Journal of Experimental Psychology: General最新文献_第9页

Supplemental Material for Experience Shapes the Granularity of Social Perception: Computational Insights Into Individual and Group-Based Representations 经验的补充材料形状的社会知觉的粒度：计算洞察到个人和群体为基础的表征

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001770.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Breaking Boundaries: The Effects of Counter-Stereotypical Sources on Ingroup Persuasion and Outgroup Dissuasion 打破界限：反刻板印象来源对群体内说服和群体外劝阻的影响

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001762.supp

引用次数: 0

Equitable burden-sharing in "take-one-for-the-team" situations: The role of coordination. “团队一人”情况下的公平负担分担：协调的作用。

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001781

Yukari Jessica Tham,Yohsuke Ohtsubo,Takaaki Hashimoto,Kaori Karasawa

{"title":"Equitable burden-sharing in \"take-one-for-the-team\" situations: The role of coordination.","authors":"Yukari Jessica Tham,Yohsuke Ohtsubo,Takaaki Hashimoto,Kaori Karasawa","doi":"10.1037/xge0001781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001781","url":null,"abstract":"Groups frequently encounter situations where someone must \"take one for the team\"-that is, one member must undertake a task for the benefit of the group. When such tasks recur, how should the burdens be shared? This question becomes particularly complex when the cost of performing the task varies among members, creating a trade-off between efficiency and equity. For instance, always assigning the task to the member who can complete it at the lowest cost is efficient but inequitable. Our research examines how this trade-off is managed, using the framework of social dilemmas, specifically volunteer's dilemmas. Across three main experiments and three supplemental experiments (N = 1,789), we find that when participants imagine these situations, they prefer equitable (but inefficient) burden-sharing (Study 1). However, when they actually face these situations, their actions often deviate from this preference, with some members taking on more burdens than necessary to achieve equity (Study 2). Further investigation reveals that the main obstacle to equity is the difficulty of coordinating who takes on the task and when (Study 3). These findings contribute two key insights to research on fairness. First, they provide initial evidence that individuals tend to prefer equity when sharing indivisible burdens, contrasting with previous studies on distributive justice and social preferences, which have focused on divisible resources (e.g., money). Second, they highlight the critical role of coordination in achieving equitable burden-sharing-an aspect overlooked in prior research, which has focused on the role of coordination in group productivity rather than fairness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Equitable burden-sharing in "take-one-for-the-team" situations: The role of coordination. “团队一人”情况下的公平负担分担：协调的作用。

IF 3.7 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001781

Yukari Jessica Tham, Yohsuke Ohtsubo, Takaaki Hashimoto, Kaori Karasawa

{"title":"Equitable burden-sharing in \"take-one-for-the-team\" situations: The role of coordination.","authors":"Yukari Jessica Tham, Yohsuke Ohtsubo, Takaaki Hashimoto, Kaori Karasawa","doi":"10.1037/xge0001781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001781","url":null,"abstract":"Groups frequently encounter situations where someone must \"take one for the team\"-that is, one member must undertake a task for the benefit of the group. When such tasks recur, how should the burdens be shared? This question becomes particularly complex when the cost of performing the task varies among members, creating a trade-off between efficiency and equity. For instance, always assigning the task to the member who can complete it at the lowest cost is efficient but inequitable. Our research examines how this trade-off is managed, using the framework of social dilemmas, specifically volunteer's dilemmas. Across three main experiments and three supplemental experiments (N = 1,789), we find that when participants imagine these situations, they prefer equitable (but inefficient) burden-sharing (Study 1). However, when they actually face these situations, their actions often deviate from this preference, with some members taking on more burdens than necessary to achieve equity (Study 2). Further investigation reveals that the main obstacle to equity is the difficulty of coordinating who takes on the task and when (Study 3). These findings contribute two key insights to research on fairness. First, they provide initial evidence that individuals tend to prefer equity when sharing indivisible burdens, contrasting with previous studies on distributive justice and social preferences, which have focused on divisible resources (e.g., money). Second, they highlight the critical role of coordination in achieving equitable burden-sharing-an aspect overlooked in prior research, which has focused on the role of coordination in group productivity rather than fairness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144021069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sustained attentional state is a floodlight not a spotlight. 持续的注意力状态是照明灯而不是聚光灯。

