Journal of personality and social psychology最新文献_第5页

Supplemental Material for Tightening up Under Threat: Social Class Shapes the Strength of Norms 《在威胁下收紧：社会阶级塑造规范的力量》补充材料

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-07-06 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000524.supp

引用次数: 0

Trust and trust funds: How others' childhood and current social class context influence trust behavior and expectations. 信任和信托基金：他人的童年和当前的社会阶层背景如何影响信任行为和期望。

IF 6.7 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000497

Kristin Laurin, Holly R Engstrom, Toni Schmader, Khai Qing Chua, Nadav Klein, Stéphane Côté

{"title":"Trust and trust funds: How others' childhood and current social class context influence trust behavior and expectations.","authors":"Kristin Laurin, Holly R Engstrom, Toni Schmader, Khai Qing Chua, Nadav Klein, Stéphane Côté","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000497","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspi0000497","url":null,"abstract":"Trust is vital for success in all kinds of social interactions. But how do people decide whether an individual can be trusted? One factor people may consider is that individual's social class. We hypothesize that people trust others from lower social class contexts more than others from higher class contexts; we also consider nuances between current and childhood class context and between trust as a behavior and trust as an expectation. Five preregistered studies (total N = 1,934, with three of five studies including a within-subjects component), and 12 preregistered replications summarized in the supplement, yielded two sets of findings. First, people consistently behaviorally trusted others whose childhoods were spent in low-class (compared to high-class) contexts and expected them to honor that trust. These effects were mediated by perceived morality. Second, people behaviorally trusted others currently in low-class (compared to high-class) contexts, but they did not expect these individuals to honor that trust or perceive them as moral. Instead, the effect of current class was linked to altruism. Our findings emerged in samples drawn from different populations, across varying manipulations of social class, in actual and hypothetical decisions, and with imaginary targets and real acquaintances. We consider implications for the psychology of trust and of social class. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"75-98"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144127952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups. 青少年对次要外群体态度发展中的外群体友谊和社会影响。

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-29 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000530

Tibor Zingora,Chloe Bracegirdle,Tobias H Stark,Olivia Spiegler

{"title":"Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups.","authors":"Tibor Zingora,Chloe Bracegirdle,Tobias H Stark,Olivia Spiegler","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000530","url":null,"abstract":"Having outgroup friends not only improves attitudes toward the (primary) outgroup but potentially also toward other (secondary) outgroups. This \"secondary transfer effect\" is attributed to the generalization of intergroup contact, but it may also reflect social influence as friends shape each other's outgroup attitudes. In three studies (two empirical and one simulation), we applied stochastic actor-oriented models to longitudinal network data representing friendships between adolescents. Across Studies 1 (n = 812) and 2 (n = 2,559), we found no evidence that having more primary outgroup friends was associated with a change in secondary outgroup attitudes; instead, adolescents' attitudes became more similar over time to those of their primary outgroup friends. Study 3, a simulation, further showed that social influence can lead to either more positive or more negative attitudes toward secondary outgroups. Thus, friendships with primary outgroup members may have negative implications for secondary outgroups when those friends hold more negative attitudes. We discuss how social influence can advance research on the generalization of intergroup contact effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148342426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Unconscious Mental Content in Implicit Evaluation: Evidence From Misprediction 内隐评价中无意识心理内容的补充材料：来自错误预测的证据

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-29 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000491.supp

引用次数: 0

The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis. “关系型”人工智能对人类福祉的影响：一个自决理论分析。

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-22 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000528

Michael A Irias,Norman B Schmidt,Thomas E Joiner,James K McNulty

{"title":"The impact of \"relational\" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.","authors":"Michael A Irias,Norman B Schmidt,Thomas E Joiner,James K McNulty","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000528","url":null,"abstract":"Advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have given rise to relational AI-AI agents that mimic human relational capabilities while possessing unique nonhuman features, including constant availability, extensive malleability, and a lack of intrinsic psychological needs. This article uses self-determination theory to examine how relational AI may support or undermine the three basic psychological needs self-determination theory posits as essential for well-being: relatedness, competence, and autonomy. Across roles including that of tutor, copilot, social mediator, companion, and therapist, relational AI may address critical challenges to these needs, facilitating goal attainment, alleviating loneliness, and promoting mental health. However, relational AI also carries potential risks for well-being, including reduced self-direction, diminished efficacy, and altered expectations within human relationships. We propose that relational AI's ultimate impact on users' well-being will depend on moderating factors that may shape both the strength and direction of its effects on well-being, including users' motivational orientation toward the goal for which they use relational AI, their motivational orientation for using relational AI, their baseline psychological need satisfaction, dynamics particular to each relational AI role, and various situational factors. Crucially, it is likely impossible to fully understand relational AI's impacts on well-being without examining all three psychological needs, as focusing on only a single need risks overlooking dynamics in which impacts on multiple needs interact to amplify or neutralize well-being. Future research on these processes can deepen our understanding of human relationship dynamics, inform responsible AI development, and reveal novel theoretical mechanisms underlying relational AI's impacts on well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148298906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements. 跨越鸿沟的倾听：高质量的倾听通过在分歧中满足基本的心理需求来促进说话者的状态健康。

