Narketpally Syndrome and the Embedding of Contextual Values in Real-Life Patient Pathways

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Vivek Podder, Rahul Kulkarni, Aditya Samitinjay, Abdul Salam, Sailaja Gade, Mansi Agrawal, Adwaith Krishna Surendran, Rakesh Biswas
{"title":"Narketpally Syndrome and the Embedding of Contextual Values in Real-Life Patient Pathways","authors":"Vivek Podder,&nbsp;Rahul Kulkarni,&nbsp;Aditya Samitinjay,&nbsp;Abdul Salam,&nbsp;Sailaja Gade,&nbsp;Mansi Agrawal,&nbsp;Adwaith Krishna Surendran,&nbsp;Rakesh Biswas","doi":"10.1111/jep.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This commentary illustrates a global patient-centered learning ecosystem, anchored in Narketpally, that adopts a syndromic approach to medical education and research. Rooted in the etymological origins of ‘syndrome’ (“together we flow”), this approach reframes medical research as a collective, contextual response to individual patient needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The structure of the paper is intentionally modeled as a team-based learning exercise, grounded in our prior Web 2.0–based cognitive tools: CBBLE (Case-Based Blended Learning Ecosystem) and PaJR (Patient Journey Record). These are framed against the conceptual scaffolding provided by three key publications: a framework by Sturmberg et al. and two contrasting commentaries by Greenhalgh and Ioannidis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Through our ongoing CBBLE–PaJR workflow, thematic learning outcomes emerged in response to these frameworks. Sturmberg's stratified realism helped us recognize how individual patient connections, recorded in our daily practice and online learning portfolios, can drive both contextual learning and meaningful changes in patient outcomes. Greenhalgh's commentary inspired our conceptualization of a ‘wildebeest river crossing value model,’ contrasting population-based efficiency with individual-centered compassion. Ioannidis's critique of methodological rigor highlighted the potential for expanding low-resource, high-impact research through patient-centered designs, particularly in phases 1 and 4 of the clinical trial hierarchy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Narketpally Syndrome represents more than a metaphor; it signifies a real, evolving ecosystem of knowledge, reflection, and practice. It suggests that research must be reimagined as a river of collective cognition, flowing across diverse clinical contexts, with each patient seen as a site of inquiry. Such an approach enables the integration of contextual values into real-life patient pathways. In contrast to the dominant forest-canopy model of population medicine, this framework emphasizes the importance of focusing on the roots of each patient that form the ecosystem of patient-centered care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This commentary illustrates a global patient-centered learning ecosystem, anchored in Narketpally, that adopts a syndromic approach to medical education and research. Rooted in the etymological origins of ‘syndrome’ (“together we flow”), this approach reframes medical research as a collective, contextual response to individual patient needs.

Methods

The structure of the paper is intentionally modeled as a team-based learning exercise, grounded in our prior Web 2.0–based cognitive tools: CBBLE (Case-Based Blended Learning Ecosystem) and PaJR (Patient Journey Record). These are framed against the conceptual scaffolding provided by three key publications: a framework by Sturmberg et al. and two contrasting commentaries by Greenhalgh and Ioannidis.

Results

Through our ongoing CBBLE–PaJR workflow, thematic learning outcomes emerged in response to these frameworks. Sturmberg's stratified realism helped us recognize how individual patient connections, recorded in our daily practice and online learning portfolios, can drive both contextual learning and meaningful changes in patient outcomes. Greenhalgh's commentary inspired our conceptualization of a ‘wildebeest river crossing value model,’ contrasting population-based efficiency with individual-centered compassion. Ioannidis's critique of methodological rigor highlighted the potential for expanding low-resource, high-impact research through patient-centered designs, particularly in phases 1 and 4 of the clinical trial hierarchy.

Conclusion

Narketpally Syndrome represents more than a metaphor; it signifies a real, evolving ecosystem of knowledge, reflection, and practice. It suggests that research must be reimagined as a river of collective cognition, flowing across diverse clinical contexts, with each patient seen as a site of inquiry. Such an approach enables the integration of contextual values into real-life patient pathways. In contrast to the dominant forest-canopy model of population medicine, this framework emphasizes the importance of focusing on the roots of each patient that form the ecosystem of patient-centered care.

纳克帕利综合征和嵌入情境价值在现实生活中的患者途径
这篇评论说明了一个以患者为中心的全球学习生态系统,以纳克特帕利为基础,采用综合征方法进行医学教育和研究。基于“综合征”(“我们一起流动”)的词源,这种方法将医学研究重新定义为对个体患者需求的集体、情境反应。本文的结构被有意建模为基于团队的学习练习,并以我们之前基于Web 2.0的认知工具为基础:CBBLE(基于案例的混合学习生态系统)和PaJR(患者旅程记录)。这些都是基于三个关键出版物提供的概念框架:Sturmberg等人的框架和Greenhalgh和Ioannidis的两个对比评论。通过我们正在进行的bble - pajr工作流程,针对这些框架出现了主题学习成果。Sturmberg的分层现实主义帮助我们认识到,记录在我们日常实践和在线学习档案中的个体患者联系如何能够推动情境学习和患者结果的有意义变化。Greenhalgh的评论启发了我们对“角马渡河价值模型”的概念,将以群体为基础的效率与以个人为中心的同情心进行了对比。Ioannidis对方法严谨性的批评强调了通过以患者为中心的设计扩大低资源、高影响研究的潜力,特别是在临床试验层次的第一阶段和第四阶段。结论Narketpally综合征不仅仅是一个隐喻;它标志着一个真实的、不断发展的知识、反思和实践的生态系统。它表明,研究必须被重新想象成一条集体认知的河流,在不同的临床环境中流动,每个病人都被视为一个调查地点。这种方法能够将情境价值整合到现实生活中的患者路径中。与人口医学中占主导地位的森林-树冠模型相比,该框架强调了关注每个患者的根源的重要性,这些患者形成了以患者为中心的护理生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信