"I Have Only Words to Play With!": Riddling Lolita's Logodaedaly

Jeremy Stewart
{"title":"\"I Have Only Words to Play With!\": Riddling Lolita's Logodaedaly","authors":"Jeremy Stewart","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Due to cryptic comments Nabokov made over the years in his published interviews and other forums, critics have long suspected that Lolita conceals a riddle. Given that there are several other such riddles or puzzles in Nabokov's oeuvre, it is reasonable to think that there is one in Lolita as well. This, however, raises the question of the relationship between authorial intention and the function of criticism; what criteria should we use to find the answer to Nabokov's riddle, and what might it contribute to a literary reading of Lolita in any case? Surveying published attempts to solve the riddle, it is clear that any solution that would betray Nabokov's own principles and theory of art should be treated with great caution. Riddles are an example of a case in which appeal to known facts about an author may be necessary (similar to the case of irony in Denis Dutton's analysis). By demonstrating how key elements in Nabokov's aesthetics might apply to the riddle, we can begin to limit possible solutions while incorporating both the search and the eventual solution into a reading that is properly literary-critical.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nabokov Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Due to cryptic comments Nabokov made over the years in his published interviews and other forums, critics have long suspected that Lolita conceals a riddle. Given that there are several other such riddles or puzzles in Nabokov's oeuvre, it is reasonable to think that there is one in Lolita as well. This, however, raises the question of the relationship between authorial intention and the function of criticism; what criteria should we use to find the answer to Nabokov's riddle, and what might it contribute to a literary reading of Lolita in any case? Surveying published attempts to solve the riddle, it is clear that any solution that would betray Nabokov's own principles and theory of art should be treated with great caution. Riddles are an example of a case in which appeal to known facts about an author may be necessary (similar to the case of irony in Denis Dutton's analysis). By demonstrating how key elements in Nabokov's aesthetics might apply to the riddle, we can begin to limit possible solutions while incorporating both the search and the eventual solution into a reading that is properly literary-critical.
“我只有文字可以玩!”谜语洛丽塔的标志
摘要:由于纳博科夫多年来在发表的访谈和其他论坛上的隐晦言论,评论家们一直怀疑《洛丽塔》隐藏着一个谜。鉴于纳博科夫的作品中还有其他几个这样的谜语或谜题,我们有理由认为《洛丽塔》中也有这样的谜语或谜题。然而,这就提出了作者意图与批评功能之间关系的问题;我们应该用什么标准来寻找纳博科夫之谜的答案,它对《洛丽塔》的文学解读有什么帮助?通过调查已发表的解开这个谜题的尝试,很明显,任何可能违背纳博科夫自己的原则和艺术理论的解决方案都应该非常谨慎地对待。谜语就是一个例子,在这种情况下,诉诸关于作者的已知事实可能是必要的(类似于丹尼斯·达顿分析中的讽刺的情况)。通过展示纳博科夫美学中的关键元素如何适用于这个谜题,我们可以开始限制可能的解决方案,同时将搜索和最终解决方案纳入适当的文学批评阅读中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信