The international journal of lower extremity wounds最新文献

{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors for Amputations in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Mariana Alves Bandeira, Rosana Nascimento Macedo, José Luis Lázaro-Martinez, Yolanda Garcia Alvarez, Michele Neves Brajão Rocha, Vera Lucia Conceição de Gouveia Santos","doi":"10.1177/15347346241292377","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15347346241292377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the incidence rate of amputations and their risk factors in people with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in two specialized outpatient clinics in Brazil. This is an epidemiological, retrospective cohort study using data collected from electronic health records of 281 adult diabetic patient types 1 or 2; attended in specialized outpatient service between 2015 and 2020. Statistical analyses were performed using the 2 sample t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, for quantitative variables, and the Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The investigation of the risk factors for amputation was carried out through logistic regression. The study was approved by ethical committee. The sample mean age was 65.6 years (SD 13.05), predominating male gender n = 211 (75%), type 2 DM n = 223 (86.7%), with cardiovascular disease n = 143 (63.2%), and about 68.7% (n = 156) with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Seventy-seven had lower limb amputation (LLA), with a rate incidence of 31.9% during five years. Logistic regression analysis showed the following associations with amputation: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy increased the rate of amputation by 3.6 times (OR = 3.631, 95% CI = 1.214-11.353; <i>P</i> = .022), and peripheral arterial disease increased by 10 times (OR = 10.631; 95% CI = 2.969-57.029; <i>P</i> = .001). The LLA in individuals with DM in two specialized outpatient services was higher compared to international literature; DPN and PAD were confirmed as risk factors for amputation, according to literature. This finding suggests that the study population faces an increased risk of amputation, highlighting the urgent need for targeted interventions and implementing robust preventive strategies to transform the current scenario and mitigate these severe outcomes. A comprehensive approach is essential to proactively address the underlying issues and reduce the prevalence and impact of amputations in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating Nonadherence in an Integrated Diabetic Limb Salvage Programme: Reasons, Associated Factors, and Impacts on Care Outcomes.","authors":"Lixia Ge, Yee Gary Ang, Joseph Molina, Yan Sun, Elaine Tan, Huiling Liew, Jeremy Hoe, Jaime Hui Xian Lin, Hui Yan Koo, Kai Qiang Low, Julia Choo, Theophilus Yap, Nur Aberleen Syafirah Bte Azmi, Donna Tan, Yi Bing Loh, Xiaoli Zhu, Enming Yong, Qiantai Hong, Tiffany Chew, Dexter Yak Seng Chan, Claris Shi, Chelsea Law, Wai Han Hoi, James Siow, Jo Ann Lim, John Arputhan Abisheganaden, Daniel Chew, Zhiwen Joseph Lo","doi":"10.1177/15347346241294178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241294178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adherence to treatment plans is crucial for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) to achieve positive outcomes. With limited understanding of nonadherence and its impacts on care outcomes, this study aimed to explore the reasons and factors associated with nonadherence in an integrated diabetic limb salvage (DLS) programme and evaluate its effects on care outcomes. This study included 2798 DFU patients who were enrolled in an integrated DLS programme across multiple institutions in central and northern Singapore from 2020 to 2021. Reasons for nonadherence were obtained via telephone interviews. Factors associated with nonadherence were identified using multiple logistic regression. Differences in one-year outcomes, including minor and major lower extremity amputation (LEA), mortality, LEA-free survival, and healthcare utilisation between adherent and nonadherent patients, were examined based on a significance level of <i>P</i> < .05. Nonadherence was observed in 40.2% of patients, with higher rates among younger patients, Malays and Indians, and those with higher HbA1c levels. Patient-related factors were the most commonly reported reasons for missed appointments (50.4%). Compared to adherent patients, nonadherent patients exhibited a relatively higher minor LEA rate (13.0% vs 10.2%, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.51), lower mortality rate (8.6% vs18.1%, OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.65), higher overall LEA-free survival (76.4% vs 71.1%, OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.53), and more hospitalisations (IRR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.33) and emergency visits (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.39). While nonadherent patients showed relatively higher minor LEA rates and more healthcare utilisation, they also exhibited lower mortality and