Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology最新文献

{"title":"American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Technical Standards for Electrical Stimulation With Intracranial Electrodes for Functional Brain Mapping and Seizure Induction.","authors":"Ravindra Arya, Fiona M Baumer, Patrick Chauvel, Birgit Frauscher, Prasanna Jayakar, Ammar Kheder, Bradley Lega, Ronald P Lesser, Kai J Miller, Marc R Nuwer, Nigel P Pedersen, Anthony L Ritaccio, David S Sabsevitz, Saurabh R Sinha, Elson L So, William O Tatum, Jessica W Templer, Stephan U Schuele","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>These American Clinical Neurophysiology Society technical standards suggest best practices for electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) with subdural and stereotactic depth electrodes for seizure induction and mapping of brain function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group was convened from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in ESM. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Recurrent meetings reviewed progress, built consensus by discussion, and developed evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>Stimulators used for ESM should have sufficient dynamic range, ability to interrupt a stimulus train, and ictal disrupt mechanism(s). Charge density should be calculated for the specific electrodes and ESM settings, the maximum safe limits being 52 to 57 μC/cm2/phase for subdural electrodes and not established for stereotactic depth electrodes. Subdural ESM for functional mapping is typically performed at 50-Hz pulse frequency, 200- to 300-µs pulse width, 2- to 8-s train duration, and 1- to 20-mA current strength. Stereo ESM is commonly performed using 2 different pulse frequencies: 1 Hz (300-500 µs pulse width, train duration up to 30 s, and often a constant current of 3-5 mA), and 50 Hz (100-500 µs pulse width, train duration 2-8 s, and 0.5-10 mA current intensity).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This guideline provides technical standards for the performance of ESM, which will likely evolve over time with advances in technology and additional evidence (also see Graphical Abstract).</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Epilepsy Surgery Education: A Survey of US Epilepsy Fellowship Program Directors.","authors":"Roohi Katyal, Irfan S Sheikh, Camilo Gutierrez, Saurabh R Sinha, B Keith Day, Jay R Gavvala, Sameer A Sheth, Elaine Wirrell, Sándor Beniczky, Fábio A Nascimento","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand the current state of epilepsy surgery education delivered to epilepsy fellows in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey focused on characteristics of epilepsy surgery education was distributed to all 93 epilepsy fellowship program directors listed on the ACGME website (accessed in May 2022). Programs were stratified per the number of fellows currently enrolled: 0 to 3 (group A) and ≥4 (group B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one of 93 (44%) epilepsy fellowship programs were included in the study. The average number of resective surgeries, ablations, or corpus callosotomies per year was mostly 0 to 30 (54%) in group A and mostly >30 (80%) in group B (P = 0.05). The average number of intracranial implantations per year was mostly 0 to 20 (58%) in group A and mostly >20 (80%) in group B (P < 0.05). The average number of neurostimulation implantations per year was 15 (range 0-90; vagal nerve stimulation), 7 (range 0-25; responsive neurostimulation), and 4 (range 0-10; deep brain stimulation). In 78% of programs, fellows are not required to present a minimum number of epilepsy surgery cases in multidisciplinary conference before graduation. Roughly half of programs (51%) reported not using objective measures to assess fellow competency in epilepsy surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest significant variability in epilepsy surgery volume and, consequently, fellow exposure to surgical cases and lack of standardized, objective measures in fellow teaching and assessment in the field of epilepsy surgery across programs in the United States. We advocate development of a core epilepsy surgery curriculum including minimum standards at the national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143399428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reference Values of the Tube-Based Laryngeal Adductor Reflex of the Healthy Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve.","authors":"Maria J Téllez, Juan Manuel Escobar-Montalvo, Catherine F Sinclair, Paola M Rodriguez Morel, Patricia Torralba, Sedat Ulkatan, Mark L Urken","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to establish reference values for laryngeal adductor reflex latency and amplitude under general anesthesia using a noninvasive technique with commercially available electromyographic endotracheal tubes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 380 patients undergoing head and neck surgery. The inclusion criteria were recording the laryngeal adductor reflex from the nonsurgical side and the absence of pathology in the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Measurements were taken before incision and surgical completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The R1 component medians for the latency and amplitude were 20 ms and 448 µV for the right and 22 ms and 425 µV for the left LARs, respectively. There were significant differences in the R1 latencies between the sides. Quantile regression models revealed that 95th percentile amplitudes exceeded 400 µV, whereas 5% of our data set surpassed 600 µV. The R2 component was present in 26% of