S. Rosiek
{"title":"Drohobycz stolicą XX wieku","authors":"S. Rosiek","doi":"10.26881/SF.2018.11.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays it is impossible to think about Schulz outside Drogobych. Wherever else he showed up, be it Vienna, Marienbad, Kudowa, Zakopane, Warsaw or Paris, he was a refugee, a patient, a visitor or a tourist – always a stranger. And he considered himself one, while others did the same. To an extent, it was his own fault. It could perhaps be otherwise if he did not so often write in his letters (and most likely said in conversations) that he was unable to live and work outside his hometown. But the words of the writer could only encourage others to contribute to a stereotype of a “modest schoolteacher from a small town.” The provincial status of Schulz, however, is not so obvious. At the end of the 19th century, thanks to oil Drogobych reached the end of centuries long stasis from which even the salt mines opened in the Middle Ages could not save it. Oil changed the life of many people in Galicia. Without leaving Drogobych, Schulz could actually watch and personally experience in doses which let him keep his independence and inner stability the rise of a metropolitan mentality described by Georg Simmel. Yet Paris was too much for him – after three weeks he escaped from the French capital with not a single word of commentary. To live in the capital of the 19th century, as Walter Benjamin called it, would have been a torture for him. Thus Schulz did not cancel the opposition of center and periphery, the capital and the provinces, but turned such distinctions upside down. Thanks to writing, the center of the world moved to his hometown so that perhaps Drogobych became the capital of the 20th century.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schulz/Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/SF.2018.11.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,人们不可能在德罗戈比奇之外想到舒尔茨。无论他出现在哪里,无论是维也纳、马里恩巴德、库多瓦、扎科帕内、华沙还是巴黎,他都是难民、病人、访客或游客——永远是陌生人。他认为自己是一个人,而其他人也这么认为。在某种程度上,这是他自己的错。如果他不经常在信中(很可能是在谈话中)写到他无法在家乡以外的地方生活和工作,情况可能会有所不同。但是,作者的话只能鼓励其他人对“来自小镇的谦虚教师”的刻板印象做出贡献。然而,舒尔茨的地方地位并不那么明显。19世纪末,由于石油的发展,德罗戈比奇摆脱了长达几个世纪的停滞状态,即使中世纪开采的盐矿也无法拯救它。石油改变了加利西亚许多人的生活。在不离开德罗戈比奇的情况下,舒尔茨实际上可以观察并亲身体验,这让他保持了独立性和内心的稳定,这是乔治·齐美尔所描述的大都会心态的兴起。然而,巴黎对他来说太过分了——三周后,他一言不发地逃离了法国首都。生活在沃尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)所称的19世纪的首都,对他来说将是一种折磨。因此,舒尔茨并没有取消中心与边缘、首都与外省的对立,而是将这种对立颠倒过来。多亏了写作,世界的中心转移到了他的家乡,所以德罗戈比奇可能成为了20世纪的首都。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drohobycz stolicą XX wieku
Nowadays it is impossible to think about Schulz outside Drogobych. Wherever else he showed up, be it Vienna, Marienbad, Kudowa, Zakopane, Warsaw or Paris, he was a refugee, a patient, a visitor or a tourist – always a stranger. And he considered himself one, while others did the same. To an extent, it was his own fault. It could perhaps be otherwise if he did not so often write in his letters (and most likely said in conversations) that he was unable to live and work outside his hometown. But the words of the writer could only encourage others to contribute to a stereotype of a “modest schoolteacher from a small town.” The provincial status of Schulz, however, is not so obvious. At the end of the 19th century, thanks to oil Drogobych reached the end of centuries long stasis from which even the salt mines opened in the Middle Ages could not save it. Oil changed the life of many people in Galicia. Without leaving Drogobych, Schulz could actually watch and personally experience in doses which let him keep his independence and inner stability the rise of a metropolitan mentality described by Georg Simmel. Yet Paris was too much for him – after three weeks he escaped from the French capital with not a single word of commentary. To live in the capital of the 19th century, as Walter Benjamin called it, would have been a torture for him. Thus Schulz did not cancel the opposition of center and periphery, the capital and the provinces, but turned such distinctions upside down. Thanks to writing, the center of the world moved to his hometown so that perhaps Drogobych became the capital of the 20th century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信