Educational and Psychological Measurement最新文献

{"title":"Interpretation of the Standardized Mean Difference Effect Size When Distributions Are Not Normal or Homoscedastic.","authors":"Larry V Hedges","doi":"10.1177/00131644241278928","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00131644241278928","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standardized mean difference (sometimes called Cohen's d) is an effect size measure widely used to describe the outcomes of experiments. It is mathematically natural to describe differences between groups of data that are normally distributed with different means but the same standard deviation. In that context, it can be interpreted as determining several indexes of overlap between the two distributions. If the data are not approximately normally distributed or if they have substantially unequal standard deviations, the relation between d and overlap between distributions can be very different, and interpretations of d that apply when the data are normal with equal variances are unreliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241278928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Enhancing Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Models by Evaluating a Two-Step Estimation Method and Multidimensional Variations on the Model.","authors":"Bowen Wang, Corinne Huggins-Manley, Huan Kuang, Jiawei Xiong","doi":"10.1177/00131644241280727","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00131644241280727","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid-guessing behavior in data can compromise our ability to estimate item and person parameters accurately. Consequently, it is crucial to model data with rapid-guessing patterns in a way that can produce unbiased ability estimates. This study proposes and evaluates three alternative modeling approaches that follow the logic of the effort-moderated item response theory model (EM-IRT) to analyze response data with rapid-guessing responses. One is the two-step EM-IRT model, which utilizes the item parameters estimated by respondents without rapid-guessing behavior and was initially proposed by Rios and Soland without further investigation. The other two models are effort-moderated multidimensional models (EM-MIRT), which we introduce in this study and vary as both between-item and within-item structures. The advantage of the EM-MIRT model is to account for the underlying relationship between rapid-guessing propensity and ability. The three models were compared with the traditional EM-IRT model regarding the accuracy of parameter recovery in various simulated conditions. Results demonstrated that the two-step EM-IRT and between-item EM-MIRT model consistently outperformed the traditional EM-IRT model under various conditions, with the two-step EM-IRT estimation generally delivering the best performance, especially for ability and item difficulty parameters estimation. In addition, different rapid-guessing patterns (i.e., difficulty-based, changing state, and decreasing effort) did not affect the performance of the two-step EM-IRT model. Overall, the findings suggest that the EM-IRT model with the two-step parameter estimation method can be applied in practice for estimating ability in the presence of rapid-guessing responses due to its accuracy and efficiency. The between-item EM-MIRT model can be used as an alternative model when there is no significant mean difference in the ability estimates between examinees who exhibit rapid-guessing behavior and those who do not.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241280727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Field-Testing Multiple-Choice Questions With AI Examinees: English Grammar Items.","authors":"Hotaka Maeda","doi":"10.1177/00131644241281053","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00131644241281053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Field-testing is an essential yet often resource-intensive step in the development of high-quality educational assessments. I introduce an innovative method for field-testing newly written exam items by substituting human examinees with artificially intelligent (AI) examinees. The proposed approach is demonstrated using 466 four-option multiple-choice English grammar questions. Pre-trained transformer language models are fine-tuned based on the 2-parameter logistic (2PL) item response model to respond like human test-takers. Each AI examinee is associated with a latent ability θ, and the item text is used to predict response selection probabilities for each of the four response options. For the best modeling approach identified, the overall correlation between the true and predicted 2PL correct response probabilities was .82 (bias = 0.00, root mean squared error = 0.18). The study results were promising, showing that item response data generated from AI can be used to calculate item proportion correct, item discrimination, conduct item calibration with anchors, distractor analysis, dimensionality analysis, and latent trait scoring. However, the proposed approach did not achieve the level of accuracy obtainable with human examinee response data. If further refined, potential resource savings in transitioning from human to AI field-testing could be enormous. AI could shorten the field-testing timeline, prevent examinees from seeing low-quality field-test items in real exams, shorten test lengths, eliminate test security, item exposure, and sample size concerns, reduce overall cost, and help expand the item bank. Example Python code from this study is available on Github: https://github.com/hotakamaeda/ai_field_testing1.