Joseph Goeb, Bart Minten, Thomas Reardon, A Myint Zu, May Thet Htar
{"title":"Vertical Integration and Coordination in Modernising Staple Food Value Chains: Evidence From Myanmar's Rice Sector","authors":"Joseph Goeb, Bart Minten, Thomas Reardon, A Myint Zu, May Thet Htar","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70088","url":null,"abstract":"Increased vertical integration and coordination are defining features of transforming and modernising agricultural value chains in low‐ and middle‐income countries, with important implications for market efficiency and farm‐level transformation. However, research documenting these processes in transforming domestic value chains is limited, with existing studies largely focusing on large firms, foreign direct investment and high‐value food products, leaving less understood how domestic processors in staple food value chains expand into complementary businesses and services. We study these processes in the rice value chain—the most important staple in Southeast Asia—in Myanmar, using unique large‐scale data from domestic rice mills and farmers. We show that both modern and traditional mills serve as key nodes in local rice value chains, fulfilling diverse roles beyond processing at both the farm and post‐harvest levels. Yet, statistical tests that control for mill and farmer characteristics, respectively, show that modern mills are more engaged in vertical integration and coordination, particularly in post‐harvest value chain segments, highlighting the co‐development of modern processing and business expansion. Consistent with this pattern in the miller data, farmers using a modern mill are more likely to receive complementary services—especially post‐harvest—and to adopt modern production practices more broadly. However, this expansion is uneven, with services reaching large farms more frequently than small and medium farms.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149199018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Astrid Mastenbroek, Robert Sparrow, Geoffrey Otim, Christine Kawuma
{"title":"Reference Points and Affordability Perceptions of Hybrid Maize Seed in Uganda: Evidence on Endowment and Expectations","authors":"Astrid Mastenbroek, Robert Sparrow, Geoffrey Otim, Christine Kawuma","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70093","url":null,"abstract":"Despite demonstrated yield advantages, adoption of hybrid maize seed in Sub‐Saharan Africa remains low, raising questions about smallholders' perceptions of value and affordability. We examine whether farmers value hybrid maize seed differently depending on whether they already possess it or form expectations about likely prices or ownership, and how this affects willingness to pay (WTP) for a 1‐kg pack of seed in Uganda. We elicit WTP and willingness to accept (WTA) using Becker‐DeGroot‐Marschak auctions and measure ownership expectations with a multiple price list. The experiment tests three mechanisms: an endowment effect, by comparing WTP and WTA; price expectations, by randomly varying price probabilities; and ownership expectations, by varying the probability of keeping the seed for free. We find a strong endowment effect: farmers require substantially more money to give up seed they already possess than they are willing to pay to acquire the same seed, with WTA exceeding WTP by about 60%. The average WTP of UGX 4605 is well below the market price of UGX 8500. Loss aversion is associated with lower WTP and higher WTA, but these effects are small, imprecise, and do not explain the valuation gap. We do not find evidence that price expectations or ownership expectations generate economically meaningful reference points. Overall, our results indicate that current possession of seed is a more salient benchmark for valuation than forward‐looking expectations. These findings suggest that scaling strategies establishing early ownership, such as trial packs or plant‐now/pay‐after‐harvest schemes, may be more effective than attempts to shift price expectations alone.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"471 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149172821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When Trade Policy Shocks Hit the Pit: Pricing, Volatility and Speculation in the 2025 Soybean Futures Market","authors":"Yasin Yildirim, Sandro Steinbach","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70091","url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149130279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Role of Women Within the Agricultural Economics Society: An Historical Perspective","authors":"Carmen Hubbard, David R. Stead","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70085","url":null,"abstract":"This note explores the historical role and changing prevalence of women within the Agricultural Economics Society (AES) over its first century. Despite an initial founding commitment in 1926 to membership for men and women on equal terms, female participation remained low for much of the twentieth century. Early contributors such as E. Handlen, Mabel K. Ashby and especially Ruth Cohen made significant intellectual and professional contributions, with Cohen later becoming the Society's first female president. However, progress was uneven and constrained by wider structural barriers, social norms and a limited pipeline to senior roles. While the AES at times led comparable organisations in promoting women, it lacked sustained institutional strategies to support gender equality. Recent decades have seen improved representation, greater visibility and increased leadership roles for women, though disparities persist, not least in the recipients of AES awards for excellence. Continued, systematic efforts are needed to achieve the Society's founding goal of gender equality.