{"title":"The best of artificial intelligence in 2024","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Recellularization via electroporation therapy of the duodenum combined with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist to replace insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 12-month results of a first-in-human study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2904","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2904","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Studies have shown that hydrothermal duodenal mucosal ablation results in improved glycemic control. Recellularization via electroporation therapy (ReCET) is a novel endoscopic procedure that uses electroporation to induce cellular apoptosis and subsequent reepithelization. In this study, we aimed to eliminate exogenous insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients through a single ReCET procedure combined with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Feasibility, safety, and (dose) efficacy of ReCET were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This first-in-human study included patients with T2D on basal insulin (age, 28-75 years; body mass index, 24-40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; glycosylated hemoglobin, ≤64 mmol/mol; C-peptide, ≥0.2 nmol/L). The electroporation dose was optimized during the study, starting with single 600 V and ending with double 750 V treatments. All patients underwent ReCET, after which insulin was discontinued and semaglutide (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) was initiated. The primary endpoints were feasibility (procedure time [from catheter in to catheter out], technical success rate), safety, and efficacy (patients off insulin at 6 months; HbA1c, ≤58 mmol/mol).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen patients underwent endoscopic ReCET. The median procedure time was 58 (interquartile range, 49-73) minutes. ReCET demonstrated a technical success rate of 100%. No device-related severe adverse events or severe hypoglycemic events were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, 12 (86%) patients remained off exogenous insulin therapy, with significant improvements in glycemic control and metabolic parameters. The 2 patients in whom insulin therapy was reintroduced both received ReCET at the lowest voltage (single 600 V).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These results suggest that ReCET is feasible and safe. In combination with semaglutide, ReCET may be a promising therapeutic option to replace insulin therapy in selected T2D patients while improving glycemic control and metabolic health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Predictors for lymph node metastasis and survival of patients with T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and endoscopic therapy: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Limited data exist regarding the long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy (ET) with or without chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Our aim was to identify the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1b EAC and assess how the chosen treatment modality affects overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed patients with histologically confirmed T1b EAC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Focusing on T1bN0M0 staging, the patients were divided into 2 groups (ET [n = 174] and surgery [n = 769]), and OS and CSS rates were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1418 patients with T1b EAC, 228 cases (16.1%) exhibited LNM at diagnosis. Notable risk factors for LNM included poorly differentiated tumor and lesion size ≥20 mm. For T1bN0M0 cases, ET was commonly performed from 2009 to 2018 (odds ratio [OR], 4.3), especially for patients aged ≥65 years (OR, 3.1) with tumor size <20 mm (OR, 2.3). During the median 50 months of follow-up, age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9), ET (HR, 1.5), and CRT (HR, 1.4) were associated with poorer OS. Factors linked to decreased CSS were age ≥65 years (subhazard ratio [SHR], 1.6), poorly differentiated tumors (SHR, 1.5), and CRT (SHR, 1.5).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In T1b EAC, tumor size ≥20 mm and poor differentiation are notable risk factors for LNM. ET exhibited comparable CSS outcomes to surgery for carefully selected T1bN0M0 lesions. CRT did not provide additional survival benefit for these lesions; however, large-scale studies are required to validate this finding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140908521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reflection on the high recurrence rate of adenomas after cold snare EMR","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Critical insights on improving risk evaluation for metachronous colorectal cancer after serrated polypectomy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142593282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Establishment and validation of a risk score model based on EUS: assessment of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2903","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2903","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Lymph node metastasis<span> significantly affects the prognosis of early gastric cancer patients. EUS plays a crucial role in the preoperative assessment of early gastric cancer. This study evaluated the efficacy of EUS in identifying lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients and developed a risk score model to aid in choosing the best treatment options.