Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Can Be Lengthened to Their Maximum Capacity with No Increased Nail Complications: A Study of Pediatric and Adult Populations.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sandeep S Bains, Reza Katanbaf, Whitney Pettijohn, Daniel Hameed, Jeremy A Dubin, John E Herzenberg, Philip K McClure
{"title":"Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Can Be Lengthened to Their Maximum Capacity with No Increased Nail Complications: A Study of Pediatric and Adult Populations.","authors":"Sandeep S Bains, Reza Katanbaf, Whitney Pettijohn, Daniel Hameed, Jeremy A Dubin, John E Herzenberg, Philip K McClure","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails (MILNs) have become an increasingly popular method for long-bone distraction osteogenesis as a means of overcoming the limitations of bone lengthening with an external fixator. While factors such as nail diameter, alignment, and other mechanical characteristics have been associated with an increased risk of nail breakage, the relationship between the percentage of maximum lengthening utilized and nail breakage remains unexplored. We specifically assessed overall complications, with and without the inclusion of contractures, based on the amount of distraction (25% to 60%, 61% to 90%, and 91% to 100% of maximum).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the records for 176 pediatric patients and 109 adult patients who had undergone limb lengthening and had ≥24 months of follow-up. The cohort was further stratified by the amount of distraction: 25% to 60% (n = 75 children and 30 adults), 61% to 90% (n = 72 children and 29 adults), and 91% to 100% (n = 29 children and 50 adults). The mean ages were 14.53, 13.53, and 12.49 years, respectively, in the pediatric cohorts and 27.1, 34.3, and 23.8 years, respectively, in the adult cohorts. The percentages of males and females were 48% vs. 52%, 54.2% vs. 45.8%, and 48.3% vs 51.7%, respectively, in the pediatric cohorts and 56.7% vs. 43.3%, 51.8% vs. 48.2%, and 58% vs. 42% in the adult cohorts. Complications included contractures, loss of length, bone fracture, axial deviation, nail failure, failure to lengthen, nail fracture/failure, and screw failure. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare mean complications across the 3 distraction categories, and Tukey pairwise t tests were performed to compare mean complications between individual distraction categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without contractures, complication rates were similar between the pediatric cohorts (p = 0.09): 4.0% (25% to 60% distraction), 13.9% (61% to 90% distraction), and 6.9% (91% to 100% distraction). With contractures included, complication rates were greatest in the 61% to 90% pediatric cohort (38.9%), followed by the 91% to 100% cohort (27.6%) and the 25% to 60% cohort (13.3%) (p = 0.002). Similarly, the adult population had a homogeneous rate of complications without the inclusion of contractures (p = 0.13). Likewise, we observed a similarly variable distribution with contractures considered, with the greatest frequency in the 91% to 100% group (36%), followed by the 61% to 90% group (31%) and the 25% to 60% group (10%) (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to explore the relationship between the percentage of nail lengthening and nail complications. The speculation that full extension of the nail could lead to increased nail bending or breakage was not consistent with our findings. This finding was consistent whether contractures were included or not.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails (MILNs) have become an increasingly popular method for long-bone distraction osteogenesis as a means of overcoming the limitations of bone lengthening with an external fixator. While factors such as nail diameter, alignment, and other mechanical characteristics have been associated with an increased risk of nail breakage, the relationship between the percentage of maximum lengthening utilized and nail breakage remains unexplored. We specifically assessed overall complications, with and without the inclusion of contractures, based on the amount of distraction (25% to 60%, 61% to 90%, and 91% to 100% of maximum).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records for 176 pediatric patients and 109 adult patients who had undergone limb lengthening and had ≥24 months of follow-up. The cohort was further stratified by the amount of distraction: 25% to 60% (n = 75 children and 30 adults), 61% to 90% (n = 72 children and 29 adults), and 91% to 100% (n = 29 children and 50 adults). The mean ages were 14.53, 13.53, and 12.49 years, respectively, in the pediatric cohorts and 27.1, 34.3, and 23.8 years, respectively, in the adult cohorts. The percentages of males and females were 48% vs. 52%, 54.2% vs. 45.8%, and 48.3% vs 51.7%, respectively, in the pediatric cohorts and 56.7% vs. 43.3%, 51.8% vs. 48.2%, and 58% vs. 42% in the adult cohorts. Complications included contractures, loss of length, bone fracture, axial deviation, nail failure, failure to lengthen, nail fracture/failure, and screw failure. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare mean complications across the 3 distraction categories, and Tukey pairwise t tests were performed to compare mean complications between individual distraction categories.

Results: Without contractures, complication rates were similar between the pediatric cohorts (p = 0.09): 4.0% (25% to 60% distraction), 13.9% (61% to 90% distraction), and 6.9% (91% to 100% distraction). With contractures included, complication rates were greatest in the 61% to 90% pediatric cohort (38.9%), followed by the 91% to 100% cohort (27.6%) and the 25% to 60% cohort (13.3%) (p = 0.002). Similarly, the adult population had a homogeneous rate of complications without the inclusion of contractures (p = 0.13). Likewise, we observed a similarly variable distribution with contractures considered, with the greatest frequency in the 91% to 100% group (36%), followed by the 61% to 90% group (31%) and the 25% to 60% group (10%) (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: This is the first study to explore the relationship between the percentage of nail lengthening and nail complications. The speculation that full extension of the nail could lead to increased nail bending or breakage was not consistent with our findings. This finding was consistent whether contractures were included or not.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信