{"title":"再論湖泗方言“打”字的三個讀音及相關問題","authors":"留文 謝","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 湖北武漢湖泗方言“打”字有三個讀音,其中表示“投擲、扔”和“擊打”義讀音為[tɕiã44]、[tɕiã23]。李榮先生認為可能反映了古音“打,都挺切”,同時又指出,湖泗話“古上聲怎麼分化成陰平、陰去兩類,有待進一步研究”。本文考察漢語南北方言相關資料,所有表示“投擲、扔”和“擊打”義讀音的來源均為中古端母、梗攝開口四等、清聲母平聲或清聲母去聲,聲調沒有清聲母上聲的來源。所以本字不可能是“都挺切”的“打”。 如果說一定要有本字,最有可能的本字是“碇(矴)”,由“碇(矴)石”拋入水中以固定船身的動作,引申出“沉入水裡”和“投擲、扔”義。","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129381649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"懷嶽片贛語咸山攝開口知系字元音高化現象考察","authors":"建江 徐","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 懷嶽片贛語咸山攝開口知系字元音往往高化,韻母今讀ɛn或en。東南方言中,咸山攝開口知三章組字元音高化存在閩粵型、吳湘型和客贛型的差別。懷嶽片贛語屬於客贛型,繼承自洪武移民時期的贛語,客贛方言咸山攝開口知三章組字元音高化可以追溯至唐宋時期。","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121325608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"景寧畲話古全濁聲母的今讀","authors":"夢冰 項","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402009","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 大部分畲族所使用的語言是一種接近客家話的漢語方言,習慣上叫做畲話。浙江景寧畲族自治縣的畲族所說的畲話,古全濁聲母今讀清塞音、清塞擦音時存在較多不送氣的情形,主要是由通語、閩語、吳語的不同影響造成的層次累積,在確定畲話的性質時應當排除這一部分字音。","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"74 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116697975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"贛語梗攝陽聲韻字的讀音及其演變","authors":"燕 熊","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 本文考察中古梗攝陽聲韻字在贛方言中的讀音,以地圖的形式展示讀音分佈情況,嘗試從梗攝陽聲韻字讀音差異探討贛語和周邊方言的關係。贛語梗攝陽聲韻字文讀音受官話的影響,部分方言替換為官話讀音,部分方言疊置多個文讀層次。白讀層讀音顯示福建建寧一帶青韻部分字有別於庚三清韻字,属于存古;湖北陽新、湖南安仁等地梗攝陽聲韻字則併入宕江攝,顯示與湘語有過共同發展。","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125073889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In lieu of Preface","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115939539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On the origin of the Mainstream Hakka word [oi1] “mother”","authors":"W. S. Coblin","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 One of the most common morphemes meaning “mother” in the Hakka dialects is a syllable pronounced [oi1], [ɔi1], or the like. This word, so far as is known, has no phonologically systematic cognates in other Chinese dialect families and is not attested in early Sinographic records. Nor has any plausible non-Sinitic donor language been identified for it. The object of the present paper is to suggest a possible earlier origin for this word. Our hypothesis is that it is in fact a fusion of a Common Neo-Hakka compound *a1 moi1, in which the first element is a kinship prefix and the second is a word whose basic meaning is “mother, aunt, etc.” The paper then suggests that the morpheme *moi1 descends from an even older, pre-Hakka word *moi4, which may in turn have been related in some way to the pre-Hàn word mǔ 母 “mother”.","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116100948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"從浙江江山長汀話探究長汀中部與南部客家話的類型差異","authors":"中杰 吳, 學年 張","doi":"10.1163/2405478x-01402007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478x-01402007","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 唐末入居福建長汀宣成,北宋中期遷到同縣的戴坊,清初又從戴坊搬到浙江江山廿八都鎮的戴氏移民所操之客家話,究竟在哪些方面保留宣成特色?哪些又是戴坊成分?受到通用於廿八都鎮當地的正話如何的影響?受更大範圍通行的吳語如何的左右?是否有上述因素之外的存古現象或自行演變?本文逐一剖析,以期了解江山長汀話的固有及外來層次、乃至語言演變歷史。以中古音系為間架,記錄長汀三洲鎮戴坊村、宣成鄉藍田村的語料,著重彼等在聲母、韻母、聲調的區別,進而觀察江山長汀話的各種組成部分。援用陳忠敏(2007)的工作方法,來離析出江山長汀話的固有及外來層次,而非推究原始客家話在語音上的出發點;且對於系統性的常規、和個別的非常規語音對應訊息同等重視。此研究經驗顯示,如欲探究特定地點的語言(江山長汀話)演變歷程,要先將在地強勢語言(正話、吳語)造成的影響成分先剔除出來,因為這屬於表層現象。其次和移民原鄉語言比對,有可能超過一種以上(宣成、三洲),因此非常複雜。最後才能確定不是來自原鄉和在地強勢語言的獨特存古或自行演變成分。調查結果能呼應何純惠(2014)紀錄,證明長汀中部與南部客家話,確實各有其特點,韻母、聲調上都具有明顯的類型差異。","PeriodicalId":132217,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Chinese linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121348849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}