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness of EUS for detecting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients. A risk score model for predicting lymph node metastasis preoperatively was created using independent risk factors identified through binary logistic regression analysis and subsequently validated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for both the development and validation cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>The overall accuracy of EUS in identifying lymph node metastasis was 85.3%, although its sensitivity (29.2%) and positive predictive value (38.7%) were relatively low. Patients were categorized based on preoperative risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including tumor size of ≥20 mm, lymph nodes of ≥10 mm, body mass index of ≥24 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup>, and lymph node metastasis on CT scans. A 7-point risk score model was developed to assess the likelihood of lymph node metastasis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the development and validation sets were 0.842 and 0.837, respectively, with sensitivities of 64% and 79%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed a practical risk score model based on preoperative factors to help EUS predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients, guiding the selection of optimal treatment approaches for these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140864400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Best of EUS 2024","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A new artificial intelligence system for both stomach and small-bowel capsule endoscopy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Despite the benefits of artificial intelligence in small-bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (CE) image reading, information on its application in the stomach and SB CE is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter, retrospective diagnostic study, gastric imaging data were added to the deep learning–based SmartScan (SS), which has been described previously. A total of 1069 magnetically controlled GI CE examinations (comprising 2,672,542 gastric images) were used in the training phase for recognizing gastric pathologies, producing a new artificial intelligence algorithm named SS Plus. A total of 342 fully automated, magnetically controlled CE examinations were included in the validation phase. The performance of both senior and junior endoscopists with both the SS Plus–assisted reading (SSP-AR) and conventional reading (CR) modes was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SS Plus was designed to recognize 5 types of gastric lesions and 17 types of SB lesions. SS Plus reduced the number of CE images required for review to 873.90 (median, 1000; interquartile range [IQR], 814.50-1000) versus 44,322.73 (median, 42,393; IQR, 31,722.75-54,971.25) for CR. Furthermore, with SSP-AR, endoscopists took 9.54 minutes (median, 8.51; IQR, 6.05-13.13) to complete the CE video reading. In the 342 CE videos, SS Plus identified 411 gastric and 422 SB lesions, whereas 400 gastric and 368 intestinal lesions were detected with CR. Moreover, junior endoscopists remarkably improved their CE image reading ability with SSP-AR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study shows that the newly upgraded deep learning–based algorithm SS Plus can detect GI lesions and help improve the diagnostic performance of junior endoscopists in interpreting CE videos.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141293316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Virtual reality intervention to improve quality of care during colonoscopy: a hybrid type 1 randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Effective management of patients’ pain, anxiety, and discomfort during colonoscopy is crucial for successful completion of the procedure, patient adherence to follow-up examinations, and patient satisfaction. Virtual reality (VR) interventions, as a nonpharmacologic and innovative solution, have demonstrated promising results in managing these outcomes. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on their effectiveness and implementation. This trial aimed to test clinical effectiveness and identify factors to facilitate the implementation of VR during colonoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A hybrid type 1 effectiveness implementation, parallel randomized controlled, open-label trial was conducted. Fifty patients were randomized (1:1) to a VR or a control group. The effectiveness (pain, anxiety, discomfort, medication use, and satisfaction) and implementation (reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) outcomes were assessed before, during, and after colonoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the VR group reported significantly lower pain (<em>P</em> = .043) and discomfort (<em>P</em> <.0001) during colonoscopy, had a higher number of completed colonoscopies without sedation (<em>P</em> = .003), and showed higher satisfaction (<em>P</em> = .032). The major barrier to the implementation and maintenance of the VR intervention was inadequate VR content design. Staff were most worried about altered patient communications, unclear responsibilities, increasing workload, and patient safety. Patients expressed willingness to reuse VR glasses and to suggest them to other patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VR can be used as a nonpharmacologic method for pain management and for overcoming anxiety and discomfort during colonoscopy. VR can improve patients’ satisfaction and diminish the need for sedative medications; accordingly, it has the potential to promote cooperation and compliance among patients and increase screening colonoscopy rates. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05723861.)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141293321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}