Rowena Lalji, Lee Koh, Anna Francis, Rabia Khalid, Chandana Guha, David W Johnson, Germaine Wong
{"title":"Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases.","authors":"Rowena Lalji, Lee Koh, Anna Francis, Rabia Khalid, Chandana Guha, David W Johnson, Germaine Wong","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD014688.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD014688.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a substantial global improvement in infant and child mortality from communicable diseases since the early 1990s there is now a growing burden of chronic disease in children and adolescents worldwide, mimicking the trend seen in the adult population. Chronic diseases in children and adolescents can affect all aspects of their well-being and function with these burdens and their health-related consequences often carried into adulthood. Up to one third of disability-adjusted life years for children and adolescents globally are a result of chronic disease. This has profound implications for the broader family unit, communities, and health systems in which these children and young people reside. Models of chronic care delivery for children and adolescents with chronic disease have traditionally been adapted from adult models. There is a growing recognition that children and adolescents with chronic diseases have a unique set of healthcare needs. Their needs extend beyond disease education and management appropriate to the developmental stage of the child, to encompass psychological well-being for the entire family and a holistic care approach focusing on the social determinants of health. It is for this reason that patient navigators have been proposed as a potential intervention to help fulfil this critical healthcare gap. Patient navigators are trained medical or non-medical personnel (e.g. lay health workers, community health workers, nurses, or people with lived experience) who provide guidance for the patients (and their primary caregivers) as they move through complex (and often bewildering) medical and social systems. The navigator may deliver education, help to co-ordinate patient care, be an advocate for the patient (and their primary caregivers), or combinations of these. Patient navigators can assist people with a chronic illness (especially those who are vulnerable or from a marginalised population, or both) to better understand their diagnoses, treatment options, and available resources. As there is considerable variation in the purpose, design, and target population of patient navigator programmes, there is a need to systematically review and summarise the existing literature on the effectiveness of navigator programmes in children and young adults with chronic disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of patient navigator programmes in children and adolescents with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos up to 20 January 2023 for related systematic reviews using search terms relevant to this review. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL EBSCO, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov for primary studies.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials reporting the effect of patient navig","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD014688"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Interventions for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.","authors":"Zainab Wajih, Krishna M Karpe, Giles D Walters","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013344.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD013344.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), caused by infection with or reactivation of BK virus, remains a challenge in kidney transplantation. Screening is recommended for all kidney transplant recipients. For those with clinically significant infection, reduction of immunosuppression is the cornerstone of management. There is no specific antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy sufficiently effective for routine use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to examine the benefits and harms of interventions for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 September 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating any intervention for the treatment or prevention of BKVAN for kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two authors independently assessed the study quality and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Twelve RCTs (2669 randomised participants) were included. Six studies were undertaken in single centres, and six were multicentre studies; two of these were international studies. The ages of those participating ranged from 44 to 57 years. The length of follow-up ranged from three months to five years. All studies included people with a kidney transplant, and three studies included people with signs of BK viraemia. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of the type of interventions and outcomes assessed. The overall risk of bias was low or unclear. Intensive screening for the early detection of BK viraemia or BK viruria prevents graft loss (1 study, 908 participants: RR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.05) and decreases the presence of decoy cells and viraemia at 12 months (1 study, 908 participants: RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11) compared to routine care (high certainty evidence). No other outcomes were reported. Compared to placebo, fluoroquinolones may slightly reduce the risk of graft loss (3 studies, 393 participants: RR 0.37, CI 0.09 to 1.57; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; low certainty evidence), probably makes little or no difference to donor-specific antibodies (DSA), may make little or no difference to B","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD013344"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462636/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142388632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wai Tong Chien, Dennis Chak Fai Ma, Daniel Bressington, Huanyu Mou
{"title":"Family-based interventions versus standard care for people with schizophrenia.","authors":"Wai Tong Chien, Dennis Chak Fai Ma, Daniel Bressington, Huanyu Mou","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013541.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD013541.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with schizophrenia often experience long-term psychosocial disabilities and frequent relapse. Family plays a key role in caring for ill relatives, which in turn probably contributes to high levels of distress and burdens for the family. Family-based interventions have been developed and applied to family members and their relatives with schizophrenia to improve their outcomes. This is an update of a Cochrane review that was last updated in 2011, which has been split into this review, one on group- versus individual-based family interventions and one on family-based cognitive versus behavioural management interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of family-based interventions for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like disorders and their families compared with standard care.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the following electronic databases from inception until April 2023: CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Clinicaltrials.gov, SinoMed, China Network Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP). We also searched the reference lists of included studies and accessible reviews for additional references.