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149077660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction to the Anniversary Issue","authors":"Jonathan Brooks","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70087","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149070965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to ‘The Announcement Volatility Risk Premium in Agricultural Markets: Evidence From USDA Report Releases’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149070964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On the Value of Improved Forecasting for Specialty Crop Producers Through Intra‐Season Supply Allocations","authors":"Hyunkyung Cho, Youngjune Kim, Jisang Yu","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70086","url":null,"abstract":"How to manage harvest and storage of agricultural products has been one of the long‐lasting questions in agricultural economics. We study the value of improved forecast accuracy for the producers in the context of intra‐seasonal supply allocation, particularly for specialty crops with multiple harvest cycles within a season. We first explore how the forecast accuracy affects intra‐seasonal storage decisions. We then derive the expression for the marginal value of the improved forecast accuracy and show that the gains from the improvement in the forecast accuracy occur by shifting the optimal storage choices to those under certainty (i.e., the state is revealed) from those under uncertainty. Finally, we provide numerical illustrations on how the value of the improved forecast accuracy for the producers differs across different degrees of market power showing that relative gains from the improvement are larger when the market is more competitive. We conclude by drawing broader implications highlighting the importance of the interaction among information, storage and market structure.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149027577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yumei Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Ruizeng Zhang, Tiantian Sun, Shenggen Fan
{"title":"Low‐Carbon Transition in China's Agrifood System: Potential, Pathways and Global Implications","authors":"Yumei Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Ruizeng Zhang, Tiantian Sun, Shenggen Fan","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70081","url":null,"abstract":"Global agrifood systems must undergo a low‐carbon transition to achieve Paris Agreement temperature goals. Accounting for 13% of global agrifood systems emissions, China has a critical role to play; yet without further action, China's agrifood emissions will continue to rise, jeopardising its carbon neutrality commitment. This study employs a mixed‐methods approach combining a narrative literature review and integrated modelling to: (1) characterise the emissions of China's agrifood system, (2) project carbon emission reduction and carbon sequestration potential under multiple domestic policy scenarios, and (3) provide wider implications for developing countries. Under the baseline scenario, holding current trends and policies constant, annual emissions are projected to rise slowly from a baseline of 1.6 billion tons in 2021 to 1.83 billion tons of CO <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> eq by 2060, driven primarily by the expansion of the livestock sector and growing energy use. However, our modelling results suggest that a combination of measures, including productivity improvements, the adoption of low‐carbon technologies, food loss and waste reduction, production structure adjustment, and a low‐carbon energy transition, could reduce emissions by over 60% or 1.1 billion tons CO <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> eq by 2060 relative to the baseline. At the same time, carbon sequestration alone could ensure carbon neutrality, with potential reductions of 1.8 billion tons CO <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> eq annually, thereby contributing to the national carbon neutrality goal. These results underscore that synergistic, system‐wide interventions substantially outperform isolated measures. China's experience offers a valuable reference for other countries in formulating sustainable agricultural policies and pursuing low‐carbon transitions.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149020027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G. F. van Hemert Daniël, Bert D'Espallier, Roy Mersland
{"title":"How Do Savings Groups Respond to Agricultural Shocks?","authors":"G. F. van Hemert Daniël, Bert D'Espallier, Roy Mersland","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70083","url":null,"abstract":"Negative aggregate shocks lead to persistent rural poverty. Access to credit and insurance can help, but is often lacking. How do informal financial institutions, dependent on locally sourced capital, respond to shocks? We study the response of savings groups—locally run financial associations mostly embedded in rural agricultural communities—to aggregate shocks. We explore this by combining group‐level performance data for 9328 savings groups primarily in five sub‐Saharan African countries with local drought data. We use two‐way fixed‐effects and heterogeneity‐robust difference‐in‐differences analyses to assess how these informal financial groups respond to drought shocks. Groups mobilise credit during shocks by increasing the number of loans they provide. The counter‐cyclical credit response is concentrated among groups shocked in the later stages of their savings cycle, where accumulated capital permits additional lending, confirming a capital‐constraint prediction. The social fund, designed for idiosyncratic shocks, is not mobilised during droughts. We discuss implications for integrating informal savings groups into climate‐risk management strategies.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149019892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index Insurance and Food Security Among Smallholder Farmers in Southern Mali","authors":"Anna Mader, Tim Ölkers, Oliver Mußhoff","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70084","url":null,"abstract":"Climate extremes increasingly threaten food security in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where vulnerable smallholder farmers often lack access to risk mitigation tools. Although index‐based insurance has been promoted as a promising adaptation measure to climate shocks, evidence on its welfare effects, especially on food security, remains limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the relationship between index insurance ownership and food security among approximately 1300 smallholder maize farmers in southern Mali. Using self‐assessed food security measures and applying a rich set of different regression models to mitigate endogeneity concerns, we find that owning an index insurance product statistically significantly improves food security. Our results suggest that this effect operates primarily through reduced ex‐post consumption adjustments. The findings are particularly relevant for policymakers and development practitioners exploring scalable and climate‐resilient financial instruments for food security.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148993749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}