Journal of evaluation in clinical practice最新文献

{"title":"Interprofessional Learning and Improving at the Paediatric Ward: A Participatory Action Research Practising Safety-II Theory","authors":"Annet van Harten,&nbsp;Margot R. Ernst-Kruis,&nbsp;Theo J. H. Niessen,&nbsp;Jur J. Koksma,&nbsp;Tineke A. Abma","doi":"10.1111/jep.70061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Rationale</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the complex setting of hospitals, professionals often lack time to improve patient safety. Safety-II theory advocates integrating safety improvement, patient participation, and interprofessional learning and proposes learning frequently from practice variability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of the research was to understand how interprofessional workplace teams can learn and improve daily from practice variability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Participatory action research (PAR) was conducted at a Dutch educational hospital paediatric ward to improve situational awareness in bedside ward-rounds. Methods included 115 semi-structured interviews and participant observations of the interactions. The action research team consisted of a representation of all stakeholders and the first author, who introduced Safety-II concepts to reflect on their practice.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The exchange of perspectives between parents, nurses and physicians increased awareness of mutual expectations and experiences prompting individual learning. To foster collective learning at the ward, the research team introduced standards tailored to participants' concerns and stimulated everyday interactions about the ward-round. This approach facilitated daily mutual perspective taking, expectation alignment, and recognition of practice variability, thereby enhancing unit-wide learning and improvement. While aiming at increasing shared situational awareness, multiple improvements emerged simultaneously and unexpectedly including time management, professional pride and job satisfaction. However, participants also discovered that lessons learned did not automatically spread to newcomers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Everyday learning in hospital units can be enhanced through daily interprofessional interactions about expectations and supported by procedural standards. Fostering daily interactions and initiating standards that met participants' concerns required the research team to spend considerable time addressing conflicting priorities. PAR proved to be a valuable and adaptive approach for learning, improving and engaging all stakeholders in a complex setting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unsolicited Emails and Spam: An Unsustainable Burden for Academics","authors":"Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva","doi":"10.1111/jep.70057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Academics, including researchers and scholars, might receive undesired/unsolicited emails, including spam. This volume might differ depending on whether they use a web-based or institutional email, since filters for each may differ. In the author's experience, most unsolicited emails have mainly been related to publishing, such as requests for submissions to lesser-known or academically suspect journals, and have become the norm. In addition, in the COVID-19 pandemic era (2020–2023), unsolicited emails related to the virus or the pandemic were received, as were some emails related to the Russo-Ukrainian war in 2022–2024. To gain an appreciation of the daily and monthly volumes of emails received by the author in 2018–2024, emails were stored in email folders over these 7 years on a monthly basis. A total of 130,941 unsolicited emails (<i>sensu lato</i>) were received in this 7-year period (14,514; 17,438; 15,668; 20,458; 19,845; 21,321; 21,697 in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively). The volume per month for each of these 7 years was 1613, 1938, 1741, 2273, 2205, 2369, and 2411 while the daily volume was 54, 64, 58, 75, 73, 79, and 80, respectively. Practical solutions are needed for academics to manage such unsustainable volumes of unsolicited emails. This brief assessment has limitations.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of a Vaccine Advocacy Scale for Childhood Vaccines and Psychometric Evaluation: A Methodological Study","authors":"Deniz S. Yorulmaz Demir","doi":"10.1111/jep.70056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study developed the Vaccine Advocacy Scale for childhood vaccines for adults and evaluated its psychometric properties.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This methodological study involved 211 adults. A literature review was conducted to create the item pool of the scale, and 12 items were prepared. While evaluating the scale's psychometric properties, the researchers performed content validity, explanatory factor analysis (factor loadings of the items, eigenvalues of the sub-dimensions, and explained variance rates), confirmatory factor analysis (factor loadings and common fit indices), and criterion validity (predictive validity) in the validation phase. In the predictive validity assessment, the distribution of scores on the scale was examined according to some behaviours related to vaccine advocacy. Additionally, we analysed the item-total score correlation, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and split-half test consistency in the reliability phase.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study's calculated Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.868, and Bartlett's test of sphericity resulted in significant results (<i>X</i>² = 1724.166; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The explanatory factor analysis revealed that the items' factor loadings were between 0.451 and 0.949 and explained 58.29% of the total variance of the structure, which consisted of 12 items and two sub-dimensions. The confirmatory factor analysis found the factor loadings of the items between 0.62 and 0.85 and identified ‘common fit indices’ within acceptable ranges and close to the perfect fit values (<i>X</i>²/df, GFI, CFI, RMSEA, RMR, NFI, TLI and IFI were 1.906, 0.950, 0.952, 0.093, 0.059, 0.906, 940 and 0.953, respectively). The Cronbach's alpha value for the scale was 0.92, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient, Guttman's split-half coefficient, and split-half correlation coefficients were 0.843, 0.842 and 0.713, respectively. The study findings indicated that individuals who had talked to other parents about vaccines, recommended vaccinations, and communicated vaccine-related issues with medical professionals had significantly higher total scale scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Considering the study findings and evaluations, the Vaccine Advocacy Scale was a valid and reliable measurement tool to assess adults’ vaccine advocacy behaviour for childhood vaccines.