皮尔卡达商定的预算合理化现象

Faqih Mujahid, Susilo Harjono
{"title":"皮尔卡达商定的预算合理化现象","authors":"Faqih Mujahid, Susilo Harjono","doi":"10.55108/jap.v3i1.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The budget is one aspect that determines the quality of the implementation of regional head elections (Pilkada). The budget problem that arose in the 2020 Pilkada Concurrent was the rationalization carried out by the DPRD on the Pilkada budget which was contained in the Regional Grant Agreement Text (NPHD) even though the NPHD was signed by the Regional Head and Pilkada Organizer (KPU and Bawaslu) as evidence of the budget allocation agreement for the activities of organizing and supervising the Pilkada. Examples of this rationalization practice occurred in 2 (two) regions, namely Ogan Komering Ulu Timur District, South Sumatra Province, and Tidore Islands City, North Maluku Province. There are 2 (two) factors that give rise to the rationalization problem. First, poor communication between the elements of Pilkada organizers (KPU and Bawaslu) together with the Government and the DPRD, which led to a deadlock and made the Central Government have to step in to resolve it. Second, the classic problems experienced by Indonesia in matters of legal governance that are out of sync (disharmony between regulations) have an impact on the quality of Pilkada budget management. Several things that affect the quality of Pilkada budget management include: First, the practice of assigning staff in charge of the Pilkada budget both at the KPU and Bawaslu has not fulfilled the principle of \"the right man on the right place\". Second, there is regulatory disharmony, namely the law regulating the authority of the DPRD in carrying out its budgeting functions with the technical regulations of the Minister of Home Affairs regarding Pilkada budgeting. By using a qualitative descriptive research method, the author will examine the rationalization problem from the aspects of communication between institutions and regional election budget management. The author uses political communication theory and election budget management to formulate alternative solutions to these problems and provide a meeting point for Pilkada budget problems in these 2 (two) regions.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fenomena Rasionalisasi Anggaran Pilkada yang Telah Disepakati\",\"authors\":\"Faqih Mujahid, Susilo Harjono\",\"doi\":\"10.55108/jap.v3i1.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The budget is one aspect that determines the quality of the implementation of regional head elections (Pilkada). The budget problem that arose in the 2020 Pilkada Concurrent was the rationalization carried out by the DPRD on the Pilkada budget which was contained in the Regional Grant Agreement Text (NPHD) even though the NPHD was signed by the Regional Head and Pilkada Organizer (KPU and Bawaslu) as evidence of the budget allocation agreement for the activities of organizing and supervising the Pilkada. Examples of this rationalization practice occurred in 2 (two) regions, namely Ogan Komering Ulu Timur District, South Sumatra Province, and Tidore Islands City, North Maluku Province. There are 2 (two) factors that give rise to the rationalization problem. First, poor communication between the elements of Pilkada organizers (KPU and Bawaslu) together with the Government and the DPRD, which led to a deadlock and made the Central Government have to step in to resolve it. Second, the classic problems experienced by Indonesia in matters of legal governance that are out of sync (disharmony between regulations) have an impact on the quality of Pilkada budget management. Several things that affect the quality of Pilkada budget management include: First, the practice of assigning staff in charge of the Pilkada budget both at the KPU and Bawaslu has not fulfilled the principle of \\\"the right man on the right place\\\". Second, there is regulatory disharmony, namely the law regulating the authority of the DPRD in carrying out its budgeting functions with the technical regulations of the Minister of Home Affairs regarding Pilkada budgeting. By using a qualitative descriptive research method, the author will examine the rationalization problem from the aspects of communication between institutions and regional election budget management. The author uses political communication theory and election budget management to formulate alternative solutions to these problems and provide a meeting point for Pilkada budget problems in these 2 (two) regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v3i1.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v3i1.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预算是决定地区领导人选举(Pilkada)执行质量的一个方面。在2020年Pilkada并行中出现的预算问题是,DPRD对Pilkada预算进行了合理化,该预算包含在区域拨款协议文本(NPHD)中,尽管NPHD是由区域负责人和Pilkada组织者(KPU和Bawaslu)签署的,作为组织和监督Pilkada活动的预算分配协议的证据。这种合理化做法的例子发生在2个地区,即南苏门答腊省的Ogan Komering Ulu Timur区和北马鲁古省的Tidore群岛市。有两个因素导致了合理化问题。第一,游行组织者(KPU和Bawaslu)与政府和民主革命党之间沟通不畅,导致僵局,中央政府不得不介入解决。其次,印尼在法律治理方面经历的经典问题是不同步(法规之间的不协调),这影响了Pilkada预算管理的质量。影响Pilkada预算管理质量的几个因素包括:首先,在KPU和Bawaslu分配负责Pilkada预算的人员的做法没有实现“合适的人在合适的地方”的原则。第二,存在监管不协调,即规定人民民主共和国执行预算职能的权力的法律与内政部长关于Pilkada预算的技术条例不协调。本文采用定性描述研究的方法,从机构间沟通和地方选举预算管理两个方面考察其合理化问题。笔者运用政治沟通理论和选举预算管理理论为这些问题制定了可选的解决方案,并为这两个地区的Pilkada预算问题提供了一个契合点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fenomena Rasionalisasi Anggaran Pilkada yang Telah Disepakati
The budget is one aspect that determines the quality of the implementation of regional head elections (Pilkada). The budget problem that arose in the 2020 Pilkada Concurrent was the rationalization carried out by the DPRD on the Pilkada budget which was contained in the Regional Grant Agreement Text (NPHD) even though the NPHD was signed by the Regional Head and Pilkada Organizer (KPU and Bawaslu) as evidence of the budget allocation agreement for the activities of organizing and supervising the Pilkada. Examples of this rationalization practice occurred in 2 (two) regions, namely Ogan Komering Ulu Timur District, South Sumatra Province, and Tidore Islands City, North Maluku Province. There are 2 (two) factors that give rise to the rationalization problem. First, poor communication between the elements of Pilkada organizers (KPU and Bawaslu) together with the Government and the DPRD, which led to a deadlock and made the Central Government have to step in to resolve it. Second, the classic problems experienced by Indonesia in matters of legal governance that are out of sync (disharmony between regulations) have an impact on the quality of Pilkada budget management. Several things that affect the quality of Pilkada budget management include: First, the practice of assigning staff in charge of the Pilkada budget both at the KPU and Bawaslu has not fulfilled the principle of "the right man on the right place". Second, there is regulatory disharmony, namely the law regulating the authority of the DPRD in carrying out its budgeting functions with the technical regulations of the Minister of Home Affairs regarding Pilkada budgeting. By using a qualitative descriptive research method, the author will examine the rationalization problem from the aspects of communication between institutions and regional election budget management. The author uses political communication theory and election budget management to formulate alternative solutions to these problems and provide a meeting point for Pilkada budget problems in these 2 (two) regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信