patients initially but decreased to 8% at surgical conclusion. The percentage difference between the median R1 value at the end of the surgery, compared with the opening value, was up to 4% for latency and 10% for amplitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The R1 component of the laryngeal adductor reflex remains a reliable tool for intraoperative neuromonitoring. This is the largest study to provide reference values for laryngeal adductor reflex, aiding future diagnostic applications in head and neck surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143382589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accuracy of SEEG Source Localization: A Pilot Study Using Corticocortical Evoked Potentials.","authors":"Benjamin C Cox, Rachel J Smith, Ismail Mohamed, Jenna V Donohue, Mahtab Rostamihosseinkhani, Jerzy P Szaflarski, Rebekah J Chatfield","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001140","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>EEG source localization is an established technique for localizing scalp EEG in medically refractory epilepsy but has not been adequately studied with intracranial EEG (iEEG). Differences in sensor location and spatial sampling may affect the accuracy of EEG source localization with iEEG. Corticocortical evoked potentials can be used to evaluate EEG source localization algorithms for iEEG given the known source location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded 205 sets of corticocortical evoked potentials using low-frequency single-pulse electrical stimulation in four patients with iEEG. Averaged corticocortical evoked potentials were analyzed using 11 distributed source algorithms and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( P < 0.05). We measured the localization error from stimulated electrodes and the spatial dispersion of each solution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimum norm, standard low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA), LP Norm, sLORETA-weighted accurate minimum norm (SWARM), exact LORETA (eLORETA), standardized weighted LORETA (swLORETA), and standardized shrinking LORETA-FOCUSS (ssLOFO) had the least localization error (13.3-15.7 mm) and were superior to focal underdetermined system solver (FOCUSS), logistic autoregressive average (LAURA, and LORETA, 17.9-21.7, P < 0.001). The FOCUSS solution had the smallest spatial dispersion (7.4 mm), followed by minimum norm, L1 norm, LP norm, and SWARM (20.8-28.3 mm). Gray matter stimulations had less localization error than white matter (median differences 3.1-6.1 mm) across all algorithms except SWARM, LORETA, and logistic autoregressive average. A multivariate linear regression showed that distance from the source to sensors and gray/white matter stimulation had a significant effect on localization error for some algorithms but not SWARM, minimum norm, focal underdetermined system solver, logistic autoregressive average, and LORETA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that minimum norm, L1 norm, LP norm, and SWARM localize iEEG corticocortical evoked potentials well with lower localization error and spatial dispersion. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143122825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Stimulation-Induced Seizures in Children Undergoing Stereo-EEG Evaluation.","authors":"Ranjith Kumar Manokaran, Ayako Ochi, Shelly Weiss, Ivanna Yau, Rohit Sharma, Hiroshi Otsubo, George M Ibrahim, Elizabeth J Donner, Puneet Jain","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001077","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study reports our center's initial experience with the use of low-frequency stimulation in provoking stimulation-induced seizures (SIS) in children with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing stereo-EEG evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled children aged 2 to 18 years with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent stereo-EEG evaluation and extraoperative direct electrical cortical stimulation to elicit seizures. The low-frequency stimulation parameters consisted of biphasic square waveforms at frequency of 1 Hz, pulse width 1 millisecond, current 1 to 3 mA, and train duration of 20 seconds. Various epilepsy-related, imaging, neurophysiology, and surgery-related variables were collected and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen children (mean age 13 years; 57.1% girls) were included, 10 of whom had unilateral stereo-EEG coverage. Cortical stimulation for provoking seizures was performed after a median of 5 days after electrode implantation. The median number of electrode-contacts stimulated per patient was 42. Four patients (28.6%) experienced habitual SIS (all extratemporal). The etiology in three patients was focal cortical dysplasia. Interictal high-frequency oscillations at electrode-contacts provoking SIS were observed in three cases (75%). Two of these individuals (50%) had class 1 International League Against Epilepsy seizure outcome at last follow-up, after the resection of the brain regions generating SIS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-frequency (1-Hz) stimulation could provoke habitual SIS in nearly one-fourth of children with focal epilepsy undergoing stereo-EEG monitoring. This study provides a limited pediatric experience with the low-frequency cortical stimulation and SIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"126-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139912745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Contraction-Induced H Reflexes of the Upper and Lower Limbs in Healthy Adults.","authors":"Antony Winkel, Mark Cook, Leslie Roberts","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001070","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Contraction-induced H reflexes are a late neurophysiologic response elicited with submaximal nerve stimulation during isometric muscle contraction. Mediated by spinal pathways, like other H reflexes, their use has remained somewhat limited despite a long history of development dating back to the original description by Hoffman. There is a paucity of data on normal reference ranges, which this article aims to add to.