{"title":"Can We Improve the Results of Internal Fixation?: Commentary on an article by Boris C. Wagner, BMedSci(Hons), MBChB, et al.: \"Outcomes for Younger Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures\".","authors":"Gerard Slobogean","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.25.00033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.25.00033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 7","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thessaly Graft Index: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Index for the Assessment of Graft Integrity in ACL-Reconstructed Knees.","authors":"Georgios Chalatsis, Athanasios Siouras, Vasileios Mitrousias, Ilias Chantes, Serafeim Moustakidis, Dimitris Tsaopoulos, Marianna Vlychou, Sotiris Tasoulis, Michael Hantes","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00427","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be a valuable noninvasive tool to evaluate graft integrity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, MRI protocols and interpretation methodologies are quite diverse, preventing comparisons of signal intensity across subsequent scans and independent investigations. The purpose of this study was to create an artificial intelligence (AI)-based index (Thessaly Graft Index [TGI]) for the evaluation of graft integrity following ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort study included 24 patients with an isolated ACL injury that had been treated with a hamstring tendon autograft and followed for 1 year. MRI was performed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The clinical and functional evaluations were performed with use of the KT-1000 and with the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Function form (IKDC), the Lysholm score, and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). An AI model, based on the YOLOv5 Nano version, was designed to compute the probability of accurately detecting, in the sagittal plane, a healthy ACL (on a percentage scale) and was trained on healthy and injured knees from the KneeMRI dataset. The model was used to assess the integrity of ACL grafts, with a maximum score of 100. The results were compared with the MRI assessment from an independent radiologist and were correlated with PROMs and KT-1000 laxity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean preoperative and postoperative TGI scores were 64.21 ± 8.96 and 82.37 ± 3.53, respectively. A mean increase of 15% in the TGI scores was observed between preoperative and postoperative images. The minimum threshold for TGI to categorize a graft as healthy on the postoperative MRI was 79.21%. Twenty-two grafts were characterized as intact and 2 as reruptured, with postoperative TGI scores of 71% and 42%. The radiologist's assessment was in total agreement with the TGI scores. The correlation of the TGI ranged from moderate to good with the TAS (0.668), IKDC (0.516), Lysholm (0.521), KOOS total (0.594), and KT-1000 (0.561).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TGI is an AI tool that is able to accurately recognize an ACL graft rupture. Moreover, the TGI correlated with the KT-1000 postoperative values and PROM scores.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"733-740"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143370739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robby Turk, Benjamin Averkamp, Kayla Hietpas, Caleb Michalek, Daniel Leas, Susan M Odum, Nady Hamid
{"title":"An Opioid-Free Perioperative Pain Protocol Is Noninferior to Opioid-Containing Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Robby Turk, Benjamin Averkamp, Kayla Hietpas, Caleb Michalek, Daniel Leas, Susan M Odum, Nady Hamid","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00460","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, orthopaedic surgeons have attempted to decrease opioid consumption through multimodal pain management. However, a limited effort has been made to eliminate opioids entirely in the perioperative period. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel opioid-free pain management pathway with that of an opioid-containing pathway across 5 common orthopaedic subspecialty surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 1:1, unblinded fashion, 315 patients were randomized to a perioperative pain management pathway that was either opioid-free (n = 157) or opioid-containing (n = 158). Pain was measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain of 0 to 10 at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours (the primary outcome assessing noninferiority), 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year after the surgical procedure. Data on patient characteristics, deviations from the pain management pathway, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), readmissions, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 315 patients in the final group, with a mean age of 63.6 years. Of the patients in the study, 59.7% were female, 85.7% were White, 12.4% were Black/African-American, 1.0% were Hispanic/Latino, 0.6% were American Indian, and 0.3% were unknown. At 24 hours, the median NRS for pain in the opioid-free group (2 [interquartile range (IQR), 0 to 4]) was statistically noninferior (p < 0.0001) to the opioid-containing group (4 [IQR, 2 to 6]). Pain levels were significantly lower in the opioid-free group than in the opioid-containing group at 12 hours (p = 0.0173) and 2 weeks (p = 0.0003). Pain scores at 6 hours, 6 weeks, and 1 year were similar. Patients in the opioid-free group reported significantly greater comfort at 24 hours (p = 0.0392) and higher satisfaction with pain control (p = 0.0355) at 6 weeks. There were no reported adverse events or unplanned readmissions. Demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across 5 common orthopaedic subspecialty procedures, an opioid-free pain management pathway was safe and effective and provided noninferior pain control at 24 hours compared with the opioid-containing pathway.