Outcomes of Calcaneal Lengthening Osteotomy in Ambulatory Patients with Cerebral Palsy and Planovalgus Foot Deformity.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Byoung Kyu Park, Sharkawy Wagih Abdel-Baki, Isaac Rhee, Kun-Bo Park, Hoon Park, Hyun Woo Kim
{"title":"Outcomes of Calcaneal Lengthening Osteotomy in Ambulatory Patients with Cerebral Palsy and Planovalgus Foot Deformity.","authors":"Byoung Kyu Park, Sharkawy Wagih Abdel-Baki, Isaac Rhee, Kun-Bo Park, Hoon Park, Hyun Woo Kim","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To date, no studies have evaluated the longevity of calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (CLO) in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and pes planovalgus. This study aimed to explore the changes in foot alignment following CLO in patients with CP, utilizing both radiographic evaluations and dynamic foot-pressure assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 282 feet in 180 ambulatory patients was performed. The mean patient age at the surgical procedure was 8.9 ± 2.6 years. The mean follow-up period was 8.0 ± 4.3 years, and the mean age at the final follow-up 16.9 ± 4.4 years. Weight-bearing radiographs at 3 separate time points (before the surgical procedure, 6 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up) were used. The feet were classified as corrected, undercorrected, or overcorrected on the basis of the radiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the final follow-up, we classified 98 feet (34.8%) as corrected, 58 (20.6%) as undercorrected, and 126 (44.7%) as overcorrected. Foot-pressure analysis demonstrated that the undercorrected feet had higher relative vertical impulses in the medial forefoot and medial midfoot than in the other groups, whereas the overcorrected feet had higher impulse in the lateral midfoot. There were no significant differences in preoperative radiographic parameters between the 3 groups, except for the calcaneal pitch angle. At 6 months after the surgical procedure, we classified 181 feet (64.2%) as corrected, 58 (20.6%) as undercorrected, and 43 (15.2%) as overcorrected. However, 53.6% of initially corrected feet changed to being undercorrected or overcorrected during further follow-up, 43.1% of the undercorrected feet became corrected or overcorrected, and 16.3% of the overcorrected feet became corrected. A younger age at the surgical procedure and lower naviculocuboid overlap at 6 months after the surgical procedure were the risk factors for overcorrection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although CLO is an effective method for correcting planovalgus foot deformities and enhancing foot-pressure distribution, the extent of correction observed early after the surgical procedure was not necessarily sustained over the follow-up period in individuals with CP. Furthermore, our findings highlight a noticeable tendency toward the overcorrection of the deformity, as evidenced by increased pressure exerted on the lateral midfoot.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"1134-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To date, no studies have evaluated the longevity of calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (CLO) in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and pes planovalgus. This study aimed to explore the changes in foot alignment following CLO in patients with CP, utilizing both radiographic evaluations and dynamic foot-pressure assessments.

Methods: A retrospective study of 282 feet in 180 ambulatory patients was performed. The mean patient age at the surgical procedure was 8.9 ± 2.6 years. The mean follow-up period was 8.0 ± 4.3 years, and the mean age at the final follow-up 16.9 ± 4.4 years. Weight-bearing radiographs at 3 separate time points (before the surgical procedure, 6 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up) were used. The feet were classified as corrected, undercorrected, or overcorrected on the basis of the radiographic parameters.

Results: At the final follow-up, we classified 98 feet (34.8%) as corrected, 58 (20.6%) as undercorrected, and 126 (44.7%) as overcorrected. Foot-pressure analysis demonstrated that the undercorrected feet had higher relative vertical impulses in the medial forefoot and medial midfoot than in the other groups, whereas the overcorrected feet had higher impulse in the lateral midfoot. There were no significant differences in preoperative radiographic parameters between the 3 groups, except for the calcaneal pitch angle. At 6 months after the surgical procedure, we classified 181 feet (64.2%) as corrected, 58 (20.6%) as undercorrected, and 43 (15.2%) as overcorrected. However, 53.6% of initially corrected feet changed to being undercorrected or overcorrected during further follow-up, 43.1% of the undercorrected feet became corrected or overcorrected, and 16.3% of the overcorrected feet became corrected. A younger age at the surgical procedure and lower naviculocuboid overlap at 6 months after the surgical procedure were the risk factors for overcorrection.

Conclusions: Although CLO is an effective method for correcting planovalgus foot deformities and enhancing foot-pressure distribution, the extent of correction observed early after the surgical procedure was not necessarily sustained over the follow-up period in individuals with CP. Furthermore, our findings highlight a noticeable tendency toward the overcorrection of the deformity, as evidenced by increased pressure exerted on the lateral midfoot.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

跟骨延长截骨术治疗脑瘫伴平外翻足畸形的临床疗效。
背景:到目前为止,还没有研究评估脑瘫(CP)和平足外翻患者的跟骨延长截骨术(CLO)的寿命。本研究旨在通过影像学评估和动态足压力评估,探讨CP患者CLO后足对线的变化。方法:对180例门诊患者282足进行回顾性研究。患者手术时的平均年龄为8.9±2.6岁。平均随访时间8.0±4.3年,末次随访平均年龄16.9±4.4岁。使用3个不同时间点(手术前、术后6个月和最后随访时)的负重x线片。根据x线摄影参数将足部分为矫正、欠矫正和过度矫正。结果:在最后的随访中,我们将98只脚(34.8%)矫正,58只脚(20.6%)矫正不足,126只脚(44.7%)矫正过度。脚压分析表明,与其他组相比,矫正不足的足部在前足内侧和中足内侧有更高的相对垂直脉冲,而矫正过度的足部在中足外侧有更高的相对垂直脉冲。除跟骨角度外,3组术前影像学参数均无显著差异。手术后6个月,我们将181只脚(64.2%)矫正,58只脚(20.6%)矫正不足,43只脚(15.2%)矫正过度。然而,在进一步的随访中,53.6%的初始矫正足变为矫正不足或过度矫正,43.1%的未矫正足变为矫正或过度矫正,16.3%的过度矫正足变为矫正。手术年龄过小和手术后6个月的下navuloboid重叠是矫直过度的危险因素。结论:虽然CLO是一种有效的矫正平外翻足畸形和增强足压分布的方法,但在CP患者的随访期间,手术后早期观察到的矫正程度不一定能持续。此外,我们的研究结果强调了畸形过度矫正的明显趋势,这可以通过对外侧中足施加的压力增加来证明。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信