Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/sf.2018.12.07
Tymoteusz Skiba
{"title":"Księga Schulza, Księga Lema","authors":"Tymoteusz Skiba","doi":"10.26881/sf.2018.12.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2018.12.07","url":null,"abstract":"The Book is not only a crucial element of the fictional world of Schulz and Lem, but also a metaphor of creation. The poetic imagination of both writers is rooted in the mythical image of the ur-Book, the Authentic Scroll which makes the axis mundi of reality. The artistic task of Schulz was to reconstruct that lost idea, while Lem decided to abandon it in favor of a vision of enormous, overwhelming libraries. At any rate, the attitude toward the myth of the Book turns out to be a common element, if not a symbol characteristic of both Schulz’s and Lem’s fiction.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122714462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/sf.2018.11.11
Iga Lasek
{"title":"Sinowskie „pożegnanie z mistrzem”?","authors":"Iga Lasek","doi":"10.26881/sf.2018.11.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2018.11.11","url":null,"abstract":"The authors associated with the periodical Sztuka i Naród were highly critical of the art of the interwar period. In their common opinion, it was unpatriotic and limited to the worship of individualism, which proved to be disastrous for the state and its social structure. Still, Wacław Bojarski, the acting editor-in-chief, decided to honor Bruno Schulz with an obituary even though the writer had nothing to do with the nationalist ideology. Schulz did not write any “engaged” or “nationalist”, but for some reason the editors of Sztuka i Naród resolved to save his name and literary achievement from oblivion.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130902513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/sf.2018.11.04
K. Szalewska
{"title":"Akwarium i luneta. Metaforyka okulocentryczna w twórczości Brunona Schulza","authors":"K. Szalewska","doi":"10.26881/sf.2018.11.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2018.11.04","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is an analysis of the motif of glass in the fiction of Bruno Schulz. The writer’s fascination with this particular material is related to the experience of modernity, since glass served as the substance of permanent and repetitive phantasms. In this respect, Schulz’s writing can be read as an artistically processed testimony of fascination with one of the material dimensions of modernity, which was glass architecture. The author interprets the modernist oculocentrism in Schulz’s stories, focusing on transparency in the spatial figures of the author of Cinnamon Shops (including panoramas, glass balls, telescopes, etc.).","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116221805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/SF.2018.11.13
Jakub Orzeszek
{"title":"Projekt księgi umarłych","authors":"Jakub Orzeszek","doi":"10.26881/SF.2018.11.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/SF.2018.11.13","url":null,"abstract":"The paper sheds light on the postwar reception of Schulz’s work and biography, usually underestimated by scholars. It reveals that at the very beginning of that period Jerzy Ficowski cooperated closely with the Jewish Society for the Encouragement of Fine Arts and later Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw, although his collaboration was rather unofficial and relied on mutual information transfer. It also presents the results of research conducted in the Archives of the Jewish Historical Institute, particularly an analysis of the documents from the Ernestyna Podhorizer-Sandel and Józef Sandel files. These are mainly biographical notes on Bruno Schulz and other Polish-Jewish artists murdered by the Nazis during World War II that were to be included the monumental and unfinished Sandels’ Polish-Jewish Artists Lexicon. The main question is how the Holocaust narrative influenced Schulz’s mainstream reception in the future.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131979919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/SF.2018.11.01
S. Rosiek
{"title":"Drohobycz stolicą XX wieku","authors":"S. Rosiek","doi":"10.26881/SF.2018.11.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/SF.2018.11.01","url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays it is impossible to think about Schulz outside Drogobych. Wherever else he showed up, be it Vienna, Marienbad, Kudowa, Zakopane, Warsaw or Paris, he was a refugee, a patient, a visitor or a tourist – always a stranger. And he considered himself one, while others did the same. To an extent, it was his own fault. It could perhaps be otherwise if he did not so often write in his letters (and most likely said in conversations) that he was unable to live and work outside his hometown. But the words of the writer could only encourage others to contribute to a stereotype of a “modest schoolteacher from a small town.” The provincial status of Schulz, however, is not so obvious. At the end of the 19th century, thanks to oil Drogobych reached the end of centuries long stasis from which even the salt mines opened in the Middle Ages could not save it. Oil changed the life of many people in Galicia. Without leaving Drogobych, Schulz could actually watch and personally experience in doses which let him keep his independence and inner stability the rise of a metropolitan mentality described by Georg Simmel. Yet Paris was too much for him – after three weeks he escaped from the French capital with not a single word of commentary. To live in the capital of the 19th century, as Walter Benjamin called it, would have been a torture for him. Thus Schulz did not cancel the opposition of center and periphery, the capital and the provinces, but turned such distinctions upside down. Thanks to writing, the center of the world moved to his hometown so that perhaps Drogobych became the capital of the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127696060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/sf.2018.12.17
