基于功能主成分聚类和神经网络的项目难度分类。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
James Zoucha, Igor Himelfarb, Nai-En Tang
{"title":"基于功能主成分聚类和神经网络的项目难度分类。","authors":"James Zoucha, Igor Himelfarb, Nai-En Tang","doi":"10.1177/00131644241299834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining consistent item difficulty across test forms is crucial for accurately and fairly classifying examinees into pass or fail categories. This article presents a practical procedure for classifying items based on difficulty levels using functional data analysis (FDA). Methodologically, we clustered item characteristic curves (ICCs) into difficulty groups by analyzing their functional principal components (FPCs) and then employed a neural network to predict difficulty for ICCs. Given the degree of similarity between many ICCs, categorizing items by difficulty can be challenging. The strength of this method lies in its ability to provide an empirical and consistent process for item classification, as opposed to relying solely on visual inspection. The findings reveal that most discrepancies between visual classification and FDA results differed by only one adjacent difficulty level. Approximately 67% of these discrepancies involved items in the medium to hard range being categorized into higher difficulty levels by FDA, while the remaining third involved <i>very easy</i> to <i>easy</i> items being classified into lower levels. The neural network, trained on these data, achieved an accuracy of 79.6%, with misclassifications also differing by only one adjacent difficulty level compared to FDA clustering. The method demonstrates an efficient and practical procedure for classifying test items, especially beneficial in testing programs where smaller volumes of examinees tested at various times throughout the year.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644241299834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Item Classification by Difficulty Using Functional Principal Component Clustering and Neural Networks.\",\"authors\":\"James Zoucha, Igor Himelfarb, Nai-En Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00131644241299834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maintaining consistent item difficulty across test forms is crucial for accurately and fairly classifying examinees into pass or fail categories. This article presents a practical procedure for classifying items based on difficulty levels using functional data analysis (FDA). Methodologically, we clustered item characteristic curves (ICCs) into difficulty groups by analyzing their functional principal components (FPCs) and then employed a neural network to predict difficulty for ICCs. Given the degree of similarity between many ICCs, categorizing items by difficulty can be challenging. The strength of this method lies in its ability to provide an empirical and consistent process for item classification, as opposed to relying solely on visual inspection. The findings reveal that most discrepancies between visual classification and FDA results differed by only one adjacent difficulty level. Approximately 67% of these discrepancies involved items in the medium to hard range being categorized into higher difficulty levels by FDA, while the remaining third involved <i>very easy</i> to <i>easy</i> items being classified into lower levels. The neural network, trained on these data, achieved an accuracy of 79.6%, with misclassifications also differing by only one adjacent difficulty level compared to FDA clustering. The method demonstrates an efficient and practical procedure for classifying test items, especially beneficial in testing programs where smaller volumes of examinees tested at various times throughout the year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational and Psychological Measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"00131644241299834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational and Psychological Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241299834\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241299834","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要准确、公平地将考生划分为及格或不及格类别,在各种测试表格中保持项目难度的一致性至关重要。本文介绍了一种利用功能数据分析(FDA)根据难度水平对项目进行分类的实用程序。在方法上,我们通过分析项目特征曲线(ICC)的功能主成分(FPC),将其聚类为难度组,然后采用神经网络预测 ICC 的难度。鉴于许多 ICC 之间的相似程度,按难度对项目进行分类可能具有挑战性。这种方法的优势在于它能够为项目分类提供一个经验性和一致性的过程,而不是仅仅依靠目测。研究结果表明,目测分类与 FDA 结果之间的大多数差异仅相差一个难度等级。在这些差异中,约有 67% 的差异涉及中等至较难的项目被 FDA 归类为较高难度级别,而其余三分之一的差异则涉及非常简单至简单的项目被归类为较低难度级别。在这些数据上训练的神经网络的准确率达到了 79.6%,与 FDA 聚类相比,误分类的难度等级也只相差一个。该方法展示了一种高效实用的测试项目分类程序,尤其适用于在全年不同时间对较少数量的考生进行测试的测试项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Item Classification by Difficulty Using Functional Principal Component Clustering and Neural Networks.

Maintaining consistent item difficulty across test forms is crucial for accurately and fairly classifying examinees into pass or fail categories. This article presents a practical procedure for classifying items based on difficulty levels using functional data analysis (FDA). Methodologically, we clustered item characteristic curves (ICCs) into difficulty groups by analyzing their functional principal components (FPCs) and then employed a neural network to predict difficulty for ICCs. Given the degree of similarity between many ICCs, categorizing items by difficulty can be challenging. The strength of this method lies in its ability to provide an empirical and consistent process for item classification, as opposed to relying solely on visual inspection. The findings reveal that most discrepancies between visual classification and FDA results differed by only one adjacent difficulty level. Approximately 67% of these discrepancies involved items in the medium to hard range being categorized into higher difficulty levels by FDA, while the remaining third involved very easy to easy items being classified into lower levels. The neural network, trained on these data, achieved an accuracy of 79.6%, with misclassifications also differing by only one adjacent difficulty level compared to FDA clustering. The method demonstrates an efficient and practical procedure for classifying test items, especially beneficial in testing programs where smaller volumes of examinees tested at various times throughout the year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信