Framing Media Online Atas Pemberitaan Isu Politik Uang dalam Pilkada Serentak 2018

Lestari Nurhajati, Xenia Angelica Wijayanto
{"title":"Framing Media Online Atas Pemberitaan Isu Politik Uang dalam Pilkada Serentak 2018","authors":"Lestari Nurhajati, Xenia Angelica Wijayanto","doi":"10.55108/jap.v1i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Money politics is one of the issues that has always been a problem in the process of electing Regional Heads (Pilkada), including in the Pilkada on June 27, 2018. All parties involved in the election process, both voters, Election Management Bodies (KPU) and Bawaslu, always see that the case of money politics is a problem that seems never resolved, and recurs from year to year. Moreover, the mass media, including online media always discuss the issue of money politics in Pilkada activities in Indonesia. This study aims to find out how the online media in Indonesia conducts framing news in the issue of money politics, especially in the 2018 Simultaneous Regional Election. Framing theory in media reporting becomes interesting to study because this theory sees that the issue by media perspective in reporting becomes important value for the media readers. Media audiences can be directly and indirectly affected by various news framing by the media. Qualitative methods with Entman’s framing approach are used to analyze framing in 5 online media with the most access in Indonesia, they are: Tribunnews.com, Detik.com, Liputan6.com, Kompas.com, and Sindonews. com. The results of this study indicate that in general the media has framing that is not much different. It’s just in the parts of treatment recommendation it appears that the media does not explicitly show their alignment with regulations and ethics which is clearly prohibit the practice of money politics in the elections.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v1i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Money politics is one of the issues that has always been a problem in the process of electing Regional Heads (Pilkada), including in the Pilkada on June 27, 2018. All parties involved in the election process, both voters, Election Management Bodies (KPU) and Bawaslu, always see that the case of money politics is a problem that seems never resolved, and recurs from year to year. Moreover, the mass media, including online media always discuss the issue of money politics in Pilkada activities in Indonesia. This study aims to find out how the online media in Indonesia conducts framing news in the issue of money politics, especially in the 2018 Simultaneous Regional Election. Framing theory in media reporting becomes interesting to study because this theory sees that the issue by media perspective in reporting becomes important value for the media readers. Media audiences can be directly and indirectly affected by various news framing by the media. Qualitative methods with Entman’s framing approach are used to analyze framing in 5 online media with the most access in Indonesia, they are: Tribunnews.com, Detik.com, Liputan6.com, Kompas.com, and Sindonews. com. The results of this study indicate that in general the media has framing that is not much different. It’s just in the parts of treatment recommendation it appears that the media does not explicitly show their alignment with regulations and ethics which is clearly prohibit the practice of money politics in the elections.
在选举地区领导人(Pilkada)的过程中,包括2018年6月27日的Pilkada选举中,金钱政治一直是一个问题。参与选举过程的所有各方,无论是选民、选举管理机构(KPU)还是巴瓦斯卢,都认为金钱政治是一个似乎永远不会解决的问题,而且年复一年地重复发生。此外,包括网络媒体在内的大众媒体一直在讨论印尼Pilkada活动中的金钱政治问题。本研究旨在找出印尼的网路媒体如何在金钱政治问题上进行框架新闻,特别是在2018年同步地区选举中。媒体报道的框架理论之所以值得研究,是因为该理论认为媒体视角的问题对媒体读者来说具有重要的价值。媒体受众可以直接或间接地受到媒体各种新闻框架的影响。本研究以Entman的框架分析方法定性分析印尼5家网路媒体的框架分析,它们分别是:Tribunnews.com、Detik.com、Liputan6.com、Kompas.com和Sindonews。com。本研究的结果表明,一般来说,媒体的框架并没有太大的不同。只是在治疗建议的部分,媒体似乎没有明确显示他们与法规和道德的一致,这些法规和道德明确禁止在选举中使用金钱政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信