“天堂的绿巷”:《洛丽塔》中的末世论与神学

E. Eklund
{"title":"“天堂的绿巷”:《洛丽塔》中的末世论与神学","authors":"E. Eklund","doi":"10.1353/nab.2020.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Drawing upon a wealth of underdeveloped and theologically significant trajectories identified by scholars and gestured toward by Nabokov himself, this article addresses the central problem Humbert Humbert's post-mortem fate poses a theological reading of Lolita, namely, Humbert's allowance by his author to wander Paradise once a year for having repented and attained to genuine love for Dolores Haze. Against exclusively metafictional interpretations which problematically bracket ethics and transcendence from aesthetics, a theological reading of Lolita must begin by considering the eschatological orientation of Nabokov's poetics, which are founded upon an analogy between metafiction and metaphysics. To this end, Nabokov's relationship with Russian religious philosopher Nicolas Berdyaev funds a consideration of their shared belief in the theurgic power of art, which is deployed to map a way for coming to terms with the complex moral and theological predicament posed by Lolita. According to this model, Humbert does find redemption at the end of his journey even as this redemption neither trivializes nor justifies his evil conduct toward Dolores.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"A green lane in Paradise\\\": Eschatology and Theurgy in Lolita\",\"authors\":\"E. Eklund\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nab.2020.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Drawing upon a wealth of underdeveloped and theologically significant trajectories identified by scholars and gestured toward by Nabokov himself, this article addresses the central problem Humbert Humbert's post-mortem fate poses a theological reading of Lolita, namely, Humbert's allowance by his author to wander Paradise once a year for having repented and attained to genuine love for Dolores Haze. Against exclusively metafictional interpretations which problematically bracket ethics and transcendence from aesthetics, a theological reading of Lolita must begin by considering the eschatological orientation of Nabokov's poetics, which are founded upon an analogy between metafiction and metaphysics. To this end, Nabokov's relationship with Russian religious philosopher Nicolas Berdyaev funds a consideration of their shared belief in the theurgic power of art, which is deployed to map a way for coming to terms with the complex moral and theological predicament posed by Lolita. According to this model, Humbert does find redemption at the end of his journey even as this redemption neither trivializes nor justifies his evil conduct toward Dolores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nabokov Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nabokov Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nabokov Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2020.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文借鉴了纳博科夫本人提出的大量不发达的、具有神学意义的轨迹,探讨了亨伯特·亨伯特的死后命运对《洛丽塔》的神学解读的核心问题,即作者允许亨伯特每年在天堂游荡一次,因为他忏悔并获得了对多洛雷斯·海兹的真爱。对《洛丽塔》的神学解读必须首先考虑纳博科夫诗学的末世论取向,而这种末世论取向是建立在元小说和形而上学之间的类比之上的。为此,纳博科夫与俄罗斯宗教哲学家尼古拉斯·别尔佳耶夫(Nicolas Berdyaev)的关系为他们对艺术的神力的共同信仰提供了资金,这种信仰被用来为解决《洛丽塔》所带来的复杂的道德和神学困境绘制一条道路。根据这个模型,亨伯特在旅程的最后找到了救赎,即使这种救赎既不轻视也不证明他对德洛丽丝的邪恶行为是正当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"A green lane in Paradise": Eschatology and Theurgy in Lolita
Abstract:Drawing upon a wealth of underdeveloped and theologically significant trajectories identified by scholars and gestured toward by Nabokov himself, this article addresses the central problem Humbert Humbert's post-mortem fate poses a theological reading of Lolita, namely, Humbert's allowance by his author to wander Paradise once a year for having repented and attained to genuine love for Dolores Haze. Against exclusively metafictional interpretations which problematically bracket ethics and transcendence from aesthetics, a theological reading of Lolita must begin by considering the eschatological orientation of Nabokov's poetics, which are founded upon an analogy between metafiction and metaphysics. To this end, Nabokov's relationship with Russian religious philosopher Nicolas Berdyaev funds a consideration of their shared belief in the theurgic power of art, which is deployed to map a way for coming to terms with the complex moral and theological predicament posed by Lolita. According to this model, Humbert does find redemption at the end of his journey even as this redemption neither trivializes nor justifies his evil conduct toward Dolores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信