IF 6.8 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-15 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000525

Dvori Saluk, Guy Itzchakov, Netta Weinstein, Moty Amar

{"title":"Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements.","authors":"Dvori Saluk, Guy Itzchakov, Netta Weinstein, Moty Amar","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000525","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspi0000525","url":null,"abstract":"People regularly disagree, but disagreements come at a cost to relationships and well-being when communication is poor. We posited that high-quality listeners who convey their clear attention, understanding, and positive intention can turn a disagreement into a constructive experience for speakers and those expressing their views. Informed by self-determination theory, we examined whether receiving high-quality listening would improve speakers' state well-being (SWB) and its future-oriented component, state optimism, by satisfying the psychological needs for relatedness, autonomy, and competence. Across five studies (N = 1,624), three of which were preregistered, and using diverse methods including experimental vignettes, live conversations, recalled conversations, and a multilevel field survey, we compared high-quality, moderate-quality (Studies 1-5), and low-quality (Study 1) listening when conversing partners agreed or disagreed. Speakers who experienced high-quality listening consistently reported greater SWB, state optimism, and basic psychological need satisfaction. The main effects on SWB and state optimism were consistently mediated by relatedness need satisfaction. Although the indirect effects via autonomy and competence varied, an internal meta-analysis showed that both significantly mediated SWB and state optimism. Importantly, in Studies 3 and 4, high-quality listening during a disagreement resulted in higher speakers' SWB than moderate-quality listening during an agreement. These findings challenge the assumption that disagreement is inherently divisive and extend interpersonal relationship research by providing a better understanding of its consequences. They point to listening quality as a pathway to SWB and social connection, even when views are opposing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148252076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Listening Across the Divide: High-Quality Listening Promotes Speakers’ State Well-Being Through Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction During Disagreements 跨越鸿沟的听力补充材料：高质量的听力通过在分歧中满足基本的心理需求来促进说话者的状态健康

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-11 DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000525.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Is My Loneliness Killing Me? Effects of Loneliness and Social Isolation on Transitions Between Cognitive Status Categories and Death 我的孤独正在折磨我吗？孤独和社会隔离对认知状态类别与死亡之间转换的影响

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-11 DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000606.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Morality Cut Both Ways: The Role of Cognition and Emotion in Attitude Moralization and Demoralization 道德双向切割：认知和情感在态度道德化和道德败坏中的作用

IF 7.6 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-08 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000489.supp

引用次数: 0

Transcending embarrassment: On the reputational benefits of laughing at yourself. 超越尴尬：论自嘲对声誉的好处。

IF 6.8 1区心理学

Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000477

Selin Goksel, Ovul Sezer, Jonathan Z Berman

{"title":"Transcending embarrassment: On the reputational benefits of laughing at yourself.","authors":"Selin Goksel, Ovul Sezer, Jonathan Z Berman","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000477","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pspa0000477","url":null,"abstract":"How do people judge those who commit faux pas? Across six preregistered studies (N = 3,204), we find that the answer depends on how a faux pas is presented to others and the extent to which it harms others. For faux pas that cause minimal or no harm to others, those who display amusement (by laughing at their error) are seen as warmer, more competent, and more authentic (though not significantly more or less moral) than those who display embarrassment. While both amusement and embarrassment displays serve an appeasement function (which reflects positively on actors), observers view those displaying embarrassment as being excessively self-conscious (which limits positive character judgments). In contrast, amusement displays are deemed more emotionally calibrated, since they signal that an actor recognizes the faux pas is benign and therefore not serious enough to warrant negative self-conscious emotions. In other words, observers do not believe actors ought to feel particularly embarrassed upon committing common benign faux pas. However, when a faux pas harms others, those who display amusement are seen as experiencing a deficient level of self-consciousness, since, in this case, amusement indicates a disregard for the welfare of others. As a result, as harm to others increases, the benefits of displaying amusement become either attenuated or reversed relative to displaying embarrassment. Together, these findings provide a simple framework for understanding when amusement and embarrassment displays reflect well on individuals who commit faux pas. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1078-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147290277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0