higher LEA-free survival. This suggests that nonadherence in this population may be associated with complex patient characteristics and behaviours that warrant further investigation to tailor interventions effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142577345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Screening for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Subjective Versus Objective Measures.","authors":"Stephanie Pleven, Nikolaos Papanas, Alfred Gatt, Cynthia Formosa","doi":"10.1177/15347346241295461","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241295461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared subjective screening modalities recommended in diabetic foot screening guidelines for the detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) with an objective measure, the NC-Stat DPNCheck^®. We assessed 63 participants (mean age 54.5 years ± 10.5) utilising subjective screening tools (Semmes-Weinstein 10-g monofilament, 128-Hz traditional tuning fork, neurothesiometer, O'Brien 128-Hz electronic tuning fork) and compared results with the objective automated sural nerve conduction test NC-Stat DPNCheck^®. A significant difference was found in the number of limbs classified with DPN between all screening tools (<i>P</i> < .05). Therefore, this suggests that some screening modalities are more sensitive in diagnosing DPN than others, highlighting the importance of using multiple screening tools to a comprehensive understanding of the patient's neurological status. The findings also emphasize the need to incorporate objective measures in diabetic foot screening and encourage future research to establish a gold standard tool for DPN diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142570854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Diode Laser Therapy and Topical Turmeric Extract Ointment in Promoting Healing of Wounds in a Murine Model.","authors":"Zahra Al-Timimi","doi":"10.1177/15347346241292127","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15347346241292127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intricate biological process of wound healing is influenced by a wide range of therapeutic techniques. In this work, the effects of topical turmeric extract ointment and diode laser therapy on wound healing in a mouse model were investigated. Out of the sixty mice, three groups of twenty male mice each were created. Three groups received treatment: the first was a control group that got no treatment; the second group received topical application of 5% curcumin twice a day; and the third group received diode laser therapy, which involved direct laser beam therapy for five minutes a day at an output power of 100 mW at an 810 nm wavelength. Over the course of two weeks, the study examined histological changes and wound closure rates. On days 0 through 14, the wound area was measured with digital calipers to provide quantifiable statistics about the process of healing. In histological analyses, epithelializations, and collagen deposition, in addition to inflammatory cells, were investigated using hematoxylin and eosin staining. It was demonstrated by comparing the outcomes to those of a control group that diode laser therapy and turmeric extract ointment are both successful therapeutic options. The results demonstrate that different therapies, while with differing degrees of effectiveness, greatly quicken the healing process of wounds. According to these results, topical turmeric extract ointment could be used as an additional or supporting therapy to aid in the healing of wounds during medical treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142524034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Heel Raises and Calf Stretches Exercises Versus Medication Only in Ischemic Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy, Abdelhfeez Moshrif, Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez, Mohamed Hamza Metwaly, Ehab Abd Elmoneim Ghazala, Hassan Gado, Hany M Aly, Badr Al-Amir Hassan, Ahmed Abdelmoniem Negm, Ahmed Atef Khamis, Wael Abdo Abdo Abd-Elgawad, Abdullah Elsayed, Nehal Farouk","doi":"10.1177/15347346241294017","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15347346241294017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intermittent claudication is a primary symptom of peripheral artery disease (PAD). a chronic progressive disease caused primarily by atherosclerosis. It is usually characterized by leg pain, aches, cramps, or fatigue when walking, which improves with rest. Physical therapy, including a supervised exercise program, is often recommended as the first treatment for sprains. This study aims to evaluate the short-term effects of incorporating heel raise and calf stretch exercises with standard medical therapy compared to medical therapy alone in managing intermittent claudication. From May 2022 to November 2023, 160 patients with Stage II Fontaine PAD were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group A (80 patients) received heel raise and calf stretch exercises in addition to medical treatment, while Group B (80 patients) received only medical treatment. Both groups underwent treadmill walking tests before and after three months to measure absolute walking distance (ACD), peak walking time (PWT), and Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) scores, including distance, speed, and symptom severity. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of ACD, peak walking time, ankle-brachial index, distance, speed, and symptoms. At follow-up, Group A showed significantly greater improvements in ACD (312.00 ± 45.43 m), peak walking time (8.54 ± 1.55 min), distance (29.46 ± 4.63 km), speed (20.01 ± 3.13 kph), and WIQ symptoms (22.10 ± 1.02) compared to Group B, which had ACD (276.55 ± 29.07 m), peak walking time (6.72 ± 1.70 min), distance (23.68 ± 3.89 km), speed (15.71 ± 2.71 kph), and WIQ symptoms (20.80 ± 1.47) (<i>P</i> < .001). The ankle-brachial index remained similar between the groups (<i>P</i> > .05). We concluded that integrating standard physical therapy exercises, such as calf raises and leg stretches, with medical therapy significantly enhances walking function in patients with ischemic intermittent claudication.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142524035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"COVID-19 and COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Skin Ulcerations in the Lower Extremities: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Paul Beaineh, Ayman El-Bsat, Bassel Hafez, Abdul Rahman Bizri, Abdul-Ghani Kibbi, Mira Merashli, Fady Haddad","doi":"10.1177/15347346241275785","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241275785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Case: </strong>A 53-year-old male patient presented to the dermatology clinics with a three-week history of painful necrotic patches coalescent of the lateral malleolus of the right and left ankles. History goes back to when the patient reported developing pruritic papules two weeks after receiving his second shot of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2). Punch biopsy was consistent with leukocytoclastic vasculitis. He was prescribed a four-week course of systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics as per cultures. Vascular assessment confirmed normal peripheral arterial and venous system. Two months later, the patient re-presented with fever and worsening of his lower extremity ulcers. He underwent debridement of his wounds. Intra-operative cultures revealed multidrug resistant bacteria. He required an additional debridement session a few days later and a 14-day course of Piperacillin-Tazobactam. The patient was subsequently discharged on corticosteroids and Azathioprine and followed up in the vascular surgery and rheumatology clinics. At four months follow-up, the patient's wounds were almost completely healed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article highlights a case of severe new-onset COVID-19 vaccine-associated leukocytoclastic vasculitis complicated with infected ulcers that required debridement twice in addition to a prolonged course of antibiotics and immunosuppression therapy. To our knowledge, none of the cases reported in the literature were this severe in nature. In this post-pandemic era, it must remain high on the differential list, and healthcare specialists should maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating sudden new-onset skin lesions that do not have an immediately apparent etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142549913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Randomized Clinical Trial Study on the Prevention Strategy and Early Detection of Ulcer Recurrence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using the Risk of Recurrence Ulcer Tool.","authors":"Haryanto Haryanto, Yunita Sari, Elveria Panjaitan, Juminar Juminar, David Armstrong","doi":"10.1177/15347346241283160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241283160","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifies: NCT06434922.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cold Environment-Associated Extremity Lesions or Severe Hypothermia Help Differentiate Between Frostbitten and Trench Foot (Immersion Foot).","authors":"Motomu Suito, Takuya Yanagida, Miho Ohtsubo, Kazuhiro Tsunekawa, Niro Kikuchi","doi":"10.1177/15347346241273138","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241273138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cold associated foot injuries, such as frostbite and trench foot (immersion foot) are relatively common in cold environments. The former is classified as a freezing cold injury, and the latter as a nonfreezing cold injury. Trench foot is sometimes misdiagnosed as frostbite, and rapid rewarming exacerbates the condition. This paper aims to help differentiate between frostbitten foot and trench foot. This study included patients with frostbitten foot or trench foot treated at our hospital between December 2005 and May 2023. The differences in sex, age, month of injury, conditions at the time of injury, injury distribution, foot lesion laterality, other complications upon arrival (finger frostbite, immersion hand, or