{"title":"纳克帕利综合征和嵌入情境价值在现实生活中的患者途径","authors":"Vivek Podder, Rahul Kulkarni, Aditya Samitinjay, Abdul Salam, Sailaja Gade, Mansi Agrawal, Adwaith Krishna Surendran, Rakesh Biswas","doi":"10.1111/jep.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This commentary illustrates a global patient-centered learning ecosystem, anchored in Narketpally, that adopts a syndromic approach to medical education and research. Rooted in the etymological origins of ‘syndrome’ (“together we flow”), this approach reframes medical research as a collective, contextual response to individual patient needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The structure of the paper is intentionally modeled as a team-based learning exercise, grounded in our prior Web 2.0–based cognitive tools: CBBLE (Case-Based Blended Learning Ecosystem) and PaJR (Patient Journey Record). These are framed against the conceptual scaffolding provided by three key publications: a framework by Sturmberg et al. and two contrasting commentaries by Greenhalgh and Ioannidis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Through our ongoing CBBLE–PaJR workflow, thematic learning outcomes emerged in response to these frameworks. Sturmberg's stratified realism helped us recognize how individual patient connections, recorded in our daily practice and online learning portfolios, can drive both contextual learning and meaningful changes in patient outcomes. Greenhalgh's commentary inspired our conceptualization of a ‘wildebeest river crossing value model,’ contrasting population-based efficiency with individual-centered compassion. Ioannidis's critique of methodological rigor highlighted the potential for expanding low-resource, high-impact research through patient-centered designs, particularly in phases 1 and 4 of the clinical trial hierarchy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Narketpally Syndrome represents more than a metaphor; it signifies a real, evolving ecosystem of knowledge, reflection, and practice. It suggests that research must be reimagined as a river of collective cognition, flowing across diverse clinical contexts, with each patient seen as a site of inquiry. Such an approach enables the integration of contextual values into real-life patient pathways. In contrast to the dominant forest-canopy model of population medicine, this framework emphasizes the importance of focusing on the roots of each patient that form the ecosystem of patient-centered care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narketpally Syndrome and the Embedding of Contextual Values in Real-Life Patient Pathways\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Podder, Rahul Kulkarni, Aditya Samitinjay, Abdul Salam, Sailaja Gade, Mansi Agrawal, Adwaith Krishna Surendran, Rakesh Biswas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This commentary illustrates a global patient-centered learning ecosystem, anchored in Narketpally, that adopts a syndromic approach to medical education and research. Rooted in the etymological origins of ‘syndrome’ (“together we flow”), this approach reframes medical research as a collective, contextual response to individual patient needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The structure of the paper is intentionally modeled as a team-based learning exercise, grounded in our prior Web 2.0–based cognitive tools: CBBLE (Case-Based Blended Learning Ecosystem) and PaJR (Patient Journey Record). These are framed against the conceptual scaffolding provided by three key publications: a framework by Sturmberg et al. and two contrasting commentaries by Greenhalgh and Ioannidis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Through our ongoing CBBLE–PaJR workflow, thematic learning outcomes emerged in response to these frameworks. Sturmberg's stratified realism helped us recognize how individual patient connections, recorded in our daily practice and online learning portfolios, can drive both contextual learning and meaningful changes in patient outcomes. Greenhalgh's commentary inspired our conceptualization of a ‘wildebeest river crossing value model,’ contrasting population-based efficiency with individual-centered compassion. Ioannidis's critique of methodological rigor highlighted the potential for expanding low-resource, high-impact research through patient-centered designs, particularly in phases 1 and 4 of the clinical trial hierarchy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Narketpally Syndrome represents more than a metaphor; it signifies a real, evolving ecosystem of knowledge, reflection, and practice. It suggests that research must be reimagined as a river of collective cognition, flowing across diverse clinical contexts, with each patient seen as a site of inquiry. Such an approach enables the integration of contextual values into real-life patient pathways. In contrast to the dominant forest-canopy model of population medicine, this framework emphasizes the importance of focusing on the roots of each patient that form the ecosystem of patient-centered care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Narketpally Syndrome and the Embedding of Contextual Values in Real-Life Patient Pathways
Introduction
This commentary illustrates a global patient-centered learning ecosystem, anchored in Narketpally, that adopts a syndromic approach to medical education and research. Rooted in the etymological origins of ‘syndrome’ (“together we flow”), this approach reframes medical research as a collective, contextual response to individual patient needs.
Methods
The structure of the paper is intentionally modeled as a team-based learning exercise, grounded in our prior Web 2.0–based cognitive tools: CBBLE (Case-Based Blended Learning Ecosystem) and PaJR (Patient Journey Record). These are framed against the conceptual scaffolding provided by three key publications: a framework by Sturmberg et al. and two contrasting commentaries by Greenhalgh and Ioannidis.
Results
Through our ongoing CBBLE–PaJR workflow, thematic learning outcomes emerged in response to these frameworks. Sturmberg's stratified realism helped us recognize how individual patient connections, recorded in our daily practice and online learning portfolios, can drive both contextual learning and meaningful changes in patient outcomes. Greenhalgh's commentary inspired our conceptualization of a ‘wildebeest river crossing value model,’ contrasting population-based efficiency with individual-centered compassion. Ioannidis's critique of methodological rigor highlighted the potential for expanding low-resource, high-impact research through patient-centered designs, particularly in phases 1 and 4 of the clinical trial hierarchy.
Conclusion
Narketpally Syndrome represents more than a metaphor; it signifies a real, evolving ecosystem of knowledge, reflection, and practice. It suggests that research must be reimagined as a river of collective cognition, flowing across diverse clinical contexts, with each patient seen as a site of inquiry. Such an approach enables the integration of contextual values into real-life patient pathways. In contrast to the dominant forest-canopy model of population medicine, this framework emphasizes the importance of focusing on the roots of each patient that form the ecosystem of patient-centered care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.