Exercise for patellar tendinopathy.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alexandre D Lopes, Rodrigo Rn Rizzo, Luiz Hespanhol, Leonardo Op Costa, Steven J Kamper
{"title":"Exercise for patellar tendinopathy.","authors":"Alexandre D Lopes, Rodrigo Rn Rizzo, Luiz Hespanhol, Leonardo Op Costa, Steven J Kamper","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013078.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellar tendinopathy is a prevalent condition that commonly affects the tendon's origin, causing pain at the front of the knee. The main treatment for patellar tendinopathy involves different types of exercise (e.g. strengthening and stretching). The most common method of strengthening exercise is eccentric (lengthening) muscle loading. Strengthening exercises can be land-based or water-based, weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing, or both. Other treatments include surgery and glucocorticoid injections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the benefits and harms of exercise for the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers to 5 September 2023, with no restrictions by language.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials of strengthening exercise interventions compared to placebo or sham intervention; no treatment, usual care, or minimal intervention; or other active intervention. Strengthening exercises include concentric, eccentric, eccentric-concentric, and isometric exercises designed to enhance the strength and power of muscles.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Major outcomes included pain, function, participant-reported global assessment of treatment success, quality of life, return to sport, proportion of participants with adverse events, and proportion of participant withdrawals.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included seven trials (211 participants with chronic patellar tendinopathy) comparing strengthening exercises with no treatment (3 trials, 93 participants), glucocorticoid injection (1 trial, 38 participants), surgery (1 trial, 40 participants), stretching exercise (1 trial, 15 participants), or pulsed ultrasound and transverse friction (1 trial, 30 participants). All trials included athletes (88% males, mean age 26 years) with a mean duration of symptoms of 41.6 months. Most trials were susceptible to bias, particularly selection bias/random sequence (57.1%), selection bias/allocation concealment (42.8%), detection bias (28.5%), attrition bias (71.4%), and selective reporting biases (28.5%). Given the nature of the intervention, neither participants nor investigators were blinded to group allocation in any trials (performance bias). We did not find any studies that compared exercise with placebo or sham intervention. Strengthening exercise versus no treatment We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain compared to no treatment. Mean pain with no treatment was 62.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = no pain) compared to 27.06 points with exercise (mean difference (MD) 34.94 points better, 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.94 better to 48.94 better; 1 study, 39 participants; very low-certainty evidence (downgraded twice for imprecision and once for bias)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to function compared to no treatment at the end of treatment. Mean function with no treatment was 65.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best function) compared to 72.04 points with exercise (MD 7.04 points better, 95% CI 6.94 points worse to 21.02 points better; 2 studies, 95 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for imprecision and once for bias)). The studies reported none of the other outcomes. Strengthening exercise versus glucocorticoid injection Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to pain compared to glucocorticoid injection at the end of treatment. Mean pain with glucocorticoid injection was 18.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = no pain) compared to 24.04 points with exercise (MD 6.04 points worse, 95% CI 8.19 better to 20.26 better; 1 trial, 38 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded twice for imprecision)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to function compared to glucocorticoid injection at the end of treatment. Mean function with no treatment was 82.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best function) compared to 76.25 points with exercise (MD 5.75 points worse, 95% CI 17.41 worse to 5.93 better; 1 trial, 38 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded twice for imprecision)). The trial reported none of the other outcomes. Strengthening exercise versus surgery We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain compared to surgery at 12-month follow-up. Mean pain with surgery was 13.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = no pain) compared to 17.00 points with exercise (MD 4.00 points worse, 95% CI 4.06 better to 12.06 worse; 1 trial, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise improves function compared to surgery. Mean function in the surgery group at the end of treatment was 45.10 points on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best function) compared to 52.4 points in the exercise group (MD 7.30 points better, 95% CI 5.02 worse to 19.62 better; 1 trial, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for bias and twice for serious imprecision)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to treatment success compared to surgery at the end of treatment. The mean global assessment of treatment success with surgery was 0.2 points on a -5 to +5 scale (+5 maximum was improvement) compared to 1.76 points with exercise (MD 1.56 points better, 95% CI 0.52 worse to 3.64 better; 1 trial, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for bias and once for imprecision)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to the rate of participants who returned fully or partially to sport when compared to surgery at 12-month follow-up. The return to sport rate with surgery was 86% compared to 85% with exercise (risk ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.34; 1 trial, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for bias and once for imprecision)). The trial reported none of the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain compared to no treatment. Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to function compared to no treatment and to function or pain compared to glucocorticoid injection. Compared to surgery, we are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain or improves function, and it may make little or no difference to treatment success and the proportion of athletes returning to sport. No trials measured adverse events. All trials analyzed in this review included participants who were athletes, limiting the findings to athletes rather than the general public.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"5 ","pages":"CD013078"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013078.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patellar tendinopathy is a prevalent condition that commonly affects the tendon's origin, causing pain at the front of the knee. The main treatment for patellar tendinopathy involves different types of exercise (e.g. strengthening and stretching). The most common method of strengthening exercise is eccentric (lengthening) muscle loading. Strengthening exercises can be land-based or water-based, weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing, or both. Other treatments include surgery and glucocorticoid injections.

Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and harms of exercise for the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers to 5 September 2023, with no restrictions by language.

Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials of strengthening exercise interventions compared to placebo or sham intervention; no treatment, usual care, or minimal intervention; or other active intervention. Strengthening exercises include concentric, eccentric, eccentric-concentric, and isometric exercises designed to enhance the strength and power of muscles.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Major outcomes included pain, function, participant-reported global assessment of treatment success, quality of life, return to sport, proportion of participants with adverse events, and proportion of participant withdrawals.

Main results: We included seven trials (211 participants with chronic patellar tendinopathy) comparing strengthening exercises with no treatment (3 trials, 93 participants), glucocorticoid injection (1 trial, 38 participants), surgery (1 trial, 40 participants), stretching exercise (1 trial, 15 participants), or pulsed ultrasound and transverse friction (1 trial, 30 participants). All trials included athletes (88% males, mean age 26 years) with a mean duration of symptoms of 41.6 months. Most trials were susceptible to bias, particularly selection bias/random sequence (57.1%), selection bias/allocation concealment (42.8%), detection bias (28.5%), attrition bias (71.4%), and selective reporting biases (28.5%). Given the nature of the intervention, neither participants nor investigators were blinded to group allocation in any trials (performance bias). We did not find any studies that compared exercise with placebo or sham intervention. Strengthening exercise versus no treatment We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain compared to no treatment. Mean pain with no treatment was 62.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = no pain) compared to 27.06 points with exercise (mean difference (MD) 34.94 points better, 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.94 better to 48.94 better; 1 study, 39 participants; very low-certainty evidence (downgraded twice for imprecision and once for bias)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to function compared to no treatment at the end of treatment. Mean function with no treatment was 65.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best function) compared to 72.04 points with exercise (MD 7.04 points better, 95% CI 6.94 points worse to 21.02 points better; 2 studies, 95 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for imprecision and once for bias)). The studies reported none of the other outcomes. Strengthening exercise versus glucocorticoid injection Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to pain compared to glucocorticoid injection at the end of treatment. Mean pain with glucocorticoid injection was 18.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = no pain) compared to 24.04 points with exercise (MD 6.04 points worse, 95% CI 8.19 better to 20.26 better; 1 trial, 38 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded twice for imprecision)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to function compared to glucocorticoid injection at the end of treatment. Mean function with no treatment was 82.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best function) compared to 76.25 points with exercise (MD 5.75 points worse, 95% CI 17.41 worse to 5.93 better; 1 trial, 38 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded twice for imprecision)). The trial reported none of the other outcomes. Strengthening exercise versus surgery We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain compared to surgery at 12-month follow-up. Mean pain with surgery was 13.00 points on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = no pain) compared to 17.00 points with exercise (MD 4.00 points worse, 95% CI 4.06 better to 12.06 worse; 1 trial, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise improves function compared to surgery. Mean function in the surgery group at the end of treatment was 45.10 points on a 0 to 100 scale (100 = best function) compared to 52.4 points in the exercise group (MD 7.30 points better, 95% CI 5.02 worse to 19.62 better; 1 trial, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for bias and twice for serious imprecision)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to treatment success compared to surgery at the end of treatment. The mean global assessment of treatment success with surgery was 0.2 points on a -5 to +5 scale (+5 maximum was improvement) compared to 1.76 points with exercise (MD 1.56 points better, 95% CI 0.52 worse to 3.64 better; 1 trial, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for bias and once for imprecision)). Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to the rate of participants who returned fully or partially to sport when compared to surgery at 12-month follow-up. The return to sport rate with surgery was 86% compared to 85% with exercise (risk ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.34; 1 trial, 40 participants; low-certainty evidence (downgraded once for bias and once for imprecision)). The trial reported none of the other outcomes.

Authors' conclusions: We are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain compared to no treatment. Strengthening exercise may make little or no difference to function compared to no treatment and to function or pain compared to glucocorticoid injection. Compared to surgery, we are very uncertain whether strengthening exercise reduces pain or improves function, and it may make little or no difference to treatment success and the proportion of athletes returning to sport. No trials measured adverse events. All trials analyzed in this review included participants who were athletes, limiting the findings to athletes rather than the general public.