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241281053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562880/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"On the Benefits of Using Maximal Reliability in Educational and Behavioral Research.","authors":"Tenko Raykov","doi":"10.1177/00131644231215771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231215771","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This note is concerned with the benefits that can result from the use of the maximal reliability and optimal linear combination concepts in educational and psychological research. Within the widely used framework of unidimensional multi-component measuring instruments, it is demonstrated that the linear combination of their components that possesses the highest possible reliability can exhibit a level of consistency considerably exceeding that of their overall sum score that is nearly routinely employed in contemporary empirical research. This optimal linear combination can be particularly useful in circumstances where one or more scale components are associated with relatively large error variances, but their removal from the instrument can lead to a notable loss in validity due to construct underrepresentation. The discussion is illustrated with a numerical example.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":"84 5","pages":"994-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142336340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Enhancing Precision in Predicting Magnitude of Differential Item Functioning: An M-DIF Pretrained Model Approach.","authors":"Shan Huang, Hidetoki Ishii","doi":"10.1177/00131644241279882","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00131644241279882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite numerous studies on the magnitude of differential item functioning (DIF), different DIF detection methods often define effect sizes inconsistently and fail to adequately account for testing conditions. To address these limitations, this study introduces the unified M-DIF model, which defines the magnitude of DIF as the difference in item difficulty parameters between reference and focal groups. The M-DIF model can incorporate various DIF detection methods and test conditions to form a quantitative model. The pretrained approach was employed to leverage a sufficiently representative large sample as the training set and ensure the model's generalizability. Once the pretrained model is constructed, it can be directly applied to new data. Specifically, a training dataset comprising 144 combinations of test conditions and 144,000 potential DIF items, each equipped with 29 statistical metrics, was used. We adopt the XGBoost method for modeling. Results show that, based on root mean square error (RMSE) and BIAS metrics, the M-DIF model outperforms the baseline model in both validation sets: under consistent and inconsistent test conditions. Across all 360 combinations of test conditions (144 consistent and 216 inconsistent with the training set), the M-DIF model demonstrates lower RMSE in 357 cases (99.2%), illustrating its robustness. Finally, we provided an empirical example to showcase the practical feasibility of implementing the M-DIF model.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241279882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Using ROC Analysis to Refine Cut Scores Following a Standard Setting Process.","authors":"Dongwei Wang, Lisa A Keller","doi":"10.1177/00131644241278925","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00131644241278925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In educational assessment, cut scores are often defined through standard setting by a group of subject matter experts. This study aims to investigate the impact of several factors on classification accuracy using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to provide statistical and theoretical evidence when the cut score needs to be refined. Factors examined in the study include the sample distribution relative to the cut score, prevalence of the positive event, and cost ratio. Forty item responses were simulated for examinees of four sample distributions. In addition, the prevalence and cost ratio between false negatives and false positives were manipulated to examine their impacts on classification accuracy. The optimal cut score is identified using the Youden Index <i>J</i>. The results showed that the optimal cut score identified by the evaluation criterion tended to pull the cut score closer to the mode of the proficiency distribution. In addition, depending on the prevalence of the positive event and cost ratio, the optimal cut score shifts accordingly. With the item parameters used to simulate the data and the simulated sample distributions, it was found that when passing the exam is a low-prevalence event in the population, increasing the cut score operationally improves the classification; when passing the exam is a high-prevalence event, then cut score should be reduced to achieve optimality. As the cost ratio increases, the optimal cut score suggested by the evaluation criterion decreases. In three out of the four sample distributions examined in this study, increasing the cut score enhanced the classification, irrespective of the cost ratio when the prevalence in the population is 50%. This study provides statistical evidence when the cut score needs to be refined for policy reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241278925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142650503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating the Ordering Structure of Clustered Items Using Nonparametric Item Response Theory","authors":"Letty Koopman, Johan