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"665-677"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143390922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Transformative Impact and Persisting Challenges of Intramedullary Nailing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Commentary on an article by Aditya Subramanian, et al.: \"Delayed Surgery Increases the Rate of Infection in Closed Diaphyseal Tibial and Femoral Fractures\".","authors":"Kiran J Agarwal-Harding","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01282","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 7","pages":"e31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Justin Solarczyk, Natasha M Simske, Austin R Thompson, Lisa Reider, Eben A Carroll, Joshua L Gary, Renan Castillo, Stephen M Quinnan, William Obremskey, Robert V O'Toole, Heather A Vallier, Saam Morshed
{"title":"Functional Outcomes After Modern External Ring Fixation or Internal Fixation for Severe Open Tibial Shaft Fractures.","authors":"Justin Solarczyk, Natasha M Simske, Austin R Thompson, Lisa Reider, Eben A Carroll, Joshua L Gary, Renan Castillo, Stephen M Quinnan, William Obremskey, Robert V O'Toole, Heather A Vallier, Saam Morshed","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00888","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00888","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the functional outcomes of patients with open tibial shaft fractures who were randomized to either modern external ring fixation (EF) or internal fixation (IF). We hypothesized that there would be differences in patient-reported function between the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This preplanned analysis of secondary outcomes from the FIXIT study, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, included patients 18 to 64 years of age with a Gustilo-Anderson Type-IIIB or severe-Type IIIA diaphyseal or metaphyseal tibial fracture who were randomly assigned to either IF (n = 132) or EF (n = 122). Follow-up visits occurred at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization. Outcomes included Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical component score (PCS), use of ambulatory assistive devices, and ability to ambulate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean VR-12 PCS was slightly higher (better) for IF (24.8) than for EF (22.6) at 3 months (mean difference, 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2, 4.3]; p = 0.03) and trended higher for IF (27.0) compared with EF (25.3) at 6 months (mean difference, 1.8 [95% CI: -0.9, 4.4]; p = 0.19). However, there was no difference between the groups at 12 months. There were no clinically important or significant differences in SMFA Dysfunction and Bother scores between the treatment groups at any time point. EF was associated with a higher risk of using any ambulatory assistive device at 6 months (relative risk, 1.5 [95% CI: 1.21, 1.82]; p < 0.0001). The absolute percentage of patients using any ambulatory device was 37.6% for IF and 45.4% for EF at 1 year. There was no difference in ambulatory status between the treatment groups at any time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no difference in physical function between patients with severe tibial fractures treated with IF versus EF. There was a high rate of impairment overall. Assistive devices for walking were more often utilized in the EF group at 6 months, and both treatment groups demonstrated similar overall impairment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"694-701"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ernesto S Quinto, Nathan P Reyes, Joshua P Steimel, JuEun Lee, John M Dowbak
{"title":"Properties of Tungsten Carbide Rings When Compressed to Failure or Cut with a Diamond Grinding Bit: A Biomechanical Study.","authors":"Ernesto S Quinto, Nathan P Reyes, Joshua P Steimel, JuEun Lee, John M Dowbak","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00582","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00582","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tungsten carbide rings are increasingly popular modern jewelry items. Tungsten carbide is an extremely dense, hard metal. Previously described methods to remove tungsten carbide rings include using locking pliers to compress the ring or cutting the ring with a high-speed dental drill.