经肠ERCP经eus引导下LAMS吻合手术解剖改变的患者。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Michiel Bronswijk, Amy Tyberg, Giuseppe Vanella, Andrea Anderloni, Pieter Hindryckx, Haroon Shahid, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Avik Sarkar, Cecilia Binda, Iman Andalib, Wim Laleman, Jan-Werner Poley, Mariano Gonzalez Haba, Fabrice Caillol, Carlo Fabbri, Tom Boeken, Aymeric Becq, Laurent Monino, Christophe Cellier, Michel Kahaleh, Schalk van der Merwe
{"title":"经肠ERCP经eus引导下LAMS吻合手术解剖改变的患者。","authors":"Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Michiel Bronswijk, Amy Tyberg, Giuseppe Vanella, Andrea Anderloni, Pieter Hindryckx, Haroon Shahid, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Avik Sarkar, Cecilia Binda, Iman Andalib, Wim Laleman, Jan-Werner Poley, Mariano Gonzalez Haba, Fabrice Caillol, Carlo Fabbri, Tom Boeken, Aymeric Becq, Laurent Monino, Christophe Cellier, Michel Kahaleh, Schalk van der Merwe","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transenteric endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP, EDEE) using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel biliary drainage technique for patients with surgically altered anatomy. To evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of EDEE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective study. We included consecutive patients with altered anatomy who underwent an EDEE. Surgical anatomy configuration, prior biliary drainage and ERCP indications were collected. The EUS-guided anastomosis technique was assessed. The primary outcome was the technical success of the EDEE. The secondary outcomes were the clinical success and the adverse events (AE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four ERCPs were performed in 55 patients (60±16.2 years-old, 56.4% male). The most frequent surgical anatomy was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (n=23, 41.8%) and a prior biliary drainage was performed in 28 patients (50.9%). Benign strictures were the most frequent indication (58.2%). The most frequent techniques to identify the biliary limb were EUS imaging alone (n=14, 25.5%) and EUS-guided puncture of the biliary limb with retrograde opacification of the surgical hepaticojejunostomy (n=14, 25.5%). The procedure was performed using a direct freehand approach (n=49, 89.1%). Technical and clinical success rates of EDEE were 87.3% and 93.8%, respectively. The overall AE rate was 20% (9.1% LAMS-related). The rate of persistent fistula was 30.6% with a median follow-up period of 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EDEE technique offers a new and effective approach for biliary drainage in patients with surgically altered anatomy, particularly in benign indications and/or when several ERCPs are expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transenteric ERCP via EUS-guided anastomosis using LAMS in patients with surgically altered anatomy.\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Michiel Bronswijk, Amy Tyberg, Giuseppe Vanella, Andrea Anderloni, Pieter Hindryckx, Haroon Shahid, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Avik Sarkar, Cecilia Binda, Iman Andalib, Wim Laleman, Jan-Werner Poley, Mariano Gonzalez Haba, Fabrice Caillol, Carlo Fabbri, Tom Boeken, Aymeric Becq, Laurent Monino, Christophe Cellier, Michel Kahaleh, Schalk van der Merwe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2025.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transenteric endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP, EDEE) using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel biliary drainage technique for patients with surgically altered anatomy. To evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of EDEE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective study. We included consecutive patients with altered anatomy who underwent an EDEE. Surgical anatomy configuration, prior biliary drainage and ERCP indications were collected. The EUS-guided anastomosis technique was assessed. The primary outcome was the technical success of the EDEE. The secondary outcomes were the clinical success and the adverse events (AE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four ERCPs were performed in 55 patients (60±16.2 years-old, 56.4% male). The most frequent surgical anatomy was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (n=23, 41.8%) and a prior biliary drainage was performed in 28 patients (50.9%). Benign strictures were the most frequent indication (58.2%). The most frequent techniques to identify the biliary limb were EUS imaging alone (n=14, 25.5%) and EUS-guided puncture of the biliary limb with retrograde opacification of the surgical hepaticojejunostomy (n=14, 25.5%). The procedure was performed using a direct freehand approach (n=49, 89.1%). Technical and clinical success rates of EDEE were 87.3% and 93.8%, respectively. The overall AE rate was 20% (9.1% LAMS-related). The rate of persistent fistula was 30.6% with a median follow-up period of 3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EDEE technique offers a new and effective approach for biliary drainage in patients with surgically altered anatomy, particularly in benign indications and/or when several ERCPs are expected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.10.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.10.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:超声内镜(EUS)引导经肠内镜逆行胆道造影(ERCP, EDEE)使用腔内金属支架(LAMS)是一种新的胆道引流技术,用于手术改变解剖结构的患者。评价EDEE的可行性、安全性和有效性。患者和方法:一项多中心回顾性研究。我们纳入了连续接受EDEE的解剖结构改变的患者。收集手术解剖结构、既往胆道引流及ERCP指征。评价eus引导下吻合技术。主要成果是EDEE的技术成功。次要结局为临床成功和不良事件(AE)。结果:55例患者(60±16.2岁,男性56.4%)行ercp 94例。最常见的手术解剖是Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术(n=23, 41.8%), 28例(50.9%)患者曾行胆道引流。良性狭窄是最常见的适应症(58.2%)。识别胆道肢最常用的技术是单独EUS成像(n=14, 25.5%)和EUS引导下胆道肢穿刺伴肝空肠吻合术逆行混浊(n=14, 25.5%)。手术采用直接徒手入路(n=49, 89.1%)。EDEE的技术成功率为87.3%,临床成功率为93.8%。AE总发生率为20%(9.1%与lam相关)。持续瘘管发生率为30.6%,中位随访时间为3个月。结论:EDEE技术为手术改变解剖结构的患者提供了一种新的有效的胆道引流方法,特别是在良性指征和/或预期进行多次ercp的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transenteric ERCP via EUS-guided anastomosis using LAMS in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transenteric endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP, EDEE) using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel biliary drainage technique for patients with surgically altered anatomy. To evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of EDEE.

Patients and methods: A multicenter, retrospective study. We included consecutive patients with altered anatomy who underwent an EDEE. Surgical anatomy configuration, prior biliary drainage and ERCP indications were collected. The EUS-guided anastomosis technique was assessed. The primary outcome was the technical success of the EDEE. The secondary outcomes were the clinical success and the adverse events (AE).

Results: Ninety-four ERCPs were performed in 55 patients (60±16.2 years-old, 56.4% male). The most frequent surgical anatomy was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (n=23, 41.8%) and a prior biliary drainage was performed in 28 patients (50.9%). Benign strictures were the most frequent indication (58.2%). The most frequent techniques to identify the biliary limb were EUS imaging alone (n=14, 25.5%) and EUS-guided puncture of the biliary limb with retrograde opacification of the surgical hepaticojejunostomy (n=14, 25.5%). The procedure was performed using a direct freehand approach (n=49, 89.1%). Technical and clinical success rates of EDEE were 87.3% and 93.8%, respectively. The overall AE rate was 20% (9.1% LAMS-related). The rate of persistent fistula was 30.6% with a median follow-up period of 3 months.

Conclusion: The EDEE technique offers a new and effective approach for biliary drainage in patients with surgically altered anatomy, particularly in benign indications and/or when several ERCPs are expected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信