Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1353/nab.2023.a937384
Leona Toker, Maria Emeliyanova
{"title":"In Collaboration with the Author\": Some Traces of Self-Translation in Nabokov's Short Stories","authors":"Leona Toker, Maria Emeliyanova","doi":"10.1353/nab.2023.a937384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2023.a937384","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Vladimir Nabokov's pre-war Russian language short stories were translated into English, whether by his son Dmitri or by others, but, in the novelist's lifetime, always \"in collaboration with the author.\" The extent of this collaboration sometimes amounts to self-translation, that is, not to improving the text but to changing its details, the way a translator has no right to do while the author is entitled to revisions. Most often such changes were made in the awareness of the horizons of the new audience; but they also reflect modified attitudes to the material and suggest which meanings it was important for Nabokov to emphasize and which it was important for him to preclude. We discuss such traces of self-translation in three of Nabokov's short stories. The changes made in the 1973 \"Torpid Smoke\" (\" Tyazhyolyy dym ,\" 1935) help to set the story in the times of the Weimar republic rather than after the Nazi 1933 takeover of power, thus forestalling interpretations that could compete with the main theme. The changes in the 1976 \"Details of a Sunset\" (original published as \"Katastrofa\" in 1924) enhance the valorization of joy, confronting the wide-spread stigma on the sense of happiness as silly. The changes made in the 1947 \"Spring in Fialta\" (the original published in 1938) are, however, more closely associated with Nabokov's current concerns, in the period of translation, rather than with those in the year of composition.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147898014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0010
Brian Boyd
{"title":"Lucette late in Ada","authors":"Brian Boyd","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0010","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In Nabokov's Ada, I proposed long ago, Lucette intervenes in Van and Ada's life after her own death: in 1922, when they reunite for life, after a shaky first attempt, and in the last ten years of their lives, 1957-1967, when Van writes his memoir of his love for Ada. Others have accepted the evidence for these interventions. But we have overlooked the strong evidence for Lucette's post-mortal intervention in their lives in their 1905 reunion, which for readers follows swiftly upon her suicide. I had also failed to appreciate how aware Van and Ada seem to be—even if tentatively and obliquely—of Lucette's kindly spectral presence at crucial turning points in their lives.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115264299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0004
Z. Kuzmanovich
{"title":"In Memoriam: Donald Barton Johnson (1933–2020)","authors":"Z. Kuzmanovich","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Abstract:</p>","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123036024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0009
E. Naiman
{"title":"Lynchers at Heart: De-ciphering \"Signs and Symbols\"","authors":"E. Naiman","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:\"Lynchers at Heart: De-ciphering 'Signs and Symbols,\" offers a new reading of Nabokov's celebrated story. First, it locates a hostile narrative presence, a homodiegetic (or even paradiegetic) narrator within the story, who works to portray the protagonists' situation as bleakly as possible. Second, it views the story as an attack by numbers on both art and the heart. The status of numbers in particular, and of de-coding strategies in general, is fraught in Nabokov's work, as the author himself seems to have both succumbed to and resisted interpretive 'calculation' in composing his fiction. \"Signs and Systems,\" however should be read as the work that provides his most compelling defense of \"incalculability.\"","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"23 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129609031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0011
Constantine Muravnik
{"title":"Nabokov and Nietzsche: Problems and Perspectives by Michael Rodgers (review)","authors":"Constantine Muravnik","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128366428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0000
E. Eklund
{"title":"\"A green lane in Paradise\": Eschatology and Theurgy in Lolita","authors":"E. Eklund","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0000","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Drawing upon a wealth of underdeveloped and theologically significant trajectories identified by scholars and gestured toward by Nabokov himself, this article addresses the central problem Humbert Humbert's post-mortem fate poses a theological reading of Lolita, namely, Humbert's allowance by his author to wander Paradise once a year for having repented and attained to genuine love for Dolores Haze. Against exclusively metafictional interpretations which problematically bracket ethics and transcendence from aesthetics, a theological reading of Lolita must begin by considering the eschatological orientation of Nabokov's poetics, which are founded upon an analogy between metafiction and metaphysics. To this end, Nabokov's relationship with Russian religious philosopher Nicolas Berdyaev funds a consideration of their shared belief in the theurgic power of art, which is deployed to map a way for coming to terms with the complex moral and theological predicament posed by Lolita. According to this model, Humbert does find redemption at the end of his journey even as this redemption neither trivializes nor justifies his evil conduct toward Dolores.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129721516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0005