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of family-based interventions for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like disorders and their families and reported at least one patient's and one family member's outcomes. In this update, we only investigated standard care as the comparator.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard Cochrane methods. The review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for each study using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. We pooled data and estimated effects with the mean difference (MD), standardised mean difference (SMD), or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We judged the certainty of evidence using GRADEpro GDT. We divided the outcomes into short-term (≤ 1 month postintervention), medium-term (> 1 to 6 months postintervention), and long-term follow-up (> 6 months postintervention), if available.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We identified 26 RCTs in this review, with 1985 people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like disorders, and 2056 family members. Most family-based interventions were conducted on a weekly or biweekly basis, with duration ranging from five weeks to two years. We had substantial concerns regarding the methodological quality of the included studies given that we judged all studies at high risk of performance bias and several studies at high risk of detection, attrition or reporting bias. Low-certainty evidence indicated that family-based interventions may reduce patients' relapse at one month or less postintervention","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD013541"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450935/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor, Tanya Walsh, Sharon R Lewis, Philip Riley, Dwayne Boyers, Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Anne-Marie Glenny, Lucy O'Malley
{"title":"Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries.","authors":"Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor, Tanya Walsh, Sharon R Lewis, Philip Riley, Dwayne Boyers, Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Anne-Marie Glenny, Lucy O'Malley","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub3","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries is a major public health problem in most industrialised countries, affecting 60% to 90% of school children. Community water fluoridation (CWF) is currently practised in about 25 countries; health authorities consider it to be a key strategy for preventing dental caries. CWF is of interest to health professionals, policymakers and the public. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2015, focusing on contemporary evidence about the effects of CWF on dental caries.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of initiation or cessation of CWF programmes for the prevention of dental caries. To evaluate the association of water fluoridation (artificial or natural) with dental fluorosis.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and four other databases up to 16 August 2023. We also searched two clinical trials registers and conducted backward citation searches.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included populations of all ages. For our first objective (effects of initiation or cessation of CWF programmes on dental caries), we included prospective controlled studies comparing populations receiving fluoridated water with those receiving non-fluoridated or naturally low-fluoridated water. To evaluate change in caries status, studies measured caries both within three years of a change in fluoridation status and at the end of study follow-up. For our second objective (association of water fluoridation with dental fluorosis), we included any study design, with concurrent control, comparing populations exposed to different water fluoride concentrations. In this update, we did not search for or include new evidence for this objective.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. For our first objective, we included the following outcomes as change from baseline: decayed, missing or filled teeth ('dmft' for primary and 'DMFT' for permanent teeth); decayed, missing or filled tooth surfaces ('dmfs' for primary and 'DMFS' for permanent teeth); proportion of caries-free participants for both primary and permanent dentition; adverse events. We stratified the results of the meta-analyses according to whether data were collected before or after the widespread use of fluoride toothpaste in 1975. For our second objective, we included dental fluorosis (of aesthetic concern, or any level of fluorosis), and any other adverse events reported by the included studies.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 157 studies. All used non-randomised designs. Given the inherent risks of bias in these designs, particularly related to management of confounding factors and blinding of outcome assessors, we downgraded the certainty of all evidence for these risks. We downgraded some evidence for imprecision, inconsistency or both. Evidence from older studies may not be applicable to ","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD010856"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amy Drahota, Julie E Udell, Heather Mackenzie, Mark T Pugh
{"title":"Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.","authors":"Amy Drahota, Julie E Udell, Heather Mackenzie, Mark T Pugh","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults are at increased risk of both falls and fall-related injuries. Falls have multiple causes and many interventions exist to try and prevent them, including educational and psychological interventions. Educational interventions aim to increase older people's understanding of what they can do to prevent falls and psychological interventions can aim to improve confidence/motivation to engage in activities that may prevent falls. This review is an update of previous evidence to focus on educational and psychological interventions for falls prevention in community-dwelling older people.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of psychological interventions (such as cognitive behavioural therapy; with or without an education component) and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and two trials registries to June 2023. We also screened reference lists and conducted forward-citation searching.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials of community-dwelling people aged 60 years and older exploring the effectiveness of psychological interventions (such as cognitive behavioural therapy) or educational interventions (or both) aiming to prevent falls.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome was rate of falls. We also explored: number of people falling; people with fall-related fractures; people with falls that required medical attention; people with fall-related hospital admission; fall-related psychological outcomes (i.e. concerns about falling); health-related quality of life; and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 37 studies (six on cognitive behavioural interventions; three on motivational interviewing; three on other psychological interventions; nine on multifactorial (personalised) education; 12 on multiple topic education; two on single topic education; one with unclear education type; and one psychological plus educational intervention). Studies randomised 17,478 participants (71% women; mean age 73 years). Most studies were at high or unclear risk of bias for one or more domains. Cognitive behavioural interventions Cognitive behavioural interventions make little to no difference to the number of fallers (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.02; 4 studies, 1286 participants; low-certainty evidence), and there was a slight reduction in concerns about falling (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.30, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.19; 3 studies, 1132 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain or missing about the effect of cognitive behavioural interventions on other outcomes. Motivational interviewing The evidence is very uncertain ","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD013480"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kitty St Pierre, Brydee A Cashmore, Davide Bolignano, Carmine Zoccali, Marinella Ruospo, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni Fm Strippoli, Andrew J Mallett, Suetonia C Green, David J Tunnicliffe
