional Tahun 2024","authors":"Ispan Diar Fauzi","doi":"10.55108/jap.v1i1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v1i1.3","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to answer the problems, the formulation and design of the special courts election and the excellences of the special courts election. This was conducted using legal-normative research through conceptual approach. In this study, special court local election are designed as a permanent adjudication court. The judicial jurisdiction under the Supreme Court includes the High Court for the special court of election of the Governor and the District Court for the special court of election of the Regent / Mayor. Special court designed has three assemblies, state administrative dispute assemblies, criminal act assemblies and dispute of electoral results assemblies. The authority of the special court election is to examine and decide all disputes during the election process. For the composition of the judges will be filled by career judges and ad hoc judges. Special court electoral in each jurisdiction are designed as the first and final judicial institutions whose decisions are final and binding. One of the advantage of special court election is the special court of local elections which provides for the settle of all disputes during the election process.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123219542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Framing Media Online Atas Pemberitaan Isu Politik Uang dalam Pilkada Serentak 2018","authors":"Lestari Nurhajati, Xenia Angelica Wijayanto","doi":"10.55108/jap.v1i1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v1i1.4","url":null,"abstract":"Money politics is one of the issues that has always been a problem in the process of electing Regional Heads (Pilkada), including in the Pilkada on June 27, 2018. All parties involved in the election process, both voters, Election Management Bodies (KPU) and Bawaslu, always see that the case of money politics is a problem that seems never resolved, and recurs from year to year. Moreover, the mass media, including online media always discuss the issue of money politics in Pilkada activities in Indonesia. This study aims to find out how the online media in Indonesia conducts framing news in the issue of money politics, especially in the 2018 Simultaneous Regional Election. Framing theory in media reporting becomes interesting to study because this theory sees that the issue by media perspective in reporting becomes important value for the media readers. Media audiences can be directly and indirectly affected by various news framing by the media. Qualitative methods with Entman’s framing approach are used to analyze framing in 5 online media with the most access in Indonesia, they are: Tribunnews.com, Detik.com, Liputan6.com, Kompas.com, and Sindonews. com. The results of this study indicate that in general the media has framing that is not much different. It’s just in the parts of treatment recommendation it appears that the media does not explicitly show their alignment with regulations and ethics which is clearly prohibit the practice of money politics in the elections.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123985582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bekerjanya Politisasi Identitas pada Pilkada Sumut 2018","authors":"Irfan Prayogi, Ian Pasaribu","doi":"10.55108/jap.v1i1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v1i1.2","url":null,"abstract":"This article will describe what is the winning factor for Edy Rahmayadi and Musa Rajekshah in the 2018 Sumatera Utara contestation of regional elections. The author sees Political Identity greatly influencing the course of democracy in North Sumatra due to differences in religious identity between the two pairs of contesting candidates. The politics of identity centered on the politicization of shared identity is an important base of glue in group collectivity. Identity is then politicized through extreme interpretation to gain support from the majority of the community both in race, ethnicity and religion. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive analysis. The data collection techniques through interviews as primary data and secondary data in the form of news, journals, books, and documents related to the results of Sumatera Utara 2018 regional elections. Findings from this study, the author saw Edy-Musa utilizing Islamic discourse as a power to obtain votes from Islamic circles. This is evident from the post-election vote acquisition in certain regional bases, as well as the social conditions of the community before the vote. In addition, Islamic discourse is clearly present through banners calling for choosing Muslim leaders, morning prayer in congregation and other identity issues as an effort to influence people’s preferences to make choices on voting. This paper seeks to understand identity politics as a form of popular strategy and the implications that arise in the electoral politics.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126377755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Meneguhkan Bawaslu Sebagai “Lembaga Peradilan” dalam Bingkai Pengawasan Pemilu","authors":"Abdul Waid","doi":"10.55108/jap.v1i1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v1i1.5","url":null,"abstract":"Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning on General Elections now has given strong authority to the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu). The Election Supervisory Agency now does not only become a recommendation institution as stated in the previous Election law. Now the Election Supervisory Agency is the executor agency or case breaker. This was stated expressly in the formulation of Article 461 paragraph (1) of Law No.7 / 2017, that the Election Supervisory Agency, Provincial Election Supervisory Agency, Regency Election Supervisory Agency receive, examine, review, and decide election administration violations. Then paragraph 6 states that the decision of the Election Supervisory Agency, Provincial Election Supervisory Agency, Regency Election Supervisory Agency is to resolve election administration violations in the form of: first, administrative improvements to systems, procedures, or mechanisms in accordance with the provisions of the legislation; second, written warning; third, dissociate of certain stages in organizing elections; and fourth, other administrative sanctions in accordance with the provisions of the law. Based on that, this paper seeks to provide an analysis of the Election Supervisory Agency as an Election Supervisory Institution on the one hand, and as a judicial institution on the other side. The reason is that the Election Supervisory Agency now has a judicial function in implementing its authority, so that the procedure for resolving cases of election administration violations carried out in the Election Supervisory Agency is also in accordance with the judicial model of judicial institution in general. This paper also tries to confirm the performance of the Election Supervisory Agency as an institution that no longer needs to depend on the commitment of other institutions such as the KPU, the Police, and the prosecutor. Law No. 7/2017 has made the Election Supervisory Agency as the “real” supervisory institution. That is, the Election Supervisory Agency should be an institution that has an important role in realizing the implementation of the legitimate election system.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133809978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}