S. Rosiek
{"title":"Śmierć Fotografa","authors":"S. Rosiek","doi":"10.26881/sf.2018.12.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2018.12.17","url":null,"abstract":"The mourning note on Bogdan Konopka, photographer and a friend of Schulz/Forum.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131958161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/SF.2018.11.18
Balbina Hoppe
{"title":"VIII Międzynarodowy Festiwal Brunona Schulza w Drohobyczu","authors":"Balbina Hoppe","doi":"10.26881/SF.2018.11.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/SF.2018.11.18","url":null,"abstract":"For the eighth time, the town of Drogobych hosted International Bruno Schulz Festival. The topic was the place, approached by participants in a number of original and unique ways. The town itself was an important, but by no means the only place taken into consideration. During the festival, Drogobych became not just the site or background of many events, such as presentations, concerts, performances, and meetings with writers, but it was indeed much alive. The very fact that the participants could visit Schulz’s hometown must have been an extraordinary experience for them.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122253729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/SF.2018.12.02
Eliza Kącka
{"title":"Czy należy spalić Schulza? Likwidatorzy: Wyka i Napierski","authors":"Eliza Kącka","doi":"10.26881/SF.2018.12.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/SF.2018.12.02","url":null,"abstract":"The author considers the circumstances in which Kazimierz Wyka and Stefan Napierski, two respected literary critics, published texts which criticized Bruno Schulz in the monthly magazine Ateneum (1939, no. 1). Schulz’s prose works were already widely known to be difficult, but there was no doubt as to their merit. The writer’s high position seemed indisputable, and yet Wyka and Napierski still consciously tried to destroy Schulz’s legacy. Their critical attack on Schulz is interpreted in the essay not as an isolated exploit, but as a model case of interpretational misunderstanding, which is not so much the effect of a lack of understanding, but of planned action and ill will of the critics. Wyka and Napierski did not want to understand, and with their dislike of the type of prose that Schulz wrote they programmed a certain type of reading and critical approach, which had many followers and determined reception. At the same time, however, their dismissal of Schulz turned out to have a positive value ‒ not for the history of criticism, but for Schulz studies as such.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123489972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/SF.2018.12.05
Kris van Heuckelom, M. Chojnacki
{"title":"Druga wojna światowa i Holokaust w prozie trzeciego pokolenia (z akcentem Schulzowskim). „Kontrapunktowe” przypadki Piotra Pazińskiego i Erwina Mortiera","authors":"Kris van Heuckelom, M. Chojnacki","doi":"10.26881/SF.2018.12.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/SF.2018.12.05","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is a comparative analysis of the „schulzoid” and „contrapuntal” novels by Piotr Paziński (The Boarding House) and Erwin Mortier (Marcel). A comparison of the novels is, however, a pretext to approach a much more complex topic which is the representation of trauma by the third post-Holocaust generation, both from the point of view of the victims (Paziński), and that of the oppressors (Mortier). The author has identified characteristic Schulzian motifs which in The Boarding House and Marcel have different functions: the autobiographical setting, the child-narrator, the tension between harmony and discord of remembrance, fascination with trash, and interest in the myths of genesis. Schulz – both the style of his fiction and he himself as a Holocaust victim – has turned into a significant figure for a generation, connecting two seemingly diverse discourses of Paziński and Mortier.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121185752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Schulz/ForumPub Date : 2018-12-03DOI: 10.26881/sf.2018.12.13
Włodzimierz Rudnicki
{"title":"Łódzkie obrachunki, czyli cztery ekslibrisy Brunona Schulza","authors":"Włodzimierz Rudnicki","doi":"10.26881/sf.2018.12.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2018.12.13","url":null,"abstract":"The author disagrees with a popular belief the Schulz’s bookplates have been made with the cliché-verre technique. He reconstructs the reasons for this misrecognition promoted by Jerzy Ficowski and Michał Kuna and the common association of Schulz’s graphic art with the Booke of Idolatry only, but in the first place makes a detailed analysis of the known bookplates, which allows him to claim that the techniques used were zincotype, drypoint, and heliogravure. The paper includes reproductions of four known bookplates by Schulz, with full descriptions made by the author.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123711728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