Braeken","doi":"10.1177/00131644241274122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241274122","url":null,"abstract":"Educational and psychological tests with an ordered item structure enable efficient test administration procedures and allow for intuitive score interpretation and monitoring. The effectiveness of the measurement instrument relies to a large extent on the validated strength of its ordering structure. We define three increasingly strict types of ordering for the ordering structure of a measurement instrument with clustered items: a weak and a strong invariant cluster ordering and a clustered invariant item ordering. Following a nonparametric item response theory (IRT) approach, we proposed a procedure to evaluate the ordering structure of a clustered item set along this three-fold continuum of order invariance. The basis of the procedure is (a) the local assessment of pairwise conditional expectations at both cluster and item level and (b) the global assessment of the number of Guttman errors through new generalizations of the H-coefficient for this item-cluster context. The procedure, readily implemented in R, is illustrated and applied to an empirical example. Suggestions for test practice, further methodological developments, and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142178007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Improving the Use of Parallel Analysis by Accounting for Sampling Variability of the Observed Correlation Matrix.","authors":"Yan Xia, Xinchang Zhou","doi":"10.1177/00131644241268073","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00131644241268073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parallel analysis has been considered one of the most accurate methods for determining the number of factors in factor analysis. One major advantage of parallel analysis over traditional factor retention methods (e.g., Kaiser's rule) is that it addresses the sampling variability of eigenvalues obtained from the identity matrix, representing the correlation matrix for a zero-factor model. This study argues that we should also address the sampling variability of eigenvalues obtained from the observed data, such that the results would inform practitioners of the variability of the number of factors across random samples. Thus, this study proposes to revise the parallel analysis to provide the proportion of random samples that suggest <i>k</i> factors (<i>k</i> = 0, 1, 2, . . .) rather than a single suggested number. Simulation results support the use of the proposed strategy, especially for research scenarios with limited sample sizes where sampling fluctuation is concerning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241268073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142675458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Added Value of Subscores for Tests With Polytomous Items","authors":"Kylie Gorney, Sandip Sinharay","doi":"10.1177/00131644241268128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241268128","url":null,"abstract":"Test-takers, policymakers, teachers, and institutions are increasingly demanding that testing programs provide more detailed feedback regarding test performance. As a result, there has been a growing interest in the reporting of subscores that potentially provide such detailed feedback. Haberman developed a method based on classical test theory for determining whether a subscore has added value over the total score. Sinharay conducted a detailed study using both real and simulated data and concluded that it is not common for subscores to have added value according to Haberman’s criterion. However, Sinharay almost exclusively dealt with data from tests with only dichotomous items. In this article, we show that it is more common for subscores to have added value in tests with polytomous items.","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141933506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluating The Predictive Reliability of Neural Networks in Psychological Research With Random Datasets","authors":"Yongtian Cheng, K. V. Petrides","doi":"10.1177/00131644241262964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241262964","url":null,"abstract":"Psychologists are emphasizing the importance of predictive conclusions. Machine learning methods, such as supervised neural networks, have been used in psychological studies as they naturally fit prediction tasks. However, we are concerned about whether neural networks fitted with random datasets (i.e., datasets where there is no relationship between ordinal independent variables and continuous or binary-dependent variables) can provide an acceptable level of predictive performance from a psychologist’s perspective. Through a Monte Carlo simulation study, we found that this kind of erroneous conclusion is not likely to be drawn as long as the sample size is larger than 50 with continuous-dependent variables. However, when the dependent variable is binary, the minimum sample size is 500 when the criteria are balanced accuracy ≥ .6 or balanced accuracy ≥ .65, and the minimum sample size is 200 when the criterion is balanced accuracy ≥ .7 for a decision error less than .05. In the case where area under the curve (AUC) is used as a metric, a sample size of 100, 200, and 500 is necessary when the minimum acceptable performance level is set at AUC ≥ .7, AUC ≥ .65, and AUC ≥ .6, respectively. The results found by this study can be used for sample size planning for psychologists who wish to apply neural networks for a qualitatively reliable conclusion. Further directions and limitations of the study are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141772234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}