{"title":"临床实践结果测量的简明概述","authors":"Ariyibi Liad Abimbola","doi":"10.1111/jep.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is an umbrella term covering different ranges of outcome instruments such as the multidimensional health-related quality of life measures (WHOQOL, HRQOL) and others like Short Form 36, EuroQol-5D, and PROMIS. These instruments were developed by experts to address issues that borders directly on the patient's needs and preferences, consequently in contemporary clinical practise it has largely replaced or supplemented traditional outcome measures which are flawed by a host of limitations. The PROM, though designed to address most of the shortcomings observed in the traditional instruments is still subject to constant improvement and validation for it to be at pace with rapid technological advancement as well as variation in human activity and behavior. This is to ensure that ultimately, the care provided is centered around what benefits the patient most. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, COSMIN, etc. have developed a set of instruments, standardized for use in clinical practice to ensure that the patient remains at the center of their care. This is continually being improved upon so that it will not lag behind as cutting-edge technological inventions and medical innovations advance healthcare delivery.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Concise Overview of Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice\",\"authors\":\"Ariyibi Liad Abimbola\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is an umbrella term covering different ranges of outcome instruments such as the multidimensional health-related quality of life measures (WHOQOL, HRQOL) and others like Short Form 36, EuroQol-5D, and PROMIS. These instruments were developed by experts to address issues that borders directly on the patient's needs and preferences, consequently in contemporary clinical practise it has largely replaced or supplemented traditional outcome measures which are flawed by a host of limitations. The PROM, though designed to address most of the shortcomings observed in the traditional instruments is still subject to constant improvement and validation for it to be at pace with rapid technological advancement as well as variation in human activity and behavior. This is to ensure that ultimately, the care provided is centered around what benefits the patient most. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, COSMIN, etc. have developed a set of instruments, standardized for use in clinical practice to ensure that the patient remains at the center of their care. This is continually being improved upon so that it will not lag behind as cutting-edge technological inventions and medical innovations advance healthcare delivery.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
患者报告的结果测量(PROM)是一个总称,涵盖了不同范围的结果测量工具,如多维健康相关生活质量测量(WHOQOL、HRQOL)和其他如Short Form 36、EuroQol-5D和PROMIS。这些仪器是由专家开发的,以解决直接与患者的需求和偏好有关的问题,因此在当代临床实践中,它在很大程度上取代或补充了传统的结果测量,这些结果测量因许多局限性而存在缺陷。PROM虽然旨在解决传统仪器中观察到的大多数缺点,但仍然需要不断改进和验证,以适应快速的技术进步以及人类活动和行为的变化。这是为了确保最终提供的护理以对患者最有利的为中心。国际保健结果计量联合会(COSMIN)等已开发了一套用于临床实践的标准化仪器,以确保患者始终处于其护理的中心。随着尖端技术发明和医疗创新推动医疗保健服务的发展,这一点正在不断得到改进,以便它不会落后。
A Concise Overview of Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice
The patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is an umbrella term covering different ranges of outcome instruments such as the multidimensional health-related quality of life measures (WHOQOL, HRQOL) and others like Short Form 36, EuroQol-5D, and PROMIS. These instruments were developed by experts to address issues that borders directly on the patient's needs and preferences, consequently in contemporary clinical practise it has largely replaced or supplemented traditional outcome measures which are flawed by a host of limitations. The PROM, though designed to address most of the shortcomings observed in the traditional instruments is still subject to constant improvement and validation for it to be at pace with rapid technological advancement as well as variation in human activity and behavior. This is to ensure that ultimately, the care provided is centered around what benefits the patient most. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, COSMIN, etc. have developed a set of instruments, standardized for use in clinical practice to ensure that the patient remains at the center of their care. This is continually being improved upon so that it will not lag behind as cutting-edge technological inventions and medical innovations advance healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.