Brendan Nieubuurt
{"title":"Cincinnatus' Pharmacy: Invitation to a Beheading & Poststructuralist Graphocentrism","authors":"Brendan Nieubuurt","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Nabokov called his 1935 story of existential imprisonment, Invitation to a Beheading, his most \"poetical\" work of fiction. This article unpacks that statement, with its subtle conflation of the poetic and the political—two semantic registers Nabokov deemed utterly incompatible. Indeed, Invitation is about that incompatibility, this study contends. More specifically, the article locates a concrete point of conflict in the contrasting ways oral and written language operate in the novel. In doing so, it inserts Nabokov into an age-old debate, initiated by Plato, over the two communicative modes' relationships to truth and their ability to articulate the authentic self. Speech has traditionally been championed in this debate as an unmediated utterance. Invitation, however, makes a vivid and visceral claim for the expressive capacity of the written word. Conventional in form, superficial in content, and meant for swift social exchange, speech is, in Invitation's nightmare world, the medium of Cincinnatus' persecutors. Unintelligible to the homogenous crowd, Cincinnatus only finds his \"voice\" on the pages of the diary he drafts with pencil and paper. The language of that diary is primordial and decidedly poetic. His text also has a peculiar texture, as Cincinnatus becomes (to quote Montaigne) the very substance of his book. Evincing these lingual values, Nabokov lands in the company of later poststructruralist thinkers, whose theories likewise problematize speech to instead champion a graphocentric mode of embodied, poetic self writing as the height of individual expression. First tracing a shared theoretical genealogy in Henri Bergson's philosophy, this paper thus ultimately reads the novel as a creative anticipation of the future intertexts, especially those of Jacques Derrida. It was the deconstructionist provocateur who most explicitly upended Plato and asserted the primacy and power of the written utterance. Derrida did so, moreover, in imagery and metaphors that resonate in sometimes uncanny harmony with Invitation's visual and verbal rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116144159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0006
Jeremy Stewart
{"title":"\"I Have Only Words to Play With!\": Riddling Lolita's Logodaedaly","authors":"Jeremy Stewart","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Due to cryptic comments Nabokov made over the years in his published interviews and other forums, critics have long suspected that Lolita conceals a riddle. Given that there are several other such riddles or puzzles in Nabokov's oeuvre, it is reasonable to think that there is one in Lolita as well. This, however, raises the question of the relationship between authorial intention and the function of criticism; what criteria should we use to find the answer to Nabokov's riddle, and what might it contribute to a literary reading of Lolita in any case? Surveying published attempts to solve the riddle, it is clear that any solution that would betray Nabokov's own principles and theory of art should be treated with great caution. Riddles are an example of a case in which appeal to known facts about an author may be necessary (similar to the case of irony in Denis Dutton's analysis). By demonstrating how key elements in Nabokov's aesthetics might apply to the riddle, we can begin to limit possible solutions while incorporating both the search and the eventual solution into a reading that is properly literary-critical.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132867159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nabokov StudiesPub Date : 2021-12-24DOI: 10.1353/nab.2020.0007
Savely Senderovich, Yelena Shvarts
{"title":"Lolita the Butterfly. Nabokov's Private Aesthetics","authors":"Savely Senderovich, Yelena Shvarts","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The paper is dedicated to parsing out several conceptual threads in Nabokov's Lolita, such as human passions, the butterfly hunter's reckless infatuation and the artistic creative freedom. These motifs tend to interact, but they cannot be brought into a ship-shape equation or even seamlessly aligned; they shed a lateral light on each other but are not to be equated; they diverge and at times converge, crisscross, overlap and jointly reveal the unique pattern concealed in the narrative fabric of Nabokov's world. They mutually comprise not so much a conception but rather a hieroglyph whose meaning is untranslatable into any neat formula. This hieroglyph is of unique kind: it belongs to the interrogative modality. This hieroglyph has a silhouette of BUTTERFLY.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121056068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}