选举后暴力对肯尼亚农村农户福利的影响

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Laura Barasa, Timothy Njagi
{"title":"选举后暴力对肯尼亚农村农户福利的影响","authors":"Laura Barasa,&nbsp;Timothy Njagi","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We investigate the causal impact of the Kenya 2008 post-election violence on rural farm households' welfare, including per capita income. We explore potential causal pathways through which post-election violence might have affected household welfare, including crop income, livestock income and off-farm income. We use a difference-in-differences estimator to analyse data from a 10-year panel of rural farm households from the Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development combined with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence and Uppsala Conflict Data Program. We find that the post-election violence had a negative impact on household welfare. Specifically, exposure to post-election violence led to a 19% reduction in household per capita income. Notably, post-election violence had a negative impact on crop income and off-farm income but a positive impact on livestock income. Households may have resorted to selling their livestock as an ex ante or ex post coping strategy. Unlike crop production, some forms of livestock production such as dairy production involve daily rather than seasonal activities. Thus, it is plausible that similar forms of livestock production might have provided an economically viable ex post income generating strategy during PEV. This study offers pertinent policy implications aimed at enhancing rural development and supporting post-election violence recovery.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"624-639"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Post-Election Violence on the Welfare of Rural Farm Households in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Laura Barasa,&nbsp;Timothy Njagi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1477-9552.12645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We investigate the causal impact of the Kenya 2008 post-election violence on rural farm households' welfare, including per capita income. We explore potential causal pathways through which post-election violence might have affected household welfare, including crop income, livestock income and off-farm income. We use a difference-in-differences estimator to analyse data from a 10-year panel of rural farm households from the Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development combined with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence and Uppsala Conflict Data Program. We find that the post-election violence had a negative impact on household welfare. Specifically, exposure to post-election violence led to a 19% reduction in household per capita income. Notably, post-election violence had a negative impact on crop income and off-farm income but a positive impact on livestock income. Households may have resorted to selling their livestock as an ex ante or ex post coping strategy. Unlike crop production, some forms of livestock production such as dairy production involve daily rather than seasonal activities. Thus, it is plausible that similar forms of livestock production might have provided an economically viable ex post income generating strategy during PEV. This study offers pertinent policy implications aimed at enhancing rural development and supporting post-election violence recovery.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"624-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12645\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了肯尼亚2008年选举后暴力对农村农户福利(包括人均收入)的因果影响。我们探讨了选举后暴力可能影响家庭福利的潜在因果途径,包括作物收入、牲畜收入和非农收入。我们使用差异中的差异估计器来分析来自Tegemeo农业政策与发展研究所的10年农村农户小组的数据,并结合来自武装冲突地点和事件数据、选举后暴力调查委员会和乌普萨拉冲突数据计划的冲突数据。我们发现,选举后的暴力对家庭福利产生了负面影响。具体而言,暴露于选举后暴力导致家庭人均收入减少19%。值得注意的是,选举后暴力对农作物收入和非农收入产生了负面影响,但对牲畜收入产生了积极影响。家庭可能将出售牲畜作为事前或事后的应对策略。与作物生产不同,某些形式的牲畜生产(如乳制品生产)涉及日常活动,而不是季节性活动。因此,类似形式的牲畜生产可能在PEV期间提供了经济上可行的事后创收战略,这是合理的。这项研究为促进农村发展和支持选举后暴力恢复提供了相关的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Post-Election Violence on the Welfare of Rural Farm Households in Kenya

We investigate the causal impact of the Kenya 2008 post-election violence on rural farm households' welfare, including per capita income. We explore potential causal pathways through which post-election violence might have affected household welfare, including crop income, livestock income and off-farm income. We use a difference-in-differences estimator to analyse data from a 10-year panel of rural farm households from the Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development combined with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence and Uppsala Conflict Data Program. We find that the post-election violence had a negative impact on household welfare. Specifically, exposure to post-election violence led to a 19% reduction in household per capita income. Notably, post-election violence had a negative impact on crop income and off-farm income but a positive impact on livestock income. Households may have resorted to selling their livestock as an ex ante or ex post coping strategy. Unlike crop production, some forms of livestock production such as dairy production involve daily rather than seasonal activities. Thus, it is plausible that similar forms of livestock production might have provided an economically viable ex post income generating strategy during PEV. This study offers pertinent policy implications aimed at enhancing rural development and supporting post-election violence recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信