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “Capturing Real-World Rare Disease Patient Journeys: Are Current Methodologies Sufficient for Informed Healthcare Decisions?”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jep.70072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70072","url":null,"abstract":"<p>K. A. Cribbs, L. T. A. Blackmore, A. R. Banks, D. S. Kim, B. J. Lahue, “Capturing Real-World Rare Disease Patient Journeys: Are Current Methodologies Sufficient for Informed Healthcare Decisions?,” <i>Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice</i> 31, no. 1 (2025): e70010, doi:10.1111/jep.70010.</p><p>In the Abstract, under <b>Results</b>, the following result was incorrect, “…<i>and <b>cross-sectional (26%)</b> designs…”</i> (<i>n</i> = 26, or 84%, of studies were cross-sectional, not 26%). This should have read, “<i>and <b>cross-sectional (84%)</b> designs….”</i></p><p>In Figure 5, the word ‘perceived’ in “Self-Perceived Health Status” is spelled incorrectly. This should have read, “Self-Perceived Health Status.” A corrected version of this figure is on the following page.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143707336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cross-Sectional Analysis of Research and Non-Research Payments From the Medical Device Industry to Healthcare Professionals and Organisations in Japan in 2022","authors":"Anju Murayama","doi":"10.1111/jep.70066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Rationale</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Financial relationships between healthcare professionals (HCPs), healthcare organisations (HCOs) and the medical device industry in Japan may lead to conflicts of interest. Limited transparency in these relationships has raised concerns regarding their potential influence on clinical decision-making and patient care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to assess the scope and magnitude of financial payments from medical device companies to HCPs and HCOs in Japan, focusing on publicly disclosed data from the 2022 fiscal year.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional analysis of publicly available payment disclosures from 169 medical device companies, including all members of the Japan Federation of Medical Devices Associations (JFMDA) and several major non-JFMDA affiliated companies, was conducted. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarise payment data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of the 169 medical device companies, 32.5% (55 companies) did not disclose payment information and 6 companies disclosed payment records in aggregated amounts with their group companies, leaving 108 companies for analysis. In total, $245.2 million in payments were made in 2022, with only 23.9% ($58.7 million) to research and development. Of the total, 34.6% ($84.9 million) was allocated to non-research payments to HCOs for sponsoring HCOs’ activities, and 19.6% ($49.0 million) were paid for lecturing and consulting fees, typically to individual HCPs. More than 80% of companies allocated a greater share of payments to non-research activities than to research.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study reveals substantial financial relationships between medical device companies and HCPs/HCOs in Japan, predominantly for non-research purposes. Improved transparency regulations, including a uniform, government-run database, are necessary to better oversee these financial interactions with medical device industry in Japan.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Family Peace of Mind of Individuals Over 65 Years of Age With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Emre Birinci,&nbsp;Ceyda Bayram,&nbsp;Ayşe Özkaraman","doi":"10.1111/jep.70063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70063","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The purpose of this study was to assess the level of family peace among people over 65 who have chronic diseases and to look at the level of peace in relation to specific factors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 July and 31 October 2023 in Internal Medicine policlinics and clinics of a hospital in Eskişehir/Türkiye. The data were collected using the ‘Introduction Form’, ‘Self-Efficacy Scale’ and ‘Family Peace Scale’. While the data were given in the form of number, percentage, mean and percantage, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> and Kruskal–Wallis <i>T</i> tests and Spearman's correlation analysis were applied in statistical analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The total mean score of the family peace scale was 64.82 ± 9.041, the deep wear sub-dimension score was 34.11 ± 5.66, and the general contentment sub-dimension score was 30.71 ± 4.64. Age of the patients showed a significantly favourable association with the overall family peace score (<i>r</i> = 0.149; <i>p</i> = 0.019) (Table 4). Individual with dependents had statistically significantly lower total and sub-dimension scores of family peace (<i>p</i> = 0.004, <i>p</i> = 0.030, <i>p</i> = 0.007, respectively). It was found that family peace increased significantly in the positive direction as the level of self-efficacy of the patients increased (<i>r</i> = 0.389, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Family peace of mind is strongly associated with age, dependents and self-efficacy perceptions of individuals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70063","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alternate Choice Organ Counselling in Altruistic Non-Directed Solid Organ Donation: An Ethical Analysis","authors":"Richard C. Armitage","doi":"10.1111/jep.70055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70055","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Currently, recruitment of non-directed altruistic (NDA) kidney and liver lobe donors in the UK regards these individuals as potential NDA donors of the particular organ type they initially express an interest in donating. Conceptualising these individuals instead as potential NDA donors of either a kidney or a liver lobe would require them to be counselled on both kidney donation and liver lobe donation. This can be referred to as ‘alternate choice organ counselling’.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper conducts an ethical analysis of alternate choice organ counselling using the ethical framework of Principlism, and suggests changes to current policy and practice, accordingly.