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A universal mechanical testing system (MTS) machine was used to diametrically compress tungsten carbide rings 9 mm in length and 2.4 mm in thickness with a 23.4-mm outer diameter and a 21.0-mm inner diameter while measuring the force required to fracture the rings. A computer numerical control (CNC) machine was used to cut tungsten carbide rings with a diamond grinding bit with and without a flow of normal saline solution. An infrared thermal camera was used to record the temperature at the site of contact between the ring and the grinding bit and at a site one-quarter of the circumference along the ring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean force with 95% confidence interval of 3.7 ± 1.2 kN was required to fracture the tungsten carbide rings via diametral compression (p = 0.05). The rings failed at a mean displacement with 95% confidence interval of 0.32 ± 0.13 mm (p = 0.05). The maximum temperature observed at the site of contact between the ring and grinding bit averaged 160.2°C including cases with and without coolant. The time to reach maximum temperature and the duration of maximum temperature differed significantly between the cases with and without coolant (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0108, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tungsten carbide rings fractured with minimal displacement using a small amount of force via diametral compression. The brittle fracture pattern of the rings produced minimal comminution. Tungsten carbide rings reached extreme temperatures when cut with a high-speed diamond grinding bit despite cooling with normal saline solution.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Previously documented methods to remove a tungsten carbide ring include breaking the ring by compressing it with pliers or cutting it off with a high-speed dental drill. Clinicians should be aware of potential complications of current methods to remove tungsten carbide rings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"e27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143416797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fernando Vanoli, Corentin Pangaud, Pauline Chabas, Sylvain Guy, Henri Peuchot, Matthieu Ollivier, Jean-Noël Argenson, Christophe Jacquet
{"title":"Similar Functional Results in Patients Outside the Classical Criteria for Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Fernando Vanoli, Corentin Pangaud, Pauline Chabas, Sylvain Guy, Henri Peuchot, Matthieu Ollivier, Jean-Noël Argenson, Christophe Jacquet","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are restricted by multiple criteria. The aim of this study was to explore the functional results of UKA in a population of patients outside the classical criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included a population of 197 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis between 2017 and 2020. Two groups of patients were compared: those meeting the classical criteria and those presenting with ≥1 contraindication (e.g., age of ≥75 years, body mass index [BMI] of ≥30 kg/m2, or coronal limb deformity of >8°). The implant that was used was a modern fixed-bearing primary medial UKA component. The minimal follow-up was 3 years. The primary outcome was the functional results, including the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the secondary outcomes were the complication and revision rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 100 patients in the indication group and 97 in the off-indication group. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for height, sex ratio, operated side, or osteoarthritis stage (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the KSS between the 2 groups (p = 0.96). At 3 years of follow-up, the survival rate without revision was 100% in the indication group and 95.38% in the off-indication group (p = 0.57). The rate of complications was 12.9% in the indication group and 8.96% in the off-indication group (p = 0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UKA for medial osteoarthritis yielded the same functional results for patients presenting with ≥1 theoretical contraindication, including a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2, age of ≥75 years, and coronal limb deformity of >8°, without altering the complication or revision rates at 3 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143772575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What's Important (Arts & Humanities): My Personal Journey from the Oil Field to Orthopaedics: Trading Drills.","authors":"Dustin L Richter","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00780","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00780","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"780-781"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jesse B Jupiter, Pietro Regazzoni, Wen-Chih Liu, Alberto Fernandez Dell'Oca
{"title":"What's Important: The Rationale for a Comprehensive and Fully Transparent Database.","authors":"Jesse B Jupiter, Pietro Regazzoni, Wen-Chih Liu, Alberto Fernandez Dell'Oca","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01028","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"778-779"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Optimizing Outcomes in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures with Nerve Palsy: The Case for Standardized Assessments and Early Intervention: Commentary on an article by Akbar N. Syed, MD, et al.: \"Nerve Recovery in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: Assessing the Impact of Time to Surgery\".","authors":"Pablo Castañeda","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 7","pages":"e30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}