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001769

Anna Corriveau,Anthony R James,Megan T deBettencourt,Monica D Rosenberg

{"title":"Sustained attentional state is a floodlight not a spotlight.","authors":"Anna Corriveau,Anthony R James,Megan T deBettencourt,Monica D Rosenberg","doi":"10.1037/xge0001769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001769","url":null,"abstract":"Maintaining attention to a task is essential for accomplishing it. However, attentional state fluctuates from moment to moment, and task-irrelevant information may compete for processing. What are the consequences of attentional fluctuations for what we remember? Do fluctuations in sustained attention vary the spotlight of selective attention, prioritizing task-relevant at the expense of task-irrelevant information? Or, are increases in a sustained attentional state akin to a floodlight, enhancing processing of all information, regardless of task relevance? In an online sample of 215 adults, participants were presented simultaneous streams of images and sounds and instructed to make responses based on only one modality. Afterward, recognition memory for both images and sounds was tested. Across individuals, we found no evidence of a trade-off between memory for task-relevant and task-irrelevant items. Within individuals, successful memory for a task-relevant item predicted successful memory for its task-irrelevant pair. Thus, the spotlight metaphor of attention does not extend to the dynamics of sustained attention. Rather, fluctuations in attention are more akin to a floodlight, affecting the processing of all task information, regardless of relevance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Dynamics of Learning New Words From Context 《从上下文中动态学习新词》补充材料

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001768.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for From “Me” to “We”: How Perspective Shifts in Language Can Shape Children’s Judgments About Kindness, Caring, and Inclusivity 从“我”到“我们”：语言视角的转变如何影响儿童对善良、关心和包容的判断

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001777.supp

引用次数: 0

Korean Hangul is more robust to a serial bottleneck: Co-occurring and semantically related Korean words can be processed in parallel. 韩文对串行瓶颈的鲁棒性更强：同时出现的和语义相关的韩文单词可以并行处理。

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001778

Sang-Ah Yoo,Sung Jun Joo

{"title":"Korean Hangul is more robust to a serial bottleneck: Co-occurring and semantically related Korean words can be processed in parallel.","authors":"Sang-Ah Yoo,Sung Jun Joo","doi":"10.1037/xge0001778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001778","url":null,"abstract":"Can readers process multiple words simultaneously, and are there cultural differences in attentional bottleneck in lexical processing? To answer these questions, we asked participants to view two words and categorize only one (single-task) or both words (dual-task), using Korean word pairs that frequently co-occur and are semantically related. We hypothesized that the coactivation of related words could facilitate lexical processing, and that the unique characteristics of Korean Hangul, such as its shallow orthographic depth and clear-cut syllabic boundaries, would enhance this effect. The results suggest that Korean Hangul is more robust to a serial processing bottleneck. Unlike the previous findings in English, independent or unrelated Korean word pairs were not processed in a strictly serial manner. Furthermore, the results for co-occurring and semantically related words supported the parallel processing model. Interestingly, for regularly co-occurring words, accuracy for one word increased if the participant was also correct about the other. These findings suggest that the relation between the words and the properties of writing systems should be considered in the long-standing serial versus parallel debate in reading research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143920976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Sustained Attentional State Is a Floodlight Not a Spotlight 持续注意力状态的补充材料是泛光灯而不是聚光灯

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001769.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Equitable Burden-Sharing in “Take-One-for-the-Team” Situations: The Role of Coordination “一人替一队”情况下公平分担责任补充材料：协调的作用

IF 4.1 1区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001781.supp

引用次数: 0