Gastrointestinal endoscopy最新文献_第3页

Marked lymphatic involvement and lymph node metastases without direct submucosal invasion in a sigmoid colon cancer arising from a flat variant of traditional serrated adenoma 一例由传统锯齿状腺瘤扁平变体引起的乙状结肠癌病例出现明显的淋巴管受累和淋巴结转移，但未直接侵犯黏膜下层。

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.025

Shota Tomaru MD, Yoji Takeuchi MD, FJGES, FASGE, Masazumi Koike MD, Hayato Ikota MD, PhD, Toshiki Mukai MD, PhD, Hiroshi Kawachi MD, PhD, Keigo Sato MD, Hirohito Tanaka MD, PhD, Shiko Kuribayashi MD, PhD, Toshio Uraoka MD, PhD

引用次数: 0

Automated endoscopic restrictive procedure: a pilot trial with more to come

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.063

Ivo Boskoski MD, PhD, Steven Shamah MD

引用次数: 0

A note from the Editor-in-Chief

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.001

Douglas G. Adler MD

引用次数: 0

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Colorectal Cancer Screening Project National Summit

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.016

Pegah Hosseini-Carroll MD, FASGE , Jason A. Dominitz MD, MHS, MASGE , Brian C. Jacobson MD, MPH, FASGE , Folasade P. May MD, PhD, MPhil , Rachel B. Issaka MD, MAS , Colleen M. Schmitt MD, MHS, MASGE , Tonya L. Adams MD , Iman J. Boston MD, MBA , Juan Carlos Bucobo MD, FASGE , Lukejohn Day MD, FASGE , Inessa B. Khaykis MD, FASGE , Mark J. Marino MD , Douglas K. Rex MD, MASGE , Edward Sun MD, MBA, FASGE , Javelle A. Wynter MD , Jennifer A. Christie MD, MASGE

引用次数: 0

Efficacy of hemostatic powder monotherapy versus conventional endoscopic treatment for nonvariceal GI bleeding: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis 止血粉单药治疗与传统内镜治疗对非静脉曲张性消化道出血的疗效对比：荟萃分析和试验序列分析。

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.042

Kai Liu MD , Wei Zhang MD , Li Gao MD , Jiawei Bai MD , Xin Dong MD , Yue Wang MD , Hui Chen MD , Jiaqiang Dong MD , Nian Fang MD , Ying Han MD , Zhiguo Liu MD

{"title":"Efficacy of hemostatic powder monotherapy versus conventional endoscopic treatment for nonvariceal GI bleeding: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis","authors":"Kai Liu MD , Wei Zhang MD , Li Gao MD , Jiawei Bai MD , Xin Dong MD , Yue Wang MD , Hui Chen MD , Jiaqiang Dong MD , Nian Fang MD , Ying Han MD , Zhiguo Liu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Hemostatic powder (HP) is a novel hemostasis modality for nonvariceal GI bleeding. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of HP monotherapy versus conventional endoscopic treatment (CET) for nonvariceal GI bleeding.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from inception to October 16, 2023. The primary outcomes were the initial hemostatic rate and the 30-day recurrent bleeding rate. After the meta-analysis, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also conducted to decrease the risk of random errors and validate the result.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included 8 studies, incorporating 653 patients in total. Given significant heterogeneity, all analyses were segregated into malignancy-related and nonmalignancy-related GI bleeding lesions. For the former, HP monotherapy significantly improved the initial hemostasis rate and 30-day recurrent bleeding rate compared with CET (relative risk [RR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.75; <em>P</em> < .001; RR, .32; 95% CI, .12-.86; <em>P</em> = .02, respectively), and TSA supported the results. For nonmalignancy-related GI bleeding, HP monotherapy and CET have similar initial hemostasis and 30-day recurrent bleeding rates (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, .98-1.19; <em>P</em> = .11; RR, 1.15; 95% CI, .46-2.90; <em>P</em> = .76, respectively), but the TSA failed to confirm the results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>HP monotherapy surpassed CET in terms of the initial hemostasis rate and 30-day recurrent bleeding rate for patients with malignancy-related GI bleeding. However, their relative efficacy for nonmalignancy-related GI bleeding remains unresolved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 539-550.e14"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142283739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Underwater versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis 水下与传统内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠病变的 Meta 分析。

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.029

Sahib Singh MD , Babu P. Mohan MD , Rakesh Vinayek MD , Sudhir Dutta MD , Dushyant Singh Dahiya MD , Sumant Inamdar MD , Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar MD , Ganesh Aswath MD , Neil Sharma MD , Douglas G. Adler MD

{"title":"Underwater versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sahib Singh MD , Babu P. Mohan MD , Rakesh Vinayek MD , Sudhir Dutta MD , Dushyant Singh Dahiya MD , Sumant Inamdar MD , Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar MD , Ganesh Aswath MD , Neil Sharma MD , Douglas G. Adler MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.029","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.029","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Effect of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection (UESD) on clinical outcomes as compared with conventional ESD (CESD) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of the available data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Online databases were searched for studies comparing UESD with CESD for colorectal lesions. The outcomes of interest were en-bloc resection, R0 resection, procedure time (minutes), dissection speed (mm<sup>2</sup>/min), and adverse events. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean difference (SMD), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven studies with 1401 patients (UESD, 452; CESD, 949) were included. Mean patient age was 69 years, and 57% of patients were men. UESD had both a shorter procedure time (SMD, –1.33; 95% CI, –2.34 to –.32; <em>P</em> = .010) and greater dissection speed (SMD, 1.01; 95% CI, .35-1.68; <em>P</em> = .003) when compared with CESD. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups with respect to en-bloc resection (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, .37-3.41), R0 resection (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, .79-7.05), delayed bleeding (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, .65-2.74), perforation (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, .64-2.00), and postresection electrocoagulation syndrome (OR, .38; 95% CI, .10-1.42).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>UESD was faster in patients with colorectal lesions but had comparable rates of en-bloc resection, R0 resection, and adverse events when compared with CESD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 3","pages":"Pages 551-557.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142462628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Top tips for diagnostic rectal EUS and assessment of rectal sphincters 诊断性直肠 EUS 和评估直肠括约肌的绝招。

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.009

Zubin Dev Sharma MD, DNB

引用次数: 0

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating pylorospasm after sleeve gastrectomy 治疗袖状胃切除术后幽门痉挛的胃口周围内窥镜肌切开术

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.047

Li Wang MD, Zu-Qiang Liu MD, Shao-Bin Luo MD, Quan-Lin Li MD, Ping-Hong Zhou MD

引用次数: 0

Response

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.030

Jean Grimaldi MD, Louis-Jean Masgnaux MD, Mathieu Pioche MD, PhD

引用次数: 0

ERCP in the era of single-use endcaps and single-use duodenoscopes

IF 6.7 1区医学

Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.033

Dana Ben-Ami Shor MD

引用次数: 0