癫痫患者和健康对照者的听觉反应时间

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nora Schwab, Roland Renzel, Murezi Capaul, Pascal Luc Faber, Tena Dubcek, Lukas Imbach, Debora Ledergerber
{"title":"癫痫患者和健康对照者的听觉反应时间","authors":"Nora Schwab, Roland Renzel, Murezi Capaul, Pascal Luc Faber, Tena Dubcek, Lukas Imbach, Debora Ledergerber","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Simple reaction time (SRT) to acoustic stimuli is a typical parameter used in the assessment of driving ability in people with epilepsy (PWE). In clinical practice, auditory SRT is commonly compared during and outside of epileptiform discharges (ED). Yet, a subset of PWE also has slowed SRT outside their ED, possibly because of antiseizure medication (ASM) or disease-associated network alterations. SRT values should therefore be compared with reference values from matched controls which are currently lacking in practice. We here aimed to find a reference range of SRT in healthy controls using the same paradigm as commonly used in PWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured auditory SRT in heathy control subjects without epilepsy and a cohort of patients with epilepsy. We matched the control cohort, according to age and sex, to a cohort of PWE who had previously been recorded at our center using the same task. This allowed to compare auditory SRT between a control cohort and a cohort of PWE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group showed a significantly lower mean SRT latency and a smaller SRT variability as compared with PWE. Within the cohort of PWE, the SRT was significantly prolonged during periods with ED. Potential confounding factors, such as age, did not show any significant contribution to auditory SRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate a small intrapersonal variance of SRT in the control group. Therefore, outlier SRT values in PWE during ED are likely a useful parameter for assessing driving ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditory Reaction Time in People With Epilepsy and Healthy Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Nora Schwab, Roland Renzel, Murezi Capaul, Pascal Luc Faber, Tena Dubcek, Lukas Imbach, Debora Ledergerber\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Simple reaction time (SRT) to acoustic stimuli is a typical parameter used in the assessment of driving ability in people with epilepsy (PWE). In clinical practice, auditory SRT is commonly compared during and outside of epileptiform discharges (ED). Yet, a subset of PWE also has slowed SRT outside their ED, possibly because of antiseizure medication (ASM) or disease-associated network alterations. SRT values should therefore be compared with reference values from matched controls which are currently lacking in practice. We here aimed to find a reference range of SRT in healthy controls using the same paradigm as commonly used in PWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured auditory SRT in heathy control subjects without epilepsy and a cohort of patients with epilepsy. We matched the control cohort, according to age and sex, to a cohort of PWE who had previously been recorded at our center using the same task. This allowed to compare auditory SRT between a control cohort and a cohort of PWE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group showed a significantly lower mean SRT latency and a smaller SRT variability as compared with PWE. Within the cohort of PWE, the SRT was significantly prolonged during periods with ED. Potential confounding factors, such as age, did not show any significant contribution to auditory SRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate a small intrapersonal variance of SRT in the control group. Therefore, outlier SRT values in PWE during ED are likely a useful parameter for assessing driving ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:简单反应时间(SRT)是评估癫痫患者驾驶能力的一个典型参数。在临床实践中,听觉SRT通常在癫痫样放电(ED)期间和之外进行比较。然而,PWE的一部分患者在ED之外的SRT也减慢,可能是因为抗癫痫药物(ASM)或疾病相关的网络改变。因此,应该将SRT值与来自匹配对照的参考值进行比较,这是目前实践中缺乏的。我们在这里的目的是在健康对照中使用与PWE中常用的相同范式找到SRT的参考范围。方法:我们测量了无癫痫的健康对照者和一组癫痫患者的听觉SRT。根据年龄和性别,我们将对照队列与先前在我们中心使用相同任务记录的PWE队列进行匹配。这样可以比较对照队列和PWE队列之间的听觉SRT。结果:与PWE相比,对照组的平均SRT潜伏期明显较低,SRT变异性较小。在PWE队列中,SRT在ED期间显着延长。潜在的混杂因素,如年龄,对听觉SRT没有任何显着贡献。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在对照组中,SRT的个人内部差异很小。因此,PWE在ED期间的异常SRT值可能是评估驾驶能力的有用参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditory Reaction Time in People With Epilepsy and Healthy Controls.

Objective: Simple reaction time (SRT) to acoustic stimuli is a typical parameter used in the assessment of driving ability in people with epilepsy (PWE). In clinical practice, auditory SRT is commonly compared during and outside of epileptiform discharges (ED). Yet, a subset of PWE also has slowed SRT outside their ED, possibly because of antiseizure medication (ASM) or disease-associated network alterations. SRT values should therefore be compared with reference values from matched controls which are currently lacking in practice. We here aimed to find a reference range of SRT in healthy controls using the same paradigm as commonly used in PWE.

Methods: We measured auditory SRT in heathy control subjects without epilepsy and a cohort of patients with epilepsy. We matched the control cohort, according to age and sex, to a cohort of PWE who had previously been recorded at our center using the same task. This allowed to compare auditory SRT between a control cohort and a cohort of PWE.

Results: The control group showed a significantly lower mean SRT latency and a smaller SRT variability as compared with PWE. Within the cohort of PWE, the SRT was significantly prolonged during periods with ED. Potential confounding factors, such as age, did not show any significant contribution to auditory SRT.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate a small intrapersonal variance of SRT in the control group. Therefore, outlier SRT values in PWE during ED are likely a useful parameter for assessing driving ability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信