{"title":"Interventions for preventing the progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.","authors":"Kitty St Pierre, Brydee A Cashmore, Davide Bolignano, Carmine Zoccali, Marinella Ruospo, Jonathan C Craig, Giovanni Fm Strippoli, Andrew J Mallett, Suetonia C Green, David J Tunnicliffe","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD010294.pub3","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD010294.pub3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading inherited cause of kidney disease. Clinical management has historically focused on symptom control and reducing associated complications. Improved understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in kidney cyst growth and disease progression has resulted in new pharmaceutical agents targeting disease pathogenesis and preventing disease progression. However, the role of disease-modifying agents for all people with ADPKD is unclear. This is an update of a review first published in 2015.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions to prevent the progression of ADPKD and the safety based on patient-important endpoints, defined by the Standardised Outcomes in NephroloGy-Polycystic Kidney Disease (SONG-PKD) core outcome set, and general and specific adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplants Register of Studies up to 13 August 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any interventions for preventing the progression of ADPKD with other interventions, placebo, or standard care were considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two authors independently assessed study risks of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effects were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 57 studies (8016 participants) that investigated 18 pharmacological interventions (vasopressin 2 receptor (V2R) antagonists, antihypertensive therapy, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, somatostatin analogues, antiplatelet agents, eicosapentaenoic acids, statins, kinase inhibitors, diuretics, anti-diabetic agents, water intake, dietary intervention, and supplements) in this review. Compared to placebo, the V2R antagonist tolvaptan probably preserves eGFR (3 studies, 2758 participants: MD 1.26 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.78; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and probably slows total kidney volume (TKV) growth in adults (1 study, 1307 participants: MD -2.70 mL/cm, 95% CI -3.24 to -2.16) (moderate certainty evidence). However, there was insufficient evidence to determine tolvaptan'","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD010294"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445802/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven Kwasi Korang, Matthew Baker, Joshua Feinberg, Christopher Jl Newth, Robinder G Khemani, Janus C Jakobsen
{"title":"Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute asthma in children.","authors":"Steven Kwasi Korang, Matthew Baker, Joshua Feinberg, Christopher Jl Newth, Robinder G Khemani, Janus C Jakobsen","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD012067.pub3","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD012067.pub3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission among children, with significant economic burden and impact on quality of life. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is increasingly used in the care of children with acute asthma, although the evidence supporting it is weak, and clinical guidelines do not offer any recommendations on its routine use. However, NPPV might be an effective way to improve outcomes for some children with asthma. A previous review did not demonstrate a clear benefit, but was limited by few studies with small sample sizes. This is an update of the previous review.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of NPPV as an add-on therapy to usual care (e.g. bronchodilators and corticosteroids) in children (< 18 years) with acute asthma.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also conducted a search of ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. We searched all databases from their inception to March 2023, with no restrictions on language of publication.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing NPPV as add-on therapy to usual care versus usual care for children hospitalised for acute asthma exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard Cochrane methods.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included three RCTs randomising 60 children with acute asthma to NPPV and 60 children to control. All included trials assessed the effects of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) for acute asthma in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting. None of the trials used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The controls received standard care. The median age of children ranged from three to six years, and asthma severity ranged from moderate to severe. Our primary outcome measures were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and asthma symptom score. Secondary outcomes were non-serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, arterial blood gases and pH, pneumonia, cost, and PICU length of stay. None of the trials reported any deaths or serious adverse events (except one trial that reported intubation rate). Two trials reported asthma symptom score, each demonstrating reductions in asthma symptoms in the BiPAP group. In one trial, the asthma symptom score was (mean difference (MD) -2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.70 to -0.30, P = 0.03; 19 children) lower in the BiPAP group. In the other trial, a cross-over trial, BiPAP was associated with a lower mean asthma symptom score (MD -3.7; 16 children; very low certainty evidence) before cross-over, but investigators did not report a standard deviation, and it could not be estimated from the first phase of the trial before cross-over. The reduction in both trials was above our predefined minimal import","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD012067"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445801/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sadia Janjua, Caroline Dancyger, Mario Mateus, Daisy McInnerney, Deborah Carter, Adrian J Tookman, Bridget Candy
