Andrew Laitha, Bart Minten, Henry Stemmler, Eva‐Marie Meemken
{"title":"Measuring Agricultural Wages Amidst Conflict: Evidence From Myanmar","authors":"Andrew Laitha, Bart Minten, Henry Stemmler, Eva‐Marie Meemken","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70082","url":null,"abstract":"Violent conflict is globally on the rise, and an increasing body of literature analyses its impacts on agricultural production and food security. Yet the quality of data collected in conflict zones is sometimes questioned and remains underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by examining two types of reporting bias—recall and question order bias—under varying levels of conflict in Myanmar. We focus on agricultural wages as the key variable of interest because wages are frequently measured in surveys and represent an important development indicator, serving as both a key input cost for farmers and a crucial income source for hired farm workers. We match ACLED conflict data with farm survey data collected across three panel rounds, with the third round including recall modules to assess recall bias. We also implement a question order experiment in the second round to assess whether the sequencing of wage questions by year and gender influences reported wages. We find modest recall bias in reported wages, but no statistically significant evidence that recall bias increases with conflict severity and only limited evidence of question order bias. Among the question order biases, only the interaction between conflict severity and asking about the previous year's wage first is statistically significant, and its magnitude is economically small. Overall reporting biases are modest and are driven more by the type of wage being reported than by conflict severity. We conclude that reliable data can be collected in conflict settings—and such data are rare but essential for evidence‐based policies and interventions as conflicts continue to rise globally.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148964295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pushing the Boundaries: Studies on Consumers and Food Demand in the Journal of Agricultural Economics","authors":"Jill E. Hobbs, Jutta Roosen","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70079","url":null,"abstract":"We summarize the development of consumer economics and food demand in the <jats:italic>Journal of Agricultural Economics</jats:italic> over the past 100 years. Even from an early stage, the role of marketing agricultural products in a thriving agricultural sector was recognized within the works published in the Journal. Early papers focused on the demand for specific commodities and consumer trends more generally. Over time, analyses became more advanced, diving into the development of theory and methods for the estimation of demand systems. While this trend has continued, other topics have come to the forefront, such as consumer demand for food quality and safety, consumer acceptance of novel technologies, the demand for sustainable food products, and the role of nutrition and health in consumer studies. Methods were developed concurrently to address the new challenges that the agricultural sector faced, from secondary data analysis to primary data collection and experimental methods.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148946752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Identifying the Causal Impacts of International Sanctions on Agricultural Trade: An Event Study Approach","authors":"Junyan Tian","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70071","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>International sanctions have been increasingly deployed for political and economic reasons. While the consequences of sanctions on political and macro-economic outcomes are well-analysed, rigorous evaluations of the causal impacts of sanctions on the agriculture and food (agri-food) trade remain limited. We obtain the causal estimates of sanctions' impact on agri-food trade by utilising samples that have been threatened with but not subject to sanctions to construct the counterfactual of the sanctioned sample. Exploiting an event study approach to analyse data from 154 countries over the period 1960–2016, we find that international sanctions mostly resulted in modest and short-lived declines in the total agri-food trade of sanctioned countries as opposed to the counterpart of countries under sanction threats. Trade volumes declined substantially for beef, pork, roots, dairy and fruit products. The decline in the exports of agri-food commodities resulting from international sanctions was more significant relative to the drop in imports. The study also reveals that the impact of sanctions on agri-food trade depends partially on the type of the sanction and on the sanction imposer. While the differences in the impact of sanctions across agri-food commodities largely reflect the fact that the commodities where there are stronger impacts are those produced more in countries subject to sanctions, future studies incorporating analytical tools from industrial organisation may provide more nuanced insights on why and how the trade of differential agri-food commodities was impacted by sanctions so differently.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"1089-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148675342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Climate Change and Agricultural Adaptations: Insights from Iran on Crop Choices and Irrigation Shifts","authors":"Soroush Kamyab, Layla Shiva","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70066","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Agriculture in the Middle East faces severe climate risks, including rising temperatures, declining precipitation, and more frequent extremes. This paper examines long-run adaptation in Iran using farmland rental prices to capture overall productivity impacts. By combining cross-sectional and panel models, we distinguish short-run weather effects from long-run climate responses and quantify adaptation benefits. While hotter and arid regions experience losses of −5.3% to −41.8% without adaptation, long-run adjustments generate gains of 11.7%–15.2%, depending on climate scenarios. Farmers primarily adapt by shifting irrigation sources toward deep wells and reallocating acreage to heat-tolerant crops. Beyond estimating the overall value of adaptation, we examine how climate change shapes these major adaptation practices, highlighting sustainability concerns, including groundwater depletion and distributional impacts in resource-constrained, developing-country settings. Our findings link long-run climate responses to both productivity gains and sustainability trade-offs.