{"title":"2016年至2021年日本制药公司向医疗保健提供商支付的趋势","authors":"Keiichiro Hayashi, Akemi Hara, Michioki Endo, Hiroaki Saito, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Akihiko Ozaki","doi":"10.1111/jep.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmaceutical payments to healthcare providers can pose conflicts of interest. Long-term trends in such payments in Japan remain under explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined pharmaceutical company payments to healthcare providers in Japan from 2016 to 2021, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis using publicly disclosed data on payments (lectures, consulting, and writing) from pharmaceutical companies. Payments were analyzed by year, amount, and specialty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Total payments remained stable from 2017 to 2019 ($249 million), dropped in 2020 ($172 million), and rose in 2021 ($272 million). The number of recipients declined overall, but mean and median payments per healthcare provider steadily increased. The share receiving over $100,000 rose from 0.09% to 0.17%. Cardiovascular and diabetes/metabolism/endocrinology specialists consistently received the highest payments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Payments became more concentrated among high-earning physicians following the COVID-19 pandemic. Continued monitoring is needed to manage potential conflicts of interest.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Pharmaceutical Company Payments to Healthcare Providers in Japan From 2016 to 2021\",\"authors\":\"Keiichiro Hayashi, Akemi Hara, Michioki Endo, Hiroaki Saito, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Akihiko Ozaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pharmaceutical payments to healthcare providers can pose conflicts of interest. Long-term trends in such payments in Japan remain under explored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examined pharmaceutical company payments to healthcare providers in Japan from 2016 to 2021, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis using publicly disclosed data on payments (lectures, consulting, and writing) from pharmaceutical companies. Payments were analyzed by year, amount, and specialty.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Total payments remained stable from 2017 to 2019 ($249 million), dropped in 2020 ($172 million), and rose in 2021 ($272 million). The number of recipients declined overall, but mean and median payments per healthcare provider steadily increased. The share receiving over $100,000 rose from 0.09% to 0.17%. Cardiovascular and diabetes/metabolism/endocrinology specialists consistently received the highest payments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Payments became more concentrated among high-earning physicians following the COVID-19 pandemic. Continued monitoring is needed to manage potential conflicts of interest.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70169\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends in Pharmaceutical Company Payments to Healthcare Providers in Japan From 2016 to 2021
Rationale
Pharmaceutical payments to healthcare providers can pose conflicts of interest. Long-term trends in such payments in Japan remain under explored.
Aims and Objectives
This study examined pharmaceutical company payments to healthcare providers in Japan from 2016 to 2021, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
We conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis using publicly disclosed data on payments (lectures, consulting, and writing) from pharmaceutical companies. Payments were analyzed by year, amount, and specialty.
Results
Total payments remained stable from 2017 to 2019 ($249 million), dropped in 2020 ($172 million), and rose in 2021 ($272 million). The number of recipients declined overall, but mean and median payments per healthcare provider steadily increased. The share receiving over $100,000 rose from 0.09% to 0.17%. Cardiovascular and diabetes/metabolism/endocrinology specialists consistently received the highest payments.
Conclusion
Payments became more concentrated among high-earning physicians following the COVID-19 pandemic. Continued monitoring is needed to manage potential conflicts of interest.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.