{"title":"The Impact of Post-Election Violence on the Welfare of Rural Farm Households in Kenya","authors":"Laura Barasa, Timothy Njagi","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We investigate the causal impact of the Kenya 2008 post-election violence on rural farm households' welfare, including per capita income. We explore potential causal pathways through which post-election violence might have affected household welfare, including crop income, livestock income and off-farm income. We use a difference-in-differences estimator to analyse data from a 10-year panel of rural farm households from the Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development combined with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence and Uppsala Conflict Data Program. We find that the post-election violence had a negative impact on household welfare. Specifically, exposure to post-election violence led to a 19% reduction in household per capita income. Notably, post-election violence had a negative impact on crop income and off-farm income but a positive impact on livestock income. Households may have resorted to selling their livestock as an ex ante or ex post coping strategy. Unlike crop production, some forms of livestock production such as dairy production involve daily rather than seasonal activities. Thus, it is plausible that similar forms of livestock production might have provided an economically viable ex post income generating strategy during PEV. This study offers pertinent policy implications aimed at enhancing rural development and supporting post-election violence recovery.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"76 3","pages":"624-639"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigate the causal impact of the Kenya 2008 post-election violence on rural farm households' welfare, including per capita income. We explore potential causal pathways through which post-election violence might have affected household welfare, including crop income, livestock income and off-farm income. We use a difference-in-differences estimator to analyse data from a 10-year panel of rural farm households from the Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development combined with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence and Uppsala Conflict Data Program. We find that the post-election violence had a negative impact on household welfare. Specifically, exposure to post-election violence led to a 19% reduction in household per capita income. Notably, post-election violence had a negative impact on crop income and off-farm income but a positive impact on livestock income. Households may have resorted to selling their livestock as an ex ante or ex post coping strategy. Unlike crop production, some forms of livestock production such as dairy production involve daily rather than seasonal activities. Thus, it is plausible that similar forms of livestock production might have provided an economically viable ex post income generating strategy during PEV. This study offers pertinent policy implications aimed at enhancing rural development and supporting post-election violence recovery.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment.
Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.