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"1050-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148682170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Platform Fulfilment and Seller Reputation: Evidence From Amazon's Marketplace","authors":"Chinonso E. Etumnu, Kenneth A. Foster","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70075","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In 2006, Amazon launched the Fulfilment by Amazon (FBA) program, providing support to third-party sellers for a fee. While the program has the potential to enhance sellers' reputations, evidence regarding its effectiveness is limited. This study estimates the association between FBA usage and seller reputation, measured by the average star rating a seller receives. Using fixed effects and staggered difference-in-differences estimation approaches as well as 26 weeks of panel data from Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, three key findings emerge. First, using FBA is significantly and positively associated with a seller's reputation, leading to higher average ratings in the short term than in the long term. This improvement is mainly due to FBA's competitive advantages, such as eligibility for Amazon Prime, standardised fulfilment quality and excellent customer service. Second, although the correlation between FBA and reputation is positive in every country, we find cross-country heterogeneity in effect sizes and significance levels, with the largest effects in Canada. Third, we show that large sellers have the best reputation, and all sellers benefit from the FBA program. However, medium-sized sellers benefit the most from the program. This trend can be attributed to how the benefits of the FBA program accrue optimally to sellers based on their operational scale. These results suggest that the FBA program is indeed effective in enhancing seller reputation, with implications for third-party sellers, Amazon and regulators.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"1122-1143"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148842875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reallocation Effects of Internalizing Externalities: Evidence From China's Straw Burning Ban","authors":"Wenyuan Hua","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70052","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the reallocation effects of a typical environmental policy aiming to internalize externalities: the straw burning ban across China. The ban prohibited the traditional farming practice of burning straw while compelling the labour-intensive practice of straw utilization. We show that the legislation banning straw burning led to an increase in local land renting activities. Our results indicate that implementation of the ban resulted in a within-village land redistribution, encouraging the exit of less-productive farmers while promoting land expansion by more-productive farmers. Consequently, village-level aggregate agricultural output and productivity increased by 5% and 3%, respectively. A complementary policy instrument to the command-and-control ban—establishing biomass power plants to incentivize farmers to collect crop residues—led to a greater land redistribution in villages with a nearby biomass power plant after the ban is imposed, relative to before.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"888-909"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148288529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marco V. Sánchez, Martín Cicowiez, Lucia Battaglia, Valentina Pernechele
{"title":"Repurposing Agricultural Budgets With Multiple Objectives and Fiscal Constraints: A Multicriteria Decision-Making Policy Tool Applied to Sub-Saharan African Countries","authors":"Marco V. Sánchez, Martín Cicowiez, Lucia Battaglia, Valentina Pernechele","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70053","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Repurposing agricultural public resources toward higher-return incentives and investments can help transform agri-food systems. This is important for low-income countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, where limited budgets restrict options for boosting agricultural spending. We demonstrate how, within a tight budget envelope, opportunities exist to achieve better agricultural transformation outcomes. To this end, we developed the policy optimization modelling tool, PolOpT, which combines a multicriteria decision-making technique and a recursive-dynamic computable general equilibrium model. We applied it with datasets for six sub-Saharan African countries, including hundreds of estimated parameters that transmit the effect of policy measures onto agricultural productivity. The approach demonstrates that reallocating agricultural public expenditure across policy measures in these countries can potentially boost agri-food output by several percentage points, create almost a million off-farm jobs in rural areas, lift almost 3 million people out of poverty and allow 16 million people more to afford a healthy diet—all without extra funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"910-927"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148288554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Government Policy, Low- and High-Skilled Labour, and Technical Inefficiency in Chinese Agriculture, 1952–2008","authors":"Yulong Chen, Peter F. Orazem","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70070","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70070","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We utilize Chinese provincial data to explore how government policies affected grain production between 1952 and 2008. We adapt the Caselli-Coleman framework to allow multiple inputs including fertilizer, land and capital as well as skilled and