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contraction-induced H reflexes were elicited from the first dorsal interosseous, flexor carpi radialis, and tibialis anterior bilaterally in 100 healthy volunteers. Reference values, including side-to-side variation, were calculated. Pearson test and multiple regression were used to evaluate the relationship of H-reflex latency to height, age, and sex of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean onset latencies of 28.00, 17.44, and 31.10 ms were seen for first dorsal interosseous, flexor carpi radialis, and tibialis anterior muscles, respectively. The calculated allowable side-to-side latency difference in individual participants was 3 to 4 ms. A correlation to participant height was seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work provides normal reference values of contraction-induced H reflexes to three muscles, including allowable side-to-side variation. The latter suggests that bilateral testing evaluating for asymmetry within an individual is likely to be optimally sensitive. The relationship to height is also confirmed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"107-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141446284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reflex Responses in Muscles of the Lower Extremities Elicited by Transcutaneous Stimulation of Cauda Equina: Part 1. Methodology and Normative Data.","authors":"Julija Rimac, Davor Jančuljak, Biserka Kovač, Miloš Jovičić, Josipa Forjan","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001088","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcutaneous electrical stimulation is used to stimulate the dorsal roots of the cauda equina. Multiple elicited responses recorded in the lower extremity muscles are called posterior root muscle reflexes (PRMRs). Normal PRMR values in the muscles of healthy lower extremities have yet to be determined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty subjects without known lumbosacral spinal root illness were included in this study. Subsequently, they were subjected to transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the cauda equina. Posterior root muscle reflex was recorded in the four muscle groups of both lower extremities. We elicited multiple PRMR and examined their characteristics in order to establish normal electrophysiological parameter values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Posterior root muscle reflex was successfully elicited in the tibialis anterior (96.7%), gastrocnemius (100%), quadriceps femoris (93.3%), and hamstring (96.7%). No statistically significant differences were found in the intensity of stimulation, latencies, or area under the PRMR between the right and left leg muscles. The area under PRMR varied significantly among the participants. Higher body weight and abdominal girth showed a significant positive correlation with stimulation intensity for eliciting PRMR, and a significant negative correlation with the area under PRMR. Older age showed a significant negative correlation with the success of eliciting PRMR and the area under the PRMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posterior root muscle reflex is a noninvasive and successful method for eliciting selective reflex responses of cauda equina posterior roots. Obtained values could be used in future studies to evaluate the utility of this methodology in clinical practice. This methodology could improve testing of the proximal lumbosacral nervous system functional integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"176-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient Handoff Practices at the Epilepsy Centers in the United States: A Survey of the Medical Directors.","authors":"Olga Selioutski, Susan Herman, Eva Katharina Ritzl, Matthew Garlinghouse, Olga Taraschenko","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001081","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Communication failure is one of the most significant causes of medical errors. Providing care to patients with seizures at comprehensive epilepsy centers requires uninterrupted coverage and a multidisciplinary approach. However, handoff practices in these settings have not been comprehensively assessed, and recommendations for their standardization are currently lacking. The aim of this observational study was to define the scope of existing practices for patient handoffs across epilepsy centers in the United States and provide relevant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 79-question survey was developed to establish the patterns of transition of care for patients undergoing continuous EEG recording, including the periodicity of handoffs and specifics of the relevant workflow. With permission from the National Association of Epilepsy Centers (NAEC), the survey was distributed to the medical directors of all Level 3 and 4 NAEC-accredited epilepsy centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses were obtained from 70 institutions yielding a survey response rate of 26%. Of these, more than 77% had established weekly handoff processes for both the epilepsy monitoring unit and continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring services. However, only 53% and 43% of centers had procedures for daily service transfers for the patients admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit or the patients undergoing cEEG, respectively. The patterns of handoffs were complex and utilized group handoffs in < 50% of institutions. In most centers (>70%), patient data transmitted through handoffs included history, clinical information, and EEG findings. However, templates were not applied to standardize this information. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that a culture of patient safety was maintained in their place of practice; however, 12% of participants felt that insufficient time was allowed to discuss these patients or carry out the handoffs without interruptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing handoff practices are not uniform or fully established across epilepsy centers in the United States. This study recommends that guidelines for formal handoff procedures be developed and introduced as a quality metric for all NAEC-accredited epilepsy centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"139-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141446290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Real-Time Seizure Detection Using Behind-the-Ear Wearable System.","authors":"Jamie Lehnen, Pooja Venkatesh, Zhuoran Yao, Abdul Aziz, Phuc V P Nguyen, Jay Harvey, Sasha Alick-Lindstrom, Alex Doyle, Irina Podkorytova, Ghazala Perven, Ryan Hays, Rodrigo Zepeda, Rohit R Das, Kan Ding","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines the usability and comfort of a behind-the-ear seizure detection device called brain seizure detection (BrainSD) that captures ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) data using four scalp electrodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a feasibility study. Thirty-two patients admitted to a level 4 Epilepsy Monitoring Unit were enrolled. The subjects wore BrainSD and the standard 21-channel video-EEG simultaneously. Epileptologists analyzed the EEG signals collected by BrainSD and validated it using video-EEG data to confirm its accuracy. A poststudy survey was completed by each participant to evaluate the comfort and usability of the device. In addition, a focus group of UT Southwestern epileptologists was held to discuss the features they would like to see in a home EEG-based seizure detection device such as BrainSD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, BrainSD captured 11 of the 14 seizures that occurred while the device was being worn. All 11 seizures captured on BrainSD had focal onset, with three becoming bilateral tonic-clonic and one seizure being of subclinical status. The device was worn for an average of 41 hours. The poststudy survey showed that most users found the device comfortable, easy-to-use, and stated they would be interested in using BrainSD. Epileptologists in the focus group expressed a similar interest in BrainSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brain seizure detection is able to detect EEG signals using four behind-the-ear electrodes. Its comfort, ease-of-use, and ability to detect numerous types of seizures make BrainSD an acceptable at-home EEG detection device from both the patient and provider perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139905657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Characterizing Seizure-Onset Patterns With the Responsive Neurostimulation System.","authors":"Zulfi Haneef, Alexandra Celine Vallera, Sameera Vedantam, Maximillian S Feygin, Stephen Cleboski, Jay R Gavvala","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001090","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The responsive neurostimulation system (RNS) aims to improve seizures by delivering electrical stimulation in response to epileptiform patterns detected by electrocorticograms. Seizure-onset patterns (SOPs) correspond to outcomes in intracranial EEG (IC-EEG), although whether this is true for RNS is unknown. This study characterizes common RNS SOPs and correlates them with seizure outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 40 patients with RNS implants, long-episode electrocorticogram characteristics of each patient's seizures were classified by visual analysis as one of the eight patterns previously described in IC-EEG. Correlation between each type of SOP and eventual seizure outcome was analyzed, with ≥50% improvement in a number of patient-reported seizure counts defined as a favorable outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 263 LEs analyzed, the most common SOP observed was low-voltage fast activity. There was no difference between the distribution of RNS SOPs and that of IC-EEG SOPs described in the literature (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P = 0.98). Additionally, there was no correlation between any particular SOP and favorable outcomes (Fisher's omnibus test, P = 0.997).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This initial description of RNS SOPs finds them to be similar to previously described IC-EEG SOPs, which suggests similar prognostic/therapeutic potential. However, we found that RNS efficacy is independent of patient SOP, suggesting that RNS is likely an equally effective treatment for all SOPs. Future research on stimulation parameters for particular RNS SOPs and correlation with IC-EEG SOPs in the same patients would be instrumental in guiding personalized neurostimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"156-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141446283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}