hypothermia), and presence and distribution of sensory disturbance at discharge were noted among the groups. A total of 16 patients (14 men) with frostbitten foot and 3 patients (3 men) with trench foot were identified. Finger frostbite observed in nine and zero patients with frostbitten foot and trench foot, respectively; and severe hypothermia on arrival observed in five and zero patients with frostbitten foot and trench foot, respectively. Physical findings at the initial examination showed that the frostbitten feet were dry, and the lesions were distal and clearly demarcated, whereas feet with trench foot were wet, and the lesions covered the entire sole and were not clearly demarcated. Accurate differentiation between frostbitten foot and trench foot and appropriate initial treatment are important. The presence of finger frostbite, immersion hand or severe hypothermia may help to differentiate between frostbitten foot and trench foot.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Free Flap Limb Salvage and Ulcer Recurrence in Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia.","authors":"Norifumi Matsuda, Dongkyung Seo, Riho Suzuki, Yutaka Dannoura, Katsumi Horiuchi","doi":"10.1177/15347346241287335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241287335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Free flap transfer is a well-established treatment for foot reconstruction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and can achieve prolonged amputation-free survival. However, reports on ulcer recurrence after free flap transfer are scarce, with most focusing on trauma patients. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed patients with CLTI who underwent free flap reconstruction at our institution over a 17-year period. Patient characteristics, ulcer recurrence rates, activity level, and variables associated with ulcer recurrence were investigated in patients who met the following criteria: successful reconstructive surgery, complete wound healing, and at least 1 year of follow-up. Free flap foot reconstruction was performed in 42 patients (92.9% male, 7.1% female; mean age 57.1 years, range 37-81 years). Among them, 39 patients (92.9%) had diabetes mellitus, 15 (35.7%) had critical limb ischemia, and 15 (35.7%) had end-stage renal disease/hemodialysis. Mean postoperative follow-up was 60.5 (range 12.0-208.0) months. The 5-year primary ulcer recurrence-free survival rate was 48.7%. High activity level and selection of the posterior tibial artery as the recipient artery were significantly associated with ulcer recurrence [hazard ratio, 3.59 and 9.81; <i>P </i>= .046 and <i>P </i>< .001, respectively]. Activity levels were not significantly different before and 1 year after surgery. In conclusion, survival analysis revealed that ulcer recurrence is most likely to occur within the first 2 years after surgery. Although recurrence occurred in approximately half of the patients, most patients maintained activity levels comparable to their preoperative levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing.","authors":"Shiv Kumar Mudgal, Subodh Kumar, Suresh K Sharma, Rakhi Gaur, Dibyajyoti Saikia, Harminder Singh, Saurabh Varshney, Ashoo Grover, Seshadri Reddy Varikasuvu","doi":"10.1177/15347346241286216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241286216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stem cell therapy in diabetic foot ulcer has emerged as a promising treatment option to promote ulcer healing. This network meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate how they compete with each other and their ranking with respect to chances of ulcer healing. A systematic search strategy to retrieve data from five databases, were used to identify potential studies. Randomized controlled trial or clinical controlled trial, published in English, using any type of stem cells as intervention in individuals aged over 18 years diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcers were included. This network meta-analysis was performed using frequentist method using R version 4.2.1. Eighteen clinical trials were included in the study which included 13 interventions. The study found that most of the stem cells were significantly promoting ulcer healing chances with human viable wound matrix (hVWM) [RR 2.91; CI: 1.28, 6.64], peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) [RR 2.35; CI: 1.21, 4.55], bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) [RR 2.20; CI: 1.34, 3.60], were top three stem cell options among all. P score also suggested the same. Risk of bias study suggested that there was \"some concern or \"high risk'' among majority of studies. It is evident from this study that bone marrow mononuclear cells were found to be most effective in wound healing in cases of diabetic foot ulcer in that order. Though there was no significant difference between these and more studies were required to ascertain whether they differ in term of efficacy for the clinical outcome of ulcer healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142305245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}