unskilled labour. We also extend the method to allow for comparisons of production possibilities over time as well as across provinces. We derive measures of the technological frontier for Chinese agricultural production for each year over the 56-year period. The empirical estimates illustrate how labour efficiency in Chinese grain production changed from 1952 to 2008, encompassing the Great Leap Forward (1958–1962), the collective farming period (1963–1977), and the rural economic reforms initiated in 1978. Government policies held back agricultural production in the 1960s and 1970s by limiting efficient use of labour at a time when the Green Revolution was raising grain yields dramatically throughout Asia. Reductions in labour efficiency led to a 12.9% average decline in grain output during the Great Leap Forward and little gain during the collective farming period. In contrast, rural reforms that allowed farmers to profit from production above their assigned quotas starting in 1978 significantly enhanced labour efficiency for the more skilled but had little impact on the productive efficiency of unskilled agricultural workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"1071-1088"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.70070","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148675113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Mechanized Fragility in Turkish Agriculture: Earthquakes, Capital Destruction and the Scarcity Trap","authors":"Alper Demirdogen, Emine Olhan","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70072","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70072","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Natural disasters increasingly threaten global food security, yet the resilience of mechanized, middle-income agriculture remains a puzzle. Standard development theory suggests households manage shocks by substituting labor for capital. We show this mechanism fails in modern, mechanized agriculture because substituting labor for destroyed capital is infeasible in the short run. We estimate the impact of the February 2023 earthquakes in Turkiye on agricultural supply, separating extensive margin adjustments (cultivated land) from intensive margin effects (yields). This disaster represents a unique ‘dual shock’: physical capital destruction coincided with a liquidity crisis that blocked asset replacement. To analyse this, we adapt the Agricultural Household Model using a Leontief (fixed-proportions) representation as a short-run limiting case. Empirically, we employ a Synthetic Difference-in-Differences strategy, combining district-level crop statistics with remote sensing data. We find a significant contraction at the extensive margin: wheat cultivation declined by 8.5% relative to the pre-treatment mean in the 2024-restricted specification. Yet, we identify a ‘Null Yield Effect’ at the intensive margin. Yields remained stable or increased. This aligns with ‘Ricardian Selection,’ where producers—facing binding capital constraints—abandon marginal lands to concentrate resources on prime plots; consistent with this mechanism, the yield gain is concentrated in marginal, low-quality districts and absent where land is better. Sharp declines in new tractor registrations (24%) and agricultural credit (16.5%) confirm a ‘Scarcity Trap.’ In high-inflation, mechanized environments, cash transfers are insufficient. Policy must instead prioritize in-kind capital replacement to bypass liquidity constraints and restore capacity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"1102-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148768799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marta Tarruella-Cayuela, Nadja El Benni, Eva Winter, Robert Huber, Robert Finger, Gabriele Mack
{"title":"Assessing the Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts of a Greenhouse Gas Emission Tax in Swiss Agriculture","authors":"Marta Tarruella-Cayuela, Nadja El Benni, Eva Winter, Robert Huber, Robert Finger, Gabriele Mack","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70076","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1477-9552.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agriculture accounts for about one fifth of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, making mitigation a key policy priority. Although policymakers are increasingly considering market-based approaches such as taxes, their broader impacts remain insufficiently assessed. This study examines the environmental, economic and social impacts of a GHG tax on Swiss agriculture. Using the agent-based sector model SWISSland, representing 3077 farms and capturing heterogeneous responses to taxation and structural change, we simulate tax levels of 100, 200 and 300 CHF/tCO<sub>2</sub>eq for 2024–2030. We consider three mitigation pathways: technical measures, structural changes in land use and livestock numbers, and farm exits. We assess their impacts on GHG emissions, nitrogen surpluses, biodiversity, farm income, food production and food security. A GHG tax activates abatement mechanisms and induces dairy herd reductions, grassland extensification, shifts towards crop production for direct human consumption, and livestock farm exits. At 100 and 200 CHF/tCO<sub>2</sub>eq, emission reductions are mainly driven by technical measures, whereas at 300 CHF/tCO<sub>2</sub>eq they increasingly result from structural adjustment, including livestock farm exits and land reallocation to less emissions-intensive production. A tax of 100 CHF/tCO<sub>2</sub>eq reduces emissions by 5%, while higher tax rates achieve greater reductions but increase sectoral income losses from 13% to 25%. Food self-sufficiency and calorie production remain stable. The model also shows environmental co-benefits, including lower nitrogen surpluses and increased biodiversity areas. These findings highlight synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions and suggest that redistributing tax revenues could mitigate adverse effects and improve policy outcomes, while enhancing the policy's social acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"1144-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.70076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148809962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}