运动治疗髌骨肌腱病。
背景:髌骨肌腱病是一种常见病,通常影响肌腱的起源,引起膝盖前部疼痛。髌骨肌腱病的主要治疗包括不同类型的运动(例如加强和拉伸)。最常见的强化锻炼方法是偏心(延长)肌肉负荷。强化训练可以是陆上的或水上的,负重的或非负重的,或两者兼而有之。其他治疗方法包括手术和糖皮质激素注射。目的:评价运动治疗髌骨肌腱病变的利与弊。检索方法:我们检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、MEDLINE、Embase和两个试验注册库,截止到2023年9月5日,没有语言限制。选择标准:我们纳入了与安慰剂或假干预相比加强运动干预的随机对照试验;没有治疗、常规护理或最低限度的干预;或其他积极干预。强化训练包括同心、偏心、偏心-同心和等距训练,旨在增强肌肉的力量和力量。数据收集和分析:两位综述作者独立选择研究纳入,提取数据,并使用GRADE评估偏倚风险和证据确定性。主要结局包括疼痛、功能、参与者报告的治疗成功总体评估、生活质量、恢复运动、不良事件参与者比例和参与者退出比例。主要结果:我们纳入了7项试验(211名慢性髌骨肌腱病变患者),比较了无治疗的强化运动(3项试验,93名受试者)、糖皮质激素注射(1项试验,38名受试者)、手术(1项试验,40名受试者)、拉伸运动(1项试验,15名受试者)或脉冲超声和横向摩擦(1项试验,30名受试者)。所有试验均包括运动员(88%为男性,平均年龄26岁),平均症状持续时间为41.6个月。大多数试验易发生偏倚,特别是选择偏倚/随机序列偏倚(57.1%)、选择偏倚/分配隐藏偏倚(42.8%)、检测偏倚(28.5%)、消耗偏倚(71.4%)和选择性报告偏倚(28.5%)。考虑到干预的性质,在任何试验中,参与者和研究者都没有对组分配盲目(表现偏倚)。我们没有发现任何将运动与安慰剂或假干预进行比较的研究。加强锻炼与不进行治疗相比,我们不确定加强锻炼是否能减轻疼痛。在0 - 100量表上,未治疗的平均疼痛为62.00分(0 =无疼痛),而运动治疗的平均疼痛为27.06分(平均差值(MD)为34.94分,95%可信区间(CI)为20.94分至48.94分;1项研究,39名参与者;非常低确定性的证据(因不精确而降级两次,因偏见而降级一次)。在治疗结束时,与不进行治疗相比,加强锻炼对功能的影响可能很小或没有影响。未治疗的平均功能为65.00分(0至100分)(100 =最佳功能),而运动的平均功能为72.04分(MD改善7.04分,95% CI差6.94分至21.02分;2项研究,95名受试者;低确定性证据(因不精确而降级一次,因偏差而降级一次)。这些研究没有报告其他结果。强化运动与糖皮质激素注射在治疗结束时,与糖皮质激素注射相比,强化运动对疼痛的影响可能很小或没有差异。糖皮质激素注射组的平均疼痛为18.00分(0 =无疼痛),而运动组的平均疼痛为24.04分(MD差6.04分,95% CI 8.19 - 20.26;1项试验,38名受试者;低确定性证据(因不精确而降级两次))。在治疗结束时,与注射糖皮质激素相比,加强锻炼对功能的影响可能很小或没有影响。未治疗的平均功能为82.00分(0至100分)(100 =最佳功能),而运动的平均功能为76.25分(MD差5.75分,95% CI 17.41差至5.93好;1项试验,38名受试者;低确定性证据(因不精确而降级两次))。该试验没有报告其他结果。在12个月的随访中,我们非常不确定强化运动与手术相比是否能减轻疼痛。手术的平均疼痛为13.00分(0 =无疼痛),而运动的平均疼痛为17.00分(MD加重4.00分,95% CI 4.06好转至12.06恶化;1项试验,40名受试者;非常低确定性证据)。我们非常不确定与手术相比,加强锻炼是否能改善功能。治疗结束时,手术组的平均功能为45.10分(0到100分),而手术组的平均功能为52分。 运动组4分(MD好7.30分,95% CI差5.02 ~好19.62分;1项试验,40名受试者;非常低确定性的证据(因有偏见而降级一次,因严重不精确而降级两次)。与治疗结束时的手术相比,加强锻炼可能对治疗成功的影响很小或没有影响。手术治疗成功的平均整体评估在-5到+5量表上为0.2分(+5最大值为改善),而运动治疗成功的平均整体评估为1.76分(MD更好1.56分,95% CI 0.52差至3.64好;1项试验,40名受试者;低确定性证据(因偏见和不精确分别降级一次)。在12个月的随访中,与手术相比,加强锻炼对完全或部分恢复运动的参与者的比率几乎没有影响。手术后恢复运动的比率为86%,而运动后恢复运动的比率为85%(风险比1.02,95% CI 0.78 ~ 1.34;1项试验,40名受试者;低确定性证据(因偏见和不精确分别降级一次)。该试验没有报告其他结果。作者的结论是:与不进行治疗相比,加强锻炼是否能减轻疼痛,我们非常不确定。与不治疗相比,加强锻炼对功能的影响微乎其微,与注射糖皮质激素相比,对功能或疼痛的影响微乎其微。与手术相比,我们非常不确定加强运动是否能减轻疼痛或改善功能,它可能对治疗成功率和运动员重返运动的比例几乎没有影响。没有试验测量不良事件。本综述中分析的所有试验均包括运动员参与者,因此研究结果仅限于运动员而非普通公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信