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper finds multiple strong ethical reasons to carry out alternate choice organ counselling for potential NDA donors of kidneys or liver lobes: the duty to respect autonomy requires alternate choice organ counselling such that the potential donor's decision to become a NDA donor of a particular organ type is fully informed; the duty of non-maleficence requires alternate choice organ counselling such that the harm subjected to the donor through living donation can be minimised (although such counselling might generate serial NDA donors, which would expose them to greater total harm); the asymmetry in the degree to which the living kidney and living liver lobe donation mechanisms promote justice requires alternate choice organ counselling for potential donors who wish to maximise the utility of their single NDA donation; finally, alternate choice organ counselling is likely to promote beneficence in potential NDA donors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper finds ethical reasons for potential NDA donors to be conceptualised as potential NDA donors of either a kidney or liver lobe, and for these individuals to be provided with alternate choice organ counselling. Suggestions on how this might be delivered in practice are offered, and the necessary further quantitative and qualitative research outlined.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70055","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Place of Evidence-Based Practices in Theoretical and Clinical Practice From the Perspective of Midwifery Students: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Feyza Aktaş Reyhan,&nbsp;Elif Dağlı,&nbsp;Havva Yeşildere Sağlam","doi":"10.1111/jep.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study was conducted to determine the views of future midwives about the place of evidence-based practices in midwifery education and practice.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 28 student midwives who took the course of evidence-based practices in midwifery. Data were collected through in-depth and face-to-face interviews using an interview form. Content analysis technique was used to analyze the data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four themes and thirteen sub-themes were identified in the data analysis. These themes are belief in evidence-based practice, differences in education and practice, barriers to evidence-based practices and implementation of evidence-based practices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the current study, students' awareness of evidence-based midwifery practices and their ability to offer opinions and suggestions are related to the fact that they have taken the evidence-based practices course in their education. In this sense, it is important to increase the knowledge, awareness and skills of midwives by integrating evidence-based practices in the education curricula of future midwives.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143698893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analysis of Youtube Videos for Artificial Airway Suctioning Training of Nurses: A Content Analysis","authors":"Sercan Kara,&nbsp;Dilek Yildirim","doi":"10.1111/jep.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Artificial airway suctioning is one of the most widespread nursing procedures in clinical practice. Although artificial airway suctioning is frequently applied procedure, it is not easy to perform. It is most important to follow the correct technique to prevent possible complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aims to assess the content, reliability, and quality of training videos on endotracheal aspiration for nurses. The descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in September 2023 and the videos available on the YouTube platform for artificial airway suctioning training of nurses were evaluated in terms of content, reliability and quality.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In total, 36 videos were analyzed. The analysis was conducted by two independent researchers. Video Information Form and Endotracheal or Tracheostomy Tube Aspiration Checklist created in line with the literature were used to evaluate the application steps of the videos. The short form of the DISCERN questionnaire was utilized to assess the reliability of the videos, while the 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) was employed to evaluate their quality. The mean DISCERN score for the videos was 2.958 ± 1.513, the mean GQS score was 3.430 ± 1.083, and the mean total score for the Implementation Checklist was 47.166 ± 10.338. A strong agreement was observed between the assessments made by the first and second researchers using the DISCERN, GQS, and Checklist. The videos included in the study were found to be of medium quality. Additionally, it was determined that all videos exhibited deficiencies in the Checklist steps. In addition, there were significant deficiencies in application principles such as compliance with sterile technique, sequence of application stages and recording.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These deficiencies are thought to pose a great risk in terms of patient safety. It is recommended that artificial airway suctioning videos available on YouTube be used in nursing education after being checked for content and by experts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143646274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fatigue Related COPD From Patient's Perspectives","authors":"Aysun Kazak Salti,&nbsp;Ayse Özkaraman,&nbsp;Nuran Dudakli","doi":"10.1111/jep.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fatigue is a common symptom in patients with the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported fatigue in the COPD and to investigate their attempts to cope with it.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This cross-sectional study was conducted with 62 patients diagnosed with the COPD. Individual Introduction Form, Fatigue Intervention Form and Visual Analog Scale were used to collect research data. The data were presented in the form of numbers, percentages, means and standard deviations, while Chi-Square, Fisher Freeman Halton and Pearson Correlation analysis were applied in statistical analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients have moderate fatigue, with a score of 6.91 ± 2.81 out of 10 and they experience fatigue for 4.95 ± 2.19 days in a week. Patients reported that the most common causes of fatigue were stress, illness and advanced age. They also mentioned feeling unhappy and angry due to fatigue, adopted a sedentary lifestyle, and being unable to do housework. The most common attempts made by patients to cope with fatigue are sleeping, taking a warm shower and using medication, while less frequently used methods include watching movies, praying, getting a massage and listening to music.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients diagnosed with the COPD frequently experience moderate fatigue, which can have harmful effects on their daily lives. In response, patients often implement strategies to conserve energy, with the aim of managing the fatigue symptoms. Nurses should routinely assess the fatigue status of the COPD patients and counsel them on coping with fatigue.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143646273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}