{"title":"Psychological interventions for emotional well-being in adults with advanced progressive life-limiting illness.","authors":"Sadia Janjua, Caroline Dancyger, Mario Mateus, Daisy McInnerney, Deborah Carter, Adrian J Tookman, Bridget Candy","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD015421","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD015421","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine the benefits and harms of psychological interventions compared to treatment as usual, waiting list, active control, or another psychological intervention to improve emotional well-being in adults with an advanced progressive life-limiting illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD015421"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marlene T Chakhtoura, Nancy F Nakhoul, Elie A Akl, Bassem Y Safadi, Christos S Mantzoros, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
{"title":"Oral vitamin D supplementation for adults with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.","authors":"Marlene T Chakhtoura, Nancy F Nakhoul, Elie A Akl, Bassem Y Safadi, Christos S Mantzoros, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD011800.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD011800.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vitamin D deficiency following bariatric surgery is common and is expected to be associated with a deleterious impact on the skeleton. However, the benefits of vitamin D supplementation and the optimal dose in this population is currently unknown. The available guidelines on the topic are derived from experts' opinions, and are not evidence based.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effects of different doses of vitamin D supplementation (low dose (less than 600 international units (IU)/day), moderate dose (600 IU/day to 3500 IU/day), high dose (greater than 3500 IU/day)) to each other or to placebo in adults living with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, two trial registries, and the reference lists of systematic reviews, articles, and health technology assessment reports without language restrictions. The last search of all databases was 27 June 2023, except Embase, which we searched on 14 August 2015.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials on vitamin D supplementation comparing different doses or comparing vitamin D to placebo in people undergoing bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes were fractures and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were vitamin D status, all-cause mortality, bone mineral change, secondary hyperparathyroidism, health-related quality of life, and muscle strength. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in each comparison.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We identified five trials with 314 participants. We included three trials in the quantitative analysis. Moderate-dose vitamin D compared to placebo One trial compared moderate-dose vitamin D (3200 IU/day) to placebo. Moderate-dose vitamin D, compared to placebo, may improve vitamin D status and may result in little to no difference in the achieved parathyroid hormone level (achieved 25-hydroxyvitamin D level: mean difference (MD) 13.60 ng/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.94 to 19.26; achieved parathyroid hormone level: -6.60 pg/mL, 95% CI -17.12 to 3.92; 1 study, 79 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trial reported no adverse events in the moderate-dose vitamin D arm, but did not provide any information on adverse events in the placebo arm. There were no data on fractures, all-cause mortality, bone density change, health-related quality of life, and muscle strength. High-dose vitamin D compared to moderate-dose vitamin D Two trials in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared moderate-dose (equivalent dose 800 IU/day to 2000 IU/day) to high-dose (equivalent dose 5000 IU/day to 7943 IU/day) vitamin D. The evidence of high-dose vitamin D on adverse events is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 5.18, 95% CI 0.23 to 116.56; 2 studies, 81 participants; ver","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"10 ","pages":"CD011800"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443589/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anne Williamson, Adrian R Martineau, David Jolliffe, Aziz Sheikh, Wim Janssens, John Sluyter, Rachida Rafiq, Renate de Jongh, Chris J Griffiths
{"title":"Vitamin D for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Anne Williamson, Adrian R Martineau, David Jolliffe, Aziz Sheikh, Wim Janssens, John Sluyter, Rachida Rafiq, Renate de Jongh, Chris J Griffiths","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013284.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD013284.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD is a common, preventable and treatable airway disease, and is currently the third leading cause of death worldwide. About one billion people worldwide are estimated to have vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. Vitamin D deficiency is common among people with COPD, and has been reported to be associated with reduced lung function and increased risk of acute exacerbations of COPD. Several clinical trials of vitamin D to prevent acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and improve COPD control have been conducted, but an up-to-date meta-analysis of all double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of this intervention is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of vitamin D for the management of acute exacerbations and symptoms for people with COPD.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register and reference lists of articles. We also searched trial registries directly, and contacted the authors of studies in order to identify additional trials. The date of the last search was 24 August 2022.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of vitamin D or its hydroxylated metabolites, for adults with a clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on the presence of characteristic symptoms and irreversible airflow obstruction. We did not impose restrictions regarding disease severity or baseline vitamin D status, in order to maximise generalisability.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used standard Cochrane methods. The primary outcome was the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations (requiring systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics or both). We also performed subgroup analyses to determine whether the effect of vitamin D on the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was modified by baseline vitamin D status, COPD severity or regular inhaled corticosteroid use. The main secondary outcomes of interest were the proportion of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations (moderate or severe), the change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1, % predicted) and the proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events of any cause, mortality (all-cause) and quality of life. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 10 double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials in this review, involving a total of 1372 adults. Five studies contributed to the primary outcome analysis of the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics or both. The duration of studies ranged from six weeks to 40 months, and all investigated the effects of administering cholecalciferol (vitamin D<sub>3</sub>). One study included two intervention arms, one where vitamin D<sub>3</sub> was given and one","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"9 ","pages":"CD013284"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}